• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:35
CEST 09:35
KST 16:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL61Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event21Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL ASL20 Preliminary Maps SC uni coach streams logging into betting site BGH Mineral Boosts Tutorial Video
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 528 users

Announcing TLnet Map Contest 13 - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
86 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2404 Posts
May 20 2019 18:29 GMT
#21
Is it possible to get some specific guidelines on what Blizzard, and subsequently the judges, are looking for in the standardization of features? This way, I could be more clear on exactly what judges are looking for when it comes to the essentials. Here are some questions I would like to know:

-Will 6 bases per player (12 total) be considered too few for the current meta and thus be disqualified automatically? If so, will the judges consider maps with 7 bases per player, or is 8 preferred?

-Should natural bases be on high ground, and main bases on level 2 above them? In other words, will flat chokes at main or natural be disqualified? This came up last go around, and I was unclear about the majority opinion.

-Should we experiment with no overlord scouting pods at the nautral, or just placement variation (by the 3rd, outside Nat, etc.)?

-Should natural minerals be explicitly 3 hexes from walls in all locations to prevent pylon/cannon rush placements, or is this becoming less of an issue in judges eyes?

-Are judges/Blizzard open to 4p maps, or do they believe that 4p map submissions will be at a significant disadvantage?

Thank you for your time!
Mapmaker & TLMC Judge. Amygdala, Frostline, Crimson Court, and Korhal Compound (WoL).
Kantuva
Profile Joined April 2010
Uruguay206 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-20 19:38:32
May 20 2019 19:37 GMT
#22
On May 21 2019 03:29 monitor wrote:
-Will 6 bases per player (12 total) be considered too few for the current meta and thus be disqualified automatically? If so, will the judges consider maps with 7 bases per player, or is 8 preferred?

No map will ever be immediately disqualified for having "only" 6 bases, the amount of bases is dependent on the desired gameplay the mapmaker intends, judges judge based on how that gameplay aligns with the category the mapmaker submitted the map to.

In the same manner a standard map with 6 bases will score badly in the macro category because it goes against what the category seeks to find, a macro map with 8 or more bases will probably not fair well if it is submitted to the standard category.

On May 21 2019 03:29 monitor wrote:
-Should natural bases be on high ground, and main bases on level 2 above them? In other words, will flat chokes at main or natural be disqualified? This came up last go around, and I was unclear about the majority opinion.

There's no hard set in stone structure for this question sadly, it very much depends on metagame development and intended gameplay outcomes, a natural with a choke at the entrance will be naturally a more defensible feature than otherwise, use this as a way to tailor the maps to their corresponding categories.

IE, maps with defensible naturals might be preferred in the macro category, or if you map is too aggressive it could use a highground natural to try and balance out the undesired aggressiveness slant


On May 21 2019 03:29 monitor wrote:
-Should we experiment with no overlord scouting pods at the natural, or just placement variation (by the 3rd, outside Nat, etc.)?

Yes, mapmakers are encouraged to explore more in this area, but should be very careful, as having maps where there are no overlord spots can easily lead to rather serious problems where Zerg can't react in time vs aggression, such as certain timings or in ZvZ.


On May 21 2019 03:29 monitor wrote:
-Should natural minerals be explicitly 3 hexes from walls in all locations to prevent pylon/cannon rush placements, or is this becoming less of an issue in judges eyes?

Ideally, yes, 3 tiles/hexes is the standard in order to avoid cannon rushes. Sometimes it might be necessary for mapmakers to provide more than 3 times, sometimes less. But always be careful to not over do it, as that can also lead to problems such as overly encouraging drop play, or curiously encouraging more cannon rushes as there would be an overly big blind spot behind the mineral lines.


On May 21 2019 03:29 monitor wrote:
-Are judges/Blizzard open to 4p maps, or do they believe that 4p map submissions will be at a significant disadvantage?

Sadly this has been the trend for a while now, 4p maps albeit interesting and a section of the playerbase derive great joy from them, they generally have more drawbacks than benefits, because the TLMC is helped judge by Pro-Players whom have to play said maps and face head first the problems of RNG spawns and the consequences that has on build orders and strategy, then it means that overall the TLMC judging panel isn't exactly friendly to the drawbacks posed by 4p maps.

Now that doesn't mean that 4p maps are instantly disqualified, it just means that mapmakers would need to create more interesting 4p maps in order to overcome said drawbacks.

On May 21 2019 03:29 monitor wrote:
Thank you for your time!

No worries monitor OwO
@Kantuva | Mapmaker | TLMC Volunteer Admin | Join us on: https://mapcave.net/discord
Pklixian
Profile Joined October 2017
Canada81 Posts
May 20 2019 20:01 GMT
#23
So I'm not a judge, but these questions I have some answers to. Kantu did a great job answering some but the mapmaker side who likely been studying what works and doesnt can also work in answer.

-Will 6 bases per player (12 total) be considered too few for the current meta and thus be disqualified automatically? If so, will the judges consider maps with 7 bases per player, or is 8 preferred?


No, very much not. 6 bases is the least you can have and depend on the layout and what the mapmaker wants for the gameplay. It general depends on what you can think.
-Can I fit this forward base here near the nat and thirds (like whats done on New Repug/kings cove) to add another expansion for terrans and protosses?
-Is this too many bases for the size, what is desired for gameplay in my eyes regarding the current meta?
But you still need to keep in mind trying to not invoke players just expanding into eachother, as that creates expansions nobody will take. Just something to keep in mind.

-Should natural bases be on high ground, and main bases on level 2 above them? In other words, will flat chokes at main or natural be disqualified? This came up last go around, and I was unclear about the majority opinion.


Ideally you want the natural to be 1 lvl below the main, but you can have a natural on the same highground as the main sharing the standard main choke. As a pocket base that isnt a lvl down. This is acceptable but not exactly explored due to how tricky designing maps can be done. But a flat choke into the main is a more of no go situation.
You can do it if you know exactly what to do. In making a artificial highground advantage. But its better having the main and nat being different lvls. But as far as it is clear, this is not a hard rule.

-Should we experiment with no overlord scouting pods at the nautral, or just placement variation (by the 3rd, outside Nat, etc.)?


They want you to experiment with this general idea as overlord pods are not required. But the reason why mapmakers in the current age of mapmaking use them is to provide vision of the natural to help zerg see aggression/tech in the nat.
Otherwise, zerg would be at a disadvantage, if they cannot hide their overlords close to the nat to see gas(es)/movement. But you can make one using unpathable area and los to make a area thats like a ovi pillar.
Its best to experiment, but its also best to just cut down on the number of ovi pillars throughout the map. To key important areas.

-Should natural minerals be explicitly 3 hexes from walls in all locations to prevent pylon/cannon rush placements, or is this becoming less of an issue in judges eyes?


Uh, 3-4 is recommended. And this isn't in just the judges eyes, if you can move behind the mineral line that gives enough space for a large cannon rush area its rather bad. You can avoid this by putting doodads behind the mineral line.
As of lately there has been a minor goal to remove the power cannon rushes have. As it is, as it stands. Something so dependent and powerful of maps that invoke it. And people complain a lot, so its easier to try and remove them in the foreseeable future.

-Are judges/Blizzard open to 4p maps, or do they believe that 4p map submissions will be at a significant disadvantage?


Blizzard is fully open to 4p maps, as seen whenever they decide to take a gsl 4p map and put it on the ladder.
But players that play at the pro level (which is a fair number of the judges) Do not like rng spawning and the chance for a large unavoidable imbalance. They are unique bunches of maps, but in a stance. 2p has became a standard as it provides enough information so that you can play the map. And not the game of finding out which type of map it is.
From what Kantu said, his words are better than mine.

But 4p arent instantly disqualified, but you have a higher chance of success avoiding 4p.
As you would need to find a way to counter the countless drawbacks 4p maps have. But you only create more in that attempt.

Thank you for your time!

Thank YOU for bringing these questions, and what Kantu said. As its been sometime since I actually spoke about these factors of mapmaking that is often voided due to possible problems they have.

Also hope to see good maps from you! As ever.
TLMC11 5th place finalist, Team TLMC2 3x finalist, aspiring mapmaker with dreams of success.
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33339 Posts
May 20 2019 20:24 GMT
#24
On May 21 2019 01:33 Superouman wrote:
We might not like it but 2fort is peak map making.


unironically speaking, the sheer popularity of maps such as 2fort and FASTESTMAPEVER sort of speak to their 'value'
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25036 Posts
May 20 2019 21:48 GMT
#25
Fruitland 2.0 when?
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25036 Posts
May 20 2019 21:52 GMT
#26
Best of luck mapmakers, looking forward to seeing what comes out.

I’d way prefer to have more ladder maps that are different in circulation, and give players a single extra veto for every 2 additional maps.

More variety, players can’t veto every weird map, and tournaments can still restrict to 7 maps if any of them turn out to be crazy broken, given bo7s tends to be the maximum series length.

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
smallGreenDuck
Profile Joined May 2019
1 Post
Last Edited: 2019-05-21 01:58:42
May 21 2019 01:58 GMT
#27
I'm tired of dark maps, Year Zero LE in particular. Hope we'll see some cheerful maps.
Pklixian
Profile Joined October 2017
Canada81 Posts
May 21 2019 12:03 GMT
#28
I'm tired of dark maps, Year Zero LE in particular. Hope we'll see some cheerful maps.


Honestly, bright maps grow boring over time. Which explains the amount of dark and gloomy maps.
Its so easy to make bright maps like kings cove that it grows boring.
But I understand you want to see maps that don't dim down the light.

Hoping to see better maps is a great idea, and all you gotta wait for is the finalist!
or what sees the ladder, so you can complain about it.
TLMC11 5th place finalist, Team TLMC2 3x finalist, aspiring mapmaker with dreams of success.
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2404 Posts
May 21 2019 18:07 GMT
#29
On May 21 2019 21:03 Pklixian wrote:
Show nested quote +
I'm tired of dark maps, Year Zero LE in particular. Hope we'll see some cheerful maps.


Honestly, bright maps grow boring over time. Which explains the amount of dark and gloomy maps.
Its so easy to make bright maps like kings cove that it grows boring.
But I understand you want to see maps that don't dim down the light.

Hoping to see better maps is a great idea, and all you gotta wait for is the finalist!
or what sees the ladder, so you can complain about it.


As much as I get irritated at the history of beach maps being chosen despite less than desirable layouts, I will admit that I personally take no pleasure in playing darker maps that are depressing/closterphobic.
Mapmaker & TLMC Judge. Amygdala, Frostline, Crimson Court, and Korhal Compound (WoL).
brickrd
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States4894 Posts
May 21 2019 18:28 GMT
#30
On May 21 2019 21:03 Pklixian wrote:
Show nested quote +
I'm tired of dark maps, Year Zero LE in particular. Hope we'll see some cheerful maps.


Honestly, bright maps grow boring over time. Which explains the amount of dark and gloomy maps.
Its so easy to make bright maps like kings cove that it grows boring.
But I understand you want to see maps that don't dim down the light.

Hoping to see better maps is a great idea, and all you gotta wait for is the finalist!
or what sees the ladder, so you can complain about it.

i don't understand how being able to see things can be boring. when i'm playing a beautiful open world game with great graphics i never think "im bored of all the stuff im looking at, id better turn the brightness way down". i also have no idea why you think it's easier to make well lit maps. i would think it's far far easier to just throw a bunch of industrial blacks and greys together with a few red and blue glowy bits, which is the definition of boring at this point
TL+ Member
insitelol
Profile Joined August 2012
845 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-22 12:53:17
May 22 2019 12:49 GMT
#31
Yes, more map "features" please. We clearly didn't had enough of them. This is so innovative and fresh. Lots of "features" from previous TLMCs had an immensely positive impact on the gameplay. They opened up new possibilities and exciting strategies, even changed the meta (also in a positive way). They were so good, that Pros even started to veto standard maps in tournaments (even forfeited matches on purpose if it was supposed to be played on standard maps). And i couldnt agree more. Who needs those boring clones of overgrowth while we can play on maps with innovative slowing fields and mineral patches with less minerals in them (or bases w/o vespen geysers). Now that's what i call innovation. Noone can deny how much these innovations contributed to the evolvement of SC2. Well done, blizzard! And very innovative.
p.s. and those who think otherwise are just people who deny progress itself.
Less is more.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25036 Posts
May 22 2019 13:12 GMT
#32
On May 22 2019 21:49 insitelol wrote:
Yes, more map "features" please. We clearly didn't had enough of them. This is so innovative and fresh. Lots of "features" from previous TLMCs had an immensely positive impact on the gameplay. They opened up new possibilities and exciting strategies, even changed the meta (also in a positive way). They were so good, that Pros even started to veto standard maps in tournaments (even forfeited matches on purpose if it was supposed to be played on standard maps). And i couldnt agree more. Who needs those boring clones of overgrowth while we can play on maps with innovative slowing fields and mineral patches with less minerals in them (or bases w/o vespen geysers). Now that's what i call innovation. Noone can deny how much these innovations contributed to the evolvement of SC2. Well done, blizzard! And very innovative.
p.s. and those who think otherwise are just people who deny progress itself.

This could be read as earnest or the most sarcastic post in the world haha.

I’m inclined to agree with at least trying stuff and seeing what works for sure.

As a veteran SC2 player/viewer I recall a time where destructible rocks were widely criticised and made fun of, but over time map makers have improved and came up with used for them that do add strategy and variety.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
NinjaNight
Profile Joined January 2018
428 Posts
May 22 2019 13:27 GMT
#33
On May 22 2019 21:49 insitelol wrote:
Yes, more map "features" please. We clearly didn't had enough of them. This is so innovative and fresh. Lots of "features" from previous TLMCs had an immensely positive impact on the gameplay. They opened up new possibilities and exciting strategies, even changed the meta (also in a positive way). They were so good, that Pros even started to veto standard maps in tournaments (even forfeited matches on purpose if it was supposed to be played on standard maps). And i couldnt agree more. Who needs those boring clones of overgrowth while we can play on maps with innovative slowing fields and mineral patches with less minerals in them (or bases w/o vespen geysers). Now that's what i call innovation. Noone can deny how much these innovations contributed to the evolvement of SC2. Well done, blizzard! And very innovative.
p.s. and those who think otherwise are just people who deny progress itself.


As I was reading this I was just thinking "is this meant to be a super sarcastic post?"
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
May 22 2019 14:09 GMT
#34
I sincerely wish good luck to everyone entering, I hope you all get some cool ideas. It will be nice to be able to take another crack at the new challenge categories and come up with interesting uses for the features.

Though, and I think this is the first time I've done this, but I'm sitting things out. I've needed a break for a while, I think. GLHF guys.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Pklixian
Profile Joined October 2017
Canada81 Posts
May 22 2019 15:12 GMT
#35
On May 22 2019 03:28 brickrd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2019 21:03 Pklixian wrote:
I'm tired of dark maps, Year Zero LE in particular. Hope we'll see some cheerful maps.


Honestly, bright maps grow boring over time. Which explains the amount of dark and gloomy maps.
Its so easy to make bright maps like kings cove that it grows boring.
But I understand you want to see maps that don't dim down the light.

Hoping to see better maps is a great idea, and all you gotta wait for is the finalist!
or what sees the ladder, so you can complain about it.

i don't understand how being able to see things can be boring. when i'm playing a beautiful open world game with great graphics i never think "im bored of all the stuff im looking at, id better turn the brightness way down". i also have no idea why you think it's easier to make well lit maps. i would think it's far far easier to just throw a bunch of industrial blacks and greys together with a few red and blue glowy bits, which is the definition of boring at this point


Its not that it grows boring for the player/viewer its that, as a mapmaker myself.
I spend days to a week making maps, and its in my reflex to make a map without too dark textures, and a lighting visibly bright.
It grows boring in a stance of maps never seem to change that much when it comes to themes if everything is a bright beach/forest/temple/facility etc. Which is why when darker maps came out, its more interesting to make and study the map on a mapmaker side in cases.

There is many who LOVE to make bright maps, and I cannot judge them on that.
But they still grow boring, dark maps doesnt make it harder to see stuff, unless the mapmaker has a dark lighting on dark textures. Just there was no long period of time to adjust to the sudden darkness.
Also your stance on whats easier is actually, something that made me laugh a bit.
Its easier to produce a map so common and seen as the textures in use are fairly similar between 5-15 to hundreds of maps. Or other cases.

Industrial maps arent easy to make, throwing stuff in doesnt give you the feel the map wants to provide.
Same with just grey with glowly colors, you need a contrast with whats in use.
Everything requires time, but simply making what people just want against all odds cause its bright pretty.
Means the map is more reproducible, and in return. As a mapmaker, boring if the same color scheme is repeated.
which is almost always is.

I respect your opinion, but this is the stance. If I call something boring, I'm not taking a stance of a average joe who plays the game. As then I'd prefer only bright maps, and not want dark and gloomy maps with their own feel in my sight.
As then I'd clearly not want difference that allows those who makes the maps you play on, have access to creativity.

Anyways, it doesnt matter. Its my opinion, its your opinion. I'm agreeing to disagreeing so I can get back to stressing about mineral walls.
TLMC11 5th place finalist, Team TLMC2 3x finalist, aspiring mapmaker with dreams of success.
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12129 Posts
May 22 2019 16:00 GMT
#36
On May 22 2019 22:12 Wombat_NI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2019 21:49 insitelol wrote:
Yes, more map "features" please. We clearly didn't had enough of them. This is so innovative and fresh. Lots of "features" from previous TLMCs had an immensely positive impact on the gameplay. They opened up new possibilities and exciting strategies, even changed the meta (also in a positive way). They were so good, that Pros even started to veto standard maps in tournaments (even forfeited matches on purpose if it was supposed to be played on standard maps). And i couldnt agree more. Who needs those boring clones of overgrowth while we can play on maps with innovative slowing fields and mineral patches with less minerals in them (or bases w/o vespen geysers). Now that's what i call innovation. Noone can deny how much these innovations contributed to the evolvement of SC2. Well done, blizzard! And very innovative.
p.s. and those who think otherwise are just people who deny progress itself.

This could be read as earnest or the most sarcastic post in the world haha.

I’m inclined to agree with at least trying stuff and seeing what works for sure.

As a veteran SC2 player/viewer I recall a time where destructible rocks were widely criticised and made fun of, but over time map makers have improved and came up with used for them that do add strategy and variety.

Some feature will never work properly because they need to be properly put in place to not disadvantage certain races. e.g. close gold, open naturals, naturals without a ramp, naturals with a wide ramp, rich vespene, low vespene expansions.

And obviously, the biggest thanks to the PvP, we still have to use 1 force field ramps to the main and mains on the high ground
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
TheRealNanMan
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1471 Posts
May 22 2019 21:22 GMT
#37
TLMC are the best~! I always loved casting/watching people play on them. I can't wait to see what the map makers come up with this time around
Sc2 Caster | Host of Sc2 Up & Coming | The Godfather of Team LXG | Sc2 Historian | Youtube.com/NanMan | Twitch.tv/TheRealNanMan | Twitter.com/TheRealNanMan |
Legan
Profile Joined June 2017
Finland402 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-06-23 21:16:00
June 01 2019 19:25 GMT
#38
Let's open the game and bump this thread for visibility now, that there is nearly one week left before pre-judging feedback deadline.

Updated final submissions. All maps should be found from all servers.
Standard:

Blood Shore
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]


Golden Forge
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Macro:

Glacier Bloom
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Thihoi Isle
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Challenge #2:

Apatite Facility
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


I will probably create a map for Challenge #1 this week.
Creator of Gresvan, Tropical Sacrifice, Taitalika, and Golden Forge
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2404 Posts
June 04 2019 17:05 GMT
#39
Hi mapmakers,

My editor is not functioning, and I will not be able to get bootcamp running on my mac before the submissions are over. Do any mapmakers have interest in adding spawn locations/player info/etc. to finish my maps and submitting them as a combined effort? I have 2 or 3 finished maps that just need the finalized details to make them playable.

I used to be a highly active mapmaker in WoL and was the first mapmaker, along with Superouman, to have a map in the ladder (Korhal Compound).

Plz send me a PM if interested!
Mapmaker & TLMC Judge. Amygdala, Frostline, Crimson Court, and Korhal Compound (WoL).
Pklixian
Profile Joined October 2017
Canada81 Posts
June 04 2019 22:09 GMT
#40
I'll do my best to help you out Monitor, since you've been there from the beginning.
And its kind to help a fellow mapmaker even with different ideals of design.
TLMC11 5th place finalist, Team TLMC2 3x finalist, aspiring mapmaker with dreams of success.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 25m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 225
TY 108
Barracks 66
HiyA 47
Dota 2
XaKoH 712
XcaliburYe0
League of Legends
JimRising 706
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1414
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor205
Other Games
WinterStarcraft670
kaitlyn58
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH368
• Hupsaiya 88
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2315
League of Legends
• Lourlo1568
• Stunt513
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
2h 25m
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
4h 25m
WardiTV European League
4h 25m
BSL: ProLeague
10h 25m
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 16h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
FEL
6 days
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.