EPTBest video card for 1280x1024 resolution
| Forum Index > Tech Support |
|
Xplitcit
United States419 Posts
| ||
|
Aduromors
United States279 Posts
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=40000048&IsNodeId=1&Description=5770&name=Desktop Graphics / Video Cards&Order=BESTMATCH | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
| ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
Xplitcit
United States419 Posts
| ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/177 4850 benched, at higher resolutions, on some of the most demanding games ever, at high settings. If you can get 20 frames on Crysis at 1680x1050 with near maxes settings and AA, you can play MW2 on low at tiny screen rez. | ||
|
Dayvx
Sweden92 Posts
| ||
|
Xplitcit
United States419 Posts
On June 12 2011 11:03 JingleHell wrote: That isn't a high resolution, man. http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/177 4850 benched, at higher resolutions, on some of the most demanding games ever, at high settings. If you can get 20 frames on Crysis at 1680x1050 with near maxes settings and AA, you can play MW2 on low at tiny screen rez. No you misread my post, it said mw3, not mw2. | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On June 12 2011 11:06 Xplitcit wrote: No you misread my post, it said mw3, not mw2. Still won't be an issue on lower settings, it's just another console port. Xbox 360 hardware hasn't gotten any better. | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
All the ~$100 cards can handle many games on reasonable settings at 1080p. If you doubt us, just buy a GTX 460: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121390 or a GTX 560 Ti as an individual ignorantly suggested. | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
Xplitcit
United States419 Posts
| ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/24204-xfx-radeon-hd-5770-1gb-gddr5-review.html http://www.anandtech.com/show/2856 http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/graphics/display/radeon-hd5770-hd5750-crossfirex.html | ||
|
Aduromors
United States279 Posts
| ||
|
jacosajh
2919 Posts
On June 12 2011 11:29 Xplitcit wrote: So anything around an ATI 5770 would work for me? The 5770 would handle well even above that resolution. The 460 or 560 Ti would be a bit overkill as mentioned, so something around the $100 range is preferable, unless you have a killer cpu which will cause you to be bottlenecked by your gpu. | ||
|
Nate.F
918 Posts
On June 12 2011 11:05 Dayvx wrote: I would go for the 460/560/560Ti, depending on how much u are willing to spend He isn't running a 1920x1200 resolution, nor higher. Those graphics cards you stated above would be totally overkill for his current resolution. | ||
|
FeiLing
Germany428 Posts
The GPU, as others have said: a hd4850 might be all you need for that low resolution. | ||
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4278/amds-radeon-hd-6670-radeon-hd-6570/1 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161365&cm_re=5670-_-14-161-365-_-Product | ||
|
Aduromors
United States279 Posts
| ||
|
Nate.F
918 Posts
| ||
| ||
