• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 15:24
CET 21:24
KST 05:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !11Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced! What's the best tug of war? The Grack before Christmas Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play
Brood War
General
What are former legends up to these days? BW General Discussion How soO Began His ProGaming Dreams Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB SemiFinals - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] WB & LB Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread 12 Days of Starcraft The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1747 users

[D] Colossus attack animation - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
geno
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States1404 Posts
December 21 2008 03:00 GMT
#41
InRaged you have singlehandedly changed my mind about the Colossus with those gifs. I came in here perfectly content with their laser attack, but those bomb gifs (particularly the second one you posted) make the unit so much better in many ways.

The cool thing about it, is if Blizzard wanted to they could impliment that animation without even changing the damage mechanics it currently uses (the bomb attack could do similar damage in a similar way as the laser attack). Additionally, it really makes the unit so unique. The initial colossus + laser design is quite similar to a number of sci-fi creations, but the only thing really similar to the bomb-style is actually the reaver which makes it a perfect lore-companion and incredibly unique unit. And on top of that, if they wanted to mess around with it, they'd have a lot of cool and interesting new mechanic options, some of which were already laid out: delayed explosions, spread out or targeted bombs vs always same pattern, quick fire bombs, etc.

I can't believe I never thought about that sooner. Bombs make so much more sense... they make it seem like a natural evolution the Reaver unit, make it a very unique design, and even make the current laser-using mobs (there is an air and a ground one if I'm not mistaken) more unique as a result. I so rarely argue against Blizzard's design choices, but this is one style that I really hope they get in the game.
Aerox
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Malaysia1213 Posts
December 21 2008 15:41 GMT
#42
Looking very cool but feels possibly imba. And if nerfed too much, there will be a lacking feeling. But still, thumbs up.

Suggestions to play with:
Bombs may be just a ball of psi energy built up by the lasers.
Maybe a second cooldown after bombs' appearance.
Maybe allow Colossus to drop bombs in multiple directions.
"Eyes in the sky."
SoMuchBetter
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Australia10606 Posts
December 21 2008 15:51 GMT
#43
i like the lasers
AUSSIESCUM
TeamLiquid eSTROgeneral #1 • RIP
Haemonculus
Profile Blog Joined November 2004
United States6980 Posts
December 21 2008 17:41 GMT
#44
I liked the lasers to some extent. However in watching that battle report that blizzard just posted, there was one fight which involved colossi and hellions in addition to a bunch of other units on both sides. We were a good 10 seconds into the fight before I even realized there were zealots engaged. They were completely hidden by colossus lasers and hellion flames.
I admire your commitment to being *very* oily
SirNeb
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States243 Posts
December 21 2008 21:18 GMT
#45
My thoughts about the colossus is this:

Blizzard needs to keep colossus in over the reaver because they want to show off the cool unit and this new physics, ie. new IK technology. Basically it's just the legs animation of the colossus stepping up and down terrains. I mean I don't mind the colossus but its current implementation is just kind of forced. I'm sure they are great support units but what's the point of being able to climb up and down cliffs if you can't do harass? They need to be able to 1 shot drones if they stick with its current implementation, I mean the laser misses all the time if you aren't at the perfect angle. I can't call these colossus "powerful" as blizzard loves to call them. They were pretty worthless for all the times protoss used them in the battle report, far from cost efficient(especially the time when it had free shots at scvs).
Aznleeman
Profile Joined November 2007
United States208 Posts
December 21 2008 21:28 GMT
#46
From a recent update on Starcraft2.com, the colossus animation isn't very distracting at all.
It dissapears very quickly and is pretty subtle for a laser beam.
._.???
Disarray
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States1164 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-12-22 02:16:10
December 22 2008 02:15 GMT
#47
sorry for the de-rail, but did anyone else think of this when they read the headline?

+ Show Spoiler +
Input limit reached. Please wait to perform more actions.
Aerox
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Malaysia1213 Posts
December 22 2008 03:06 GMT
#48
On December 22 2008 11:15 Disarray wrote:
sorry for the de-rail, but did anyone else think of this when they read the headline?

+ Show Spoiler +
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmfnFabcHXs&#t=2m53

+ Show Spoiler +
honestly, I thought of this instead:
"Eyes in the sky."
FinalB055
Profile Joined July 2008
United States15 Posts
December 29 2008 08:26 GMT
#49
I was playing world in conflict the other day and got an idea for an improvement to the colossus attack, regardless of animation. Personally the horizontal beam didn't mean much to me, it was more the lack of control. In world in conflict, you had special artillery which was called by clicking a starting location then dragging out the beam. What if you could apply this concept to the colossus? maybe keep a horizontal beam as the standard attack but you have the ability to control the beam in that way, direct it over the battlefield in front of you.
Polyphasic
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States841 Posts
December 29 2008 08:39 GMT
#50
On November 27 2008 09:02 Manit0u wrote:


It starts at about 0:30.

Doesn't look too juicy, does it?


I feel like what blizzard is aiming for with the colossus is kind of like a lurker unit, except it does a line of damage parallel to the target rather than towards the target. this means it should attack a line of units head on rather than from the side, meaning its ideal position in a battle would be behind a line of zealots rather than say, trying to flank from the side as one should do with lurkers.

a lot of the ideas in this section seem too focused on the looks and not realizing you are taking out a lot of the micro dynamics away from both side playing.
can't making a relationship last longer than 2 weeks, since 1984 :thumbs:
Love.Zelduck
Profile Joined February 2008
United States170 Posts
December 29 2008 10:30 GMT
#51
On December 29 2008 17:39 Polyphasic wrote:

I feel like what blizzard is aiming for with the colossus is kind of like a lurker unit, except it does a line of damage parallel to the target rather than towards the target. this means it should attack a line of units head on rather than from the side, meaning its ideal position in a battle would be behind a line of zealots rather than say, trying to flank from the side as one should do with lurkers.

a lot of the ideas in this section seem too focused on the looks and not realizing you are taking out a lot of the micro dynamics away from both side playing.


I think the idea of microing parallel lines and moving beams just to get 3 random hits on a whole worker line is part of the problem, so I'd say changing the looks to some psi/laser-splosion that has some aoe to it is part of the solution. Honestly, you put both reavers and collossi in shuttles, they're both slow, one can walk up cliffs but takes air dmg as a result, the other doesn't, one does some weak ass laser that can only kill a lot of workers if they're all in a line and he gets 2-3 beams off, the other needs only an instant out of the shuttle to kill every worker caught in a big radius (and from further away). Which would you prefer?
dcttr66
Profile Joined October 2003
United States555 Posts
December 29 2008 15:15 GMT
#52
On November 23 2008 02:34 sushiman wrote:
The attack now just looks lame. I loved the old one, and the fact that it used both its lances instead of just one like now. A different AoE attack would probably be best. Either a zigzagging move with both beams, or a single concentrated impact with AoE similar to that of a siege tank.

holy crap a zigzag attack would be awesome!
FinalB055
Profile Joined July 2008
United States15 Posts
December 29 2008 15:58 GMT
#53
Thats why i feel the world in conflict Idea would be cool. It not only gives the player more control and makes the look of the beam more natural and fluid, but it is definitely an outlet for unit micro. But it might have to do enough damage so that people would take the time to control it. If the attack cant kill anything anyway then why bother...
Mannequin
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada131 Posts
December 29 2008 16:04 GMT
#54
Eh I would be so happy if they just put the Reaver back, a mech worm that can kill all your workers ftw. It was my favorite thing in P games.
The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on.
Polyphasic
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States841 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-12-29 18:27:04
December 29 2008 18:24 GMT
#55
On December 29 2008 19:30 Love.Zelduck wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2008 17:39 Polyphasic wrote:

I feel like what blizzard is aiming for with the colossus is kind of like a lurker unit, except it does a line of damage parallel to the target rather than towards the target. this means it should attack a line of units head on rather than from the side, meaning its ideal position in a battle would be behind a line of zealots rather than say, trying to flank from the side as one should do with lurkers.

a lot of the ideas in this section seem too focused on the looks and not realizing you are taking out a lot of the micro dynamics away from both side playing.


I think the idea of microing parallel lines and moving beams just to get 3 random hits on a whole worker line is part of the problem, so I'd say changing the looks to some psi/laser-splosion that has some aoe to it is part of the solution. Honestly, you put both reavers and collossi in shuttles, they're both slow, one can walk up cliffs but takes air dmg as a result, the other doesn't, one does some weak ass laser that can only kill a lot of workers if they're all in a line and he gets 2-3 beams off, the other needs only an instant out of the shuttle to kill every worker caught in a big radius (and from further away). Which would you prefer?


the person microing the colossus in the video was a noob. if he had a reaver, it would have been even worse. i doubt that little sequence is a good display of colossus micro or what the colossus can do when used correctly.

first off, he didn't position his colossus right to get maximum hits. he didn't have nearly the amount of apm to do that. you should keep in mind that colossus recharge shield while in the shuttle. the shuttle also recharges shields very very quickly. without mutalisks, taking those down is a bitch.
can't making a relationship last longer than 2 weeks, since 1984 :thumbs:
Jyvblamo
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Canada13788 Posts
December 29 2008 19:03 GMT
#56
Maybe they should add the ability to toggle the attack mode of the Collosus between the current line-sweeping laser to something more useful for taking out workers.
Not_Computer
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Canada2277 Posts
December 29 2008 19:47 GMT
#57
wow, all these gifs are so well done. i'm amazed.

requesting sattire gifs? lol, colossus throwing bob-ombs
haha, j/k

on topic: the original lasers aren't bad, and tbh i don't find the animation that bad either... though i am totally open to other possibilities such as the quintuple scarab chucking colossus which looks pretty awesome too
"Jaedong hyung better be ready. I'm going to order the most expensive dinner in Korea."
ForVengeance
Profile Joined August 2008
United States111 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-12-29 21:43:07
December 29 2008 21:36 GMT
#58
Arent you supposed to fly your nullifier in and use stasis block to block off worker exit routes before you bring up the colossi to start lasering?

If Blizzard doesnt add ingenius ways to use single units it may be up to the players to pull off effective things by using units in combination. Cause currently i dont see colossus killing anything by itself.
MuShu
Profile Joined March 2005
United States3223 Posts
December 30 2008 02:28 GMT
#59
pretty awesome images InRaged, but I hope Blizzard will come up with a decent animation.

Or just bring back the reaver with rolly-polly upgrade.
aseq
Profile Joined January 2003
Netherlands3992 Posts
December 30 2008 15:35 GMT
#60
I don't even think the animation is bad, but the entire firing makes little sense. We got a big robot here, and all i can do is fire from right to left? When there's 2 workere behind each other, it can't even change the direction, nor can it stop moving the laser when there's only 1?

I know that may not be the idea behind the unit, but such a huge unit which fires in such a stupid way deserves little awe. When melee units approach the thing it looks completely lost. I would personally propose hitting the same area of effect, but all at the same time. The primary target would then be at the center of the aoe.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL 21
20:00
WB & LB Finals
Cross vs Dewalt
ZZZero.O299
LiquipediaDiscussion
OSC
18:00
World Championship: Challenger
WardiTV915
davetesta30
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JuggernautJason179
MindelVK 46
Railgan 29
Vindicta 23
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 15950
Mini 670
EffOrt 476
Shuttle 438
ZZZero.O 299
hero 94
Rush 57
ggaemo 54
Sexy 50
Hyun 46
[ Show more ]
910 29
HiyA 13
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1497
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu432
Other Games
Grubby6777
FrodaN3260
B2W.Neo1021
fl0m816
ceh9805
mouzStarbuck329
Mlord277
RotterdaM179
ArmadaUGS149
XaKoH 82
Mew2King78
KnowMe33
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1012
StarCraft 2
angryscii 29
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 52
• HeavenSC 36
• Reevou 20
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 17
• 80smullet 15
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2214
• Ler101
Other Games
• imaqtpie2260
• Shiphtur237
• tFFMrPink 19
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
12h 36m
Wardi Open
15h 36m
OSC
1d 15h
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
OSC
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
OSC
5 days
OSC
5 days
OSC
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1: W1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Escore Tournament S1: W2
Escore Tournament S1: W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.