• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:15
CET 07:15
KST 15:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? [D] Hacker peak in sc2 ? Liquibets sc2 season 30 Evil Geniuses - shutting down Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win
Tourneys
SC4ALL: II Venue Change Announcement! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps Starcraft 2 Advance [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles Mutation # 548 Shining Bright
Brood War
General
sOs joins Best's team, Newcatsle University Rollback Netcode in Brood War SC4ALL: II Venue Change Announcement! [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stratus: Battle for the sky now on steam Early acc Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Deus Ex 3!?
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Dating: How's your luck? Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8377 users

2016 WCS Challenger format announced. - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
110 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 18:46 GMT
#61
On February 02 2016 03:40 Makro wrote:
i was hyped until i saw firegod's contribution


Haha I am sorry :D

At least, This tournament might show to everybody how bad the ladder is right now (and thus maybe Blizzard will do something to fix this).
It is a big issue because it prevents new people who don't have many contacts among pro players to practice.
Many people talk about the problem to find new talents in korea but it is the same problem in Europe because new talents can't get practice and thus become strong players.
Progamer
SNSeigifried
Profile Joined April 2013
United States1640 Posts
February 01 2016 19:02 GMT
#62
So will blizzard open gm today so this competition will start for the pros xD
Icebound Esports
jcairne
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States127 Posts
February 01 2016 19:04 GMT
#63
If we are worried about ladder and matchmaking maybe this is a good thing Blizzard is doing this. It will help expose any of the glaring issues and Blizzard will be forced to fix them if they want to keep up the quality of the competition.
DSK
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
England1110 Posts
February 01 2016 19:07 GMT
#64
Interesting, I wonder how this change will playout.
**@ YT: SC2POVs at https://www.youtube.com/c/SC2POVsTV | https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/SC2POVs @**
ivancype
Profile Joined December 2012
Brazil485 Posts
February 01 2016 19:08 GMT
#65
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1
The other race is OP
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 19:17 GMT
#66
I think this is a major step forward. This gives amateur players an extremely clear and defined path towards going pro. No longer it is "be good at ladder and ... I guess show up and be good at tournaments." This makes it so your actual practice (you can argue how good ladder is for practice but lets pretend here for a sec) is closely intertwined with how you can go pro in the game. I love it.

Two notes though: They really, really need Ladder 2.0 for this to work. As it stands you can miss getting in GM and now suddenly you can't qualify because no matter how well you play if GM is full you're not qualifying. That isn't right. When they release Ladder 2.0 that has GM as GM + Masters that should solve this problem, though.

Next is they simply have to be more aggressive and more proactive about hacking. No more "Oh yeah that guy who is #8 on GM is an obvious maphacker" shit. Ideally prevent it outright but since we don't live in a perfect world they'll need some people who's main focus of their job is to monitor hacking reports and react swiftly.
Wat
Circumstance
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States11403 Posts
February 01 2016 19:24 GMT
#67
Like him or not, Catz makes a difference.
The world is better when every background has a chance.
Yiome
Profile Joined February 2014
China1687 Posts
February 01 2016 19:29 GMT
#68
Oh
Totalbiscuit should be pleased and given credit for this : P
ejozl
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark3561 Posts
February 01 2016 19:42 GMT
#69
us.battle.net
Now this post actually makes sense and you can call Grand Master: Pro and Master: Semi Pro
SC2 Archon needs "Terrible, terrible damage" as one of it's quotes.
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 19:46 GMT
#70
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.
Progamer
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 19:50 GMT
#71
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.
Wat
SuperHofmann
Profile Joined September 2013
Italy1741 Posts
February 01 2016 19:51 GMT
#72
Ladder? Ahahah
Vasacast always in my <3
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-01 19:57:28
February 01 2016 19:57 GMT
#73
Where are all the people who always complain that the TL community is too negative? You see? This is an update that people actually like and you see almost exlusively positive responses. (or at least not negative ones)
SuperHofmann
Profile Joined September 2013
Italy1741 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-01 20:02:58
February 01 2016 20:00 GMT
#74
using ladder is so stupid. There are maphackers, people using bonus pool, etc. They can find a better method.
Vasacast always in my <3
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 20:01 GMT
#75
Weren't they discussing getting rid of bonus pool in the ladder revamp?
Wat
FireCake
Profile Joined March 2013
151 Posts
February 01 2016 20:12 GMT
#76
On February 02 2016 04:50 Tenks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.


I agree, this is why I would prefer a new ladder system then to promote it they could do this qualifier.
This qualifier will show all the issues of the ladder instead of promoting the benefit of the future ladder
Progamer
Solar424
Profile Blog Joined June 2013
United States4001 Posts
February 01 2016 20:17 GMT
#77
If they don't fix the "leave league" bug the ladder is pretty much useless at the top level
Tenks
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3104 Posts
February 01 2016 20:17 GMT
#78
On February 02 2016 05:12 FireCake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 02 2016 04:50 Tenks wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:46 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 04:08 ivancype wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:58 FireCake wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:36 Musicus wrote:
On February 02 2016 01:32 FireCake wrote:
It is a good idea because almost no pro players are playing on ladder right now (the matchmaking makes the ladder useless). We might have some funny ladder games and stream might be more interesting for viewers.

But...

The matchmaking has been broken for months and is still broken, you can abuse the system by saving your bonus pool and use it just before the end of the qualifier. Not to mention that people can trade win very easily, it has been done many time in the past when koreans players had to play hundreds games to participate in the WCS.

It would be a lot better to use MMR to rank people and not points.


I still love the fact that they are putting this system in place. Sure there are problems with it for now, but since they are aiming at a ladder revamp anyway, it will be really cool in the long run I think.

Win traders usually get caught in ladder qualifers like in Shoutcraft or Destiny I and get disqualified.


How do you detect win traders ? Most of time nothing is done with cheaters so I am worried with this qualifier.
Many people share their account, how do you deal with this ?
In WCS it is forbidden to use skin units, on ladder it is allowed. So in this qualifier it is allowed to cheat...

There are many many problems with this qualifier and it seems they are not ready for this or they simply don't care ...



iAsonu and XY were suspend from WCS America 2014 because they win traded, so there is punishment for this

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/13423452444#1


They were not very careful, there are other players that have been hiding their win trades a lot better.
It is really not difficult to chat somewhere else than the bnet client to ask for win trades.

But I think the worst thing in this qualifier is that people are always sharing their accounts on ladder and thus the MMR of many top players on the ladder is not calculated by the wins of the owner of the account.


I think many of your concerns could be solved via some big data processing assuming they're collecting it. If someone is suspected of sharing accounts it should be fairly easy to tell based upon hotkeys, APM, IP address, MAC address(? doubt they would collect that) and easily solved that this is clearly two separate people playing the game.

For the win trading I feel they could generate trends as well. Where these two players have about a 50% winrate when playing each other, their match time is below the average across the ladder so these players get flagged. Then human intervention could determine if these two are in fact win trading.

I highly doubt any of this infrastructure is in place, though.


I agree, this is why I would prefer a new ladder system then to promote it they could do this qualifier.
This qualifier will show all the issues of the ladder instead of promoting the benefit of the future ladder


There may be some kinks in the system to iron out not 100% associated with the ladder. I do agree this system seems to put the cart in front of the horse since it feels like it would work out better with their revamped ladder in place. But since it sounded like that won't be out until Spring/Summer they probably just wanted to try out this system and refine it to have a better system in place for when the new ladder actually launches.

For all we know Blizzard has been hard at work on some of this automated detection and they're ready to really test it out which is why it has started now. Blizzard would be wise to be secret about how they are addressing or plan on addressing the extremely valid concerns you're bringing up. So I wouldn't take silence as an absence of a plan until we see inaction against known offenders.
Wat
IceBerrY
Profile Joined February 2012
Germany220 Posts
February 01 2016 20:18 GMT
#79
On February 02 2016 01:20 Musicus wrote:
Show nested quote +
Players will be required to play under the name that they wish to use during the WCS Circuit Winter Championship. A free character name change was provided to every account on January 29th.


Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!

Die barcodes, die!!!

Damn, this is great news.


So nice to see! Also this will spice up the ladder, i really like it.
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24239 Posts
February 01 2016 20:37 GMT
#80
Fighting barcodes !
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
09:00
FSL season 12 opener: HM vs ST
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft505
RuFF_SC2 203
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2404
Mind 152
Larva 80
Terrorterran 28
Bale 27
yabsab 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Counter-Strike
fl0m499
Other Games
summit1g10597
JimRising 511
C9.Mang0252
Fuzer 85
NeuroSwarm70
ViBE67
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick512
BasetradeTV149
Counter-Strike
PGL109
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 25
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Sammyuel 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2135
League of Legends
• Stunt227
Other Games
• Scarra943
Upcoming Events
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4h 45m
Reynor vs Solar
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs MaxPax
herO vs Rogue
IPSL
10h 45m
WorsT vs nOmaD
Dewalt vs andersOn
AI Arena Tournament
12h 45m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 4h
IPSL
1d 10h
Azhi_Dahaki vs ggnore13
Double vs WIZARD
Replay Cast
1d 16h
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
YoungYakov vs Lambo
SHIN vs TBD
Percival vs Shameless
Solar vs TBD
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-05
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

Sector 951
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.