|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On June 12 2012 05:23 AmericanUmlaut wrote:
This thread is developing a sort of zealotish self-sacrificing culture among some regulars that I find... disturbing. Try to remember that this thread exists to mock the stupidity of those who can't figure out how to navigate TL without getting banned.
I think most of it is just Praetorial.
|
On June 12 2012 05:23 AmericanUmlaut wrote:
This thread is developing a sort of zealotish self-sacrificing culture among some regulars that I find... disturbing. Try to remember that this thread exists to mock the stupidity of those who can't figure out how to navigate TL without getting banned.
People get heated over the weirdest shit now adays. The internet definitely brings out the crazy in people.
This thread has always been TL Jerry Springer in my book. Its moving away from that tho, I agree.
|
On June 12 2012 05:23 AmericanUmlaut wrote:
This thread is developing a sort of zealotish self-sacrificing culture among some regulars that I find... disturbing. Try to remember that this thread exists to mock the stupidity of those who can't figure out how to navigate TL without getting banned.
Luckily I don't participate in this.
|
Nauru12397 Posts
brokenLoL was just temp banned for 2 weeks by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-05-13 05:40:42 and had 279 posts.
Reason: Still not learning. Off topic MLG bashing.
This is the end of the line, next one is going to be a much more permanent solution to the problem.
new reddit thread:
"tl.net nazi mods are threatening my lyfe--should i call the cops???!?"
|
On June 12 2012 07:23 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +brokenLoL was just temp banned for 2 weeks by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-05-13 05:40:42 and had 279 posts.
Reason: Still not learning. Off topic MLG bashing.
This is the end of the line, next one is going to be a much more permanent solution to the problem. new reddit thread: "tl.net nazi mods are threatening my lyfe--should i call the cops???!?"
the drones have already been sent out for surveillance of the target
|
Nauru12397 Posts
On June 12 2012 07:26 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 07:23 dAPhREAk wrote:brokenLoL was just temp banned for 2 weeks by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-05-13 05:40:42 and had 279 posts.
Reason: Still not learning. Off topic MLG bashing.
This is the end of the line, next one is going to be a much more permanent solution to the problem. new reddit thread: "tl.net nazi mods are threatening my lyfe--should i call the cops???!?" the drones have already been sent out for surveillance of the target
i always knew he was a viking hitman.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=Liquid`Drone
|
|
|
Well, he didn't start with it, it's buried in a jumble of other things, and the cited reason was not "this post shouldn't be being posted" but a concern about a different rule (show a replay)...
|
from a PM i received (from a banling) about martyr posts:
I think we're trying to make a distinction between "martyring" being "ban me I don't care" and not "I'll probably get banned for this but...(reasonable content)"
i think there might be a policy shift underway here..
or perhaps i should say an attempt to get back to the original premise of the 'bans for martyrs' policy.
|
herrmus was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2010-12-12 12:11:18 and had 88 posts.
Reason: You have 7 mod actions over 88 posts, this is your 8th.
Shape up your posting please, or the bans are going to get a lot longer.
8 mod actions over 88 posts? Why not perm him to keep it nice and even. Or else we will need to wait 11 posts more for his 9th mod action.
On June 12 2012 09:32 kerpal wrote:from a PM i received (from a banling) about martyr posts: Show nested quote +
I think we're trying to make a distinction between "martyring" being "ban me I don't care" and not "I'll probably get banned for this but...(reasonable content)"
i think there might be a policy shift underway here.. or perhaps i should say an attempt to get back to the original premise of the 'bans for martyrs' policy.
Hmm.. that was not how I viewed their policy. But if a banling say so. I always thought that they put martyring first, as in no mater the content, if you martyr you will get banned even if it is a great post otherwise.
|
Guys post made sense is why. He didn't need to include the martyr but other then that, it wasn't flaming.
|
On June 12 2012 09:33 JackDragon wrote:Show nested quote +herrmus was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2010-12-12 12:11:18 and had 88 posts.
Reason: You have 7 mod actions over 88 posts, this is your 8th.
Shape up your posting please, or the bans are going to get a lot longer. 8 mod actions over 88 posts? Why not perm him to keep it nice and even. Or else we will need to wait 11 posts more for his 9th mod action. Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 09:32 kerpal wrote:from a PM i received (from a banling) about martyr posts:
I think we're trying to make a distinction between "martyring" being "ban me I don't care" and not "I'll probably get banned for this but...(reasonable content)"
i think there might be a policy shift underway here.. or perhaps i should say an attempt to get back to the original premise of the 'bans for martyrs' policy. Hmm.. that was not how I viewed their policy. But if a banling say so. I always thought that they put martyring first, as in no mater the content, if you martyr you will get banned even if it is a great post otherwise.
I think that's how it has been working for a while now, but it was suggested that they were trying to change that.
I'm not sure if they are still discussing it, or if they decided to try to nuance their position a little, or if they've just flat out decided it's too difficult to consistently differentiate.
In the case I was PMing about, another mod banned the guy as a martyr anyways!
|
United States22154 Posts
On June 12 2012 09:38 Jisall wrote:Guys post made sense is why. He didn't need to include the martyr but other then that, it wasn't flaming.
More likely than not whoever read it skimmed the post and missed the martyr, and the guy got warned for something else.
Martyr = ban, always, unless the mod misses it.
(I'm the guy who missed it the first time around, btw :-P)
|
On June 12 2012 09:41 kerpal wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 09:33 JackDragon wrote:herrmus was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2010-12-12 12:11:18 and had 88 posts.
Reason: You have 7 mod actions over 88 posts, this is your 8th.
Shape up your posting please, or the bans are going to get a lot longer. 8 mod actions over 88 posts? Why not perm him to keep it nice and even. Or else we will need to wait 11 posts more for his 9th mod action. On June 12 2012 09:32 kerpal wrote:from a PM i received (from a banling) about martyr posts:
I think we're trying to make a distinction between "martyring" being "ban me I don't care" and not "I'll probably get banned for this but...(reasonable content)"
i think there might be a policy shift underway here.. or perhaps i should say an attempt to get back to the original premise of the 'bans for martyrs' policy. Hmm.. that was not how I viewed their policy. But if a banling say so. I always thought that they put martyring first, as in no mater the content, if you martyr you will get banned even if it is a great post otherwise. I think that's how it has been working for a while now, but it was suggested that they were trying to change that. I'm not sure if they are still discussing it, or if they decided to try to nuance their position a little, or if they've just flat out decided it's too difficult to consistently differentiate. In the case I was PMing about, another mod banned the guy as a martyr anyways!
That is possible, I didn't even know that they where going to change it, but it makes sense I guess. Then again he was banned by Gmarshal right now so I guess maybe they don't change it lol. Man you must be happy that you got ABL to cover your back right Gmarshal? 
|
Nauru12397 Posts
On June 12 2012 09:45 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 09:38 Jisall wrote:Guys post made sense is why. He didn't need to include the martyr but other then that, it wasn't flaming. More likely than not whoever read it skimmed the post and missed the martyr, and the guy got warned for something else. Martyr = ban, always, unless the mod misses it. (I'm the guy who missed it the first time around, btw :-P)
its okay, you were probably busy with the execution orders on brokenLoL.
|
On June 12 2012 09:45 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 09:38 Jisall wrote:Guys post made sense is why. He didn't need to include the martyr but other then that, it wasn't flaming. More likely than not whoever read it skimmed the post and missed the martyr, and the guy got warned for something else. Martyr = ban, always, unless the mod misses it. (I'm the guy who missed it the first time around, btw :-P)
So was I lied to by my unnamed source within the banling team?
|
On June 12 2012 09:50 kerpal wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 09:45 GMarshal wrote:On June 12 2012 09:38 Jisall wrote:Guys post made sense is why. He didn't need to include the martyr but other then that, it wasn't flaming. More likely than not whoever read it skimmed the post and missed the martyr, and the guy got warned for something else. Martyr = ban, always, unless the mod misses it. (I'm the guy who missed it the first time around, btw :-P) So was I lied to by my unnamed source within the banling team?
Banlings don't lie. The truth just reshapes itself at their whims.
|
United States22154 Posts
On June 12 2012 09:50 kerpal wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 09:45 GMarshal wrote:On June 12 2012 09:38 Jisall wrote:Guys post made sense is why. He didn't need to include the martyr but other then that, it wasn't flaming. More likely than not whoever read it skimmed the post and missed the martyr, and the guy got warned for something else. Martyr = ban, always, unless the mod misses it. (I'm the guy who missed it the first time around, btw :-P) So was I lied to by my unnamed source within the banling team?
I can neither confirm nor deny any possible policy changes that may be taking place or under discussion, I do know that if you say "I hope I don't get banned for this" or "ban me, I don't care" or "these nazi mods will surely ban me just for expressing my perfectly reasonable opinion that GMarshal should go die in a fire because he is a rear end in a tophat!" I will ban you.
|
On June 12 2012 09:55 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 09:50 kerpal wrote:On June 12 2012 09:45 GMarshal wrote:On June 12 2012 09:38 Jisall wrote:Guys post made sense is why. He didn't need to include the martyr but other then that, it wasn't flaming. More likely than not whoever read it skimmed the post and missed the martyr, and the guy got warned for something else. Martyr = ban, always, unless the mod misses it. (I'm the guy who missed it the first time around, btw :-P) So was I lied to by my unnamed source within the banling team? I can neither confirm nor deny any possible policy changes that may be taking place or under discussion, I do know that if you say "I hope I don't get banned for this" or "ban me, I don't care" or "these nazi mods will surely ban me just for expressing my perfectly reasonable opinion that GMarshal should go die in a fire because he is a rear end in a tophat!" I will ban you.
Dammit, I can't report banlings for martyring three times in a single post!
Also, the Constitution protects my freedom of speech! Banning people for martyring is censorship and unconstitutional! My seventeen degrees from Harvurd law school said so, and I'll be calling the supreme court with a petition from reddit tomorrow to get a court order given to TL!
(This was sarcasm, if you couldn't tell. Although I'm sure you've seen similar more seriously.)
|
United States5162 Posts
I dunno, I'm pretty sure I've seen martyrs get away with warnings before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
