|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On June 11 2012 13:01 Archas wrote: I remember when this thread was only 80 pages, and we only talked about bans. The ABL sure has evolved... Yeah I brought that up awhile back. It was booed down and I felt like an ass. Go with it, join the hamsters.
|
On June 11 2012 13:01 Archas wrote: I remember when this thread was only 80 pages, and we only talked about bans. The ABL sure has evolved...
I think Toast and Mattorn are mostly to blame for that.
|
Netherlands45349 Posts
On June 11 2012 13:01 Archas wrote: I remember when this thread was only 80 pages, and we only talked about bans. The ABL sure has evolved... dw ill talk to u bout kpop girls any day
u know u love them
Edit: actually is this thread even still about bans?O.o.
|
On June 11 2012 15:05 Kipsate wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2012 13:01 Archas wrote: I remember when this thread was only 80 pages, and we only talked about bans. The ABL sure has evolved... dw ill talk to u bout kpop girls any day u know u love them. I want to report how this post was made but you're too cute. Damn you. That and kpop girls. *drools*
|
On June 11 2012 13:16 Pillage wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2012 13:01 Archas wrote: I remember when this thread was only 80 pages, and we only talked about bans. The ABL sure has evolved... I think Toast and Mattorn are mostly to blame for that. Absolutely. Remember page 1000 where he went crazy with over 1,000 Rainbow Dash pictures? :O
Also when I mentioned how hamsters are cute, Mattorn sent me this PM:
Title: I'm sorry
Original Message From marttorn: But blubb made me do it. You see, nowadays, there is a certain rite of sorts that one must go through to enter the ABL thread. You must understand... One does not simply admit to admiring hamsters in the presence of me, the LORD OF THE HAMSTERS. ![[image loading]](http://www.picgifs.com/avatars/animals/hamster/avatars-hamster-598063.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.hamsterbungalow.com/images/hamster%20health/first-aid-kit/hamster-first-aid-kit.jpg) + Show Spoiler +
|
Wow, the ABL thread is not what I expected! (And I'm new here).
|
TL.net Bot TL.net. June 11 2012 15:18. Posts 3 PM Profile Quote # Tangel0 was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-11 04:59:36 and had 2 posts.
Reason: Again, I know you are new, and you have no idea what the hell broodwar is, or why it has such weight, but show some damn respect to the game that made this site what it is. There is no need to express glee at an event that is painful for a lot of us.
Just wanted to mention that this is a very well said version of what I think. I wasnt active on this forum before sc2 beta but I watched bw for a long time (up until the betting scandal) and while I follow sc2 I in no way celebrate the dying of sc1. Its like has never been seen in gaming and likely will never be seen again. A golden age if you will.
That doesnt take away from my enjoyment of sc2 or dota2 or whatever. I still feel sad that bw will not longer after a time be this amazing thing behind competitive gaming. To cheer its death makes me angry.
|
On June 11 2012 15:09 Fencer710 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2012 13:16 Pillage wrote:On June 11 2012 13:01 Archas wrote: I remember when this thread was only 80 pages, and we only talked about bans. The ABL sure has evolved... I think Toast and Mattorn are mostly to blame for that. Absolutely. Remember page 1000 where he went crazy with over 1,000 Rainbow Dash pictures? :O Also when I mentioned how hamsters are cute, Mattorn sent me this PM: Title: I'm sorry Show nested quote +Original Message From marttorn: But blubb made me do it. You see, nowadays, there is a certain rite of sorts that one must go through to enter the ABL thread. LOL.
Hamsters are cute. You must understand... One does not simply admit to admiring hamsters in the presence of me, the LORD OF THE HAMSTERS. ![[image loading]](http://www.picgifs.com/avatars/animals/hamster/avatars-hamster-598063.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.hamsterbungalow.com/images/hamster%20health/first-aid-kit/hamster-first-aid-kit.jpg) + Show Spoiler + I got a message like that but with more hamsters. It made me so happy.
Marttorn, nice obituary. ![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif)
|
On June 11 2012 09:07 Pillage wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2012 08:27 Deleuze wrote:On June 11 2012 08:23 Blazinghand wrote:On June 11 2012 08:21 Probe1 wrote: There's a rule about people that put SC/SC2 or xXxEliteProtisSniper420xXx in their name. What is the story behind "Elite Protis Sniper"? I've seen/heard that once or twice but I don't know the context. It's an eu battle.net meme. Some kid got dts rushed in the bronze league and went ape shit about 'Protis snipers,' then made a thread on bnet and got promptly trolled. Posters would right a comment and cut it short mid-sentence as if they were sniped. Disappointingly, it found its way on this thread 10 pages or so ag- If anyone could somehow link this thread in question I'll be forever in your debt.
http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/566442670?page=1
This is the thread where they 'discuss' the meme, as for the original I will quote the bnet poster :
You can always search for it, but it will mean over 30 pages of bnet garbage.
|
No guys I swear we do talk about bans sometimes! ![](/mirror/smilies/frown.gif)
Uh... Uh... Here! Here's a ban and some background for it!
SpunXtainz was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-02 21:56:20 and had 13 posts.
Reason: Goodbye. You clearly didn't deserve a second chance.
His original account:
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/qmaIr.png)
He has a very... Strange posting history. Yeah. Strange should do it. Take these schizophrenic posts from an LR thread for GSL, in February of this year:
On February 09 2012 22:43 SpunXtain wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 22:42 Witten wrote:On February 09 2012 22:41 SpunXtain wrote:On February 09 2012 22:39 SpunXtain wrote:On February 09 2012 22:36 SpunXtain wrote: The reason protoss aren't doing as well in Code A is that they're not as good at making the late game as the higher tier protoss players. If they hold early/mid game, protoss has a rediculous chance of winning the late game in PvT. Just sayin'. I agree, but it's not really suprising. Terran tier 3 basically ALL have energy which can be manaburnt by feedback for 50 energy - basically one high templar can nullify 4 high tier terran units, many of which individually cost more than the templar itself. Coupled with the rediculous amount of splash damage the protoss units get (which shines in late game engagements where splitting everything is harder), terran is difficult to win with. ^This. I don't think I've seen a TvP late game end well for terran this whole season.. . . Stop spamming and quoting yourself. Or learn how to log-in to your alt account better. Why would I make an alt account, that is a bannable offense you realize. Do you have alt accounts???
So let me get this straight, he wants to expand upon his original point, but chooses to do so as if he were a different person, agreeing with himself. W-w-why?
Anyway, other than that his posting history isn't that interesting, until one day...
HE DECIDED TO MAKE HIS OWN FANCLUB
TWICE
He then went on to get pema-banned. In this thread!
On February 12 2012 07:14 SpunXtain wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2012 10:46 neoghaleon55 wrote:I think this SpunXtain guy got off a little easy with only 2 days ban Considering how much his posts were an eye sore for the entire LR yesterday. Also quoting yourself and agreeing with yourself is so obnoxious! On February 09 2012 22:52 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On February 09 2012 22:43 SpunXtain wrote:On February 09 2012 22:42 Witten wrote:On February 09 2012 22:41 SpunXtain wrote:On February 09 2012 22:39 SpunXtain wrote:On February 09 2012 22:36 SpunXtain wrote: The reason protoss aren't doing as well in Code A is that they're not as good at making the late game as the higher tier protoss players. If they hold early/mid game, protoss has a rediculous chance of winning the late game in PvT. Just sayin'. I agree, but it's not really suprising. Terran tier 3 basically ALL have energy which can be manaburnt by feedback for 50 energy - basically one high templar can nullify 4 high tier terran units, many of which individually cost more than the templar itself. Coupled with the rediculous amount of splash damage the protoss units get (which shines in late game engagements where splitting everything is harder), terran is difficult to win with. ^This. I don't think I've seen a TvP late game end well for terran this whole season.. . . Stop spamming and quoting yourself. Or learn how to log-in to your alt account better. Why would I make an alt account, that is a bannable offense you realize. Do you have alt accounts??? I almost fell out of my chair. This is actually one of the most hilarious things I've ever read in a LR thread. Everybody needs to read this. U really need to calm down bro, its not like I shot your sister. Such a hater. User was banned for this post.
Plexa crafted the following exquisite ban reason:
SpunXtain was just banned by Plexa.
That account was created on 2010-06-09 20:27:09 and had 164 posts.
Reason: Hey Spud, we've known each other for quite some time now. In fact, a little under a year. It hasn't always been easy, after all you took a shit in our living room, not once, not twice, but many times. There's only so much I can put up with, so it's time we say our farewells and hope the future is brighter for both of us.
I just realized this guy would be a far more obituary than that Goetzinho guy. Oh well, I'm too lazy to make a full one now so w/e.
In short, he made another account and got himself banned again.
|
Martin you need to collect these obituaries somewhere man, in a few years you'll have a huge collection but they'll be spread out over this spread and it would take exactly 1 lightyear to find them all.
+ Show Spoiler +the lightyear part was a joke keep your pants on -____-
|
Sweden5554 Posts
On June 10 2012 05:44 solidbebe wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2012 05:10 TheToast wrote:morlakaix was just temp banned for 1 week by salle.
That account was created on 2011-02-26 10:48:26 and had 152 posts.
Reason: Caster / event bashing in LR thread. First salle ban? daaawwww With stock ban reason /dissapointed -Ares
Yeah it was my first ban. And I have to start some where, right?
|
On June 11 2012 19:50 salle wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2012 05:44 solidbebe wrote:On June 10 2012 05:10 TheToast wrote:morlakaix was just temp banned for 1 week by salle.
That account was created on 2011-02-26 10:48:26 and had 152 posts.
Reason: Caster / event bashing in LR thread. First salle ban? daaawwww With stock ban reason /dissapointed -Ares Yeah it was my first ban. And I have to start some where, right?
Nevertheless, ares dissapoint
|
I was bored, ok? :S
On November 06 2010 13:43 flamewheel wrote: KILLER YOU SUCK
User was warned for this post
On August 05 2010 20:36 flamewheel wrote:User was warned for this post
On May 08 2010 12:07 flamewheel wrote: Hot_Bid is a really amazing person.
User was warned for this post
Mod Edit: Please don't kiss ass, it's TL giving keys out, not me.
--Hot_Bid
|
On June 11 2012 19:50 salle wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2012 05:44 solidbebe wrote:On June 10 2012 05:10 TheToast wrote:morlakaix was just temp banned for 1 week by salle.
That account was created on 2011-02-26 10:48:26 and had 152 posts.
Reason: Caster / event bashing in LR thread. First salle ban? daaawwww With stock ban reason /dissapointed -Ares Yeah it was my first ban. And I have to start some where, right? Congratz on the hammer, but the first ban is supposed to be epic, i mean you only get one.
|
Sweden5554 Posts
On June 11 2012 21:35 Jaaaaasper wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2012 19:50 salle wrote:On June 10 2012 05:44 solidbebe wrote:On June 10 2012 05:10 TheToast wrote:morlakaix was just temp banned for 1 week by salle.
That account was created on 2011-02-26 10:48:26 and had 152 posts.
Reason: Caster / event bashing in LR thread. First salle ban? daaawwww With stock ban reason /dissapointed -Ares Yeah it was my first ban. And I have to start some where, right? Congratz on the hammer, but the first ban is supposed to be epic, i mean you only get one. Thanks, but you see, I don't agree with that at all. If you set the bar too high for you first time either it wont happen due to performance anxiety or you feel disappointed afterwards because it didn't live up to the hype you set for it, or you it is just that awesome but then you can't do something as great again and you'll never be content with any following bans or you'll have to raise the bar even higher and it will take even longer before you can do that. And while it's true you only get one "first" ban it's kinda arbitrary to put any extra significance to that. I mean I could just as well say my most epic ban will be my 74th, that's just as arbitrary, and I only get one 74th ban, right? If or when I do an epic ban I'll remember it just as much as I would if it was my first ban. Sure I'll remember my first ban, but that doesn't mean I need to make it extra special, those will come when they'll come naturally, which is way better than doing something that's forced.
|
On June 11 2012 22:04 salle wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2012 21:35 Jaaaaasper wrote:On June 11 2012 19:50 salle wrote:On June 10 2012 05:44 solidbebe wrote:On June 10 2012 05:10 TheToast wrote:morlakaix was just temp banned for 1 week by salle.
That account was created on 2011-02-26 10:48:26 and had 152 posts.
Reason: Caster / event bashing in LR thread. First salle ban? daaawwww With stock ban reason /dissapointed -Ares Yeah it was my first ban. And I have to start some where, right? Congratz on the hammer, but the first ban is supposed to be epic, i mean you only get one. Thanks, but you see, I don't agree with that at all. If you set the bar too high for you first time either it wont happen due to performance anxiety or you feel disappointed afterwards because it didn't live up to the hype you set for it, or you it is just that awesome but then you can't do something as great again and you'll never be content with any following bans or you'll have to raise the bar even higher and it will take even longer before you can do that. And while it's true you only get one "first" ban it's kinda arbitrary to put any extra significance to that. I mean I could just as well say my most epic ban will be my 74th, that's just as arbitrary, and I only get one 74th ban, right? If or when I do an epic ban I'll remember it just as much as I would if it was my first ban. Sure I'll remember my first ban, but that doesn't mean I need to make it extra special, those will come when they'll come naturally, which is way better than doing something that's forced.
Somewhere I sense double entendre... hmm, maybe it's just me...
|
On June 11 2012 22:04 salle wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2012 21:35 Jaaaaasper wrote:On June 11 2012 19:50 salle wrote:On June 10 2012 05:44 solidbebe wrote:On June 10 2012 05:10 TheToast wrote:morlakaix was just temp banned for 1 week by salle.
That account was created on 2011-02-26 10:48:26 and had 152 posts.
Reason: Caster / event bashing in LR thread. First salle ban? daaawwww With stock ban reason /dissapointed -Ares Yeah it was my first ban. And I have to start some where, right? Congratz on the hammer, but the first ban is supposed to be epic, i mean you only get one. Thanks, but you see, I don't agree with that at all. If you set the bar too high for you first time either it wont happen due to performance anxiety or you feel disappointed afterwards because it didn't live up to the hype you set for it, or you it is just that awesome but then you can't do something as great again and you'll never be content with any following bans or you'll have to raise the bar even higher and it will take even longer before you can do that. And while it's true you only get one "first" ban it's kinda arbitrary to put any extra significance to that. I mean I could just as well say my most epic ban will be my 74th, that's just as arbitrary, and I only get one 74th ban, right? If or when I do an epic ban I'll remember it just as much as I would if it was my first ban. Sure I'll remember my first ban, but that doesn't mean I need to make it extra special, those will come when they'll come naturally, which is way better than doing something that's forced. Are we still talking about bans here?
|
On June 11 2012 22:04 salle wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2012 21:35 Jaaaaasper wrote:On June 11 2012 19:50 salle wrote:On June 10 2012 05:44 solidbebe wrote:On June 10 2012 05:10 TheToast wrote:morlakaix was just temp banned for 1 week by salle.
That account was created on 2011-02-26 10:48:26 and had 152 posts.
Reason: Caster / event bashing in LR thread. First salle ban? daaawwww With stock ban reason /dissapointed -Ares Yeah it was my first ban. And I have to start some where, right? Congratz on the hammer, but the first ban is supposed to be epic, i mean you only get one. Thanks, but you see, I don't agree with that at all. If you set the bar too high for you first time either it wont happen due to performance anxiety or you feel disappointed afterwards because it didn't live up to the hype you set for it, or you it is just that awesome but then you can't do something as great again and you'll never be content with any following bans or you'll have to raise the bar even higher and it will take even longer before you can do that. And while it's true you only get one "first" ban it's kinda arbitrary to put any extra significance to that. I mean I could just as well say my most epic ban will be my 74th, that's just as arbitrary, and I only get one 74th ban, right? If or when I do an epic ban I'll remember it just as much as I would if it was my first ban. Sure I'll remember my first ban, but that doesn't mean I need to make it extra special, those will come when they'll come naturally, which is way better than doing something that's forced. I'm disappointed boss. I would have gladly sacrificed myself for the greater good if you just had asked me.
|
On June 11 2012 22:04 salle wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2012 21:35 Jaaaaasper wrote:On June 11 2012 19:50 salle wrote:On June 10 2012 05:44 solidbebe wrote:On June 10 2012 05:10 TheToast wrote:morlakaix was just temp banned for 1 week by salle.
That account was created on 2011-02-26 10:48:26 and had 152 posts.
Reason: Caster / event bashing in LR thread. First salle ban? daaawwww With stock ban reason /dissapointed -Ares Yeah it was my first ban. And I have to start some where, right? Congratz on the hammer, but the first ban is supposed to be epic, i mean you only get one. Thanks, but you see, I don't agree with that at all. If you set the bar too high for you first time either it wont happen due to performance anxiety or you feel disappointed afterwards because it didn't live up to the hype you set for it, or you it is just that awesome but then you can't do something as great again and you'll never be content with any following bans or you'll have to raise the bar even higher and it will take even longer before you can do that. And while it's true you only get one "first" ban it's kinda arbitrary to put any extra significance to that. I mean I could just as well say my most epic ban will be my 74th, that's just as arbitrary, and I only get one 74th ban, right? If or when I do an epic ban I'll remember it just as much as I would if it was my first ban. Sure I'll remember my first ban, but that doesn't mean I need to make it extra special, those will come when they'll come naturally, which is way better than doing something that's forced. Ok i can respect that opinion, but i always like my first to be something awesome, in relation to forum bans and other things
|
|
|
|