• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:08
CEST 00:08
KST 07:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202547RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 586 users

[T] Potential Solutions to Automine - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 19 20 21 Next All
Kennigit *
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada19447 Posts
November 17 2008 18:20 GMT
#21
No one is against a quality game. The fact is that SC2 is in internal alpha and will have a beta into the new year. Automine and MBS are here to stay - rather than complaining about it im trying to come up with solutions. We've been saying it has to go for 2 years and nothing has really changed so the only solution is to adapt to it.
Kennigit *
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada19447 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-11-17 18:26:55
November 17 2008 18:24 GMT
#22
On November 18 2008 03:19 -orb- wrote:
Kennigit I have come up with a way to solve the problems chill brings up.

See, if you can always go back and tell your workers to move faster, you'll never have time for micro and there will be more macro than in BW.

So what you should do is have it so that each worker has one potential speed boost that, once used, can not be used again.

This makes it so that when your workers come out of the nexus, you can still add the speed boost, but you only have to do it once per worker, instead of constantly going back and selecting each of your 50 workers.

This creates a number of other game possibilities, such as the strategy that if you wanted to have a timing push it might be more efficient to save the speed boost for a certain time in the game in which you speed up all your workers at once (don't know, maybe it would be better to just get it going earlier so you get those workers faster).

Another possibility this creates is if they implemented some way in the game to "recharge" your workers. One possible way to do this would be to have this ability cost energy. Another possibility would be to have some kind of other unit's ability or building (like the shield battery) be able to recharge the workers' speed upgrade.

What do you think?

P.S. Another cool trick pros would use this for is things like boxer's scv rush, and drone drilling. When using workers offensively and planning that you are going to do this, a player could save up the workers' speed ability and then use it in a rush. I think this would create some totally baller all-in situations.

P.P.S. One other option you might want to consider is having it as an upgrade, so that you can't use the ability to speed them up until you research that ability. This would open the door for some creative build orders to tech fast to speedy worker ability.

I think this is great thinking. Yeah i know my original idea is by no means perfect (or even necessarily right) but hopefully it opens avenues to ideas like this and the stimpack idea. I'd imagine this ability be rechargeable. Also if you see your posts deleted its cause your an idiot.
-orb-
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5770 Posts
November 17 2008 18:27 GMT
#23
On November 18 2008 03:24 Kennigit wrote:Also if you see your posts deleted its cause your an idiot.


lolwut?
'life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery'
how sad that sc2 has no shield battery :(
Kennigit *
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada19447 Posts
November 17 2008 18:30 GMT
#24
no not you, random idiots posting 1 liners
diehilde
Profile Joined September 2008
Germany1596 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-11-17 18:35:18
November 17 2008 18:33 GMT
#25
On November 18 2008 03:20 Kennigit wrote:
No one is against a quality game. The fact is that SC2 is in internal alpha and will have a beta into the new year. Automine and MBS are here to stay - rather than complaining about it im trying to come up with solutions. We've been saying it has to go for 2 years and nothing has really changed so the only solution is to adapt to it.

no its not. This is pure opportunism. Its like being against a retarded law the government wants to install and after a cpl years, say "ok w/e we cant do anything against it, lets live with it!". Look at prohibition for example, it was a retarded law and basically nobody followed the law. The customers (the people in my example) have the power, not the institution.
There are still other solutions - a mod for the game without automining and mbs, which all the major leagues agree to play. Not buying the game. Forming a coalision of SC websites all making a head article on their front page when beta hits, reading "Don't buy SC2 if you expect a game coming close to SC:BW, it sux from a competetive standpoint!". Basically anything that doesn't involve buckling down to blizz just because they see some retarded premises to make big $$, which dont even exist in reality.
Savior: "I will cheat everyone again in SC2!" - SCII Beta Tester
Kennigit *
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada19447 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-11-17 18:34:52
November 17 2008 18:34 GMT
#26
...........DONT derail this thread.
brandonc
Profile Joined February 2008
United States72 Posts
November 17 2008 18:47 GMT
#27
I dont know if anyones mentioned this earlier, but you could just have the bonus apply to NEW scvs only once... It doesnt have to be speed bonus, it could just be the first mineral it returns be double, or bonus and only once. This could add up throughout the game after you've gotten 50 + scvs. I know double minerals would have way more of an impact in the beginning (say you start off with 4 scvs ((bw)) and you tell them to mine you get 64 minerals). But everyone would have to command their first initial game start scvs to mine anyway, so no one would be hurt.

You could also give the bonus a duration time, like 30 secs. So you cant just go back and drag select all scvs and tell them to mine, trying to get the scvs you missed because you were busy microing.
DrainX
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Sweden3187 Posts
November 17 2008 18:58 GMT
#28
Another way you could do it to make it similar to the way the gas mechanic works is to have workers get a debuff after a certain amount of minerals mined. That debuff might represent their tools/fangs/beams getting less sharp and would make them mine slower. The debuff would be visible and you would have to select the workers and turn it off by clicking some button. You could change the % slower mining rate and the time it takes for it to switch on to balance it :e
Heyoka
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Katowice25012 Posts
November 17 2008 19:06 GMT
#29
On November 18 2008 03:24 Kennigit wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2008 03:19 -orb- wrote:
Kennigit I have come up with a way to solve the problems chill brings up.

See, if you can always go back and tell your workers to move faster, you'll never have time for micro and there will be more macro than in BW.

So what you should do is have it so that each worker has one potential speed boost that, once used, can not be used again.

This makes it so that when your workers come out of the nexus, you can still add the speed boost, but you only have to do it once per worker, instead of constantly going back and selecting each of your 50 workers.

This creates a number of other game possibilities, such as the strategy that if you wanted to have a timing push it might be more efficient to save the speed boost for a certain time in the game in which you speed up all your workers at once (don't know, maybe it would be better to just get it going earlier so you get those workers faster).

Another possibility this creates is if they implemented some way in the game to "recharge" your workers. One possible way to do this would be to have this ability cost energy. Another possibility would be to have some kind of other unit's ability or building (like the shield battery) be able to recharge the workers' speed upgrade.

What do you think?

P.S. Another cool trick pros would use this for is things like boxer's scv rush, and drone drilling. When using workers offensively and planning that you are going to do this, a player could save up the workers' speed ability and then use it in a rush. I think this would create some totally baller all-in situations.

P.P.S. One other option you might want to consider is having it as an upgrade, so that you can't use the ability to speed them up until you research that ability. This would open the door for some creative build orders to tech fast to speedy worker ability.

I think this is great thinking. Yeah i know my original idea is by no means perfect (or even necessarily right) but hopefully it opens avenues to ideas like this and the stimpack idea. I'd imagine this ability be rechargeable. Also if you see your posts deleted its cause your an idiot.



This idea still feels a little forced to me, and I'm not a big fan of any of the specific proposals yet but this is a good line of thought to go down - there is something here.

The thought I am having now is how about, instead of a speed boost, you make those selected SCVs able to carry more minerals per trip. So instead of having 5 minerals, maybe they bring back 12 but still collect at the same rate (or only slightly increased - the idea is improve efficiency). It would be a one use, limited time ability. Perhaps you could have the option to even use the ability expire at some point, say after 3 more workers are made from that CC. This would ensure that there are great benefits to looking back at a base and macroing in a style more like traditional BW.

The problem I have, is that this is almost adding complexity for complexity's sake. Ideally you could have a mechanic that not only requires macro to be used well, but also adds depth to the game as a whole (the speedboost idea is good here; it potentially opens up new gameplans of when to use it for things like bunker rush or timing push).
@RealHeyoka | ESL / DreamHack StarCraft Lead
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
November 17 2008 19:09 GMT
#30
I think "do this if you want to be competitive"-type solutions should be avoided, they will piss a large part of the userbase off AND they feel sort of silly to implement after we've already gotten automining...

It's like having your cake and then pouring a kg of salt on top of it before you try to eat it.

A good mechanic would need to be something that allows for more customization/fine tuning of your economy. Maybenexttime has posted a suggestion for a gas mechanic where the gas operates in various stages of effeciency, which you can toggle between.
I don't have a link right now but that type of solution is much more attractive to me.

If one mode of use turned out to be wholly superior to all the others it could end up sort of useless, but that's fairly easy to patch..

A problem with the speed boost mechanics, apart from them being "use these unless you want to lose", is that yeah, they make sense for the SCV. What about the probe? The drone?
It becomes a very contrived solution.

Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-11-17 19:20:35
November 17 2008 19:20 GMT
#31
On November 18 2008 04:09 FrozenArbiter wrote:
A good mechanic would need to be something that allows for more customization/fine tuning of your economy. Maybenexttime has posted a suggestion for a gas mechanic where the gas operates in various stages of effeciency, which you can toggle between.
I don't have a link right now but that type of solution is much more attractive to me.

The problem with this type of solution is that it tends to be a "fire and forget" one-time action, rather than something you're constantly needing to attend to. If you don't have to look back to your base regularly, its not creating macro ACTIONS.
Moderator
A3iL3r0n
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States2196 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-11-17 19:27:24
November 17 2008 19:26 GMT
#32
I think this is a great idea, but here's my tweak:

Instead of the workers losing their mining speed bonus over time, they would keep it through entire game, and it would be a small bonus; therefore it would require you have to a lot of uber-peons to make a substantial difference. The uber-peon status would be decided by the very first command to mine: was it given by the player or by the rally point?

This mechanic would encourage players to try to play perfect, like BW does, but also doesn't totally derail your economy if you can't continue to make them through the mid and late game. Most importantly, it gives the superior player a worthwhile advantage.

Also, this mechanic poses interesting strategical questions:

•How many uber-peons do I continue to try to make throughout the game?
•Do I send my uber-peons to mine the gold minerals even though it's a hotly contested portion of the map?
•Do I use my uber-peons to mine a hidden, naked expansion that is very vulnerable if discovered?
•Do I take the time to find and load my uber-peons into a dropship for the island expand?
•I just lost a bunch of uber-peons, do I take the time to make more (primarily a mid to late game question)?
My psychiatrist says I have deep-seated Ragneuroses :(
ZeroCartin
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Costa Rica2390 Posts
November 17 2008 19:31 GMT
#33
Hmm, thats a really interesting idea!

Could be cool to see the workers you´ve rallied manually with a kind of boost effect on em, so if u see them without the effect, you just rally them again. Though, it would be cool to see it last like just a while, not the whole game, so you would be forced if u want, to go and autoselect em again to get them back up to boost mode.
"My sister is on vacation in Costa Rica right now. I hope she stays a while because she's a miserable cunt." -pubbanana
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
November 17 2008 19:41 GMT
#34
On November 18 2008 04:20 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2008 04:09 FrozenArbiter wrote:
A good mechanic would need to be something that allows for more customization/fine tuning of your economy. Maybenexttime has posted a suggestion for a gas mechanic where the gas operates in various stages of effeciency, which you can toggle between.
I don't have a link right now but that type of solution is much more attractive to me.

The problem with this type of solution is that it tends to be a "fire and forget" one-time action, rather than something you're constantly needing to attend to. If you don't have to look back to your base regularly, its not creating macro ACTIONS.

The main point is that that [the gas mechanic variation] type of solution has a purpose beyond "make the player click more".

This type of "speed boost if manually ordered" has been brought up before, I'm almost certain, and it's just not gonna fly with most people. There really is no point in including automine if to be competitive you HAVE TO ignore it. People are gonna hate it. I hate it.

Can you see Tasteless explaining this type of mechanic while casting? It's not a result of skilled players clicking faster and getting an advantage because they are able to do something more effeciently - it's a mechanic designed purely to make you click. It's just way, waaay too artifical for my liking.

There has to be strategy involved, there has to be a trade-off somewhere. This is more of a "click this button or you lose" type deal, which really belongs more in an arcade game.
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
Savio
Profile Joined April 2008
United States1850 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-11-17 20:06:38
November 17 2008 19:44 GMT
#35
I think this idea has huge potential--much more than the gas mechanic Blizzard has now.

I think this "bonus" should be one time deal. I don't think going back over and over again to mass move your drones off the minerals just to command them to mine again would add to the game.

To lessen the concerns brought up by Chill, I think it should not so much be a speed "bonus" to ordered units, but rather a speed decrease to those who were only sent to the minerals by rally point. This would mean that really great players would not set their rally on the minerals, but would do what is done in BW.

The speed decrease should last a max of about 3 minutes and only happen once. No multiple boosting of workers.

Also, I think this speed decrease should apply to all units on rally point command. Right now, as part of automine, soldiers leave their training facility on attack move orders. So you can just rally into their base and forget about them. But if soldiers movement and attack speed had a slight deficit when moving on "rally orders" then you would want to order them yourselves.
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. – Winston Churchill
Osmoses
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Sweden5302 Posts
November 17 2008 19:45 GMT
#36
Not crazy about the idea, but it is an idea and

So what you should do is have it so that each worker has one potential speed boost that, once used, can not be used again.


this would make it alot more attractive. But like FA said, this makes sense for the SCV, but not the Probe or the Drone. One is a robot and the other is a Drone, a slave compelled to work by a hive mind, motivation doesn't enter into it.

Good job though on trying to move from complaining to constructive critisism, I approve of this message. So maybe I should contribute something to keep the discussion going... (none of these ideas will be great)

First thing that comes to mind is a simple delay. Automining sends the worker to mine, but it takes a few seconds. Might be a good idea to have some kind of deploy animation for this, it would be frustrating to just have it appear and then sit idly for a few seconds before getting it's ass in gear.

Something about ordering your worker to mine a free mineral in early game (automine sending it to the rallied one), but then again they autosplit too well with the new AI.

Perhaps a gas mechanic that harm the workers. Gas is acidious or something, takes like 5% hp every run, so in order to not have them die you would need to circulate them, basically letting them "cool off" mining minerals (5% +hp every five seconds or something) before they can go back into the refinery. Or if not a damage, perhaps a slow effect (like stacking devourer acid only with movement speed) that is negated by mining minerals.

Way back when the Nomad was announced, I thought it was something like a super SCV, required in order to build Thors or something, and I also thought they should have some kind of mining attribute. Being able to mine with something other than just your workers might be an idea, like ghouls chopping trees in WC3. Of course, while its easy to imagine zerglings mining, the same can't really be said about, for example, Terran units, but then again it doesn't have to be the same mechanic for each race. Zerg can use their melee units to help mine, Terran could get some kind of super SCV, Protoss could have some kind of warp-mine mechanic, I dunno.

I always thought it was kind of contrived that in Starcraft, as opposed to C&C which I played before SC, the minerals were all nicely lined up so that one could squeeze a command center up close and get great mining mileage. Perhaps spreading these out or making them "grow" randomly like the ore in C&C could create some micro opportunities, like keeping off a certain patch for a while to allow it to regrow. Would require getting rid of the minimum distance to minerals for the hatchery/nexus/cc.

Perhaps an optional "scaffolding" or something, helping the workers get to the "good part" of the minerals and getting an increased mining rate?

Drones merging and scvs and probes going all Voltron in order to become better workers, 2scvs = 2.2x mining rate, better mining, hurts more to lose.

Spacegnomes, with jetpacks and +5 mining gloves. Yeah I'm out.
Excuse me hun, but what is your name? Vivian? I woke up next to you naked and, uh, did we, um?
Savio
Profile Joined April 2008
United States1850 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-11-17 20:08:12
November 17 2008 19:46 GMT
#37
Kennigit, do you mind if I post this on the Battle.net forums if I source you and TL? I would like to give Blizz the best opportunity possible to at least read the recommendation.

At the very least it can get their creative juices flowing in mechanics of this nature.

The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. – Winston Churchill
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-11-17 19:52:44
November 17 2008 19:49 GMT
#38
On November 18 2008 04:44 Savio wrote:
I think this idea has huge potential--much more than the gas mechanic Blizzard has now.

I think this "bonus" should be one time deal. I don't think going back over and over again to mass move your drones off the minerals just to command them to mine again would add to the game.

To lessen the concerns brought up by Chill, I think it should not so much be a speed "bonus" to ordered units, but rather a speed decrease to those who were only sent to the minerals by rally point. This would mean that really great players would not set their rally on the minerals, but would do what is done in BW.

The speed decrease should last a max of about 3 minutes and only happen once. No multiple boosting of workers.

Also, I think this speed decrease should apply to all units on rally point command. Right now, as part of automine, soldiers leave their training facility on attack move orders. So you can just rally into their base and forget about them. But if soldiers movement and slight power deficit when moving on "rally orders" then you would want to order them yourselves.

Yes, great, punish the beginners without them even knowing it.

How do you even begin to explain this in the tutorials or the campaign? "Yeah, so hey - if you rally your workers to the minerals they uh.. get a bad case of the mondays. Yeah. Your best bet is to rally them sort of to the side of the mineral, then blindside them and force them right to work before they can protest".

-.-

Also, rally point being attack move instead of move needs to change. Badly. Having a unit run off course because it's chasing a zergling it saw on the fringe of its vision instead of going where I told it to go = bad.
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
Savio
Profile Joined April 2008
United States1850 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-11-17 19:58:08
November 17 2008 19:56 GMT
#39
On November 18 2008 04:49 FrozenArbiter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2008 04:44 Savio wrote:
I think this idea has huge potential--much more than the gas mechanic Blizzard has now.

I think this "bonus" should be one time deal. I don't think going back over and over again to mass move your drones off the minerals just to command them to mine again would add to the game.

To lessen the concerns brought up by Chill, I think it should not so much be a speed "bonus" to ordered units, but rather a speed decrease to those who were only sent to the minerals by rally point. This would mean that really great players would not set their rally on the minerals, but would do what is done in BW.

The speed decrease should last a max of about 3 minutes and only happen once. No multiple boosting of workers.

Also, I think this speed decrease should apply to all units on rally point command. Right now, as part of automine, soldiers leave their training facility on attack move orders. So you can just rally into their base and forget about them. But if soldiers movement and slight power deficit when moving on "rally orders" then you would want to order them yourselves.

Yes, great, punish the beginners without them even knowing it.

How do you even begin to explain this in the tutorials or the campaign? "Yeah, so hey - if you rally your workers to the minerals they uh.. get a bad case of the mondays. Yeah. Your best bet is to rally them sort of to the side of the mineral, then blindside them and force them right to work before they get a chance to protest".

-.-

Also, rally point being attack move instead of move needs to change. Badly. Having a unit run off course because it's chasing a zergling it saw on the fringe of its vision instead of going where I told it to go = bad.


This would be very easy to explain in the tutorial.

"Rally points are orders given to newly trained units to proceed to a given location. They are useful tools included for your convenience. However, be aware that a unit acting under one of these pre-set rally orders will have a small and temporary speed deficit compared to those under the direct orders of the commander"

Then you let them use it for themselves. New kids will not even notice it. It becomes more noticeable at the pro levels. Also remember that how much the deficit is, and its duration is just a balancing matter. It can be made VERY slight or significant according to what makes the game better in beta. Pros, at their level will always choose no not rely on rally points no matter how slight the advantage is.
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. – Winston Churchill
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
November 17 2008 20:03 GMT
#40
But it makes no sense..
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 19 20 21 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 52m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .267
Nathanias 211
BRAT_OK 44
Nina 0
StarCraft: Brood War
Sexy 30
Bale 8
Dota 2
monkeys_forever325
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1098
Foxcn293
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe112
Liquid`Ken26
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu407
Other Games
tarik_tv10053
summit1g7760
Grubby3233
FrodaN1584
C9.Mang0212
Sick44
Maynarde0
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV24
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta80
• poizon28 50
• musti20045 38
• Hupsaiya 34
• Kozan
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Eskiya23 19
• Azhi_Dahaki3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22524
League of Legends
• Doublelift3180
Other Games
• imaqtpie1362
• Shiphtur410
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
11h 52m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 12h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.