• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:07
CEST 11:07
KST 18:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High14Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments2[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 15-21): herO Goes For Four0StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes200BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch2Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes Weekly Cups (Sept 15-21): herO Goes For Four Why Storm Should NOT Be Nerfed – A Core Part of Pr Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps! #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 Stellar Fest KSL Week 80 StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense
Brood War
General
Old rep packs of BW legends BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion [ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High ASL ro8 Upper Bracket HYPE VIDEO
Tourneys
SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN [ASL20] Ro8 Day 1 [ASL20] Ro16 Group D BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Borderlands 3 General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Big Programming Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Why can't Americans stop ea…
Peanutsc
Too Many LANs? Tournament Ov…
TrAiDoS
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2092 users

2016 WCS Challenger format announced. - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
110 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 18:46 GMT
#61
On February 02 2016 03:40 Makro wrote:
i was hyped until i saw firegod's contribution


Haha I am sorry :D

At least, This tournament might show to everybody how bad the ladder is right now (and thus maybe Blizzard will do something to fix this).
It is a big issue because it prevents new people who don't have many contacts among pro players to practice.
Many people talk about the problem to find new talents in korea but it is the same problem in Europe because new talents can't get practice and thus become strong players.
Progamer
SNSeigifried
Profile Joined April 2013
United States1640 Posts
February 01 2016 19:02 GMT
#62
So will blizzard open gm today so this competition will start for the pros xD
Icebound Esports
jcairne
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States127 Posts
February 01 2016 19:04 GMT
#63
If we are worried about ladder and matchmaking maybe this is a good thing Blizzard is doing this. It will help expose any of the glaring issues and Blizzard will be forced to fix them if they want to keep up the quality of the competition.
DSK
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
England1110 Posts
February 01 2016 19:07 GMT
#64
Interesting, I wonder how this change will playout.
**@ YT: SC2POVs at https://www.youtube.com/c/SC2POVsTV | https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/SC2POVs @**
ivancype
Profile Joined December 2012
Brazil485 Posts
February 01 2016 19:08 GMT
#65
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1
The other race is OP
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 19:17 GMT
#66
I think this is a major step forward. This gives amateur players an extremely clear and defined path towards going pro. No longer it is "be good at ladder and ... I guess show up and be good at tournaments." This makes it so your actual practice (you can argue how good ladder is for practice but lets pretend here for a sec) is closely intertwined with how you can go pro in the game. I love it.

Two notes though: They really, really need Ladder 2.0 for this to work. As it stands you can miss getting in GM and now suddenly you can't qualify because no matter how well you play if GM is full you're not qualifying. That isn't right. When they release Ladder 2.0 that has GM as GM + Masters that should solve this problem, though.

Next is they simply have to be more aggressive and more proactive about hacking. No more "Oh yeah that guy who is #8 on GM is an obvious maphacker" shit. Ideally prevent it outright but since we don't live in a perfect world they'll need some people who's main focus of their job is to monitor hacking reports and react swiftly.
Wat
Circumstance
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States11403 Posts
February 01 2016 19:24 GMT
#67
Like him or not, Catz makes a difference.
The world is better when every background has a chance.
Yiome
Profile Joined February 2014
China1687 Posts
February 01 2016 19:29 GMT
#68
Oh
Totalbiscuit should be pleased and given credit for this : P
ejozl
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark3413 Posts
February 01 2016 19:42 GMT
#69
us.battle.net
Now this post actually makes sense and you can call Grand Master: Pro and Master: Semi Pro
SC2 Archon needs "Terrible, terrible damage" as one of it's quotes.
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 19:46 GMT
#70
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.
Progamer
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 19:50 GMT
#71
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.
Wat
SuperHofmann
Profile Joined September 2013
Italy1741 Posts
February 01 2016 19:51 GMT
#72
Ladder? Ahahah
Vasacast always in my <3
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-01 19:57:28
February 01 2016 19:57 GMT
#73
Where are all the people who always complain that the TL community is too negative? You see? This is an update that people actually like and you see almost exlusively positive responses. (or at least not negative ones)
SuperHofmann
Profile Joined September 2013
Italy1741 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-01 20:02:58
February 01 2016 20:00 GMT
#74
using ladder is so stupid. There are maphackers, people using bonus pool, etc. They can find a better method.
Vasacast always in my <3
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 20:01 GMT
#75
Weren't they discussing getting rid of bonus pool in the ladder revamp?
Wat
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 20:12 GMT
#76
On February 02 2016 04:50 Tenks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.


I agree, this is why I would prefer a new ladder system then to promote it they could do this qualifier.
This qualifier will show all the issues of the ladder instead of promoting the benefit of the future ladder
Progamer
Solar424
Profile Blog Joined June 2013
United States4001 Posts
February 01 2016 20:17 GMT
#77
If they don't fix the "leave league" bug the ladder is pretty much useless at the top level
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 20:17 GMT
#78
On February 02 2016 05:12 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:50 Tenks wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.


I agree, this is why I would prefer a new ladder system then to promote it they could do this qualifier.
This qualifier will show all the issues of the ladder instead of promoting the benefit of the future ladder


There may be some kinks in the system to iron out not 100% associated with the ladder. I do agree this system seems to put the cart in front of the horse since it feels like it would work out better with their revamped ladder in place. But since it sounded like that won't be out until Spring/Summer they probably just wanted to try out this system and refine it to have a better system in place for when the new ladder actually launches.

For all we know Blizzard has been hard at work on some of this automated detection and they're ready to really test it out which is why it has started now. Blizzard would be wise to be secret about how they are addressing or plan on addressing the extremely valid concerns you're bringing up. So I wouldn't take silence as an absence of a plan until we see inaction against known offenders.
Wat
IceBerrY
Profile Joined February 2012
Germany220 Posts
February 01 2016 20:18 GMT
#79
On February 02 2016 01:20 Musicus wrote:
Show nested quote +
Players will be required to play under the name that they wish to use during the WCS Circuit Winter Championship. A free character name change was provided to every account on January 29th.


Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!

Die barcodes, die!!!

Damn, this is great news.


So nice to see! Also this will spice up the ladder, i really like it.
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24212 Posts
February 01 2016 20:37 GMT
#80
Fighting barcodes !
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 54m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4539
Bisu 940
Backho 229
sorry 139
Soma 128
Dewaltoss 107
Sharp 61
ZerO 57
ToSsGirL 53
soO 25
[ Show more ]
Pusan 21
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
Bale 13
Sacsri 12
Aegong 9
Light 0
Dota 2
XcaliburYe239
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss500
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor142
Other Games
summit1g7970
singsing229
Pyrionflax187
NeuroSwarm112
crisheroes25
ZerO(Twitch)6
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 29
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt647
• HappyZerGling113
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
54m
Barracks vs Mini
Wardi Open
1h 54m
Monday Night Weeklies
6h 54m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d
Afreeca Starleague
1d
Snow vs EffOrt
Wardi Open
1d 1h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 14h
LiuLi Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Maestros of the Game
5 days
Serral vs herO
Clem vs Reynor
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
RSL Revival: Season 2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2025-26
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.