EPTBest video card for 1280x1024 resolution
| Forum Index > Tech Support |
|
Xplitcit
United States419 Posts
| ||
|
Aduromors
United States279 Posts
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=40000048&IsNodeId=1&Description=5770&name=Desktop Graphics / Video Cards&Order=BESTMATCH | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
| ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
Xplitcit
United States419 Posts
| ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/177 4850 benched, at higher resolutions, on some of the most demanding games ever, at high settings. If you can get 20 frames on Crysis at 1680x1050 with near maxes settings and AA, you can play MW2 on low at tiny screen rez. | ||
|
Dayvx
Sweden92 Posts
| ||
|
Xplitcit
United States419 Posts
On June 12 2011 11:03 JingleHell wrote: That isn't a high resolution, man. http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/177 4850 benched, at higher resolutions, on some of the most demanding games ever, at high settings. If you can get 20 frames on Crysis at 1680x1050 with near maxes settings and AA, you can play MW2 on low at tiny screen rez. No you misread my post, it said mw3, not mw2. | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On June 12 2011 11:06 Xplitcit wrote: No you misread my post, it said mw3, not mw2. Still won't be an issue on lower settings, it's just another console port. Xbox 360 hardware hasn't gotten any better. | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
All the ~$100 cards can handle many games on reasonable settings at 1080p. If you doubt us, just buy a GTX 460: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121390 or a GTX 560 Ti as an individual ignorantly suggested. | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
Xplitcit
United States419 Posts
| ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/24204-xfx-radeon-hd-5770-1gb-gddr5-review.html http://www.anandtech.com/show/2856 http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/graphics/display/radeon-hd5770-hd5750-crossfirex.html | ||
|
Aduromors
United States279 Posts
| ||
|
jacosajh
2919 Posts
On June 12 2011 11:29 Xplitcit wrote: So anything around an ATI 5770 would work for me? The 5770 would handle well even above that resolution. The 460 or 560 Ti would be a bit overkill as mentioned, so something around the $100 range is preferable, unless you have a killer cpu which will cause you to be bottlenecked by your gpu. | ||
|
Nate.F
918 Posts
On June 12 2011 11:05 Dayvx wrote: I would go for the 460/560/560Ti, depending on how much u are willing to spend He isn't running a 1920x1200 resolution, nor higher. Those graphics cards you stated above would be totally overkill for his current resolution. | ||
|
FeiLing
Germany428 Posts
The GPU, as others have said: a hd4850 might be all you need for that low resolution. | ||
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4278/amds-radeon-hd-6670-radeon-hd-6570/1 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161365&cm_re=5670-_-14-161-365-_-Product | ||
|
Aduromors
United States279 Posts
| ||
|
Nate.F
918 Posts
| ||
|
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
On June 12 2011 11:01 Xplitcit wrote: I don't mean to doubt our u guys' computer knowledge, but it's for sure that those graphic cards suggested above can handle mw3 or bf3 smoothly at 1280x1024. They seems to be very out-of-par compare to others such as gtx460 or ati 5850. Again, this is my first time building so I dont know what I'm talking about. 1280x1024 is actually a low resolution by today's standards. 5770 and 4850 are very solid if not overkill for many modern games at that resolution. You could even get away with lower. | ||
|
czaku
Poland429 Posts
| ||
|
grs
Germany2339 Posts
On June 12 2011 11:29 Xplitcit wrote: Yep, I have an 5700er card and run the same resolution as you require. Works fine.So anything around an ATI 5770 would work for me? | ||
|
Aduromors
United States279 Posts
Both the 4850 and the 5670 are below Bad Company 2's recommended specs, BF3 will be much more GPU intensive. You'll also want DX11 support | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On June 12 2011 23:13 Aduromors wrote: don't waste your money on anything cheaper than a 5770 Both the 4850 and the 5670 are below Bad Company 2's recommended specs, BF3 will be much more GPU intensive. You'll also want DX11 support 1: Low resolution. 2: Lower end budget system. 3: Not worried about high end graphics, includes DX11. 4: 5770 isn't powerful enough for good quality and DX11. 5: High DX support when playing low quality is pointless. 6: Console port. For the record, these are reasons your suggestion is silly. | ||
|
theSAiNT
United States726 Posts
| ||
|
S.O.U.L
Latvia149 Posts
| ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
Aduromors
United States279 Posts
On June 12 2011 23:24 JingleHell wrote: 1: Low resolution. 2: Lower end budget system. 3: Not worried about high end graphics, includes DX11. 4: 5770 isn't powerful enough for good quality and DX11. 5: High DX support when playing low quality is pointless. 6: Console port. For the record, these are reasons your suggestion is silly. 1. 5770 is a great card for low resolutions and not much else 2. price/performance is more important than buying the cheapest card, a 4850 may be $20 less expensive or whatever but the 5770 is 20% more powerful 3. DX11 has alternative, less system intensive AA options and optimizations for texture streaming. BF3 will be the first game to make use of them 4. dur 5. dur 6. wrong | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On June 13 2011 12:23 Aduromors wrote: 1. 5770 is a great card for low resolutions and not much else 2. price/performance is more important than buying the cheapest card, a 4850 may be $20 less expensive or whatever but the 5770 is 20% more powerful 3. DX11 has alternative, less system intensive AA options and optimizations for texture streaming. BF3 will be the first game to make use of them 4. dur 5. dur 6. wrong He wants a cheap option. It's not the worst suggestion, but the 4850 will do fine for his needs. Point 3 I concede. Point 6, even if it's PC first, it's coming out on 360. If a 360 will play it, he doesn't need high end hardware. | ||
|
ragnasaur
United States804 Posts
supposedly it runs cool and can handle games pretty well It has been going in and out of stock at newegg for a while. | ||
| ||
