Dota 2 QQ thread - Page 51
Forum Index > The Tavern |
Please remember that while this thread is for QQ and venting about the game, racism is not tolerated here on LD. | ||
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
| ||
Glurkenspurk
United States1915 Posts
On May 26 2012 02:22 Numy wrote: I hate AM pickers in AP that take everyone's farm then think they god and blink into 5 players. Not to mention goes mkb last item against a riki that already has butterfly. As a regular pub AM. You literally cannot win. You farm and it's "omg stupid mangina always farm never team fight" or "omg go farm u always teamfite" I just want to meet my quota =( | ||
ChrisXIV
Austria3553 Posts
I knew something was wrong when my winrate went through the roof for the last week. >_> Now I'm getting punished. | ||
Vikuu
3 Posts
Like every single game. I was hoping EU servers had english people. I was wrong | ||
pileopoop
Canada317 Posts
On May 26 2012 02:17 Odal wrote: I'm glad the new UI managed to implement everything I hated about bnet 2.0 Small chat window, tons of unused space, ugly background.. It's so fucking terrible. Stop trying to fix things that aren't broken. I dont even want to play the game with this shit UI | ||
anonymitylol
Canada4477 Posts
On May 29 2012 07:42 pileopoop wrote: I dont even want to play the game with this shit UI You know it's a beta for a reason, right? There are going to be a lot of UI changes both in-game and at the dashboard. Don't be a baby, go on the Development forums and post there what you'd like to see improved. | ||
morlakaix
United States860 Posts
it actually makes the game a lot more fun and less stressful edit- just kidding i still get mad fuck this game | ||
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
| ||
paper
13196 Posts
We need salt made from DotA QQing ASAP | ||
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
And what color would QQ be? also LOLOLOLOLOL at selling salt of "sorrow" | ||
| ||
Cu(oCo)
Italy358 Posts
On May 27 2012 01:37 ChrisXIV wrote: Too. Many. Stacks. I knew something was wrong when my winrate went through the roof for the last week. >_> Now I'm getting punished. same, its really frustrating atm | ||
Alur
Denmark3900 Posts
Yeah, these people playing with people they know, how dare they! | ||
ChrisXIV
Austria3553 Posts
On May 30 2012 22:00 Alur wrote: Yeah, these people playing with people they know, how dare they! If it was stack vs stack I would understand it, but randoms vs stack is just ridiculous. | ||
Alur
Denmark3900 Posts
On May 30 2012 22:03 ChrisXIV wrote: If it was stack vs stack I would understand it, but randoms vs stack is just ridiculous. Not if MM mitigates the advantage the group has, which we can't really tell, and I feel it would be safe to assume that it does. | ||
ChrisXIV
Austria3553 Posts
On May 30 2012 22:06 Alur wrote: Not if MM mitigates the advantage the group has, which we can't really tell, and I feel it would be safe to assume that it does. Group has the biggest advantage in a team game - teamplay. It doesn't matter that I can easily detect the enemy team going for Rosh when my team doesn't want to stop them. Even if the individual skill is much lower, as long as you coordinate you will stomp randoms 90% of the time. | ||
Alur
Denmark3900 Posts
On May 30 2012 22:16 ChrisXIV wrote: Group has the biggest advantage in a team game - teamplay. It doesn't matter that I can easily detect the enemy team going for Rosh when my team doesn't want to stop them. Even if the individual skill is much lower, as long as you coordinate you will stomp randoms 90% of the time. I'd disagree, no amount of picks, lanes or coordination is going to make up for the fact that your "individual skill" is much lower. I would rather play with 4 randoms that I don't know, while not being allowed to communicate. Rather than playing with 4 supposedly well coordinated lesser players, the difference in mechanics can really make things happen that aren't "supposed" to happen. From what I've seen your claimed 90% seems quite unreasonable. Losing to randoms while playing as a group, and beating groups while playing with randoms happens as much as the opposite - or atleast it doesn't seem to "stick out" in the degree that you are describing. Whether this can be attributed to different MMR brackets or is just anecdotal evidence I don't know. In the end the amount of factors that can vary within a MM game are almost endless (Dev post on MM), and "stacks" are probably just one of the things that take the blame, when a game for one reason or another turns out to be lopsided. | ||
tpmraven
United States833 Posts
On May 30 2012 22:53 Alur wrote: I'd disagree, no amount of picks, lanes or coordination is going to make up for the fact that your "individual skill" is much lower. I would rather play with 4 randoms that I don't know, while not being allowed to communicate. Rather than playing with 4 supposedly well coordinated lesser players, the difference in mechanics can really make things happen that aren't "supposed" to happen. From what I've seen your claimed 90% seems quite unreasonable. Losing to randoms while playing as a group, and beating groups while playing with randoms happens as much as the opposite - or atleast it doesn't seem to "stick out" in the degree that you are describing. Whether this can be attributed to different MMR brackets or is just anecdotal evidence I don't know. In the end the amount of factors that can vary within a MM game are almost endless (Dev post on MM), and "stacks" are probably just one of the things that take the blame, when a game for one reason or another turns out to be lopsided. I play alone, i win about 50% of the time. I play with a group of 4 or more i win 80% of the time. I think its pretty dumb to think playing with a team doesnt give an advantage. | ||
5-s
United States1674 Posts
On May 31 2012 02:35 tpmraven wrote: I play alone, i win about 50% of the time. I play with a group of 4 or more i win 80% of the time. I think its pretty dumb to think playing with a team doesnt give an advantage. Seems like proof to me | ||
Bash
Finland1533 Posts
| ||
| ||