| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
KR_4EVR
316 Posts
On November 04 2018 00:20 Waxangel wrote: An extra large refinery to hide Widow Mines behind, please I want my zerglings to look like mini-ultralisks and my Ultralisks to look like mega-zerglings. | ||
|
HaloLegend98
United States54 Posts
On November 03 2018 20:27 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Bit offtopic but has anybody got the watching rewards? I have watched everyday of WCS Global finals and I havent got anything. I got rare loot chest for Heroes of the Storm even tho I watched it for less than 1 minute. I got two of the random drop banners (one Random and one Terran) and two of the portraits for SC2, and a rare loot chest for HotS. I watched almost all day on the Quarter finals. I didn't get the Zerg or Protoss banners from the random drops. | ||
|
dummy1
420 Posts
| ||
|
litLikeBic
Canada105 Posts
| ||
|
Agh
United States1061 Posts
On November 06 2018 13:00 litLikeBic wrote: <insert obligatory post whining about no option to disable skins> totes they need XXXL zergling wings so they become actually impossible to count Better yet just give the new mech ones the metal umbrellas from fortnite so you can't see anything under them | ||
|
Dingodile
4139 Posts
On November 06 2018 14:19 Agh wrote: they need XXXL zergling wings so they become actually impossible to count green wings from Diablo3 (completing set portals). | ||
|
Werwolf
Russian Federation31 Posts
| ||
|
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
| ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17657 Posts
so if i want my Terran opponent to look like "Dominion Special Forces" because I hate teh Mengsk family... i buy the "Dominion Special Forces" skin pack and make my opponent look how i want. or if i just want all skins to be the default standard skins.. i can have that too. customizing opponents skins gives the best of both worlds for skin lovers and for ultra competitive players. The Skin Customization Screen and associated software engineering requires substantial Blizzard resources so they can charge say... $25 for skin customization.  ATVI also has to pay someone to fold all the money Bobby Kotick makes so we'll have to add another $2 to that $25. so it'll be $27 total. | ||
|
litLikeBic
Canada105 Posts
On November 10 2018 06:18 brickrd wrote: on the skin debate, anyone ever suggest making skins unranked-only? like, if you queue unranked you see the skins, if you queue ranked you don't? seems like a somewhat reasonable compromise to me... that way the issue of game balance being altered is mitigated since people who are laddering seriously for rank are unaffected can we please stop with this already? when will you realize it's fruitless to even ponder the disabling of skins? every time there's a thread on skins, we get the same predictable posts whining about how they supposedly alter game balance. if they do alter balance, is it really so gamebreaking? is it the end of the world if you're rank 90 master instead of rank 70 master because jimmy's big ling wings obscured your view? | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16079 Posts
On November 10 2018 07:09 litLikeBic wrote: can we please stop with this already? when will you realize it's fruitless to even ponder the disabling of skins? every time there's a thread on skins, we get the same predictable posts whining about how they supposedly alter game balance. if they do alter balance, is it really so gamebreaking? is it the end of the world if you're rank 90 master instead of rank 70 master because jimmy's big ling wings obscured your view? maybe it's not about ladder rank but about fun. games are supposed to be fun, you know? And it reduces the fun for me if I have to put more attention than usual in differentiating the units. | ||
|
phodacbiet
United States1740 Posts
On November 10 2018 07:15 Charoisaur wrote: maybe it's not about ladder rank but about fun. games are supposed to be fun, you know? And it reduces the fun for me if I have to put more attention than usual in differentiating the units. But it increases the fun for me if I know you're putting more attention than usual in differentiating the units. | ||
|
sbEAGLES
United States7 Posts
| ||
|
Malongo
Chile3472 Posts
On November 05 2018 04:18 KR_4EVR wrote: I want my zerglings to look like mini-ultralisks and my Ultralisks to look like mega-zerglings. I´d like my zealots with a guitar instead of psiblades, so they look like making solo riff when charging. | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12130 Posts
On November 12 2018 07:18 Malongo wrote: I´d like my zealots with a guitar instead of psiblades, so they look like making solo riff when charging. I would love all ranged protoss units do Pew! Pew! Pew! instead of their general attack sounds  Except for Colossus, where it would be a long Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! | ||
|
Quantran
United States44 Posts
| ||
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19367 Posts
On November 06 2018 13:00 litLikeBic wrote: insert obligatory post whining about no option to disable skins What's wrong with that? I'm colorblind and certain skins can cause me trouble. Should it not be an option to disable them for the vision impaired? Being colorblind is really tough especially in StarCraft. I've had to deal with the pains it has caused me in SC1 for 20 years. SC2 has been much better at colors. Wouldn't it be wise to ask that disabling skins is an options while I still have the chance for developers to improve my predicament? | ||
NonY
8751 Posts
On November 10 2018 07:09 litLikeBic wrote: can we please stop with this already? when will you realize it's fruitless to even ponder the disabling of skins? every time there's a thread on skins, we get the same predictable posts whining about how they supposedly alter game balance. if they do alter balance, is it really so gamebreaking? is it the end of the world if you're rank 90 master instead of rank 70 master because jimmy's big ling wings obscured your view? people who buy skins want to be able to set the skins they see, including opponents' units. it keeps coming up because it's a really obvious improvement that a lot of customers would enjoy and i think they might sell more of the 3-race packs if they did it. win-win i know in every other game it's the same as sc2 is now (player sets his own skins and other people have to see his choices). but if someone with authority at blizzard would take 5 mins to think about it, it's pretty clear that sc2 should be an exception on how skins work. it's gonna be brought up in every warchest thread until they implement this improvement | ||
|
Doink
75 Posts
On November 15 2018 06:31 NonY wrote: people who buy skins want to be able to set the skins they see, including opponents' units. it keeps coming up because it's a really obvious improvement that a lot of customers would enjoy and i think they might sell more of the 3-race packs if they did it. win-win i know in every other game it's the same as sc2 is now (player sets his own skins and other people have to see his choices). but if someone with authority at blizzard would take 5 mins to think about it, it's pretty clear that sc2 should be an exception on how skins work. it's gonna be brought up in every warchest thread until they implement this improvement I think many people buy skins because they want them to be seen though. So it's better as it is now. More money for SC2. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20338 Posts
| ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
Bombastic Starleague
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Bombastic Starleague
The PondCast
HomeStory Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
