• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:53
CEST 15:53
KST 22:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy13ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research6Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Pros React To: SoulKey vs Ample Build Order Practice Maps [ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group F [ASL21] Ro24 Group E 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches [ASL21] Ro24 Group B
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1810 users

2016 WCS Challenger format announced. - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
110 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 18:46 GMT
#61
On February 02 2016 03:40 Makro wrote:
i was hyped until i saw firegod's contribution


Haha I am sorry :D

At least, This tournament might show to everybody how bad the ladder is right now (and thus maybe Blizzard will do something to fix this).
It is a big issue because it prevents new people who don't have many contacts among pro players to practice.
Many people talk about the problem to find new talents in korea but it is the same problem in Europe because new talents can't get practice and thus become strong players.
Progamer
SNSeigifried
Profile Joined April 2013
United States1640 Posts
February 01 2016 19:02 GMT
#62
So will blizzard open gm today so this competition will start for the pros xD
Icebound Esports
jcairne
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States127 Posts
February 01 2016 19:04 GMT
#63
If we are worried about ladder and matchmaking maybe this is a good thing Blizzard is doing this. It will help expose any of the glaring issues and Blizzard will be forced to fix them if they want to keep up the quality of the competition.
DSK
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
England1110 Posts
February 01 2016 19:07 GMT
#64
Interesting, I wonder how this change will playout.
**@ YT: SC2POVs at https://www.youtube.com/c/SC2POVsTV | https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/SC2POVs @**
ivancype
Profile Joined December 2012
Brazil485 Posts
February 01 2016 19:08 GMT
#65
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1
The other race is OP
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 19:17 GMT
#66
I think this is a major step forward. This gives amateur players an extremely clear and defined path towards going pro. No longer it is "be good at ladder and ... I guess show up and be good at tournaments." This makes it so your actual practice (you can argue how good ladder is for practice but lets pretend here for a sec) is closely intertwined with how you can go pro in the game. I love it.

Two notes though: They really, really need Ladder 2.0 for this to work. As it stands you can miss getting in GM and now suddenly you can't qualify because no matter how well you play if GM is full you're not qualifying. That isn't right. When they release Ladder 2.0 that has GM as GM + Masters that should solve this problem, though.

Next is they simply have to be more aggressive and more proactive about hacking. No more "Oh yeah that guy who is #8 on GM is an obvious maphacker" shit. Ideally prevent it outright but since we don't live in a perfect world they'll need some people who's main focus of their job is to monitor hacking reports and react swiftly.
Wat
Circumstance
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States11403 Posts
February 01 2016 19:24 GMT
#67
Like him or not, Catz makes a difference.
The world is better when every background has a chance.
Yiome
Profile Joined February 2014
China1687 Posts
February 01 2016 19:29 GMT
#68
Oh
Totalbiscuit should be pleased and given credit for this : P
ejozl
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark3486 Posts
February 01 2016 19:42 GMT
#69
us.battle.net
Now this post actually makes sense and you can call Grand Master: Pro and Master: Semi Pro
SC2 Archon needs "Terrible, terrible damage" as one of it's quotes.
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 19:46 GMT
#70
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.
Progamer
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 19:50 GMT
#71
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.
Wat
SuperHofmann
Profile Joined September 2013
Italy1741 Posts
February 01 2016 19:51 GMT
#72
Ladder? Ahahah
Vasacast always in my <3
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-01 19:57:28
February 01 2016 19:57 GMT
#73
Where are all the people who always complain that the TL community is too negative? You see? This is an update that people actually like and you see almost exlusively positive responses. (or at least not negative ones)
SuperHofmann
Profile Joined September 2013
Italy1741 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-01 20:02:58
February 01 2016 20:00 GMT
#74
using ladder is so stupid. There are maphackers, people using bonus pool, etc. They can find a better method.
Vasacast always in my <3
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 20:01 GMT
#75
Weren't they discussing getting rid of bonus pool in the ladder revamp?
Wat
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 20:12 GMT
#76
On February 02 2016 04:50 Tenks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.


I agree, this is why I would prefer a new ladder system then to promote it they could do this qualifier.
This qualifier will show all the issues of the ladder instead of promoting the benefit of the future ladder
Progamer
Solar424
Profile Blog Joined June 2013
United States4001 Posts
February 01 2016 20:17 GMT
#77
If they don't fix the "leave league" bug the ladder is pretty much useless at the top level
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 20:17 GMT
#78
On February 02 2016 05:12 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:50 Tenks wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.


I agree, this is why I would prefer a new ladder system then to promote it they could do this qualifier.
This qualifier will show all the issues of the ladder instead of promoting the benefit of the future ladder


There may be some kinks in the system to iron out not 100% associated with the ladder. I do agree this system seems to put the cart in front of the horse since it feels like it would work out better with their revamped ladder in place. But since it sounded like that won't be out until Spring/Summer they probably just wanted to try out this system and refine it to have a better system in place for when the new ladder actually launches.

For all we know Blizzard has been hard at work on some of this automated detection and they're ready to really test it out which is why it has started now. Blizzard would be wise to be secret about how they are addressing or plan on addressing the extremely valid concerns you're bringing up. So I wouldn't take silence as an absence of a plan until we see inaction against known offenders.
Wat
IceBerrY
Profile Joined February 2012
Germany220 Posts
February 01 2016 20:18 GMT
#79
On February 02 2016 01:20 Musicus wrote:
Show nested quote +
Players will be required to play under the name that they wish to use during the WCS Circuit Winter Championship. A free character name change was provided to every account on January 29th.


Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!

Die barcodes, die!!!

Damn, this is great news.


So nice to see! Also this will spice up the ladder, i really like it.
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24238 Posts
February 01 2016 20:37 GMT
#80
Fighting barcodes !
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
11:00
2026 Week 3
RotterdaM849
TKL 262
SteadfastSC178
IndyStarCraft 171
Rex139
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 849
TKL 262
SteadfastSC 178
IndyStarCraft 171
Rex 139
Hui .127
ProTech121
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 63993
Calm 6620
Bisu 2814
Leta 1349
EffOrt 628
Stork 487
Soma 415
firebathero 322
Mini 317
ggaemo 252
[ Show more ]
actioN 229
Rush 177
PianO 176
Soulkey 173
Dewaltoss 140
Last 111
hero 96
Mind 88
Sharp 52
Hyun 51
Barracks 36
sorry 35
ToSsGirL 34
JYJ 27
Movie 26
Shine 22
Hm[arnc] 22
yabsab 17
scan(afreeca) 17
Noble 13
soO 12
GoRush 11
Sexy 10
Sacsri 8
Rock 8
Terrorterran 4
Dota 2
Lowko361
Counter-Strike
byalli622
zeus420
edward50
Other Games
singsing2144
hiko490
B2W.Neo434
crisheroes291
XaKoH 160
QueenE139
oskar42
DeMusliM37
Happy0
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 59
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV732
League of Legends
• Nemesis2917
• Jankos2004
• TFBlade854
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
10h 7m
The PondCast
20h 7m
OSC
1d 10h
RSL Revival
1d 20h
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
BSL
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.