EPTTLMC7 Voting - Page 9
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Make sure to comment in this thread for your vote to count! | ||
|
NinjaToss
Austria1383 Posts
| ||
|
Musicus
Germany23570 Posts
On June 07 2016 20:51 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Voting only determines the prize money. it doesn't determine what gets put on ladder. Yeah, New Gettysburg is already confirmed I think. Blizzard always has the last word, but the result of the vote might still influence them for the rest of the maps. Although they won't put in 3 macro maps, if the top 3 are all macro maps I guess. | ||
|
Solstice245
United States145 Posts
| ||
|
Whizler
1 Post
| ||
|
Chachal
Poland15 Posts
| ||
|
SimplyDestroyer
1 Post
| ||
|
TheSkunk
82 Posts
| ||
|
lBWl ArT
Poland1 Post
| ||
|
Psychotikah
Canada101 Posts
| ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
| ||
|
SidianTheBard
United States2474 Posts
On June 07 2016 22:00 Ej_ wrote: BTW I guess we won't get TL Open on these maps? Believe just the basetradetv tournament was it. I do know Monk has all the maps uploaded so you can grab a friend or two and play on whichever map you'd like. | ||
|
gropheR
Italy13 Posts
| ||
|
Dahktor
1 Post
| ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany15867 Posts
On June 07 2016 20:28 egrimm wrote: Voted. Annihilation Station and Shiva were nobrainers for me, really really good maps. Then for last 3 i went for big macro Apotheosis, standard Cloud Kingdom like Galactic Process and short and straight-forward Korhal Killzone. Exactly the same maps as me :O Good choice. | ||
|
rauskimon
Finland2 Posts
| ||
|
DSK
England1110 Posts
| ||
|
egrimm
Poland1199 Posts
On June 07 2016 22:18 Charoisaur wrote: Exactly the same maps as me :O Good choice. Thx! But no surprise here, really - we both chosen Jin Air as a flair so our choices are always superior as our team is  | ||
|
MF_Icy
Sweden99 Posts
| ||
|
slit
Spain212 Posts
Namaste is <3 | ||
|
-NegativeZero-
United States2141 Posts
On June 07 2016 11:47 lord_nibbler wrote: The thing is, once you allow the finalist to drastically change their maps in order "to get the best possible ladder map", you undermine the whole contest! See, it might be hard to accept, but a contest is different to a contract work. Ultimately they aim for different outcomes! The contest wants to provide equal opportunity, a fair and open process and sustained interest in the contest itself. The selection of maps for ladder is only a byproduct of the contest! It is not even a question, the selection process does not need to be fair or open in any way. I know you are personally involved and all, but in the interest of fairness, they should have told you "Sorry, but changing 90% of your map is unacceptable. You will have to enter the 2.0 version in the next competition. But maybe you are lucky and Blizzard selects your old version anyway." i get the point and normally i'd sort of agree with you, but in this case i think the goal of getting the best possible ladder maps outweighs the goal of "fairly" rewarding all of the finalists. say that old version of namaste actually got selected for ladder, then we'd be stuck with a shitty map for at least a full season, but now we'll have a decent map in its current iteration. might suck for some finalists to potentially lose out on the prize pool because of it, but personally i'd forgo the money in favor of getting what i think is an objectively better map on ladder, and i think a lot of other mapmakers would agree. (not saying i think namaste is better than my entry, but just hypothetically lol) | ||
| ||
