• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:07
CEST 20:07
KST 03:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon98Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?179Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
Has online-only competition during the pandemic changed your enjoyment of pro SC2? How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament KSL Week #92
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
Remastered crash fix suggestions a Announcement on the JEDI Ringing ASL22 General Discussion BW General Discussion Syncronization issues and can't find games
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group D BWCL Season 65 Announcement [Megathread] Daily Proleagues KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Post Your Watch!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8445 users

2016 WCS Challenger format announced. - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
110 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 18:46 GMT
#61
On February 02 2016 03:40 Makro wrote:
i was hyped until i saw firegod's contribution


Haha I am sorry :D

At least, This tournament might show to everybody how bad the ladder is right now (and thus maybe Blizzard will do something to fix this).
It is a big issue because it prevents new people who don't have many contacts among pro players to practice.
Many people talk about the problem to find new talents in korea but it is the same problem in Europe because new talents can't get practice and thus become strong players.
Progamer
SNSeigifried
Profile Joined April 2013
United States1640 Posts
February 01 2016 19:02 GMT
#62
So will blizzard open gm today so this competition will start for the pros xD
Icebound Esports
jcairne
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States127 Posts
February 01 2016 19:04 GMT
#63
If we are worried about ladder and matchmaking maybe this is a good thing Blizzard is doing this. It will help expose any of the glaring issues and Blizzard will be forced to fix them if they want to keep up the quality of the competition.
DSK
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
England1110 Posts
February 01 2016 19:07 GMT
#64
Interesting, I wonder how this change will playout.
**@ YT: SC2POVs at https://www.youtube.com/c/SC2POVsTV | https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/SC2POVs @**
ivancype
Profile Joined December 2012
Brazil485 Posts
February 01 2016 19:08 GMT
#65
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1
The other race is OP
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 19:17 GMT
#66
I think this is a major step forward. This gives amateur players an extremely clear and defined path towards going pro. No longer it is "be good at ladder and ... I guess show up and be good at tournaments." This makes it so your actual practice (you can argue how good ladder is for practice but lets pretend here for a sec) is closely intertwined with how you can go pro in the game. I love it.

Two notes though: They really, really need Ladder 2.0 for this to work. As it stands you can miss getting in GM and now suddenly you can't qualify because no matter how well you play if GM is full you're not qualifying. That isn't right. When they release Ladder 2.0 that has GM as GM + Masters that should solve this problem, though.

Next is they simply have to be more aggressive and more proactive about hacking. No more "Oh yeah that guy who is #8 on GM is an obvious maphacker" shit. Ideally prevent it outright but since we don't live in a perfect world they'll need some people who's main focus of their job is to monitor hacking reports and react swiftly.
Wat
Circumstance
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States11403 Posts
February 01 2016 19:24 GMT
#67
Like him or not, Catz makes a difference.
The world is better when every background has a chance.
Yiome
Profile Joined February 2014
China1687 Posts
February 01 2016 19:29 GMT
#68
Oh
Totalbiscuit should be pleased and given credit for this : P
ejozl
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark3548 Posts
February 01 2016 19:42 GMT
#69
us.battle.net
Now this post actually makes sense and you can call Grand Master: Pro and Master: Semi Pro
SC2 Archon needs "Terrible, terrible damage" as one of it's quotes.
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 19:46 GMT
#70
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.
Progamer
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 19:50 GMT
#71
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.
Wat
SuperHofmann
Profile Joined September 2013
Italy1741 Posts
February 01 2016 19:51 GMT
#72
Ladder? Ahahah
Vasacast always in my <3
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-01 19:57:28
February 01 2016 19:57 GMT
#73
Where are all the people who always complain that the TL community is too negative? You see? This is an update that people actually like and you see almost exlusively positive responses. (or at least not negative ones)
SuperHofmann
Profile Joined September 2013
Italy1741 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-01 20:02:58
February 01 2016 20:00 GMT
#74
using ladder is so stupid. There are maphackers, people using bonus pool, etc. They can find a better method.
Vasacast always in my <3
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 20:01 GMT
#75
Weren't they discussing getting rid of bonus pool in the ladder revamp?
Wat
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 20:12 GMT
#76
On February 02 2016 04:50 Tenks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.


I agree, this is why I would prefer a new ladder system then to promote it they could do this qualifier.
This qualifier will show all the issues of the ladder instead of promoting the benefit of the future ladder
Progamer
Solar424
Profile Blog Joined June 2013
United States4001 Posts
February 01 2016 20:17 GMT
#77
If they don't fix the "leave league" bug the ladder is pretty much useless at the top level
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 20:17 GMT
#78
On February 02 2016 05:12 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:50 Tenks wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.


I agree, this is why I would prefer a new ladder system then to promote it they could do this qualifier.
This qualifier will show all the issues of the ladder instead of promoting the benefit of the future ladder


There may be some kinks in the system to iron out not 100% associated with the ladder. I do agree this system seems to put the cart in front of the horse since it feels like it would work out better with their revamped ladder in place. But since it sounded like that won't be out until Spring/Summer they probably just wanted to try out this system and refine it to have a better system in place for when the new ladder actually launches.

For all we know Blizzard has been hard at work on some of this automated detection and they're ready to really test it out which is why it has started now. Blizzard would be wise to be secret about how they are addressing or plan on addressing the extremely valid concerns you're bringing up. So I wouldn't take silence as an absence of a plan until we see inaction against known offenders.
Wat
IceBerrY
Profile Joined February 2012
Germany220 Posts
February 01 2016 20:18 GMT
#79
On February 02 2016 01:20 Musicus wrote:
Show nested quote +
Players will be required to play under the name that they wish to use during the WCS Circuit Winter Championship. A free character name change was provided to every account on January 29th.


Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!

Die barcodes, die!!!

Damn, this is great news.


So nice to see! Also this will spice up the ladder, i really like it.
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24239 Posts
February 01 2016 20:37 GMT
#80
Fighting barcodes !
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 53m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
UpATreeSC 152
MindelVK 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 353
Rush 167
Dewaltoss 109
Zeus 92
Hm[arnc] 51
Pusan 48
IntoTheRainbow 11
Dota 2
Gorgc5016
Counter-Strike
fl0m1024
x6flipin625
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0105
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu101
Other Games
Grubby3219
Liquid`RaSZi1697
FrodaN990
mouzStarbuck453
B2W.Neo441
ceh9433
KnowMe151
ArmadaUGS133
RotterdaM96
QueenE66
Mew2King66
Chillindude14
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1483
StarCraft 2
WardiTV590
TaKeTV 179
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 5
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki14
• Michael_bg 9
• 80smullet 9
• Pr0nogo 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4008
League of Legends
• TFBlade909
Other Games
• imaqtpie693
• Shiphtur137
Upcoming Events
OSC
3h 53m
Replay Cast
5h 53m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
16h 53m
RotterdaM Event
22h 8m
Replay Cast
1d 5h
GSL
1d 16h
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL
2 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
2 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Shine vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Light vs EffOrt
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-16
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.