• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:24
CEST 13:24
KST 20:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week4[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL70
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation RSL Season 1 - Final Week The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Script to open stream directly using middle click ASL20 Preliminary Maps [G] Progamer Settings Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource! [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 534 users

Possible reason why Blizzard dropped LAN support - Also c…

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 13 14 15 Next All
Caphe
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Vietnam10817 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-06-30 20:05:14
June 30 2009 17:56 GMT
#1
First of all, I am a long time lurker here at TL, back to 2003 I think. I enjoyed TL a lot but too lazy to post.
But now I find a very good reason to share my point of view and information that I’ve obtained.
We all know that currently Blizzard have no plan to support LAN in the upcoming SC2, and many wonder why?
I think I may have answers to many of your questions.
The reason lies in pirating and particularly in China.
First of all let me do a quick introduce about the backbone of Chinese SC/WC3 gaming platform in China:
As we already known Chinese SC players are among the best outside of Korea, and I can guarantee you that most of Chinese SC players don’t even play on Bnet. They play on a gaming platform called Haofang(and few others but Haofang is the 1st and the biggest)
A few thing about Haofang: It is biggest gaming site in China, it has millions of users for many games including SC and WC3. It is free and using LAN(TCP/IP protocol) to allow players to play.
How Haofang works: You download a small program for Haofang, run it, tell it where your SC folder is. You join a room(max 255 players because TCP/IP can handle max to 255)then hit RUN, the little program will load your SC up and instead of log on to Bnet you go to LAN, and can find many games their to play since 255 players in the same room is a lot.
Why it is bad: Cos millions of players in China were/are/going to using pirated SC/WC3 to play without any limitation.
Why Blizzard cares: Of course they care, if even SC2 is going to last only half the life of SC the next big market is definitely China(cos Korea is given). If things going on like SC/WC3 Blizzard is going to lose tons of money.
Did Blizzard do anything about it: Yes they did but failed. A few year back Blizzard sued Haofang but lost and Haofang is continue to grow and now become the most recognize site in China(among gamers of course).
Why is Haofang able to sneak pass Blizzard: Haofang told that they only allow players play via LAN(TCP/IP) they do not do anything to mess with Blizzard Battle.net and thus can not be judged. I know it is bullshit since it allows players with pirated copies play multi play which is the life SC, but it holds true in the EULA and Blizzard can do nothing about it.

So to conclude, When I see the news about Blizzard not support LAN, to tell the truth I wasn’t surprised at all. I knew it gonna come it some form or another. I am just deeply sorry for us those dedicated gamers got affected by pirate using scum.
I feel deeply for Blizzard, this is a very difficult decision for them to make but I think it is a necessary one. Long live BLIZZARD.
That’s it for now, discuss whatever you want!

[UPDATE]
For people that think that Blizzard removing LAN support to prevent the game being hacked, it is not true.
SC2 will be hacked and put on torrent sharing site within a week when it comes out.
What Blizzard is trying to do here is prevent company like Haofang which encourage mass piracy.
In China and many others place in the world people only go out to buy the game after they find out that there is no way or ivery troublesome for their pirated copy to play online.
Even if this increase the people that buy the game in developing countries buy 10-20% it is a huge gain for Blizzard.

What I think we need to discuss now is how Blizzard should do it to make it less painful for legimated gamers. Maybe like many people have pointed out a system like Stream should work?
Terran
Deadlift
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States358 Posts
June 30 2009 17:58 GMT
#2
Well said.
s.a.y
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
Croatia3840 Posts
June 30 2009 18:03 GMT
#3
nice info.
I am not good with quotes
Tsagacity
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States2124 Posts
June 30 2009 18:03 GMT
#4
I loved LAN parties, but the direction in which Battle.net is headed, I would always choose to play on Battle.net > 99% of the time and even if for whatever reason I did decide to lug my computer to a friend's house in this day of age
-Karune

http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=18031370482&pageNo=1&sid=3000#15

Hopefully B.net is as good as they're acting like it will be
"Everyone worse than me at video games is a noob. Everyone better than me doesn't have a life."
lantern77
Profile Joined June 2009
Canada60 Posts
June 30 2009 18:04 GMT
#5
Where can you get HaoFang? Just kidding....
Love, pain, and misery
AdunToridas
Profile Joined December 2008
Germany380 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-06-30 18:06:59
June 30 2009 18:06 GMT
#6
Nice ideas.. Karune also said something about LAN parties with SC2 in THIS Blue post.
I have to say, I'm not convinced...

//edit: Tsagacity posted it before ^^
« People say I'm strange, does it make me a stranger that my best friend was born in a manger? »
zazen
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Brazil695 Posts
June 30 2009 18:07 GMT
#7
That's probably the asian counterpart of Garena.

The only thing that pisses me off is that they have nothing to announce yet, and are just teasing with us. "We're taking LAN and giving you something else that's much better, but we won't tell you what it is!"

Very frustrating...
"The quest for nexus has brought many men of genius to insanity... HUEHUEHUE!"
Tsagacity
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States2124 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-06-30 18:17:48
June 30 2009 18:12 GMT
#8
As mentioned by Rob Pardo in interviews, piracy is a serious problem and often times tie in closely with LAN. At the end of the day, we want the best for the community and fans that support our games, and having chunk of the community pirate the game actually hurts the community.

1) Pirated servers splinter the community instead of consolidating all players who love to play the game. Battle.net will bring players together in skirmishes, ladder play, custom games, and allow everyone the opportunity to share a common experience.

2) More people on Battle.net means more even more resources devoted to evolving this online platform to cater to further community building and new ways to enjoy the game online. World of Warcraft is a great example of a game that has evolved beyond anyone's imagination since their Day 1 and will continue to do so to better the player experience for as long as players support the title. The original StarCraft is an even better example of how 11 years later, players still love and play this title, and we will continue to support and evolve it with patches.

We would not take out LAN if we did not feel we could offer players something better.

If I were to buy StarCraft II or any other title, I know the money I spent would be going to supporting that title. Personally, I would be upset that others were freeloading while others are legitimately supporting a title that has great potential and goals of making this title have 'long legs.'

If you like a song a lot, buy it, and that artist will only come out with more awesome songs for you. If you like a game, buy it, and we will promise to constantly work to make the player experience better at every corner we can.

Support the causes you believe in (This is applicable to all things, not just gaming).
Don't be a leech to society, innovation, and further awesome creations.

http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=18031370482&sid=3000&pageNo=3#49

Could add this to the OP maybe.

They have the right idea targeting splintered communities at least. A new battle.net that gives players everything they need and contains 99% of the community would be absolutely amazing. Hopefully we'll have awesome LAN latency, AMM, team support, and constant tournaments. No longer will you have to go on a private server to play against the best teams maybe?
"Everyone worse than me at video games is a noob. Everyone better than me doesn't have a life."
aeronexus
Profile Joined June 2007
United States392 Posts
June 30 2009 18:17 GMT
#9
I loved LAN parties, but the direction in which Battle.net is headed, I would always choose to play on Battle.net > 99% of the time and even if for whatever reason I did decide to lug my computer to a friend's house in this day of age
-Karune

I find this completely ridiculous. It is always, without fail, more fun to play a multiplayer game when your opponent is sitting right across from you. There's way more interaction than anything the internet can currently provide. Oh and also lugging computers around isn't that difficult if you have this thing called a laptop, buddy...

On the other hand, I can see that haofang is a major issue, but I don't think it would be so difficult to implement a CD-key check for LAN play the way there is on Bnet. Then again that could get complicated, but I'm kinda blown away by their decision to completely eliminate LAN. There is definitely a possibility of a compromise that they're throwing away. In my book real life competition beats the shit out of interwebs competition any day.
10 points!
Yenzilla
Profile Joined May 2009
Canada84 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-06-30 18:21:03
June 30 2009 18:19 GMT
#10
I wouldn't say Blizzard is teasing us, per say. Obviously, it sucks that they told us there'd be no LAN without being able to tell us what they've added to Battle.net 2.0 to replace it, but it was revealed by an interview question they answered, right? They probably didn't plan to say, until they had Battle.net 2.0 to show us.

Also: CD-key checks don't work for LAN the same reason why CD-checks don't work (at least, have a very simply bypass): its done locally. It's fairly easy to edit a file or two to either stop it from checking, or tricking it into thinking you're good.
Boundz(DarKo)
Profile Joined March 2009
5311 Posts
June 30 2009 18:20 GMT
#11
Sad but interesting information... funny how there's always something to blame China about.
Eury
Profile Joined December 2008
Sweden1126 Posts
June 30 2009 18:23 GMT
#12
On July 01 2009 03:20 Boundz(DarKo) wrote:
Sad but interesting information... funny how there's always something to blame China about.


Well, it isn't only China. Just check the amount of WC 3 players on Garena, many of them don't have a legal copy.
Dgtl
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada889 Posts
June 30 2009 18:25 GMT
#13
It will just be a matter of time before some one figures out how to make a LAN option or reduce the lag so it is like LAN on Bnet or make it so people can still play with other people using pirated versions. It's almost impossible to prevent some one from playing a pirated version on line with some program.
^______________^
B1nary
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Canada1267 Posts
June 30 2009 18:26 GMT
#14
Not to encourage pirating, but I heard (from a friend) that the players on HaoFang are generally really really good, like >250apm even in 1v1 noob games. Can anyone verify/refute this?
Keniji
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Netherlands2569 Posts
June 30 2009 18:26 GMT
#15
On July 01 2009 03:17 aeronexus wrote:
Show nested quote +
I loved LAN parties, but the direction in which Battle.net is headed, I would always choose to play on Battle.net > 99% of the time and even if for whatever reason I did decide to lug my computer to a friend's house in this day of age
-Karune

I find this completely ridiculous. It is always, without fail, more fun to play a multiplayer game when your opponent is sitting right across from you. There's way more interaction than anything the internet can currently provide. Oh and also lugging computers around isn't that difficult if you have this thing called a laptop, buddy...

On the other hand, I can see that haofang is a major issue, but I don't think it would be so difficult to implement a CD-key check for LAN play the way there is on Bnet. Then again that could get complicated, but I'm kinda blown away by their decision to completely eliminate LAN. There is definitely a possibility of a compromise that they're throwing away. In my book real life competition beats the shit out of interwebs competition any day.


i think you miss-understood karunes' statement.
he is saying that even if he is at his friends' house he would choose the bnet to play with his friend instead of playing over lan. (so he still have the interactions, because he is at his friends' home, but don't net the lan function)
Tsagacity
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States2124 Posts
June 30 2009 18:27 GMT
#16
On July 01 2009 03:17 aeronexus wrote:
Show nested quote +
I loved LAN parties, but the direction in which Battle.net is headed, I would always choose to play on Battle.net > 99% of the time and even if for whatever reason I did decide to lug my computer to a friend's house in this day of age
-Karune

I find this completely ridiculous. It is always, without fail, more fun to play a multiplayer game when your opponent is sitting right across from you. There's way more interaction than anything the internet can currently provide. Oh and also lugging computers around isn't that difficult if you have this thing called a laptop, buddy...

Huh? I'm pretty sure he's saying even while LANing with friends you're going to be better off playing with them over battle.net.

you're still playing with your opponent sitting in the same room, you're just logged onto or authenticated through b.net too.
"Everyone worse than me at video games is a noob. Everyone better than me doesn't have a life."
Klogon
Profile Blog Joined November 2002
MURICA15980 Posts
June 30 2009 18:30 GMT
#17
It'll probably work like Steam. You authenticate your version with the main server, and as long as you are connected to that, you're allowed to play on LAN.
killanator
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States549 Posts
June 30 2009 18:31 GMT
#18
I thought I heard somewhere that people in China can't connect to bnet due to the government or something?(same reason it took so long for them to get WoW) and thats why haofang started? or was i just on a massive trip?
DJ, put it back on!
Eury
Profile Joined December 2008
Sweden1126 Posts
June 30 2009 18:31 GMT
#19
On July 01 2009 03:25 Dgtl wrote:
It will just be a matter of time before some one figures out how to make a LAN option or reduce the lag so it is like LAN on Bnet or make it so people can still play with other people using pirated versions. It's almost impossible to prevent some one from playing a pirated version on line with some program.


For crying out loud, as mentioned thousands of times before on this very forum there won't be any need for "lag reducers". Reason why old BattleNet have extra latency is by choice to reduce lag spikes particular for dial-up connections. BattleNet 2 won't be made for dial-up connections in mind so it won't have that extra latency either.

For sure someone will release a program that will bypass BattleNet, but this time around without a LAN option in the game, that will be illegal. So Blizzard can sue the people behind Garena, for an example, if they try to bypass BattleNet in SC 2.
Zzoram
Profile Joined February 2008
Canada7115 Posts
June 30 2009 18:37 GMT
#20
On July 01 2009 03:31 Eury wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2009 03:25 Dgtl wrote:
It will just be a matter of time before some one figures out how to make a LAN option or reduce the lag so it is like LAN on Bnet or make it so people can still play with other people using pirated versions. It's almost impossible to prevent some one from playing a pirated version on line with some program.


For crying out loud, as mentioned thousands of times before on this very forum there won't be any need for "lag reducers". Reason why old BattleNet have extra latency is by choice to reduce lag spikes particular for dial-up connections. BattleNet 2 won't be made for dial-up connections in mind so it won't have that extra latency either.

For sure someone will release a program that will bypass BattleNet, but this time around without a LAN option in the game, that will be illegal. So Blizzard can sue the people behind Garena, for an example, if they try to bypass BattleNet in SC 2.


This.

I am fine with this, because I think everyone should BUY Starcraft 2, especially if they pirated the original.
1 2 3 4 5 13 14 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 36m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 1526
Tasteless 1146
Harstem 187
IndyStarCraft 160
Rex 106
ForJumy 31
Creator 6
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 2594
Jaedong 1123
Larva 510
Hyun 422
firebathero 389
Mini 374
Stork 357
BeSt 326
Pusan 250
hero 100
[ Show more ]
JYJ89
ToSsGirL 87
Snow 77
sorry 70
Aegong 54
Shinee 51
Sacsri 49
JulyZerg 44
Barracks 31
NaDa 30
Movie 30
ajuk12(nOOB) 24
Sharp 20
yabsab 20
sSak 20
Icarus 18
SilentControl 10
Dota 2
Gorgc4795
XaKoH 622
XcaliburYe438
League of Legends
JimRising 414
Counter-Strike
allub135
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor170
Other Games
tarik_tv20738
gofns18746
FrodaN2193
B2W.Neo851
shahzam657
Fuzer 359
crisheroes356
DeMusliM341
Pyrionflax259
KnowMe194
Lowko148
Hui .85
SortOf83
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick30796
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 749
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• 3DClanTV 79
• StrangeGG 7
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt609
Upcoming Events
FEL
4h 36m
Elazer vs Trifax
Krystianer vs MaNa
Big Brain Bouts
4h 36m
Fjant vs Babymarine
Bunny vs GuMiho
OSC
8h 36m
TriGGeR vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
ShoWTimE vs Percival
Gerald vs Jumy
Spirit vs TBD
Solar vs TBD
SC Evo Complete
10h 36m
RSL Revival
22h 36m
SHIN vs Clem
FEL
1d
FEL
1d 4h
Gerald vs PAPI
Spirit vs ArT
CSO Cup
1d 4h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 6h
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 22h
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
1d 22h
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV European League
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.