EPT
On November 03 2019 20:07 Xain0n wrote:
You mean that blind vultures are trying to make Serral look like he failed hard? He reached the semifinals. If he failed, what about Maru, Rogue, Stats?
Every single player who was the favourite to won BlizzCon lost, except probably Mvp in 2011; the point is not that Serral lost, it's how he lost. He is human, anyway; being the best at Sc2 doesn't mean you get to win every game and every tournament, unlike it happens in other sports/esports(and ignoring the fact Serral actually did that in the second half in 2018; that was an exception, it doesn't normally happen and it's not supposed to).
If you call Serral's games bad, you may want to skip 90% of played games in Sc2;Serral in the past surely played better than he did at BlizzCon, but it was still very high level Starcraft, what you are saying sounds ridicolous.
You mean that blind vultures are trying to make Serral look like he failed hard? He reached the semifinals. If he failed, what about Maru, Rogue, Stats?
Every single player who was the favourite to won BlizzCon lost, except probably Mvp in 2011; the point is not that Serral lost, it's how he lost. He is human, anyway; being the best at Sc2 doesn't mean you get to win every game and every tournament, unlike it happens in other sports/esports(and ignoring the fact Serral actually did that in the second half in 2018; that was an exception, it doesn't normally happen and it's not supposed to).
If you call Serral's games bad, you may want to skip 90% of played games in Sc2;Serral in the past surely played better than he did at BlizzCon, but it was still very high level Starcraft, what you are saying sounds ridicolous.
Well Rogue failed for sure, since he allowed a non zerg in the semi finals, but you can't compare Maru and Stats performances to Serral because statistically it's far more difficult for them to reach the semi finals
