• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:54
CEST 02:54
KST 09:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 651 users

Proposed changes for creep spread

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
861 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-15 13:25:04
November 15 2019 11:10 GMT
#1
I ve watched to Serral games and his playstyle confirm what i m thinking.. Of course he s one of the best cause his creep spread is better than other players, but in studying the last game, you can proof that Zerg pro players could "give a try" / "try the challenge" to spread creep only with Queens (no replication of creep tumors) cause probably half of tumors are made from queens...

I m clearly in favor of this change or at least invit some players to test this idea. Then, there s some changes according to this "drastic change" (it s not really a nerf indeed ?) as consequences (and also to allow a Queens number gamble)

Main Changes :


- Tumors replication ability removed
- Tumors energy cost decreased from 25 to 15

Eventual update

- Tumors replication ability removed
- Tumors energy cost decreased from 25 to 12
- Tumor size creep spread decrease from 10.5 to 8.5

Basic Eventual Changes :

- Queen time production is decreased from 36 to 32
- Hit points decrease from 175 to 160
- Creep Cycle from tumors and hatchery decrease from 0.45 to 0.4
- Spawn creep tumors duration decrease from 11 sec to 7 sec


Ideas Considered


- Transfusion ability decreased form (75 + 50 over 7 sec) to (60 + 40 over 7 sec)
- Creep size spreading from Overseer increase from 4.5 to 6
- Creep speed reduction ?


Of course these changes will be impactfull on every creatures of the Zerg player and the changes could be adjusted according to the new weakness of each creatures and their behavior along the game.
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
November 15 2019 11:18 GMT
#2
This would promote mass queen play. The queen is allready one of the strongest units in the game and is build quite often. If creep tumors couldn t reproduce, Zerg would built even more queens, especially, when they got cheaper.
The only way to attack with mass queens is thru the Nydus, thoug.
I think that would be an awfull change.
MaxPax
MinixTheNerd
Profile Joined July 2019
200 Posts
November 15 2019 11:31 GMT
#3
I'd be happy to keep creep as is but lower the unit speed bonuses. Maybe decrease the vision a bit as well to about the vision of a burrowed widow mine
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
861 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-15 13:21:29
November 15 2019 12:25 GMT
#4
On November 15 2019 20:18 dbRic1203 wrote:
This would promote mass queen play. The queen is allready one of the strongest units in the game and is build quite often. If creep tumors couldn t reproduce, Zerg would built even more queens, especially, when they got cheaper.
The only way to attack with mass queens is thru the Nydus, thoug.
I think that would be an awfull change.


Who is talking about price ? I didn t change the cost of the unit in my proposal. Then your re not entirely wrong but if the energy price of tumors is decreased from 25 to 15, you ll need 60% less queens, this has already been taken into account.

As you can see the time duration for produce a queen is also decreased, it is to serve the same purpose. It s difficult to decrease her time creation due to proxy opening.

I think it s interesting as comments but the forms is very negative. Then you tie the creep spread problem to nydus which can be easily avoid with the new patch released (and so in increasing a little bit time of spawning nydus for example, isn t it ?)

I repeat, thanks to energy, you need 60% less queens to spread enought quantity of creep, in admitting a Zerg player doesn t use the ability of replication of tumors. Actually, without the queens dedicated to hatchery, a zerg player should bet (gamble) around a number of queens depending on how fast he wants to spread the creep and how large the map is (You won t need more queens in definitive, for example if Serral has 8 Queens dedicated to spawn tumors, with this change, he only have to create 5 Queens - As he must expand around twice faster, he needs now 10 Queens.. But Its Serral..).

Obviously, if you re afraid to get a mass queens, you can decreased cost energy of tumors from 25 to 10 and decrease their size creap spread from 10.5 to 8.5,.. This is simple idea, and probably a good idea.

So if your comments is half true and half wrong, As We can t change the supply cost for obvious reasons, We can also think to reduce the Transfusion ability for example from (75 base + 50 over 7 sec) to (60 base + 40 over 7 sec). Combining with the hit points reduction the Queen role is now more oriented as a defensive unit / mandatory unit.

- Transfusion ability decreased form (75 + 50 over 7 sec) to (60 + 40 over 7 sec)

On November 15 2019 20:31 MinixTheNerd wrote:
I'd be happy to keep creep as is but lower the unit speed bonuses. Maybe decrease the vision a bit as well to about the vision of a burrowed widow mine


It would be a problem in term of design in the mini map.. fog of war will be plenty of holes covering your territory

There are many solutions to avoid massing Queens ? what do you propose guys ?

Then, the nydus could be unable to spawn outside the creep without an upgrade...
Or Nydus price could depend of how far it spawns... The playstyle will be more creep spread oriented if you allow Nydus earlier in the game, you could also make larger the creep spread from overseer and his speed reduction slower.. There are many ways to solve this problem, and often the simple idea of removing replication ability of tumors is the best.. (this is not my idea indeed..)

FFgringo
Profile Joined December 2015
44 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-15 17:48:45
November 15 2019 17:47 GMT
#5
In the last pylon show, one question was: "what would you nerf in your own race, you cannot answer nothing."
TLO said it was "too easy to scout" with the zerg race.
I believe a reduction in vision radius around the tumor as proposed above would be fine, and enough. If you still want to keep a fully visible zone on creep that means you would need to have more creep tumors so they're closer from each other, hence decreasing creep spread speed in the end as a result as well. Tweaking queens is too dangerous.
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
November 15 2019 21:10 GMT
#6
On November 16 2019 02:47 FFgringo wrote:
In the last pylon show, one question was: "what would you nerf in your own race, you cannot answer nothing."
TLO said it was "too easy to scout" with the zerg race.
I believe a reduction in vision radius around the tumor as proposed above would be fine, and enough. If you still want to keep a fully visible zone on creep that means you would need to have more creep tumors so they're closer from each other, hence decreasing creep spread speed in the end as a result as well. Tweaking queens is too dangerous.

If you're scouting your opponent with creep, you've already won the game or are doing a really weird cheese.
Brutaxilos
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States2624 Posts
November 15 2019 22:13 GMT
#7
My suggestion: make creep tumor's vision slightly smaller than the amount of creep it generates. That way you are encouraged to have units provide vision if you want your creep to be spread maximally efficient. Otherwise your spread will be say 70% less per new tumor.
Jangbi favorite player. Forever~ CJ herO the King of IEM. BOMBERRRRRRRR. Sexy Boy Rogue. soO #1! Oliveira China Represent!
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25047 Posts
November 15 2019 22:39 GMT
#8
I’m not sure what specifically to change, creep vision from spread is unrecognisable compared to the early days of SC2, feels the game was not really balanced around what modern Zergs can accomplish.

It’s probably the single biggest improvement in player competence we’ve seen in the game, and things like chrono and muling it was much quicker for players to top out at the ceiling in those regards.

I like the idea about having to use units to push it out, but not mass Queens.

All sorts of other tweaks you could implement from tumour costs, cooldowns, rate of spread etc

What about needing non-tumour vision to spread creep? You could still push it out with spotter lings or overlords, but this would give more benefit to your opponent sharking them away.

Also as an aside it does amuse that a guy with the username Vision is so concerned with creep granting vision :p
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
brickrd
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States4894 Posts
November 16 2019 03:23 GMT
#9
On November 16 2019 06:10 Boggyb wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2019 02:47 FFgringo wrote:
In the last pylon show, one question was: "what would you nerf in your own race, you cannot answer nothing."
TLO said it was "too easy to scout" with the zerg race.
I believe a reduction in vision radius around the tumor as proposed above would be fine, and enough. If you still want to keep a fully visible zone on creep that means you would need to have more creep tumors so they're closer from each other, hence decreasing creep spread speed in the end as a result as well. Tweaking queens is too dangerous.

If you're scouting your opponent with creep, you've already won the game or are doing a really weird cheese.

you're misinterpreting him on purpose. obviously the point is that if scouting is easy then reducing map vision would provide counterbalance in the form of giving T/P opponents more opportunity to outposition and flank. don't act obtuse just to make yourself appear clever
TL+ Member
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
861 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-17 17:07:36
November 17 2019 17:07 GMT
#10
I haven t still read your comments but some of them looks really interesting,

Without much tought, we can say "multi spawn" tumors in the same area is weird,.. Indeed, the only purpose of doing that is to prevent ennemies to kill tumors faster and everybody can agree of their exponential spreading, not mathematically checked.
I don t say it s idiot or something else, it s a lack of design issue cause even if it s also an advantage for rapid fire users, SC2 stands as a strategy game and not a competition of "fastest click on the creep" (not worthy). In authorizing this kind of gameplay, chances of players are unavoidably disturb and the part of the strategy game will be reduced while the part of "fastest player won" will be increased.
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
861 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-29 22:23:16
November 29 2019 20:51 GMT
#11
Here my study on numbers creep tumors by type of creation

[image loading]

Linearity for Queens : 0.07
Linearity for Tumors : 0.2

I ve worked on two other study games but this result is the most interesting among three.

Disco BloodBath ( TIME - SERRAL WCS global 2019): 37 created from tumors, 11 created from queens
Acropolis ( INNOVATION - SERRAL WCS global 2019): 39 created from tumors, 16 created from queens

This study can confirm most of the tumors are only created from the repetability of creep tumors. Notice factor is around triple !! and the biggest part of Queens action is before 5 min... As if the spell has been worked for the first minutes of the game...

Remind you the duration of cooldown is 11 seconds.... The next step is to get the a new duration with a factor equal to the double, it could be enought as a nerf
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
861 Posts
November 29 2019 22:33 GMT
#12
After some toughts, a great issue "none so drastic" (as i proposed before, i.e removed entirely the iterative spawning tumors) It s to set a max limit of iteration in the spwanning process of creep tumors. I would say main tumors can create two others secondary tumors (...) then an ending special animation informs Zerg Player of the last tumors of this branch
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
861 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-12-01 15:00:40
December 01 2019 15:00 GMT
#13
So the next natural step is to study the peak after 5 minutes (up to 7 min 20s , i.e 310 to 440) :

The graph shows :

with 6 initial tumors made from queens, serral create 30 creep tumors within 130 seconds without spending any additionnal mana. During this time, total amount of mana gain is equal to 6 x 156 = 936 mana points.

We could also estimate the potential mana cost of each tumors if they were created by a Queen :
30 x 25 = 750 mana points

And the total cost of the 6 first tumors : 6 X 25 = 150 mana points.

During this time, Serral has save 750 - 150 = 600 mana points of 936.. (64%)


Then this amount of mana save will decrease the virtual mana cost of the other spells :

50 x 0.64 = 32 points of mana...
Which means a potential Transfusion every 26 seconds.. (decreased from 42 sec to 26 sec)

25 x 0.64 = 16 points of mana....
Which means an injection every 13 seconds (decreased from 21 sec to 13 sec)


Conclusion,
Now 3 hatcheries can be injected only having one Queen.
Where is gone the Queen ?


terribleplayer1
Profile Joined July 2018
95 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-12-01 18:18:29
December 01 2019 18:17 GMT
#14
What's "Creep Cycle"?

- Creep size spreading from Overseer increase from 4.5 to 6


What a buff. (lol)

I'm not sure if transfuse needs to be nerfed considering the extra amount of queen energy to keep creep going this change would cause.
bela.mervado
Profile Joined December 2008
Hungary387 Posts
December 01 2019 19:37 GMT
#15
On December 02 2019 03:17 terribleplayer1 wrote:
What's "Creep Cycle"?

- Creep size spreading from Overseer increase from 4.5 to 6


What a buff. (lol)

I'm not sure if transfuse needs to be nerfed considering the extra amount of queen energy to keep creep going this change would cause.


once every 'creep cycle' seconds, every generator generates one cell of creep within its radius, next to a cell covered in creep (yep a spanning tree).
overseer does not generate creep, so that must be a typo, he must have meant poop lords i guess.
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
861 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-12-13 15:36:34
December 13 2019 10:53 GMT
#16
Hello Community,

Here a good idea to control creep numbers tumors repetition :

- After each tumors, Creep size spreading from tumors is decreased by 2 (around 2, maybe 1.5 with min = 6)

What do you think about this ?

Then, you can slowly nerf the speed when Queens is spawnning tumors to have a chance to catch them.

- Add delay for spwanning tumors by the queen : around 4 seconds (as a worker the queen stands near the tumors during spell)

Why agree or not ?

From starcraft 2 wiki :
""The Spawn Creep Tumor is a less prioritized ability of the Queen, as Spawn Larva is a more essential ability, but it is still a commonly used and powerful ability.""


It s not only a less prioritized ability, it s also an over concentrated ability (see graph above). It s seems natural to conclude repetitive tumors creeps ability is overlapping the role of queens ability which is needed only during the 1/4 of the game duration, especially at start.

Inevitably, opponent can t struggle against the repetability from tumors, feature which is illimited, and which can t be reduce to a limited number of iteration (cause it mustn t be too complicated at playing, it needs working mecanism..). People doesn t want to change that and it s easy to understand...
The only way to smooth this powerfull ability is to reduce gradually the power (area surface) of the creep (not his speed cause it s directly dependant of player skill). Then the Zerg player (who said Serral ?) has to drive his queens with more risks to the border line of his creep if he wants to go on spreading.





ThunderJunk
Profile Joined December 2015
United States677 Posts
December 13 2019 18:46 GMT
#17
On November 30 2019 05:51 Vision_ wrote:
Here my study on numbers creep tumors by type of creation

[image loading]

Linearity for Queens : 0.07
Linearity for Tumors : 0.2

I ve worked on two other study games but this result is the most interesting among three.

Disco BloodBath ( TIME - SERRAL WCS global 2019): 37 created from tumors, 11 created from queens
Acropolis ( INNOVATION - SERRAL WCS global 2019): 39 created from tumors, 16 created from queens

This study can confirm most of the tumors are only created from the repetability of creep tumors. Notice factor is around triple !! and the biggest part of Queens action is before 5 min... As if the spell has been worked for the first minutes of the game...

Remind you the duration of cooldown is 11 seconds.... The next step is to get the a new duration with a factor equal to the double, it could be enought as a nerf



Beautiful work, truly. Well done.
I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.
hiroshOne
Profile Joined October 2015
Poland425 Posts
December 13 2019 19:31 GMT
#18
Creep spread is the indicator of Zerg being good or bad, and clearing creepvis the indicator of how good Zerg's opponent is. For example in ZvT the better my creep spread is, it forces Terran to burn orbital energy for scans. That means less mules. It's kind of harras of Zerg in some means. The same way as Terran harrases to limit Zerg's economy. Ofc creep spread give Zerg advantages but it's hard to spread it as Serral does, and he is the best player in the world. Implications of nerfing creep would be extremely dangerous for balance. Creep is another resource for Zerg and very critical forbZerg gameplay. Leave it alone. It was nerfed already few times. This is same thing as nerfing chronoboost or mules.
Ultima Ratio Regum
Xamo
Profile Joined April 2012
Spain877 Posts
December 13 2019 19:53 GMT
#19
Creep should not provide the vision it provides. Top zergs can prepare almost perfect engagements with all that vision.
It could provide the type of vision a sensor tower provides, which helps with positioning but not so much with the engagement itself.
My life for Aiur. You got a piece of me, baby. IIIIIIiiiiiii.
Arghmyliver
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United States1077 Posts
December 14 2019 00:56 GMT
#20
Creep does not provide "free" vision. Top Zergs have that vision sometimes because they are very good at spreading creep. Attention spent spreading creep is time not spent making units, injecting, making overlords, bming, making upgrades, microing units, etc.

Look guys, at the end of the day, someone is actually going to have to just be better at Starcraft than Serral if you want him to stop winning. The smite of the nerfhammer still stings. Maybe the recent nerfs were warranted, but at this point you're literally trying to pull the rug from under our multitudinous feet.
Now witness their attempts to fly from tree to tree. Notice they do not so much fly as plummet.
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Korean StarCraft League #77
CranKy Ducklings101
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft423
Livibee 123
ProTech68
Vindicta 26
RuFF_SC2 5
StarCraft: Brood War
MaD[AoV]45
Bale 30
Icarus 4
Dota 2
monkeys_forever362
NeuroSwarm122
League of Legends
JimRising 607
Counter-Strike
summit1g11022
tarik_tv4886
taco 563
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King125
Other Games
shahzam855
Maynarde148
ToD114
JuggernautJason112
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick49546
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta30
• HeavenSC 10
• Mapu3
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Eskiya23 23
• Pr0nogo 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2191
League of Legends
• Jankos1705
• TFBlade637
• Stunt281
Other Games
• Scarra1383
• WagamamaTV193
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
9h 6m
WardiTV European League
15h 6m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
23h 6m
The PondCast
1d 9h
WardiTV European League
1d 11h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 15h
Replay Cast
1d 23h
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
[ Show More ]
FEL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.