|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
your Country52798 Posts
On August 25 2012 05:08 Hnnnggg wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 04:52 Cokefreak wrote:Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=HnnnggHe posted this among other posts into the What is rape thread. On August 25 2012 03:50 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:47 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:42 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:40 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:
[quote]
So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Because of course rapists have brands on their foreheads that read "I RAPE PEOPLE" You're being utterly absurd. Anything worth doing isn't easy. You want to be spoonfed information about people like whether or not they rape people? There are different amounts of trust you should put in people. I trust my friends because I know they won't rape me. They've passed their rites. Strangers I don't trust, no matter how sexy/muscular they are. I've never been in a situation where consent could be misconstrued because I don't put myself in those situations. On August 25 2012 03:41 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:
[quote]
So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Majority of rape isn't done by strangers, the situation I described was acquaintance rape. Also rapists don't wear labels, chances are reasonably good one of your friends is a rapist. So it's impossible to tell before a rape is occurring whether someone is a rapist? I suppose it's also impossible to tell before you're being murdered that the person you're murdering might have some tendency to murder people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_BernardoWhen the detectives asked Bernardo why he thought he was being investigated for the rapes, he admitted that he did resemble the composite. The detectives concluded that such a well-educated, well-adjusted, congenial young man could not be responsible for the vicious crimes. Regarding one of the more prolific serial rapists and killers. But I guess the standard you hold the average woman to is higher than those of the detectives who deal with serial rapists as their job. His father was abusive and convicted of a crime. Big red flag. His mom was a slut. Big red flag. I wouldn't associate with that person, ever. User was banned for this post. + Show Spoiler +Also a big fuck you to the people that kept going off topic and making the warning at the top the way it is, it's fucking annoying. What a dick.
Well hello there!
|
Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user
lol
|
Well, that's a new one...
|
Classic, did anyone here get the report or was the ban-hammer sent direct to mod?
Edit: more to the point, nice to see someone get banned and then make an alt just to go straight to the ABL. Class.
|
On August 25 2012 05:16 Deleuze wrote:
Classic, did anyone here get the report or was the ban-hammer sent direct to mod?
I did of course 
|
On August 25 2012 04:52 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=HnnnggHe posted this among other posts into the What is rape thread. Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 03:50 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:47 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:42 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:40 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:19 Hnnngg wrote:
[quote]
Being safe rather than sorry. Guess how many times I've been forced to penetrate (I'm male).
I won't bother with the guessing, 0! Because I don't make mistakes regarding who I associate with. Thus, I don't suffer the negative consequences. I walk home drunk by myself, regardless of how many times/people ask if they can help. So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Because of course rapists have brands on their foreheads that read "I RAPE PEOPLE" You're being utterly absurd. Anything worth doing isn't easy. You want to be spoonfed information about people like whether or not they rape people? There are different amounts of trust you should put in people. I trust my friends because I know they won't rape me. They've passed their rites. Strangers I don't trust, no matter how sexy/muscular they are. I've never been in a situation where consent could be misconstrued because I don't put myself in those situations. On August 25 2012 03:41 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:19 Hnnngg wrote:
[quote]
Being safe rather than sorry. Guess how many times I've been forced to penetrate (I'm male).
I won't bother with the guessing, 0! Because I don't make mistakes regarding who I associate with. Thus, I don't suffer the negative consequences. I walk home drunk by myself, regardless of how many times/people ask if they can help. So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Majority of rape isn't done by strangers, the situation I described was acquaintance rape. Also rapists don't wear labels, chances are reasonably good one of your friends is a rapist. So it's impossible to tell before a rape is occurring whether someone is a rapist? I suppose it's also impossible to tell before you're being murdered that the person you're murdering might have some tendency to murder people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_BernardoWhen the detectives asked Bernardo why he thought he was being investigated for the rapes, he admitted that he did resemble the composite. The detectives concluded that such a well-educated, well-adjusted, congenial young man could not be responsible for the vicious crimes. Regarding one of the more prolific serial rapists and killers. But I guess the standard you hold the average woman to is higher than those of the detectives who deal with serial rapists as their job. His father was abusive and convicted of a crime. Big red flag. His mom was a slut. Big red flag. I wouldn't associate with that person, ever. User was banned for this post. + Show Spoiler +Also a big fuck you to the people that kept going off topic and making the warning at the top the way it is, it's fucking annoying.
Was there really even that much off topic in between the last 2 mod note updates? Im pretty sure a mod is just having some fun atm.
|
On August 25 2012 05:21 solidbebe wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 04:52 Cokefreak wrote:Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=HnnnggHe posted this among other posts into the What is rape thread. On August 25 2012 03:50 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:47 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:42 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:40 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:
[quote]
So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Because of course rapists have brands on their foreheads that read "I RAPE PEOPLE" You're being utterly absurd. Anything worth doing isn't easy. You want to be spoonfed information about people like whether or not they rape people? There are different amounts of trust you should put in people. I trust my friends because I know they won't rape me. They've passed their rites. Strangers I don't trust, no matter how sexy/muscular they are. I've never been in a situation where consent could be misconstrued because I don't put myself in those situations. On August 25 2012 03:41 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:
[quote]
So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Majority of rape isn't done by strangers, the situation I described was acquaintance rape. Also rapists don't wear labels, chances are reasonably good one of your friends is a rapist. So it's impossible to tell before a rape is occurring whether someone is a rapist? I suppose it's also impossible to tell before you're being murdered that the person you're murdering might have some tendency to murder people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_BernardoWhen the detectives asked Bernardo why he thought he was being investigated for the rapes, he admitted that he did resemble the composite. The detectives concluded that such a well-educated, well-adjusted, congenial young man could not be responsible for the vicious crimes. Regarding one of the more prolific serial rapists and killers. But I guess the standard you hold the average woman to is higher than those of the detectives who deal with serial rapists as their job. His father was abusive and convicted of a crime. Big red flag. His mom was a slut. Big red flag. I wouldn't associate with that person, ever. User was banned for this post. + Show Spoiler +Also a big fuck you to the people that kept going off topic and making the warning at the top the way it is, it's fucking annoying. Was there really even that much off topic in between the last 2 mod note updates? Im pretty sure a mod is just having some fun atm.
Right before Motbob changed it, a pisston of people got warnings. Or maybe right after. Hard to keep track. This thread moves fast.
|
On August 25 2012 05:23 JingleHell wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 05:21 solidbebe wrote:On August 25 2012 04:52 Cokefreak wrote:Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=HnnnggHe posted this among other posts into the What is rape thread. On August 25 2012 03:50 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:47 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:42 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:40 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:
[quote]
Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms.
Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Because of course rapists have brands on their foreheads that read "I RAPE PEOPLE" You're being utterly absurd. Anything worth doing isn't easy. You want to be spoonfed information about people like whether or not they rape people? There are different amounts of trust you should put in people. I trust my friends because I know they won't rape me. They've passed their rites. Strangers I don't trust, no matter how sexy/muscular they are. I've never been in a situation where consent could be misconstrued because I don't put myself in those situations. On August 25 2012 03:41 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:
[quote]
Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms.
Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Majority of rape isn't done by strangers, the situation I described was acquaintance rape. Also rapists don't wear labels, chances are reasonably good one of your friends is a rapist. So it's impossible to tell before a rape is occurring whether someone is a rapist? I suppose it's also impossible to tell before you're being murdered that the person you're murdering might have some tendency to murder people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_BernardoWhen the detectives asked Bernardo why he thought he was being investigated for the rapes, he admitted that he did resemble the composite. The detectives concluded that such a well-educated, well-adjusted, congenial young man could not be responsible for the vicious crimes. Regarding one of the more prolific serial rapists and killers. But I guess the standard you hold the average woman to is higher than those of the detectives who deal with serial rapists as their job. His father was abusive and convicted of a crime. Big red flag. His mom was a slut. Big red flag. I wouldn't associate with that person, ever. User was banned for this post. + Show Spoiler +Also a big fuck you to the people that kept going off topic and making the warning at the top the way it is, it's fucking annoying. Was there really even that much off topic in between the last 2 mod note updates? Im pretty sure a mod is just having some fun atm. Right before Motbob changed it, a pisston of people got warnings. Or maybe right after. Hard to keep track. This thread moves fast.
Ah that explains it, I was away for about 2 days and there were like 6 new pages, kinda shimmed through them.
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On August 25 2012 05:06 andrewlt wrote:
When I saw that thread title (the rape thread), I immediately thought that that thread would attract an inordinate number of idiots who think with their dicks instead of their brains. I clicked on it anyway but immediately realized my mistake and pressed the back button. I'm sure I would've just lost my temper conversing with the people that got banned.
It's a lot better now than when it first started, especially after Hnnngg was banned. It's decent enough that I've been able to respond reasonably in the thread.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37096 Posts
Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster.
Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user
Calling it right now. Hnnngg is on Empyrean's "list"
|
On August 25 2012 05:43 SeeKeR wrote:Show nested quote +Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. Show nested quote +Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user Calling it right now. Hnnngg is on Empyrean's "list"
I bet I'm on Hnnngg's list 
|
when i see the name hnnngg, i think of the sound i make when i have a big ass turd and am trying to force it out. i wonder if empyrean was thinking the same thing when he forced hnnngg out of tl.net.
|
On August 25 2012 05:50 dAPhREAk wrote:
when i see the name hnnngg, i think of the sound i make when i have a big ass turd and am trying to force it out. i wonder if empyrean was thinking the same thing when he forced hnnngg out of tl.net.
Maybe it's what StorkHwaiting was thinking in between his post on Japanese girls and his perma-ban.
|
On August 25 2012 05:51 Shady Sands wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 05:50 dAPhREAk wrote:
when i see the name hnnngg, i think of the sound i make when i have a big ass turd and am trying to force it out. i wonder if empyrean was thinking the same thing when he forced hnnngg out of tl.net. Maybe it's what StorkHwaiting was thinking in between his post on Japanese girls and his perma-ban.
On August 25 2012 05:50 dAPhREAk wrote:
when i see the name hnnngg, i think of the sound i make when i have a big ass turd and am trying to force it out. i wonder if empyrean was thinking the same thing when he forced hnnngg out of tl.net.
On August 25 2012 05:49 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 05:43 SeeKeR wrote:Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user Calling it right now. Hnnngg is on Empyrean's "list" I bet I'm on Hnnngg's list
On August 25 2012 05:43 SeeKeR wrote:Show nested quote +Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. Show nested quote +Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user Calling it right now. Hnnngg is on Empyrean's "list"
Entertainment is my business.
+ Show Spoiler +Business isn't doing so well 
On August 25 2012 05:13 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user lol
Ban evasion is no laughing matter!
|
On August 25 2012 05:54 Notreallyreal wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 05:51 Shady Sands wrote:On August 25 2012 05:50 dAPhREAk wrote:
when i see the name hnnngg, i think of the sound i make when i have a big ass turd and am trying to force it out. i wonder if empyrean was thinking the same thing when he forced hnnngg out of tl.net. Maybe it's what StorkHwaiting was thinking in between his post on Japanese girls and his perma-ban. Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 05:50 dAPhREAk wrote:
when i see the name hnnngg, i think of the sound i make when i have a big ass turd and am trying to force it out. i wonder if empyrean was thinking the same thing when he forced hnnngg out of tl.net. Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 05:49 Cokefreak wrote:On August 25 2012 05:43 SeeKeR wrote:Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user Calling it right now. Hnnngg is on Empyrean's "list" I bet I'm on Hnnngg's list Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 05:43 SeeKeR wrote:Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user Calling it right now. Hnnngg is on Empyrean's "list" Entertainment is my business. + Show Spoiler +Business isn't doing so well
Quick! Which PBU is this?
|
On August 25 2012 05:56 Shady Sands wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 05:54 Notreallyreal wrote:On August 25 2012 05:51 Shady Sands wrote:On August 25 2012 05:50 dAPhREAk wrote:
when i see the name hnnngg, i think of the sound i make when i have a big ass turd and am trying to force it out. i wonder if empyrean was thinking the same thing when he forced hnnngg out of tl.net. Maybe it's what StorkHwaiting was thinking in between his post on Japanese girls and his perma-ban. On August 25 2012 05:50 dAPhREAk wrote:
when i see the name hnnngg, i think of the sound i make when i have a big ass turd and am trying to force it out. i wonder if empyrean was thinking the same thing when he forced hnnngg out of tl.net. On August 25 2012 05:49 Cokefreak wrote:On August 25 2012 05:43 SeeKeR wrote:Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user Calling it right now. Hnnngg is on Empyrean's "list" I bet I'm on Hnnngg's list On August 25 2012 05:43 SeeKeR wrote:Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user Calling it right now. Hnnngg is on Empyrean's "list" Entertainment is my business. + Show Spoiler +Business isn't doing so well Quick! Which PBU is this?
+ Show Spoiler +
|
No worries, entertainment is a public good as far as I'm concerned. Pretty entertained, all things considered.
Wow Hnnnng -__- it's also the heart attack meme fwiw.
-Archangel- was just temp banned for 2 days by KwarK. That account was created on 2010-05-26 16:00:29 and had 2765 posts. Reason: Show nested quote +On August 24 2012 17:25 -Archangel- wrote:
Only 21 years lol. It is a sad day
If I was a judge there I would give him a life sentence and order him to be locked up in a jail known for male rape between inmates and have guards there ignore what other prisoners do to him... The idea that the justice system should be utilising prison rape as a weapon is frankly horrific.
Jesus. That thread is definitely really silly. But somehow moderation found a way to create genuine discussion lol.
|
On August 25 2012 05:43 SeeKeR wrote:Show nested quote +Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. Show nested quote +Hnnnggg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:06:32 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user Calling it right now. Hnnngg is on Empyrean's "list"
No joke, Empyrean and I have had a conversation in the past about my bad posting.
KwarK didn't seem to mind, or maybe didn't have the time to warn me.
|
Notreallyreal was just banned by Harem.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:53:32 and had 4 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user.
Ouch, got booped.
Better luck next time, I guess? FWIW usually a good first step is to PM a moderator and state something about your having changed, or otherwise having made an attempt to rectify whatever it was about you that caused the perm. (this opposed to posting in ABL discussion and kinda-sorta-derailing after we have a freight train gif coming through the top courtesy of motbob)
|
On August 25 2012 06:08 Aerisky wrote:Show nested quote +Notreallyreal was just banned by Harem.
That account was created on 2012-08-25 05:53:32 and had 4 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. Ouch, got booped. Better luck next time, I guess? FWIW usually a good first step is to PM a moderator and state something about your having changed, or otherwise having made an attempt to rectify whatever it was about you that caused the perm. (this opposed to posting in ABL discussion and kinda-sorta-derailing after we have a freight train gif coming through the top courtesy of motbob)
On the flip side, the off-topic discussion around NRR just became an on-topic discussion about a current ban.
So which PBU do you think he was?
EDIT: Who's Kappa7?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
