EPTsc2gg SC2 Article (6/29/09) - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
illu
Canada2531 Posts
| ||
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
| ||
|
Highways
Australia6119 Posts
Is it true first person, where you can see the mouse and selection box? | ||
|
Psyonic_Reaver
United States4342 Posts
Edit: I meant later today. I keep forgetting today is Monday now. | ||
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
| ||
|
vradovic
United States293 Posts
| ||
|
selboN
United States2523 Posts
On June 29 2009 16:51 Pufftrees wrote: http://g4tv.com/videos/39544/StarCraft-II-Pre-Beta-Lead-Designer-Interview/ this is pretty cool too, just posted. Thanks for posting that. Good interview, at least this guy seems to know what we expect out of Starcraft. I think for SCII we might actually get some support from Blizzard, hopefully. | ||
|
Numba
United States76 Posts
On June 29 2009 16:53 illu wrote: what is NDA? Non-disclosure agreement where Blizzard basically told those who visited on Monday to not talk about what they saw until this Monday, today. | ||
|
Husky
United States3362 Posts
Was really hoping for new information are possible beta release, though it seems like it will be within the month. It seems like it definitely wont be this week at least. | ||
|
nataziel
Australia1455 Posts
| ||
|
MrRey
183 Posts
http://son-clan.m-rey.com/index.php?topic=69.msg153;topicseen#new | ||
|
Klockan3
Sweden2866 Posts
Seems like the campaign will feature a lot of stuff not found in skirmish, this bodes well for UMS! They can choose the order of the missions, they can choose which units they want to upgrade. So if you love yourself some medics, hey I got a couple upgrades for you they would make them so powerful we'd never put them in multiplayer. We've got a couple upgrades in there--oh, did you want an eight-man bunker with three armor? Go you. Did you want a Hercules dropship that can carry three Thors into battle, and looks like it can? There's all kinds of crazy stuff that you only get through the solo campaign. I think it'll really rock 'em, but we'll see. | ||
|
Orphan
Australia49 Posts
On June 29 2009 16:22 Wedge wrote: Then why the hell did they have a godamn NDA, jeez. Wasn't the NDA supposed to allow all participants a chance to report on their findings? Rather than the ones who were lucky enough to get in on Monday posting up mass news articles, while the ones at the end of the week either a) getting everything ruined and/or b) not having a chance to post up news articles themselves. By delaying it a week all the sites were able to post up the news at the same time. Anyway, this is all interesting stuff about the obs mode, but not really something I'm interested in. I hope there's an option to disable obs mode too, since the article seems to indicate that anyone joining can switch to obs if they want, and I don't necessarily want random people observing me if they're probably just going to tell my opponent what I'm doing. | ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On June 29 2009 16:26 Excalibur_Z wrote: No real new information? Rewindable replays? That's pretty huge. Also I heard that they were supposed to see the new Battle.net and single player features in person, but Battle.net broke the day the reporters were supposed to go there. Too bad, really, but oh well, it happens. Rewinding replays is definitely not new news  On October 24 2008 08:51 fusionsdf wrote: I'm sure I mentioned it as well after the blizzard HQ visit before blizzcon last yearnot to hijack thread, but from the US press conference you linked: StarCraft 2 Replays: A new feature called Bookmarks will be implemented into the replay functionality of StarCraft 2. There will be both standard and user customizable bookmark functionalities. For example, there may be automatic bookmarks set at every 5 or 10 minute mark. This would allow the user to quick jump throughout the replay without have to spend time fast forwarding. Very similiar to the difference between DVD and Tapes. With user customizable bookmarks, the replay author could set bookmarks at particular battles and other points of interest. | ||
|
Eury
Sweden1126 Posts
On June 29 2009 20:52 Plexa wrote: Rewinding replays is definitely not new news I'm sure I mentioned it as well after the blizzard HQ visit before blizzcon last year They talked about it last Blizzcon regarding things they wanted to add to the game, but it was never confirmed before the visit, but yeah it is one week old. It was one of the few tidbits that slipped out before Blizzard enforced the NDA last week. | ||
Hyde
Australia14568 Posts
On June 29 2009 19:53 Klockan3 wrote: http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/59317 Seems like the campaign will feature a lot of stuff not found in skirmish, this bodes well for UMS! Just read that interview, it sounds so crazy, I'm not a Terran player but I'm looking forward to the campaign, it actually sounds exciting. I want to see the level where the lava rises every few minutes haha | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On June 29 2009 16:25 Psyonic_Reaver wrote: I have no idea why they had us sign an NDA considering they didn't show us much. Maybe they didn't want the European and Korean sites to hear that Blizzard had nothing to show them and to still make them fly out to California? lol | ||
|
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
Mh I really wonder how big the replay files are gonna be Anyways, I liked the article even all the points that were already known were imo better explained than elsewhere. | ||
|
Eury
Sweden1126 Posts
1) NDA make the playing field fair for all the sites. So that those journalists that visit Blizzard last Monday doesn't have an advantage over those that did the visit two days later. 2) Blizzard's plan was to show and release much more of the game, but in the last minute they change the plans. Single player and Battle.net 2 reveal was put on hold. From what I have heard Blizzard are going to invite people back in a couple of weeks, to release the information they planned to release last week but didn't. | ||
|
Elric
United Kingdom1327 Posts
Some of us don't hump the SC2 forums for updates so we can shout OLDDDD like a forum noob. Even if it was just a summary of the observer mode features, it was a great read. Thanks. | ||
| ||
