| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Grettin
42394 Posts
On March 13 2016 18:23 rednusa wrote: Has Google formally expressed any interest in a SC2 AI project? Haven't seen anything but this. "'StarCraft,' I think, is our likely next target," Google Senior Fellow Jeff Dean said at the Structure Data event in San Francisco. Source | ||
|
Kerence
Sweden1817 Posts
On March 13 2016 18:23 rednusa wrote: Has Google formally expressed any interest in a SC2 AI project? Apparently they have, there's already a thread about this. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/505728-google-vs-sc2 Although reading the linked article it's not clear if they are talking about SC:BW or SC2. http://uk.businessinsider.com/google-deepmind-could-play-starcraft-2016-3?r=US&IR=T | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7031 Posts
On March 13 2016 17:46 rabidch wrote: it will take a while for google to come up with this though (a few years or more), mostly because of hashing out plans with blizzard (assuming theyll cooperate), designing how theyll train and do decisions, and then getting enough computing power and time to train. even with google's cloud i think it will take a massive amount of computing to train the thing, assuming they choose neutral networks like they did with alphago Why should they need permission from Blizzard though? Their other AIs would work with just visual input, it is not like they would need access to the game state. | ||
|
Cuce
Turkey1127 Posts
| ||
|
weikor
Austria580 Posts
On March 13 2016 18:39 Grumbels wrote: Why should they need permission from Blizzard though? Their other AIs would work with just visual input, it is not like they would need access to the game state. Its technically botting, and I think blizzard could sue a large conpany if they are developing illegal tools - thats why permission. Im pretty sure an advanced Ai would crush any human player in starcraft. Just look at those micro bots. Add perfect macro to that and they would need one build order to win 100% of games. The advantage ai will always have In any game is 100% memory, beeing able to calculate multiple outcomes and perfect multitasking. | ||
|
CrayonPopChoa
Canada761 Posts
Flash vs. TZP Jaedong vs. ZTP Bisu vs. ZP Jangbi/Stork vs. T | ||
|
CrayonPopChoa
Canada761 Posts
On March 13 2016 17:51 Spazzer wrote: I think this point is the biggest issues. Here is an example of what it could accomplish and some. but isnt that cheating, like we arent supposed to know what the siege tanks are targeting?? why would the AI know which ling is being targeted. its not like a seeker missle where it shows up alerting you. its different then like when a unit is taking damage u then micro it away. Tank shot comes without you really knowing where its gonna hit, maybe the AI could guess, but if your controlling ur tanks u can click on something else no? | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On March 13 2016 19:13 CrayonPopChoa wrote: but isnt that cheating, like we arent supposed to know what the siege tanks are targeting?? why would the AI know which ling is being targeted. its not like a seeker missle where it shows up alerting you. its different then like when a unit is taking damage u then micro it away. Tank shot comes without you really knowing where its gonna hit, maybe the AI could guess, but if your controlling ur tanks u can click on something else no? In theory you do know which one they're going to be attacking. As a player you will know which unit will be auto-targeted first, it is just a part of the behavior of units. It isn't random. I don't think this bot knows which one they are targetting by scanning game activity files. This bot knows which one they are attacking, because yes you can determine that based on tank behavior. Professional players play around this (or should) all the time. This video is an even better example (than the marine splitting one) of why AI would totally crush any StarCraft pro given some time to learn. I've seen some suggestions on limiting the APM and amount of clicks to be similar to mouse/keyboard input. I don't think that really matters in the end. I doubt the zergling vs. tank video has a high amount of apm involved. Even if it did you can pretty much get 90% of efficiency with just picking out individual zerglings that are going to be targeted, while the rest of your army is on a-move. It's pretty much just clicking accuracy that you can do with relatively low apms. | ||
|
KT_Elwood
Germany1150 Posts
So I guss an AI without any restraint could easily win against any human in SC(l2). 40000 APM? Why not. Perfect macro, perfect micro and millions of games to find out the best reaction possible. First constraint must be APM and Data Input. AI should only see the screen (Pixels), and interact through mouse/kb input. There will be a serious task of "recognition" alone. Easiest way: Make a robot play the game. And I dont see a robot handel sc(2) | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On March 13 2016 19:25 KT_Elwood wrote: I think you can not make AI vs Human without apply the mechanical constraints to the AI that a Physical player has. So I guss an AI without any restraint could easily win against any human in SC(l2). 40000 APM? Why not. Perfect macro, perfect micro and millions of games to find out the best reaction possible. First constraint must be APM and Data Input. AI should only see the screen (Pixels), and interact through mouse/kb input. There will be a serious task of "recognition" alone. Easiest way: Make a robot play the game. And I dont see a robot handel sc(2) The problem is in
I'm pretty sure you can make an absolutely crushing AI with relatively low apm (200 or so should be enough). No need to assume this AI is going to need 50k apm for the above. It will help of course it will be able to do even more, but the gains are pretty marginal since speed is one of the least important factors when you can account for the above listed points. Limiting the apm isn't going to do much. | ||
|
juvenal
2448 Posts
On March 13 2016 15:44 Jibba wrote: It would be kind of awesome to see an AI do a probe rush in BW and win with perfect micro. At least it'd be awesome the first time, and it wouldn't be awesome because of the AI but because it's such an infuriating, unsolvable way to lose. "unsolvable", you mean no human being can rush a probe tight wall? | ||
|
KT_Elwood
Germany1150 Posts
I see the problem in access on "game state" = 100% possible data in handy format and "screen/pixeldata only" And AI with access to game state can have possible 100% flawless multitask wich will win you most Sc2 games. If you never miss a beat, really never, then you can afford to send units out to scout everything at any time. Build 99% Depots around the map and always cancel on last sec would give you so much information. Or have 3 Reapers/lings around that give you vision on any angle of attack (on perfect micro those can always escape !). Players might not do that because they need XX minerals for BO but a computer could just scratch those XX mins from perfect Worker-Timings perfect mineral mining and so on. I think of it as a possible 10 player Archon with mind-synchronisation. A 10-Player Archon woul always have 100% of information possible and most of all "awareness", not only minimap-vision | ||
|
Dumbledore
Sweden725 Posts
On March 13 2016 18:58 weikor wrote: Its technically botting, and I think blizzard could sue a large conpany if they are developing illegal tools - thats why permission. Im pretty sure an advanced Ai would crush any human player in starcraft. Just look at those micro bots. Add perfect macro to that and they would need one build order to win 100% of games. The advantage ai will always have In any game is 100% memory, beeing able to calculate multiple outcomes and perfect multitasking. You really think botting in games is illegal? lol | ||
|
404AlphaSquad
839 Posts
| ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16062 Posts
On March 13 2016 19:20 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: In theory you do know which one they're going to be attacking. As a player you will know which unit will be auto-targeted first, it is just a part of the behavior of units. It isn't random. I don't think this bot knows which one they are targetting by scanning game activity files. This bot knows which one they are attacking, because yes you can determine that based on tank behavior. Professional players play around this (or should) all the time. This video is an even better example (than the marine splitting one) of why AI would totally crush any StarCraft pro given some time to learn. I've seen some suggestions on limiting the APM and amount of clicks to be similar to mouse/keyboard input. I don't think that really matters in the end. I doubt the zergling vs. tank video has a high amount of apm involved. Even if it did you can pretty much get 90% of efficiency with just picking out individual zerglings that are going to be targeted, while the rest of your army is on a-move. It's pretty much just clicking accuracy that you can do with relatively low apms. really? always box-clicking the zerglings surrounding the targeted zergling and individually pulling them away and that multiple times at once. I'm pretty sure the APM are insane in that scenario. | ||
|
moonlawn
Latvia6 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On March 13 2016 20:27 Charoisaur wrote: really? always box-clicking the zerglings surrounding the targeted zergling and individually pulling them away and that multiple times at once. I'm pretty sure the APM are insane in that scenario. I mean sure it isn't a walk in the park, but for a computer with perfect accuracy I don't think it needs to be abnormally high to get a high reward. You can continue to make it better to pretty much unlimited apm, though. Essentially pulling away zerglings and selecting single zerglings with perfect accuracy should be doable while keeping the numbers low. | ||
|
outscar
2832 Posts
| ||
|
Fighter
Korea (South)1531 Posts
edit: OH. Yep, it's on this page :p | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16062 Posts
On March 13 2016 20:48 Fighter wrote: Has anyone posted any links to some of those micro bots? I remember one where lings were micro'd perfectly against tanks, so each tank shot only one died. Made lings look ungodly powerful. no, here aren't any links... | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2 6119Jaedong 2528Sea  2248Mini  840EffOrt 636Stork 406Hyuk 389firebathero 340actioN 337Rush 288[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games singsing1602 B2W.Neo907 crisheroes286 XaKoH  155elazer103 ArmadaUGS85 KnowMe52 Trikslyr31 ZerO(Twitch)20 QueenE11 |
|
Replay Cast
GSL
Cure vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Bunny
KCM Race Survival
Big Gabe
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Escore
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
