• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:14
CEST 23:14
KST 06:14
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun10[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists21[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers25Maestros of the Game 2 announced92026 GSL Tour plans announced15Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid25
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool MaNa leaves Team Liquid Maestros of the Game 2 announced
Tourneys
GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) SC2 INu's Battles#15 <BO.9 2Matches> WardiTV Spring Cup RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event SEL Masters #6 - Solar vs Classic (SC: Evo)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 523 Firewall Mutation # 522 Flip My Base Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss
Brood War
General
Pros React To: Leta vs Tulbo (ASL S21, Ro.8) ASL21 General Discussion [TOOL] Starcraft Chat Translator JaeDong's ASL S21 Ro16 Post-Review Missed out on ASL tickets - what are my options?
Tourneys
ASL Season 21 LIVESTREAM with English Commentary [ASL21] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL21] Ro8 Day 1 [ASL21] Ro16 Group D
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Daigo vs Menard Best of 10 Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Diablo IV
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread 3D technology/software discussion Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2249 users

GOAT Addendum: Maru and the perception of Code S - Page 7

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 18 Next All
goldensail
Profile Joined May 2022
132 Posts
May 21 2024 06:23 GMT
#121
I often wish we have more data-driven analyses to support arguments from both sides. A guy with the handle "Imdata" tried doing that some time ago to support his argument that Serral is a bigger outlier than Maru, I actually thought it was a good attempt, but unfortunately his data was clearly flawed and I didn't see a follow-up after I pointed out some issues.

If we have a hosted dataset (e.g. participants and results from all Premier/Major events for the last 10 years) in Excel format that we can download and model, I believe we can have more objective discussions.
Argonauta
Profile Joined July 2016
Spain4967 Posts
May 21 2024 06:58 GMT
#122
On May 21 2024 15:23 goldensail wrote:
I often wish we have more data-driven analyses to support arguments from both sides. A guy with the handle "Imdata" tried doing that some time ago to support his argument that Serral is a bigger outlier than Maru, I actually thought it was a good attempt, but unfortunately his data was clearly flawed and I didn't see a follow-up after I pointed out some issues.

If we have a hosted dataset (e.g. participants and results from all Premier/Major events for the last 10 years) in Excel format that we can download and model, I believe we can have more objective discussions.



You can download Aligulac results in SQL format here:
http://aligulac.com/about/db/
Rogue | Maru | Scarlett | Trap
TL+ Member
MJG
Profile Joined May 2018
United Kingdom1451 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 07:46:57
May 21 2024 07:41 GMT
#123
On May 21 2024 06:01 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 20 2024 20:58 MJG wrote:
On May 18 2024 06:10 Expensive-Law-9830 wrote:
Rule number 1 in this forum: never ask today's 'GOATS' what achievement they had when Kespa team houses existed.

This has been mentioned plenty of times.

Since the Korean team league structure collapsed, the standard of competition has dropped off a cliff. Players did not dominate season after season back when the Korean team leagues existed. Several players rose up to win GSL only to drop off just as quickly. Maru's G5L was such a landmark achievement precisely because it was so difficult for someone to achieve that many GSL wins prior to Maru managing to do so, but even that happened after the Korean team league structure collapsed.

Even qualifying for GSL consistently was difficult back then. For example, look at the winners of the (Wiki)NesTea Award, given to players who manage to qualify for Code S ten times in a row. Only four players managed to do this before the Korean team league structure fell apart in 2016. Fifteen players have done so since. It's not difficult to join the dots.

Serral's achievements are impressive, but they've all come during a period where there's a lower standard of competition. People can choose to ignore this if they want - "you can only beat what's put in front of you" - but I personally think it's an important factor to consider.

One flipside of this argument is that Korean players are operating under similar conditions to foreign players now, and without having that team house setup advantage that gap has closed considerably.

I don’t think it’s a complete refutation, there are other associated issues that are also impactful. It’s not just the collapse of the previous structure, it’s an underfunding of the current one which contributes to the overall decline.

The collapse of the Korean team league structure is just a convenient line for me to draw. Regardless of where you choose to draw the line, it remains my opinion that the standard and depth of competition has declined as a result of money leaving the scene, and that this makes Serral's achievements less remarkable than those of other GOAT candidates.

It'll only ever be an opinion though. Amongst his peers, Serral is clearly an outlier, and for some people that is the most important thing. I can't say those people are objectively wrong, it's just a different perspective, and that's what makes the discussion interesting!

puking up frothing vitriolic sarcastic spittle
Poopi
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France12912 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 07:50:03
May 21 2024 07:49 GMT
#124
On May 21 2024 16:41 MJG wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 06:01 WombaT wrote:
On May 20 2024 20:58 MJG wrote:
On May 18 2024 06:10 Expensive-Law-9830 wrote:
Rule number 1 in this forum: never ask today's 'GOATS' what achievement they had when Kespa team houses existed.

This has been mentioned plenty of times.

Since the Korean team league structure collapsed, the standard of competition has dropped off a cliff. Players did not dominate season after season back when the Korean team leagues existed. Several players rose up to win GSL only to drop off just as quickly. Maru's G5L was such a landmark achievement precisely because it was so difficult for someone to achieve that many GSL wins prior to Maru managing to do so, but even that happened after the Korean team league structure collapsed.

Even qualifying for GSL consistently was difficult back then. For example, look at the winners of the (Wiki)NesTea Award, given to players who manage to qualify for Code S ten times in a row. Only four players managed to do this before the Korean team league structure fell apart in 2016. Fifteen players have done so since. It's not difficult to join the dots.

Serral's achievements are impressive, but they've all come during a period where there's a lower standard of competition. People can choose to ignore this if they want - "you can only beat what's put in front of you" - but I personally think it's an important factor to consider.

One flipside of this argument is that Korean players are operating under similar conditions to foreign players now, and without having that team house setup advantage that gap has closed considerably.

I don’t think it’s a complete refutation, there are other associated issues that are also impactful. It’s not just the collapse of the previous structure, it’s an underfunding of the current one which contributes to the overall decline.

The collapse of the Korean team league structure is just a convenient line for me to draw. Regardless of where you choose to draw the line, it remains my opinion that the standard and depth of competition has declined as a result of money leaving the scene, and that this makes Serral's achievements less remarkable than those of other GOAT candidates.

It'll only ever be an opinion though. Amongst his peers, Serral is clearly an outlier, and for some people that is the most important thing. I can't say those people are objectively wrong, it's just a different perspective, and that's what makes the discussion interesting!


The same applies for Rogue though, not just Serral. He "only" started winning big when proleague was disbanded, and zerg started to get really strong. Only Maru among the three GOAT candidates was truly a top class player in the fiercest era.
Imo Serral has a better case of GOATness than Rogue. As for Maru, as a super fan I am biased so my opinion on the matter isn't very interesting
WriterMaru
MJG
Profile Joined May 2018
United Kingdom1451 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 08:25:55
May 21 2024 08:19 GMT
#125
On May 21 2024 16:49 Poopi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 16:41 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 06:01 WombaT wrote:
On May 20 2024 20:58 MJG wrote:
On May 18 2024 06:10 Expensive-Law-9830 wrote:
Rule number 1 in this forum: never ask today's 'GOATS' what achievement they had when Kespa team houses existed.

This has been mentioned plenty of times.

Since the Korean team league structure collapsed, the standard of competition has dropped off a cliff. Players did not dominate season after season back when the Korean team leagues existed. Several players rose up to win GSL only to drop off just as quickly. Maru's G5L was such a landmark achievement precisely because it was so difficult for someone to achieve that many GSL wins prior to Maru managing to do so, but even that happened after the Korean team league structure collapsed.

Even qualifying for GSL consistently was difficult back then. For example, look at the winners of the (Wiki)NesTea Award, given to players who manage to qualify for Code S ten times in a row. Only four players managed to do this before the Korean team league structure fell apart in 2016. Fifteen players have done so since. It's not difficult to join the dots.

Serral's achievements are impressive, but they've all come during a period where there's a lower standard of competition. People can choose to ignore this if they want - "you can only beat what's put in front of you" - but I personally think it's an important factor to consider.

One flipside of this argument is that Korean players are operating under similar conditions to foreign players now, and without having that team house setup advantage that gap has closed considerably.

I don’t think it’s a complete refutation, there are other associated issues that are also impactful. It’s not just the collapse of the previous structure, it’s an underfunding of the current one which contributes to the overall decline.

The collapse of the Korean team league structure is just a convenient line for me to draw. Regardless of where you choose to draw the line, it remains my opinion that the standard and depth of competition has declined as a result of money leaving the scene, and that this makes Serral's achievements less remarkable than those of other GOAT candidates.

It'll only ever be an opinion though. Amongst his peers, Serral is clearly an outlier, and for some people that is the most important thing. I can't say those people are objectively wrong, it's just a different perspective, and that's what makes the discussion interesting!


The same applies for Rogue though, not just Serral. He "only" started winning big when proleague was disbanded, and zerg started to get really strong. Only Maru among the three GOAT candidates was truly a top class player in the fiercest era.
Imo Serral has a better case of GOATness than Rogue. As for Maru, as a super fan I am biased so my opinion on the matter isn't very interesting

My reasoning applies to anyone who came to prominence after the scene peaked, and to everything anyone achieved after the scene peaked.

If you wanted to describe it statistically, then I suppose the way it works in my head is that every achievement prior to the scene peaking has a 1x multiplier, whereas every achievement after the scene peaked has an ever decreasing multiplier the further away we get from the peak.

But this is just one (very subjective) way of looking at things, and I'm not claiming to be more "correct" than anyone else.
puking up frothing vitriolic sarcastic spittle
Poopi
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France12912 Posts
May 21 2024 08:35 GMT
#126
On May 21 2024 17:19 MJG wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 16:49 Poopi wrote:
On May 21 2024 16:41 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 06:01 WombaT wrote:
On May 20 2024 20:58 MJG wrote:
On May 18 2024 06:10 Expensive-Law-9830 wrote:
Rule number 1 in this forum: never ask today's 'GOATS' what achievement they had when Kespa team houses existed.

This has been mentioned plenty of times.

Since the Korean team league structure collapsed, the standard of competition has dropped off a cliff. Players did not dominate season after season back when the Korean team leagues existed. Several players rose up to win GSL only to drop off just as quickly. Maru's G5L was such a landmark achievement precisely because it was so difficult for someone to achieve that many GSL wins prior to Maru managing to do so, but even that happened after the Korean team league structure collapsed.

Even qualifying for GSL consistently was difficult back then. For example, look at the winners of the (Wiki)NesTea Award, given to players who manage to qualify for Code S ten times in a row. Only four players managed to do this before the Korean team league structure fell apart in 2016. Fifteen players have done so since. It's not difficult to join the dots.

Serral's achievements are impressive, but they've all come during a period where there's a lower standard of competition. People can choose to ignore this if they want - "you can only beat what's put in front of you" - but I personally think it's an important factor to consider.

One flipside of this argument is that Korean players are operating under similar conditions to foreign players now, and without having that team house setup advantage that gap has closed considerably.

I don’t think it’s a complete refutation, there are other associated issues that are also impactful. It’s not just the collapse of the previous structure, it’s an underfunding of the current one which contributes to the overall decline.

The collapse of the Korean team league structure is just a convenient line for me to draw. Regardless of where you choose to draw the line, it remains my opinion that the standard and depth of competition has declined as a result of money leaving the scene, and that this makes Serral's achievements less remarkable than those of other GOAT candidates.

It'll only ever be an opinion though. Amongst his peers, Serral is clearly an outlier, and for some people that is the most important thing. I can't say those people are objectively wrong, it's just a different perspective, and that's what makes the discussion interesting!


The same applies for Rogue though, not just Serral. He "only" started winning big when proleague was disbanded, and zerg started to get really strong. Only Maru among the three GOAT candidates was truly a top class player in the fiercest era.
Imo Serral has a better case of GOATness than Rogue. As for Maru, as a super fan I am biased so my opinion on the matter isn't very interesting

My reasoning applies to anyone who came to prominence after the scene peaked, and to everything anyone achieved after the scene peaked.

If you wanted to describe it statistically, then I suppose the way it works in my head is that every achievement prior to the scene peaking has a 1x multiplier, whereas every achievement after the scene peaked has an ever decreasing multiplier the further away we get from the peak.

But this is just one (very subjective) way of looking at things, and I'm not claiming to be more "correct" than anyone else.

But what if there is another competitive peak?
I mean, imagine if SA keeps investing into esports, and the new RTS (zerospace / stormgate) are worse than Starcraft 2, so ultimately Microsoft/Blizzard finally cares about sc2 again and invests into it. We could have another competitive peak if some new blood from foreign scene / KR scene plays starcraft instead of fortnite, league of legends or whatever other esports.
At which point will your multiplier starts increasing back to 1x then?
And at which rate your multiplier decays from the peak, to like now in 2024?
Seems like magic numbers to me instead of a carefully thought out process
WriterMaru
goldensail
Profile Joined May 2022
132 Posts
May 21 2024 08:36 GMT
#127
On May 21 2024 15:58 Argonauta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 15:23 goldensail wrote:
I often wish we have more data-driven analyses to support arguments from both sides. A guy with the handle "Imdata" tried doing that some time ago to support his argument that Serral is a bigger outlier than Maru, I actually thought it was a good attempt, but unfortunately his data was clearly flawed and I didn't see a follow-up after I pointed out some issues.

If we have a hosted dataset (e.g. participants and results from all Premier/Major events for the last 10 years) in Excel format that we can download and model, I believe we can have more objective discussions.



You can download Aligulac results in SQL format here:
http://aligulac.com/about/db/


Thank you. I don't know SQL and I'm debating with myself whether I should learn a new tool just so I can argue better on an internet forum about a game

Again I appreciate it.
MJG
Profile Joined May 2018
United Kingdom1451 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 08:47:29
May 21 2024 08:47 GMT
#128
On May 21 2024 17:35 Poopi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 17:19 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 16:49 Poopi wrote:
On May 21 2024 16:41 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 06:01 WombaT wrote:
On May 20 2024 20:58 MJG wrote:
On May 18 2024 06:10 Expensive-Law-9830 wrote:
Rule number 1 in this forum: never ask today's 'GOATS' what achievement they had when Kespa team houses existed.

This has been mentioned plenty of times.

Since the Korean team league structure collapsed, the standard of competition has dropped off a cliff. Players did not dominate season after season back when the Korean team leagues existed. Several players rose up to win GSL only to drop off just as quickly. Maru's G5L was such a landmark achievement precisely because it was so difficult for someone to achieve that many GSL wins prior to Maru managing to do so, but even that happened after the Korean team league structure collapsed.

Even qualifying for GSL consistently was difficult back then. For example, look at the winners of the (Wiki)NesTea Award, given to players who manage to qualify for Code S ten times in a row. Only four players managed to do this before the Korean team league structure fell apart in 2016. Fifteen players have done so since. It's not difficult to join the dots.

Serral's achievements are impressive, but they've all come during a period where there's a lower standard of competition. People can choose to ignore this if they want - "you can only beat what's put in front of you" - but I personally think it's an important factor to consider.

One flipside of this argument is that Korean players are operating under similar conditions to foreign players now, and without having that team house setup advantage that gap has closed considerably.

I don’t think it’s a complete refutation, there are other associated issues that are also impactful. It’s not just the collapse of the previous structure, it’s an underfunding of the current one which contributes to the overall decline.

The collapse of the Korean team league structure is just a convenient line for me to draw. Regardless of where you choose to draw the line, it remains my opinion that the standard and depth of competition has declined as a result of money leaving the scene, and that this makes Serral's achievements less remarkable than those of other GOAT candidates.

It'll only ever be an opinion though. Amongst his peers, Serral is clearly an outlier, and for some people that is the most important thing. I can't say those people are objectively wrong, it's just a different perspective, and that's what makes the discussion interesting!


The same applies for Rogue though, not just Serral. He "only" started winning big when proleague was disbanded, and zerg started to get really strong. Only Maru among the three GOAT candidates was truly a top class player in the fiercest era.
Imo Serral has a better case of GOATness than Rogue. As for Maru, as a super fan I am biased so my opinion on the matter isn't very interesting

My reasoning applies to anyone who came to prominence after the scene peaked, and to everything anyone achieved after the scene peaked.

If you wanted to describe it statistically, then I suppose the way it works in my head is that every achievement prior to the scene peaking has a 1x multiplier, whereas every achievement after the scene peaked has an ever decreasing multiplier the further away we get from the peak.

But this is just one (very subjective) way of looking at things, and I'm not claiming to be more "correct" than anyone else.

But what if there is another competitive peak?
I mean, imagine if SA keeps investing into esports, and the new RTS (zerospace / stormgate) are worse than Starcraft 2, so ultimately Microsoft/Blizzard finally cares about sc2 again and invests into it. We could have another competitive peak if some new blood from foreign scene / KR scene plays starcraft instead of fortnite, league of legends or whatever other esports.
At which point will your multiplier starts increasing back to 1x then?
And at which rate your multiplier decays from the peak, to like now in 2024?
Seems like magic numbers to me instead of a carefully thought out process

I don't think that's likely to happen, and I'm not sure how I would feel if it did given the murkiness of Saudi Arabian funding, but I suppose it would have to start trending back towards 1x.

Having said that, it's more of a concept/feeling than a rigid statistical system.

It's not a well thought-out process in the slightest.

puking up frothing vitriolic sarcastic spittle
Poopi
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France12912 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 09:00:31
May 21 2024 08:58 GMT
#129
On May 21 2024 17:36 goldensail wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 15:58 Argonauta wrote:
On May 21 2024 15:23 goldensail wrote:
I often wish we have more data-driven analyses to support arguments from both sides. A guy with the handle "Imdata" tried doing that some time ago to support his argument that Serral is a bigger outlier than Maru, I actually thought it was a good attempt, but unfortunately his data was clearly flawed and I didn't see a follow-up after I pointed out some issues.

If we have a hosted dataset (e.g. participants and results from all Premier/Major events for the last 10 years) in Excel format that we can download and model, I believe we can have more objective discussions.



You can download Aligulac results in SQL format here:
http://aligulac.com/about/db/


Thank you. I don't know SQL and I'm debating with myself whether I should learn a new tool just so I can argue better on an internet forum about a game

Again I appreciate it.

I don't think you should learn SQL to do it. I prompted ChatGPT with your request AND the tables description of aligulac database (available on the link), downloaded the aligulac.sql.gz zipped file and the response it gave seems good enough to work, and relatively easy to implement even for a beginner. I will try it once work is finished to see if it gives a good result.

If you want to try to implement it yourself, here is the answer (you would need Python, I choose it because it's the easiest way for me but feel free to ask anything to the chatbot).

+ Show Spoiler +
To create an Excel dataset containing participants and results from major/premier tournaments over the last 10 years from the aligulac database dump, follow these steps. We'll use Python and assume you can execute these steps in an environment where you have access to PostgreSQL and Python.

### Step 1: Set Up Your Database
1. **Unzip the SQL dump**: If you haven't already, unzip your `aligulac.sql.gz` file.
```bash
gzip -d aligulac.sql.gz
```

2. **Create a PostgreSQL database**:
```sql
CREATE DATABASE aligulac;
```

3. **Import the SQL dump into PostgreSQL**:
```bash
psql -d aligulac -f aligulac.sql
```

### Step 2: Install Required Python Libraries
You'll need `pandas` for data manipulation, `sqlalchemy` for database connection, and `openpyxl` to write to Excel.
```bash
pip install pandas sqlalchemy openpyxl psycopg2
```

### Step 3: Python Script to Extract Data and Export to Excel
Now, let's write a Python script that connects to the PostgreSQL database, queries the data, and writes it to an Excel file.

```python
import pandas as pd
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from datetime import datetime, timedelta

# Database connection
engine = create_engine('postgresql://username:password@localhost:5432/aligulac')

# Calculate the date 10 years ago
ten_years_ago = datetime.now() - timedelta(days=365*10)

# SQL Query to fetch major/premier tournament results from the last 10 years
query = """
SELECT p.tag AS player_tag, p.country, m.date, m.sca, m.scb, m.rca, m.rcb, e.name AS event_name
FROM match m
JOIN player p ON p.id = m.pla_id
JOIN event e ON e.id = m.eventobj_id
WHERE m.date >= %s AND e.big = True
ORDER BY m.date DESC;
"""

# Execute the query
df = pd.read_sql(query, engine, params={ten_years_ago})

# Export to Excel
output_file = 'tournament_results.xlsx'
df.to_excel(output_file, index=False, engine='openpyxl')

print(f"Data exported to {output_file}")
```

### Explanation:
1. *atabase Connection**: Adjust the `create_engine` line to match your PostgreSQL username, password, and database details.
2. **SQL Query**: This queries the `match`, `player`, and `event` tables. It joins these tables to fetch player tags, country codes, match dates, scores, races, and event names for matches that occurred in the last ten years in major/premier events (where `big = True`).
3. **Export to Excel**: The script then writes this data to an Excel file using the `pandas` library.

### Step 4: Execute the Script
Run the Python script in your environment. This will generate an Excel file named `tournament_results.xlsx` in your current directory containing the dataset you need.

This workflow assumes a functional Python environment with database access. Adjust credentials and connection details as necessary for your setup.


On May 21 2024 17:47 MJG wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 17:35 Poopi wrote:
On May 21 2024 17:19 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 16:49 Poopi wrote:
On May 21 2024 16:41 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 06:01 WombaT wrote:
On May 20 2024 20:58 MJG wrote:
On May 18 2024 06:10 Expensive-Law-9830 wrote:
Rule number 1 in this forum: never ask today's 'GOATS' what achievement they had when Kespa team houses existed.

This has been mentioned plenty of times.

Since the Korean team league structure collapsed, the standard of competition has dropped off a cliff. Players did not dominate season after season back when the Korean team leagues existed. Several players rose up to win GSL only to drop off just as quickly. Maru's G5L was such a landmark achievement precisely because it was so difficult for someone to achieve that many GSL wins prior to Maru managing to do so, but even that happened after the Korean team league structure collapsed.

Even qualifying for GSL consistently was difficult back then. For example, look at the winners of the (Wiki)NesTea Award, given to players who manage to qualify for Code S ten times in a row. Only four players managed to do this before the Korean team league structure fell apart in 2016. Fifteen players have done so since. It's not difficult to join the dots.

Serral's achievements are impressive, but they've all come during a period where there's a lower standard of competition. People can choose to ignore this if they want - "you can only beat what's put in front of you" - but I personally think it's an important factor to consider.

One flipside of this argument is that Korean players are operating under similar conditions to foreign players now, and without having that team house setup advantage that gap has closed considerably.

I don’t think it’s a complete refutation, there are other associated issues that are also impactful. It’s not just the collapse of the previous structure, it’s an underfunding of the current one which contributes to the overall decline.

The collapse of the Korean team league structure is just a convenient line for me to draw. Regardless of where you choose to draw the line, it remains my opinion that the standard and depth of competition has declined as a result of money leaving the scene, and that this makes Serral's achievements less remarkable than those of other GOAT candidates.

It'll only ever be an opinion though. Amongst his peers, Serral is clearly an outlier, and for some people that is the most important thing. I can't say those people are objectively wrong, it's just a different perspective, and that's what makes the discussion interesting!


The same applies for Rogue though, not just Serral. He "only" started winning big when proleague was disbanded, and zerg started to get really strong. Only Maru among the three GOAT candidates was truly a top class player in the fiercest era.
Imo Serral has a better case of GOATness than Rogue. As for Maru, as a super fan I am biased so my opinion on the matter isn't very interesting

My reasoning applies to anyone who came to prominence after the scene peaked, and to everything anyone achieved after the scene peaked.

If you wanted to describe it statistically, then I suppose the way it works in my head is that every achievement prior to the scene peaking has a 1x multiplier, whereas every achievement after the scene peaked has an ever decreasing multiplier the further away we get from the peak.

But this is just one (very subjective) way of looking at things, and I'm not claiming to be more "correct" than anyone else.

But what if there is another competitive peak?
I mean, imagine if SA keeps investing into esports, and the new RTS (zerospace / stormgate) are worse than Starcraft 2, so ultimately Microsoft/Blizzard finally cares about sc2 again and invests into it. We could have another competitive peak if some new blood from foreign scene / KR scene plays starcraft instead of fortnite, league of legends or whatever other esports.
At which point will your multiplier starts increasing back to 1x then?
And at which rate your multiplier decays from the peak, to like now in 2024?
Seems like magic numbers to me instead of a carefully thought out process

I don't think that's likely to happen, and I'm not sure how I would feel if it did given the murkiness of Saudi Arabian funding, but I suppose it would have to start trending back towards 1x.

Having said that, it's more of a concept/feeling than a rigid statistical system.

It's not a well thought-out process in the slightest.



So it's mostly foreigner bashing then?
WriterMaru
MJG
Profile Joined May 2018
United Kingdom1451 Posts
May 21 2024 09:15 GMT
#130
On May 21 2024 17:58 Poopi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 17:47 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 17:35 Poopi wrote:
On May 21 2024 17:19 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 16:49 Poopi wrote:
On May 21 2024 16:41 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 06:01 WombaT wrote:
On May 20 2024 20:58 MJG wrote:
On May 18 2024 06:10 Expensive-Law-9830 wrote:
Rule number 1 in this forum: never ask today's 'GOATS' what achievement they had when Kespa team houses existed.

This has been mentioned plenty of times.

Since the Korean team league structure collapsed, the standard of competition has dropped off a cliff. Players did not dominate season after season back when the Korean team leagues existed. Several players rose up to win GSL only to drop off just as quickly. Maru's G5L was such a landmark achievement precisely because it was so difficult for someone to achieve that many GSL wins prior to Maru managing to do so, but even that happened after the Korean team league structure collapsed.

Even qualifying for GSL consistently was difficult back then. For example, look at the winners of the (Wiki)NesTea Award, given to players who manage to qualify for Code S ten times in a row. Only four players managed to do this before the Korean team league structure fell apart in 2016. Fifteen players have done so since. It's not difficult to join the dots.

Serral's achievements are impressive, but they've all come during a period where there's a lower standard of competition. People can choose to ignore this if they want - "you can only beat what's put in front of you" - but I personally think it's an important factor to consider.

One flipside of this argument is that Korean players are operating under similar conditions to foreign players now, and without having that team house setup advantage that gap has closed considerably.

I don’t think it’s a complete refutation, there are other associated issues that are also impactful. It’s not just the collapse of the previous structure, it’s an underfunding of the current one which contributes to the overall decline.

The collapse of the Korean team league structure is just a convenient line for me to draw. Regardless of where you choose to draw the line, it remains my opinion that the standard and depth of competition has declined as a result of money leaving the scene, and that this makes Serral's achievements less remarkable than those of other GOAT candidates.

It'll only ever be an opinion though. Amongst his peers, Serral is clearly an outlier, and for some people that is the most important thing. I can't say those people are objectively wrong, it's just a different perspective, and that's what makes the discussion interesting!


The same applies for Rogue though, not just Serral. He "only" started winning big when proleague was disbanded, and zerg started to get really strong. Only Maru among the three GOAT candidates was truly a top class player in the fiercest era.
Imo Serral has a better case of GOATness than Rogue. As for Maru, as a super fan I am biased so my opinion on the matter isn't very interesting

My reasoning applies to anyone who came to prominence after the scene peaked, and to everything anyone achieved after the scene peaked.

If you wanted to describe it statistically, then I suppose the way it works in my head is that every achievement prior to the scene peaking has a 1x multiplier, whereas every achievement after the scene peaked has an ever decreasing multiplier the further away we get from the peak.

But this is just one (very subjective) way of looking at things, and I'm not claiming to be more "correct" than anyone else.

But what if there is another competitive peak?
I mean, imagine if SA keeps investing into esports, and the new RTS (zerospace / stormgate) are worse than Starcraft 2, so ultimately Microsoft/Blizzard finally cares about sc2 again and invests into it. We could have another competitive peak if some new blood from foreign scene / KR scene plays starcraft instead of fortnite, league of legends or whatever other esports.
At which point will your multiplier starts increasing back to 1x then?
And at which rate your multiplier decays from the peak, to like now in 2024?
Seems like magic numbers to me instead of a carefully thought out process

I don't think that's likely to happen, and I'm not sure how I would feel if it did given the murkiness of Saudi Arabian funding, but I suppose it would have to start trending back towards 1x.

Having said that, it's more of a concept/feeling than a rigid statistical system.

It's not a well thought-out process in the slightest.



So it's mostly foreigner bashing then?

An entirely unintended consequence!



And I should probably add that every Zerg achievement towards the end of WoL gets an automatic 0x multiplier...

puking up frothing vitriolic sarcastic spittle
Mizenhauer
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
United States1923 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 10:43:54
May 21 2024 10:24 GMT
#131
On May 21 2024 15:23 goldensail wrote:
I often wish we have more data-driven analyses to support arguments from both sides. A guy with the handle "Imdata" tried doing that some time ago to support his argument that Serral is a bigger outlier than Maru, I actually thought it was a good attempt, but unfortunately his data was clearly flawed and I didn't see a follow-up after I pointed out some issues.

If we have a hosted dataset (e.g. participants and results from all Premier/Major events for the last 10 years) in Excel format that we can download and model, I believe we can have more objective discussions.


I have most of that stuff. It's just a huge pain to edit a massive google sheet with all the (most relevant) information.

Personally, I find Mvp to be the biggest outlier as far as "dominance" goes. He played during an era where all the best players were playing in Korea and he had far superior win rates (and won way more events) against the same field that all the other top pros (MC, NesTea, MKP, MMA, Leenock etc) where playing against.

Serral's numbers reflect a slightly greater degree of dominance. But, given region lock and all sorts of factors that have segmented the player base, he doesn't get as many chances as Mvp did to go against his top rivals (and/or victims) which is why I have Serral as the "best" player rather than the most "dominant".
┗|∵|┓Second Place in LB 28, Third Place in LB 29 and Destined to Be a Kong
tskarzyn
Profile Joined July 2010
United States516 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 11:49:36
May 21 2024 11:48 GMT
#132
It's hard to call Maru the GOAT when a contemporary has a dominating record against him.

That said, I think two trends are fairly reliable.

Zerg is better in weekend tournaments. The race is built for stability:
-Stable, unexploitable standard openings
-superior scouting
-strongest defensively (due to creep, larvae, scouting advantage, etc.)
-Limited need for build variety

GSL on the other hand is built for Terran and Protoss. Each round, you are focusing on 1-2 players at most. Build variety becomes an advantage as you can tune builds to exploit specific opponents. Get past your 2 opponents? Now you have another week+ to prepare new builds for pre-determined opponents.

Throw in the fact that Koreans are playing with severe jet lag in the majority of weekenders, and it's no surprise that Serral has dominated the European scene.

TLDR: Serral is the best Zerg, Maru is the best Terran, but we will never know who the best player is.
Poopi
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France12912 Posts
May 21 2024 11:55 GMT
#133
On May 21 2024 20:48 tskarzyn wrote:
It's hard to call Maru the GOAT when a contemporary has a dominating record against him.

That said, I think two trends are fairly reliable.

Zerg is better in weekend tournaments. The race is built for stability:
-Stable, unexploitable standard openings
-superior scouting
-strongest defensively (due to creep, larvae, scouting advantage, etc.)
-Limited need for build variety

GSL on the other hand is built for Terran and Protoss. Each round, you are focusing on 1-2 players at most. Build variety becomes an advantage as you can tune builds to exploit specific opponents. Get past your 2 opponents? Now you have another week+ to prepare new builds for pre-determined opponents.

Throw in the fact that Koreans are playing with severe jet lag in the majority of weekenders, and it's no surprise that Serral has dominated the European scene.

TLDR: Serral is the best Zerg, Maru is the best Terran, but we will never know who the best player is.

Maru is the best player, playing the most difficult race at a level way above the other terrans for long period of times
WriterMaru
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18282 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 12:00:16
May 21 2024 11:58 GMT
#134
On May 21 2024 16:49 Poopi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 16:41 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 06:01 WombaT wrote:
On May 20 2024 20:58 MJG wrote:
On May 18 2024 06:10 Expensive-Law-9830 wrote:
Rule number 1 in this forum: never ask today's 'GOATS' what achievement they had when Kespa team houses existed.

This has been mentioned plenty of times.

Since the Korean team league structure collapsed, the standard of competition has dropped off a cliff. Players did not dominate season after season back when the Korean team leagues existed. Several players rose up to win GSL only to drop off just as quickly. Maru's G5L was such a landmark achievement precisely because it was so difficult for someone to achieve that many GSL wins prior to Maru managing to do so, but even that happened after the Korean team league structure collapsed.

Even qualifying for GSL consistently was difficult back then. For example, look at the winners of the (Wiki)NesTea Award, given to players who manage to qualify for Code S ten times in a row. Only four players managed to do this before the Korean team league structure fell apart in 2016. Fifteen players have done so since. It's not difficult to join the dots.

Serral's achievements are impressive, but they've all come during a period where there's a lower standard of competition. People can choose to ignore this if they want - "you can only beat what's put in front of you" - but I personally think it's an important factor to consider.

One flipside of this argument is that Korean players are operating under similar conditions to foreign players now, and without having that team house setup advantage that gap has closed considerably.

I don’t think it’s a complete refutation, there are other associated issues that are also impactful. It’s not just the collapse of the previous structure, it’s an underfunding of the current one which contributes to the overall decline.

The collapse of the Korean team league structure is just a convenient line for me to draw. Regardless of where you choose to draw the line, it remains my opinion that the standard and depth of competition has declined as a result of money leaving the scene, and that this makes Serral's achievements less remarkable than those of other GOAT candidates.

It'll only ever be an opinion though. Amongst his peers, Serral is clearly an outlier, and for some people that is the most important thing. I can't say those people are objectively wrong, it's just a different perspective, and that's what makes the discussion interesting!


The same applies for Rogue though, not just Serral. He "only" started winning big when proleague was disbanded, and zerg started to get really strong. Only Maru among the three GOAT candidates was truly a top class player in the fiercest era.
Imo Serral has a better case of GOATness than Rogue. As for Maru, as a super fan I am biased so my opinion on the matter isn't very interesting

If the only era that counts is before the collapse of proleague, the GOAT is clearly innovation. In fact, Maru probably doesn't make top 10.

Edit: obviously can make a case for he-who-shall-not-be-named as well, but we WON'T.
Poopi
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France12912 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 12:08:50
May 21 2024 12:08 GMT
#135
On May 21 2024 20:58 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 16:49 Poopi wrote:
On May 21 2024 16:41 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 06:01 WombaT wrote:
On May 20 2024 20:58 MJG wrote:
On May 18 2024 06:10 Expensive-Law-9830 wrote:
Rule number 1 in this forum: never ask today's 'GOATS' what achievement they had when Kespa team houses existed.

This has been mentioned plenty of times.

Since the Korean team league structure collapsed, the standard of competition has dropped off a cliff. Players did not dominate season after season back when the Korean team leagues existed. Several players rose up to win GSL only to drop off just as quickly. Maru's G5L was such a landmark achievement precisely because it was so difficult for someone to achieve that many GSL wins prior to Maru managing to do so, but even that happened after the Korean team league structure collapsed.

Even qualifying for GSL consistently was difficult back then. For example, look at the winners of the (Wiki)NesTea Award, given to players who manage to qualify for Code S ten times in a row. Only four players managed to do this before the Korean team league structure fell apart in 2016. Fifteen players have done so since. It's not difficult to join the dots.

Serral's achievements are impressive, but they've all come during a period where there's a lower standard of competition. People can choose to ignore this if they want - "you can only beat what's put in front of you" - but I personally think it's an important factor to consider.

One flipside of this argument is that Korean players are operating under similar conditions to foreign players now, and without having that team house setup advantage that gap has closed considerably.

I don’t think it’s a complete refutation, there are other associated issues that are also impactful. It’s not just the collapse of the previous structure, it’s an underfunding of the current one which contributes to the overall decline.

The collapse of the Korean team league structure is just a convenient line for me to draw. Regardless of where you choose to draw the line, it remains my opinion that the standard and depth of competition has declined as a result of money leaving the scene, and that this makes Serral's achievements less remarkable than those of other GOAT candidates.

It'll only ever be an opinion though. Amongst his peers, Serral is clearly an outlier, and for some people that is the most important thing. I can't say those people are objectively wrong, it's just a different perspective, and that's what makes the discussion interesting!


The same applies for Rogue though, not just Serral. He "only" started winning big when proleague was disbanded, and zerg started to get really strong. Only Maru among the three GOAT candidates was truly a top class player in the fiercest era.
Imo Serral has a better case of GOATness than Rogue. As for Maru, as a super fan I am biased so my opinion on the matter isn't very interesting

If the only era that counts is before the collapse of proleague, the GOAT is clearly innovation. In fact, Maru probably doesn't make top 10.

Edit: obviously can make a case for he-who-shall-not-be-named as well, but we WON'T.

Yeah INnoVation is the GOAT in my heart as well, if only Maru didn't exist to remind INno that he isn't the most talented / gifted player in the world. Poor INno
WriterMaru
rwala
Profile Joined December 2019
338 Posts
May 21 2024 12:25 GMT
#136
On May 21 2024 19:24 Mizenhauer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 15:23 goldensail wrote:
I often wish we have more data-driven analyses to support arguments from both sides. A guy with the handle "Imdata" tried doing that some time ago to support his argument that Serral is a bigger outlier than Maru, I actually thought it was a good attempt, but unfortunately his data was clearly flawed and I didn't see a follow-up after I pointed out some issues.

If we have a hosted dataset (e.g. participants and results from all Premier/Major events for the last 10 years) in Excel format that we can download and model, I believe we can have more objective discussions.


I have most of that stuff. It's just a huge pain to edit a massive google sheet with all the (most relevant) information.

Personally, I find Mvp to be the biggest outlier as far as "dominance" goes. He played during an era where all the best players were playing in Korea and he had far superior win rates (and won way more events) against the same field that all the other top pros (MC, NesTea, MKP, MMA, Leenock etc) where playing against.

Serral's numbers reflect a slightly greater degree of dominance. But, given region lock and all sorts of factors that have segmented the player base, he doesn't get as many chances as Mvp did to go against his top rivals (and/or victims) which is why I have Serral as the "best" player rather than the most "dominant".


This makes sense. I can't remember if you went into this at all, but I wonder what you think of the game's evolution towards more stable metas and how it impacts these player assessments. My intuition is that this makes Mvp's dominance even that much more impressive, because in those earlier years it was a lot easier to discover or develop new strategies, tactics, and builds that could counter a particular player's strengths. And because the pro scene was a lot bigger, it was more likely that those strategies would surface quickly to displace any player who was super dominant.

It's interesting to think of how these SC2 GOAT convos compare with similar convos in chess where there are legitimately multiple GOAT contenders. Maru is kinda like Gary Kasparov in that he's been on top forever, over the course of multiple generations and metas in how the game is played. Serral is kinda like Magnus Carlsen in that he's the best player to ever play the game. And Mvp is kinda like Bobby Fischer in the level of unrivaled dominance he had over his peers. There are differences of course, these aren't perfect analogies.

There's actually another analogy that I want to touch on, which is how both Mvp and Maru adapted to their injuries. I don't know if Maru has ever said this, but having watched the guy forever, he's definitely adapted to a more cerebral style that is focused on strategic decision-making more than the ridiculously fast mechanics and micro that define, for example, Clem's playstyle. I wonder how much of this adaptation is just a natural result of his accumulated game knowledge and maturity, and how much of it is a deliberate pivot to a style that works better with his injuries.


goldensail
Profile Joined May 2022
132 Posts
May 21 2024 13:43 GMT
#137
On May 21 2024 17:58 Poopi wrote:

I don't think you should learn SQL to do it. I prompted ChatGPT with your request AND the tables description of aligulac database (available on the link), downloaded the aligulac.sql.gz zipped file and the response it gave seems good enough to work, and relatively easy to implement even for a beginner. I will try it once work is finished to see if it gives a good result.

If you want to try to implement it yourself, here is the answer (you would need Python, I choose it because it's the easiest way for me but feel free to ask anything to the chatbot).


Thanks!
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16062 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 14:30:34
May 21 2024 14:29 GMT
#138
On May 21 2024 20:58 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 16:49 Poopi wrote:
On May 21 2024 16:41 MJG wrote:
On May 21 2024 06:01 WombaT wrote:
On May 20 2024 20:58 MJG wrote:
On May 18 2024 06:10 Expensive-Law-9830 wrote:
Rule number 1 in this forum: never ask today's 'GOATS' what achievement they had when Kespa team houses existed.

This has been mentioned plenty of times.

Since the Korean team league structure collapsed, the standard of competition has dropped off a cliff. Players did not dominate season after season back when the Korean team leagues existed. Several players rose up to win GSL only to drop off just as quickly. Maru's G5L was such a landmark achievement precisely because it was so difficult for someone to achieve that many GSL wins prior to Maru managing to do so, but even that happened after the Korean team league structure collapsed.

Even qualifying for GSL consistently was difficult back then. For example, look at the winners of the (Wiki)NesTea Award, given to players who manage to qualify for Code S ten times in a row. Only four players managed to do this before the Korean team league structure fell apart in 2016. Fifteen players have done so since. It's not difficult to join the dots.

Serral's achievements are impressive, but they've all come during a period where there's a lower standard of competition. People can choose to ignore this if they want - "you can only beat what's put in front of you" - but I personally think it's an important factor to consider.

One flipside of this argument is that Korean players are operating under similar conditions to foreign players now, and without having that team house setup advantage that gap has closed considerably.

I don’t think it’s a complete refutation, there are other associated issues that are also impactful. It’s not just the collapse of the previous structure, it’s an underfunding of the current one which contributes to the overall decline.

The collapse of the Korean team league structure is just a convenient line for me to draw. Regardless of where you choose to draw the line, it remains my opinion that the standard and depth of competition has declined as a result of money leaving the scene, and that this makes Serral's achievements less remarkable than those of other GOAT candidates.

It'll only ever be an opinion though. Amongst his peers, Serral is clearly an outlier, and for some people that is the most important thing. I can't say those people are objectively wrong, it's just a different perspective, and that's what makes the discussion interesting!


The same applies for Rogue though, not just Serral. He "only" started winning big when proleague was disbanded, and zerg started to get really strong. Only Maru among the three GOAT candidates was truly a top class player in the fiercest era.
Imo Serral has a better case of GOATness than Rogue. As for Maru, as a super fan I am biased so my opinion on the matter isn't very interesting

If the only era that counts is before the collapse of proleague, the GOAT is clearly innovation. In fact, Maru probably doesn't make top 10.

Edit: obviously can make a case for he-who-shall-not-be-named as well, but we WON'T.

There's a difference between "Results after 2016 shouldn't count" and "results post-2016 should gradually be worth less as the competition of the scene decreased".

The first one is imo stupid and I'm not sure why people bring it up, as if in 2017 it suddenly was so much easier to win tournaments just because Kespa disbanded.
The scene getting less competitive was a gradual process, it didn't happen over night.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16062 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-05-21 14:38:40
May 21 2024 14:35 GMT
#139
On May 21 2024 20:48 tskarzyn wrote:
It's hard to call Maru the GOAT when a contemporary has a dominating record against him.

That said, I think two trends are fairly reliable.

Zerg is better in weekend tournaments. The race is built for stability:
-Stable, unexploitable standard openings
-superior scouting
-strongest defensively (due to creep, larvae, scouting advantage, etc.)
-Limited need for build variety

GSL on the other hand is built for Terran and Protoss. Each round, you are focusing on 1-2 players at most. Build variety becomes an advantage as you can tune builds to exploit specific opponents. Get past your 2 opponents? Now you have another week+ to prepare new builds for pre-determined opponents.

Throw in the fact that Koreans are playing with severe jet lag in the majority of weekenders, and it's no surprise that Serral has dominated the European scene.

TLDR: Serral is the best Zerg, Maru is the best Terran, but we will never know who the best player is.

I'd add to that that Serrals record against Maru is almost solely based on 2022-2024 as they hardly faced each other before that. I think Maru can still be the Goat despite another player being better than him for 2.5 years out of Marus 14 year career.

Of course it can never be proven but I think Serral got quite lucky he mostly avoided Maru from 2018-2021 as his ZvT back then wasn't on the level as it was in 2022-2024 and he lost multiple important series against the likes of Byun, Cure, Inno, Clem during that time
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
lokol4890
Profile Joined May 2023
114 Posts
May 21 2024 15:13 GMT
#140
On May 21 2024 23:35 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2024 20:48 tskarzyn wrote:
It's hard to call Maru the GOAT when a contemporary has a dominating record against him.

That said, I think two trends are fairly reliable.

Zerg is better in weekend tournaments. The race is built for stability:
-Stable, unexploitable standard openings
-superior scouting
-strongest defensively (due to creep, larvae, scouting advantage, etc.)
-Limited need for build variety

GSL on the other hand is built for Terran and Protoss. Each round, you are focusing on 1-2 players at most. Build variety becomes an advantage as you can tune builds to exploit specific opponents. Get past your 2 opponents? Now you have another week+ to prepare new builds for pre-determined opponents.

Throw in the fact that Koreans are playing with severe jet lag in the majority of weekenders, and it's no surprise that Serral has dominated the European scene.

TLDR: Serral is the best Zerg, Maru is the best Terran, but we will never know who the best player is.

I'd add to that that Serrals record against Maru is almost solely based on 2022-2024 as they hardly faced each other before that. I think Maru can still be the Goat despite another player being better than him for 2.5 years out of Marus 14 year career.

Of course it can never be proven but I think Serral got quite lucky he mostly avoided Maru from 2018-2021 as his ZvT back then wasn't on the level as it was in 2022-2024 and he lost multiple important series against the likes of Byun, Cure, Inno, Clem during that time


Considering maru bopped him when they played at the wesg in 2018, yeah that probably tracks
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 18 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 46m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JuggernautJason109
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 355
Movie 144
Sexy 97
firebathero 82
NaDa 11
Dota 2
monkeys_forever475
League of Legends
Doublelift1400
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps2055
Super Smash Bros
PPMD32
Other Games
summit1g6975
tarik_tv5208
FrodaN910
mouzStarbuck446
shahzam399
ceh9324
C9.Mang0189
elazer117
UpATreeSC89
RotterdaM73
NightEnD19
Grubby0
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV284
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream55
StarCraft 2
angryscii 17
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 25
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 47
• RayReign 29
• Azhi_Dahaki27
• FirePhoenix6
• Michael_bg 3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie1437
• Shiphtur318
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
11h 46m
Escore
12h 46m
INu's Battles
13h 46m
Classic vs ByuN
SHIN vs ByuN
OSC
15h 46m
Big Brain Bouts
18h 46m
Replay Cast
1d 2h
Replay Cast
1d 11h
RSL Revival
1d 12h
Classic vs GgMaChine
Rogue vs Maru
WardiTV Invitational
1d 13h
IPSL
1d 18h
Ret vs Art_Of_Turtle
Radley vs TBD
[ Show More ]
BSL
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs TriGGeR
NightMare vs Solar
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
2 days
IPSL
2 days
eOnzErG vs TBD
G5 vs Nesh
Patches Events
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Jaedong vs Light
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Flash
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
GSL
5 days
Classic vs Cure
Maru vs Rogue
GSL
6 days
SHIN vs Zoun
ByuN vs herO
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-04-29
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
2026 GSL S1
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W5
KK 2v2 League Season 1
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.