EPTseems decent for multi-threaded apps I suppose...
Computer Build Resource Thread - Page 646
| Forum Index > Tech Support |
When using this resource, please read FragKrag's opening post. The Tech Support forum regulars have helped create countless of desktop systems without any compensation. The least you can do is provide all of the information required for them to help you properly. | ||
|
nalgene
Canada2153 Posts
seems decent for multi-threaded apps I suppose... | ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
Too bad 22nm tri-gate transistors are going to blow everything up in about half a year. For servers, it's Intel's process advantage that will soon be too overwhelming. | ||
|
Shauni
4077 Posts
On October 12 2011 13:37 skyR wrote: I didn't get the joke )= he means this ![[image loading]](http://static.techspot.com/articles-info/452/bench/Synthetic_04.png) Anyway, I think you guys are jumping the gun a bit quickly. It has some intelligent power saving features and performs better than i7 2600k in most multithreaded applications. It's like when AMD released 64 bit technology and people said it was unnecessary. Maybe if 8 core processors becomes the norm then people will try to develop games and programs to use more than two cores. And because it will be regarded as a failure, the pricing will probably go down later on. | ||
|
mahnini
United States6862 Posts
| ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/95bOe.png) XD omfg god dam, amd way to make intel looks great even in shit like ciniebench and x264 benchmarks in which all cores can be taxed you're only breaking about even. | ||
|
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
On October 12 2011 14:17 semantics wrote: Bawhahah XD omfg god dam, amd way to make intel looks great even in shit like ciniebench and x264 benchmarks in which all cores can be taxed you're only breaking about even. What is this...? I don't even... | ||
|
nalgene
Canada2153 Posts
That's so much in power consumption for that processor... wow... and in most cases, they compare it to a stock 2600K... anand said he was gonna not sleep until he's done... so it might up in a few hours... jf-amd is evil | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
| ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
Now try that on a motherboard with a reasonable price tag.  edit: AT review up as of 1-2 minutes ago: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/the-bulldozer-review-amd-fx8150-tested | ||
|
Bambipwnsu
Canada698 Posts
On October 12 2011 14:27 Myrmidon wrote: edit: AT review up as of 1-2 minutes ago: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/the-bulldozer-review-amd-fx8150-tested NO! NO! NO! I should be working...not reading a review... | ||
|
chroniX
517 Posts
![[image loading]](http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4955/41703.png) | ||
|
nalgene
Canada2153 Posts
sc2 isn't going to use more than 2 cores though so IPC per core helps significantly for intel in that one | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
On October 12 2011 14:27 Myrmidon wrote: bit-tech system power draw at wall was 110W with the FX-8150 at idle, with an Enermax Revo85+ 1050W. Did they really just pull like 425W from the CPU VRMs lol wtf. Crosshair V getting put to good use... Now try that on a motherboard with a reasonable price tag. edit: AT review up as of 1-2 minutes ago: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/the-bulldozer-review-amd-fx8150-tested i wonder what sort of fire was started when they used 1 module at 8.5Ghz or w.e it was But it's a really a shot to the balls at enthusiasts being that hot and not even hitting higher clocks then the 2500k which was able to hit 5Ghz and does more per the clock. | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
On October 12 2011 14:27 Myrmidon wrote: bit-tech system power draw at wall was 110W with the FX-8150 at idle, with an Enermax Revo85+ 1050W. Did they really just pull like 425W from the CPU VRMs lol wtf. Crosshair V getting put to good use... Now try that on a motherboard with a reasonable price tag. edit: AT review up as of 1-2 minutes ago: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/the-bulldozer-review-amd-fx8150-tested Huh look at that. It actually performs pretty damn well on the id tech5 engine. | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
I found this pretty funny, from HardwareCanuck's article: At these settings, the system is is idling at around 195W at idle, but when running the aforementioned Prime95 stress test, it pulls an immense 550W from the socket. If we also add a fully loaded GeForce GTX 460 1GB, that number spikes up to almost 800W. Has anyone realized that this is 32nm and you need 1.4v for 4.6GHz? That's pretty pathetic... | ||
|
Bambipwnsu
Canada698 Posts
| ||
|
Lup
United Kingdom13 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
On October 12 2011 15:22 Bambipwnsu wrote: Didn't have time to read much...what the hell is the deal, they took the phenom 2 x6 and stapled 2 extra cores on it? Stapled two cores on it then stepped on it a few times. | ||
|
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
 | ||
|
sechkie
United States334 Posts
 | ||
| ||
