|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote: Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On June 12 2012 00:37 dhmgoh wrote: screw BLIZZARD
User was warned for this post Wow, I was way off. I thought that was such a certain ban, even for such a long-time veteran.
|
On June 12 2012 03:14 AmericanUmlaut wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 00:37 dhmgoh wrote: screw BLIZZARD
User was warned for this post Wow, I was way off. I thought that was such a certain ban, even for such a long-time veteran.
While his comment may have been unnecessary and pointless, it's not like he's wrong...
|
On June 12 2012 01:15 marttorn wrote:+ Show Spoiler +I'm Still BoredOn July 31 2011 07:55 Torte de Lini wrote: English only.
User was warned for this post On September 09 2011 12:23 Torte de Lini wrote: Since when? Is it a social problem? Or a minor personal one? It doesn't sound like a social one, so the personal issue should be decided on case by case basis by those involved.
User was warned for this post (in response to someone that i'm too lazy to quote here because the thread was closed, so I have to do it manually ;_;) On December 22 2011 05:36 Torte de Lini wrote:Show nested quote +On December 22 2011 05:29 Wegandi wrote:On December 22 2011 05:14 Torte de Lini wrote:On December 22 2011 05:07 Wegandi wrote:On December 22 2011 05:01 Torte de Lini wrote:Yeah, she is reaching. This is similar to radical feminists frowning on Princess-Disney movies because it sets young girls up with the mentality that they need a prince to save her so she can live a proper life accompanied by a handsome young male. In a sense, they have a point, but it is not as damning as they make it. That video is pretty bad too and sounds like contemporary bullshit of trying too hard and reading too much into the lyrics (especially about Mariah Carey, all her songs are fucking like that, rofl). The things you should know about feminism are these three key points: - Women are not paid equal wages as men for the same job
- Women are still trapped within gender-roles and expectations
- Mother-child unit are still presumed in many countries
Women are getting paid more than men in many areas today. Again, I ask, where are all the Feminists arguing to get paid less? If by trapped you mean they are born by nature with certain characteristics with advantages and disadvantages that accompany...Well, I don't think you are going to win that fight with 'Mother' Nature :p. (Not sure what this has to do with Feminism in the first place....oh right, todays Feminism has nothing to do with the Feminism most of us probably think of) Again, another area trying to fight against nature. This is why many argue that Egalitarianism is a Revolt Against Nature. You ain't going to win that battle. The world ain't equal, and if it were it would be a damn dull place that I think many people would find themselves shooting themselves in the head. It's one thing to pursue an end to discrimination, it is entirely another to want discrimination to continue instead though, in your favor. Feminists ain't meritocratists I can ensure you. Where are men getting paid less than women. You must be confused unless the gender has a specific utility to the job. http://www.unpac.ca/economy/wagegap3.htmlHere are some stats and examples of jobs where women are paid 70.4% (could be more now) to the men's dollar. If by trapped you mean they are born by nature with certain characteristics with advantages and disadvantages that accompany...Well, I don't think you are going to win that fight with 'Mother' Nature :p. (Not sure what this has to do with Feminism in the first place....oh right, todays Feminism has nothing to do with the Feminism most of us probably think of) No, feminism has a lot to do with what people think of, they just take it on peg too far. I mean trapped by the ideas they are often obliged to take care of the kids, be the homemaker and are pressured by the expectancy of the gender divide in work. You think everyone has equal opportunity to work and become an independent breadwinner, but you are sorely mistaken even in Westernized countries. This is why many argue that Egalitarianism is a Revolt Against Nature. You ain't going to win that battle. The world ain't equal, and if it were it would be a damn dull place that I think many people would find themselves shooting themselves in the head. It's one thing to pursue an end to discrimination, it is entirely another to want discrimination to continue instead though, in your favor. Feminists ain't meritocratists I can ensure you What's it like being completely delusional? Do you say the same thing about homosexuals wanting equal rights? I don't group people. Homosexuals have no special rights, nor do any other group. There is only individual rights, and that is very much an ideal predicated on the equal liberties of one to another. If you are talking about Marriage, I do not support State involvement whatsoever. It should be a personal, religious, and contractual matter. A Church should not be compelled against their will to accept a homosexual marriage, nor should the State prevent two parties to coming to a contractual agreement for all the things we associate with the legal entity Marriage (Next of Kin, PoA, Shared Bank Accounts, etc.). But that isn't what Feminism is about. It isn't about Suffrage, or Equality of Law (liberty). It's about stupid cultural shit about an egalitarian society where there should be an equal number of males and females and of pay in every industry and every sector regardless of the INDIVIDUALS interests, wants, needs, and desires. It's a totalitarian movement. This is why you see places like Iceland banning the individual woman's choice to pursue a job stripping, or of porn / prostitution. Further, when the evidence points to them getting paid more on average than their male counterparts in a great deal many areas (which is increasing every year), you hear not a PEEP about that women should be getting paid less and should be equal with their male counterparts. You are under some false impression from waydays of Susan B. Anthony and Suffrage movement that Feminism is about equality of liberty/Law. It used to be. Hasn't been the case since the 1950s/60s. Perhaps you should take your egalitarian nightmare and go become a borg. Everyone is equal in the Borg. There is no individual. There is the collective and they are all the same. Let me know how long you find yourself living in that environment before you go insane (not to mention the stupendous amount of violence and force you would need to compel and make people behave, believe, and act in such a manner to create such a society). Human beings are not equal. We are all born with INDIVIDUAL characteristics completely unique to ourselves. Why are you so biased against uniqueness? Why are you so fascinated by a totalitarian egalitarian doctrine? By nature we are not egalitarian, therefore to fight against nature requires violence, force, and compulsion. Human beings are not a borg. Holy shit, you wrote a lot about nothing. No, see. As a society and cultural diversity, there are groups and they are roped in by various traits or issues. That's why something becomes a Social problem and not a individual concern. You don't group people because it's easier to ignore an issue when it's an anecdotal one. When it's a globalized concern, then it's harder to ignore. Go you! You're deeply confused about the institution of the Church. Dare I even talk about it or will you sweep your hand in one go and dismiss it under bullshit philosophies that have no real tangible meanings in westernized and diverse culture. Show nested quote +But that isn't what Feminism is about. It isn't about Suffrage, or Equality of Law (liberty). It's about stupid cultural shit about an egalitarian society where there should be an equal number of males and females and of pay in every industry and every sector regardless of the INDIVIDUALS interests, wants, needs, and desires. It's a totalitarian movement. This is why you see places like Iceland banning the individual woman's choice to pursue a job stripping, or of porn / prostitution. Further, when the evidence points to them getting paid more on average than their male counterparts in a great deal many areas (which is increasing every year), you hear not a PEEP about that women should be getting paid less and should be equal with their male counterparts. You're confused again. Equal opportunities doesn't mean equal jobs or careers split for each party. There should be equal opportunities for all based on their credentials and not being swayed by the increment of one's gender (and this goes for restaurants hiring attractive waitresses to attract more visitors, though they can pass this by claiming it's a business move, unfortunately). I just showed you evidence on a national scale that women are getting paid significantly less. Your article is a magazine, mine is a bit more... statically accurate and accepted. Like I said, it's not a comparative movement, it's an equality one. They're not looking to be paid like men, they're looking to be paid or have the opportunity to be paid as the next person male or female (which they're not). See Tyler's explanation as well please. You're a complete and utter fool. User was warned for this post On December 26 2011 06:21 Torte de Lini wrote: Too many people are shitting on iNcontrol as if it'll matter
Rofl, the vocal minority sure is vocal. Should do something productive like start a choir before singing the hate on a player.
User was warned for this post On January 26 2012 11:48 Torte de Lini wrote: Second time I've seen Joedaddy go a bit beyond the boundaries.
User was warned for this post if you are really bored, why dont you figure out why he was banned?
|
was he lost in the malay jungles for 7 years.
|
If somebody registers in 2005 and only posts twice until 2012, is that guy really a veteran? Either the guy has an alternate account, lurked hardcore or just didn't visit the site for a loooooooooooooong while.
|
On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote: Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post.
Oops. Cokefreak pulled a blubbdavid. ABL regular getting banned in the ABL, and not on page 1k. Awkward.
|
On June 12 2012 04:14 JingleHell wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote: Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post. Oops. Cokefreak pulled a blubbdavid. my first thought was "cokefreak, i am disappointed with you" until i saw the ban reason, and decided to keep my mouth shut.
|
Hahaha wow, cokefreak's unlucky day.
|
On June 12 2012 04:15 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 04:14 JingleHell wrote:On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote: Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post. Oops. Cokefreak pulled a blubbdavid. my first thought was "cokefreak, i am disappointed with you" until i saw the ban reason, and decided to keep my mouth shut.
Although it would be a kinda funny chain of temps if we all quoted it and said the same thing.
|
On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote: Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post.
Cokefreak I am disappoint.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
Cokefreak was just temp banned for 2 days by Excalibur_Z.
That account was created on 2011-06-05 05:53:54 and had 2472 posts.
Reason: "I am disappoint" is a terrible meme.
I knew the day would come. I knew it... I knew it.
if you are really bored, why dont you figure out why he was banned?
Who, TDL? I'll list his bans if that's what you want, or are you referring to the SS thing? It thought it had already been established, he was banned for being an awful Warlock.
You're kidding, solidbebe too? C'mon, guys ;_;
|
On June 12 2012 04:18 solidbebe wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote: Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post. Cokefreak I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post. lol. Gmarshal is not amused, but i am.
On June 12 2012 04:21 marttorn wrote:Show nested quote +Cokefreak was just temp banned for 2 days by Excalibur_Z.
That account was created on 2011-06-05 05:53:54 and had 2472 posts.
Reason: "I am disappoint" is a terrible meme. I knew the day would come. I knew it... I knew it. Who, TDL? I'll list his bans if that's what you want, or are you referring to the SS thing? It thought it had already been established, he was banned for being an awful Warlock. You're kidding, solidbebe too? C'mon, guys ;_; i maintain that he was banned related to the failure to follow safe sex etiquette.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95875¤tpage=771#15408
|
On June 12 2012 04:18 solidbebe wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote: Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post. Cokefreak I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post. I don't usually laugh at bans but lol.
|
Is it already the 2k page?
|
On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote: Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post.
On June 12 2012 04:18 solidbebe wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote: Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post. Cokefreak I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post.
Solid play guys. Just another notch on GMarshal's Bedpost.
|
On June 12 2012 04:51 blubbdavid wrote: Is it already the 2k page?
Can't be, you managed to post on this one.
|
I swear, I am gonna be on the 2k page. And it will be glorious.
|
This thread is developing a sort of zealotish self-sacrificing culture among some regulars that I find... disturbing. Try to remember that this thread exists to mock the stupidity of those who can't figure out how to navigate TL without getting banned.
|
On June 12 2012 05:23 AmericanUmlaut wrote: This thread is developing a sort of zealotish self-sacrificing culture among some regulars that I find... disturbing. Try to remember that this thread exists to mock the stupidity of those who can't figure out how to navigate TL without getting banned. So are you saying that you're... disappoint? Let the people have their fun, we can make fun of them once they get banned for it.
|
|
|
|