• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 08:27
CET 14:27
KST 22:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
[BSL23] RO16 Group Stage14Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top?2Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Serral's getting trashed by New Catsle's Mind Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top? Liquibets sc2 season 30 StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon
Tourneys
soO & FanTaSy return! SC2 Kevin Scrim 4v4 (Nov 16) RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament iNu's Battles #22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Starcraft 2 Advance [G] How to playtest arcade maps [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 551 Robotic Revival Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles
Brood War
General
List of top players active on ShieldBattery BW General Discussion [BSL23] RO16 Group Stage screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool [BW] Looking for Clan Thread!
Tourneys
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4 BWCL Season 65 Announcement [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL23] Ro16 Group C - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Infested Terran strategies in 2026 Nuke strategy worked in K-League 2026-11-09 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy)
Other Games
General Games
List of Game Threads The PlayStation 5 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Can Game Data Analytics Help Players Improvements
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Trading/Investing Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Dating: How's your luck? US Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The time I organised my…
AssyrianKing
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 16703 users

Community Feedback Update - January 22 - Page 8

Forum Index > SC2 General
312 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 16 Next All
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16103 Posts
January 23 2016 01:00 GMT
#141
On January 23 2016 09:19 BronzeKnee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2016 08:44 pure.Wasted wrote:
On January 23 2016 07:40 BronzeKnee wrote:
The fact I have power of over you over the internet says a lot about you. Be like me, don't care what other people think about you.

The only opinion that matters is what you think of yourself.


The fact that you think you have power over me says a lot about you. Don't worry about me BronzeKnee, thinking that you're an ass doesn't get in the way of me having a fantastic day.

I don't think the WM is genius design, I think - as I said - it is genius compared to the other units in this game. In fact, as I'm sure you're aware, a unit can only be designed well or poorly in relation to other units. Banelings without WMs are awful, with WMs they're great. Marines without Medivacs and Banes are terrible, with them they're friggin awesome.

The WM's defining characteristic, as seen 99% of the time that it's used in the MU where it's used the most, is making Zerg units more interesting than they otherwise would be.

Any shittiness in the randomness of its targeting (still kind of an issue), or its burst (not at all an issue IMO), pales in comparison to the good it does for the MU.

If you're drawing a line for units that deserve to be cut or totally reworked, there are infinity plus one better candidates than the WM, eg Roaches, which are neither interesting in and of themselves, nor force particularly interesting plays of the opponent.




This is one of the greatest SC2 games of all time in my opinion, and with the Widow Mine we wouldn't have seen the greatness of it.

you talk like they weren't any good tvz games with WMs
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
jasonbourne907
Profile Joined May 2015
17 Posts
January 23 2016 01:05 GMT
#142
it is unchanging that adept performance per price is ridiculous in 1tier unit
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
January 23 2016 01:05 GMT
#143
On January 23 2016 10:00 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2016 09:19 BronzeKnee wrote:
On January 23 2016 08:44 pure.Wasted wrote:
On January 23 2016 07:40 BronzeKnee wrote:
The fact I have power of over you over the internet says a lot about you. Be like me, don't care what other people think about you.

The only opinion that matters is what you think of yourself.


The fact that you think you have power over me says a lot about you. Don't worry about me BronzeKnee, thinking that you're an ass doesn't get in the way of me having a fantastic day.

I don't think the WM is genius design, I think - as I said - it is genius compared to the other units in this game. In fact, as I'm sure you're aware, a unit can only be designed well or poorly in relation to other units. Banelings without WMs are awful, with WMs they're great. Marines without Medivacs and Banes are terrible, with them they're friggin awesome.

The WM's defining characteristic, as seen 99% of the time that it's used in the MU where it's used the most, is making Zerg units more interesting than they otherwise would be.

Any shittiness in the randomness of its targeting (still kind of an issue), or its burst (not at all an issue IMO), pales in comparison to the good it does for the MU.

If you're drawing a line for units that deserve to be cut or totally reworked, there are infinity plus one better candidates than the WM, eg Roaches, which are neither interesting in and of themselves, nor force particularly interesting plays of the opponent.




This is one of the greatest SC2 games of all time in my opinion, and with the Widow Mine we wouldn't have seen the greatness of it.

you talk like they weren't any good tvz games with WMs

Well whether X unit can produce good games isn't much the point of discussion, but rather X unit's actual impact on games overall. You can have 10 games that fit inside this bubble where things are fun and cool, but have 100 games all outside the bubble, where things aren't so cool.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
ProtossMasterRace
Profile Joined January 2016
57 Posts
January 23 2016 01:07 GMT
#144
On January 23 2016 10:05 jasonbourne907 wrote:
it is unchanging that adept performance per price is ridiculous in 1tier unit


Ah so massing t1 units is a problem now, but the fact that zerglings and marines are viable and extremely effective throughout the entire game is not? Also with this change marines will be able to trade cost efficiently with units that are designed to kill light units.
Lexender
Profile Joined September 2013
Mexico2665 Posts
January 23 2016 01:10 GMT
#145
So I've been doing some math on the tank and taking some inspiration from a reddit thread I've come up with a small change that helps the siege tank and mech without going overboard.

Change siege tank damage from 35+15 to 41+15.
Change siege tank attack upgrades from 3+2 for each upgrade to 2+3 for each upgrade.

Reasoning, with this buff tanks would take 1 shot to kill some P/Z units (1 less shot to kill stalkers, adepts, zealots, roaches, ravagers) and 2 shots less to kill archons. At the same time it would take the same amount of shots to kill bio units (marines and marauder) and the interactions stay the same compared to actual siege tank with same upgrade. Also it would take the same amount of shots to kill an immortal.

Once fully upgraded the tank retains somewhat the same strenght also.

A small change that its not too strong but goes a long way to help siege tanks and mech, specially early game.
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16103 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-01-23 01:15:00
January 23 2016 01:13 GMT
#146
On January 23 2016 10:07 ProtossMasterRace wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2016 10:05 jasonbourne907 wrote:
it is unchanging that adept performance per price is ridiculous in 1tier unit


Ah so massing t1 units is a problem now, but the fact that zerglings and marines are viable and extremely effective throughout the entire game is not? Also with this change marines will be able to trade cost efficiently with units that are designed to kill light units.

it's a problem when you need t3 units to counter t1 units. Protoss can just mass adepts and you are forced to turtle to mass libs/mass wm. adepts are supremely cost-effective against all low tier units of terran.
Just watch alive vs classic where classic played with an adept monocomposition 10 minutes into the game and won.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
ClaudeSc2
Profile Joined May 2014
United States73 Posts
January 23 2016 01:14 GMT
#147
I have a feeling we're still going to see protosses doing damage to terrans with their adepts. They won't kill 17 workers while marines slowly drain their health. But I think skilled GSL level protosses will be positioning their warp prism more aggressively for pickup micro...we might even see it become a thing that raises the skill ceiling. Where like koreans can do it while macroing well and foreigners can't. We'll have to see. I have faith that Blizzard is going to fix this game correctly because it will be the last Starcraft for awhile. 2016 may be a shitty year for the competitive scene because of this, but if 2017-2025 is good (even if it's just a thriving amateur scene like BW because of the terrible things that may happen this year) I'm fine with them taking it slow. I like the idea of tanks quickly sieging and unsieging. Sounds like a great middle ground that will make TvT more skill oriented like it was in HotS and WoL. Like a clear division between the b tier Terrans and the A-tier ones, because there isn't one right now really. Sorry, Journey, Bravo and Natural didn't become competitive at the highest level in TvT overnight for no reason.
jasonbourne907
Profile Joined May 2015
17 Posts
January 23 2016 01:17 GMT
#148
hey blizzard sc2 team! please listen kr progammer feedback. they play game 8h+ a day.
they know sc2 than you all!!!!! just listen and do. It is difficult?
Jonsoload
Profile Joined October 2011
Germany62 Posts
January 23 2016 01:24 GMT
#149
it's a problem when you need t3 units to counter t1 units. Protoss can just mass adepts and you are forced to turtle to mass libs/mass wm. adepts are supremely cost-effective against all low tier units of terran.
Just watch alive vs classic where classic played with an adept monocomposition 10 minutes into the game and won.


@Charoisaur
Deja-vu!!!! It's almost like you're talkin about the reverse of PvT for the entirety of WoL and HoTS
I want a TC icon,not a race icon of scII :(
Tosster
Profile Joined August 2011
Poland299 Posts
January 23 2016 01:27 GMT
#150
Yeah lets not give a fuck about lurkers destroying everything without any micro whatsoever.
Fran_
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1024 Posts
January 23 2016 01:29 GMT
#151
On January 23 2016 10:07 ProtossMasterRace wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2016 10:05 jasonbourne907 wrote:
it is unchanging that adept performance per price is ridiculous in 1tier unit


Ah so massing t1 units is a problem now, but the fact that zerglings and marines are viable and extremely effective throughout the entire game is not? Also with this change marines will be able to trade cost efficiently with units that are designed to kill light units.


By "trade cost efficiently" you mean that marines will still be raped but not as fast. I see.
BiiG-Fr
Profile Joined May 2015
Canada109 Posts
January 23 2016 01:32 GMT
#152
On January 23 2016 10:24 Jonsoload wrote:
Show nested quote +
it's a problem when you need t3 units to counter t1 units. Protoss can just mass adepts and you are forced to turtle to mass libs/mass wm. adepts are supremely cost-effective against all low tier units of terran.
Just watch alive vs classic where classic played with an adept monocomposition 10 minutes into the game and won.


@Charoisaur
Deja-vu!!!! It's almost like you're talkin about the reverse of PvT for the entirety of WoL and HoTS



That's total BS, marines are good with stim shield AND medivac in support, adept are good from the beginning to the end.
If your opponent is of choleric temper, irritate him.
Naracs_Duc
Profile Joined August 2015
746 Posts
January 23 2016 01:34 GMT
#153
On January 23 2016 10:13 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2016 10:07 ProtossMasterRace wrote:
On January 23 2016 10:05 jasonbourne907 wrote:
it is unchanging that adept performance per price is ridiculous in 1tier unit


Ah so massing t1 units is a problem now, but the fact that zerglings and marines are viable and extremely effective throughout the entire game is not? Also with this change marines will be able to trade cost efficiently with units that are designed to kill light units.

it's a problem when you need t3 units to counter t1 units. Protoss can just mass adepts and you are forced to turtle to mass libs/mass wm. adepts are supremely cost-effective against all low tier units of terran.
Just watch alive vs classic where classic played with an adept monocomposition 10 minutes into the game and won.


Um... this is like the entirety of the protoss side of life from WoL => HotS

Terran spams bio
Protoss needs T3

Now it is switched and people cry that there is a problem?

JackONeill
Profile Joined September 2013
861 Posts
January 23 2016 01:37 GMT
#154
- adept change is underwhelming. It only nerfs very early game, maybe 3g warp prism allin too. But once toss gets +1, it's back to the "oh I failed my drop : doesn't matter killed 12 scvs lol"
- PB nerf is ridiculous. The spell is so badly designed they already are on the path no nerf hammer it until no one can use it.
- overcharge nerf : still a terrible designed spell that's nerfed because it's not viable.
- don't care much for the spore nerf

STILL NOTHING ABOUT

- thor AA
- liberator AG
- retarded disruptor
- ravager
- tankivac ("in TvT and TvZ"... okay DK you finally clearly stated we're not supposed to build tanks in TvP, thanks.)
- thor AA
- viper/corru/BL deathball
- 8 armor ultra

I'm seriously asking myself if DK and his team are lord of the ring's ents. We've litterally seen NO changes for a few months. So much for community feedback.
Seed's interview was the wake up call, so blizzard got scared people won't buy the mission packs, so they cut DK's 3 months vacations.
Foxxan
Profile Joined October 2004
Sweden3427 Posts
January 23 2016 01:42 GMT
#155
I much rather they do some design changes and than try to balance the game from there.
They are so bloody scared over there i want to scream atthem in the face
BiiG-Fr
Profile Joined May 2015
Canada109 Posts
January 23 2016 01:43 GMT
#156
I guess they are more focused on selling their mission packs than balancing the game, btw I miss hots a lot, the only good point with lotv, to me, is the 12 workers start: all the new units are not very fun to play, to deal with or to watch.
If your opponent is of choleric temper, irritate him.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-01-23 02:04:01
January 23 2016 01:46 GMT
#157
On January 23 2016 10:32 BiiG-Fr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2016 10:24 Jonsoload wrote:
it's a problem when you need t3 units to counter t1 units. Protoss can just mass adepts and you are forced to turtle to mass libs/mass wm. adepts are supremely cost-effective against all low tier units of terran.
Just watch alive vs classic where classic played with an adept monocomposition 10 minutes into the game and won.


@Charoisaur
Deja-vu!!!! It's almost like you're talkin about the reverse of PvT for the entirety of WoL and HoTS



That's total BS, marines are good with stim shield AND medivac in support, adept are good from the beginning to the end.


Marines only need the stim/shield/medivac because the opponent's have been fielding blink/charge/speed or more expensive, often very specific anti-marine units against terran.
Adept's are good from the beginning because all the starting units are light. The moment you start fielding armored units (roaches, stalkers) they become quite weak. They also require an upgrade to keep up. Terran is just out of luck in that regard because blizzard never fixed the oracle which means you cannot open with marauders, so you have to pretend you lack a brain and build marines despite knowing adepts are coming.
ProtossMasterRace
Profile Joined January 2016
57 Posts
January 23 2016 02:04 GMT
#158
On January 23 2016 10:29 Fran_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2016 10:07 ProtossMasterRace wrote:
On January 23 2016 10:05 jasonbourne907 wrote:
it is unchanging that adept performance per price is ridiculous in 1tier unit


Ah so massing t1 units is a problem now, but the fact that zerglings and marines are viable and extremely effective throughout the entire game is not? Also with this change marines will be able to trade cost efficiently with units that are designed to kill light units.


By "trade cost efficiently" you mean that marines will still be raped but not as fast. I see.


By trade cost efficiently I mean 2 marines will be able to kill an adept almost and 3 will be able to kill one with ease, 1 adept costs 100 minerals 25 gas, so lets say that's ~150 minerals that are 3 marines because gas is more valuable then minerals.
So yea at that point mass marine will trade cost efficiently with something that is supposed to hard counter it.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-01-23 02:10:18
January 23 2016 02:09 GMT
#159
On January 23 2016 11:04 ProtossMasterRace wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2016 10:29 Fran_ wrote:
On January 23 2016 10:07 ProtossMasterRace wrote:
On January 23 2016 10:05 jasonbourne907 wrote:
it is unchanging that adept performance per price is ridiculous in 1tier unit


Ah so massing t1 units is a problem now, but the fact that zerglings and marines are viable and extremely effective throughout the entire game is not? Also with this change marines will be able to trade cost efficiently with units that are designed to kill light units.


By "trade cost efficiently" you mean that marines will still be raped but not as fast. I see.


By trade cost efficiently I mean 2 marines will be able to kill an adept almost and 3 will be able to kill one with ease, 1 adept costs 100 minerals 25 gas, so lets say that's ~150 minerals that are 3 marines because gas is more valuable then minerals.
So yea at that point mass marine will trade cost efficiently with something that is supposed to hard counter it.


I don't think that is true. I've played around with a test map with these customized adepts and they still countered marines pretty well as far as I recall. I surely can't tell you about all scenarios (low amounts, high amounts, all upgrade variations), but note that with 1/1 vs 1/1 to 3/3 vs 3/3 there is hardly any change at all, since adepts upgrade with +1(+1 vs light) and thereby reinstate any pre-nerf shot relations unless the terran is ahead in armor upgrades. And even that only works until +2 is done for the protoss.
redloser
Profile Joined May 2011
Korea (South)1751 Posts
January 23 2016 02:24 GMT
#160
Nerfing spores? Mutas are still damn strong in ZvZ... What are they thinking...
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 16 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Invitational
21:00
WardiTV Not-Summer Championshi
Lambo vs Shameless
Percival vs YoungYakov
TBD vs GgMaChine
WardiTV527
ComeBackTV 384
Rex112
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
elazer 179
Rex 112
Classic 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 34174
Rain 1822
Jaedong 1418
EffOrt 747
Shuttle 653
Mini 527
Light 353
Larva 326
Stork 204
Rush 171
[ Show more ]
firebathero 168
Last 163
Snow 135
Killer 107
Pusan 97
hero 72
Hyun 72
Aegong 52
Hm[arnc] 39
Movie 32
ToSsGirL 32
Barracks 30
Noble 21
sorry 20
Sacsri 18
soO 16
Free 10
910 10
yabsab 10
Terrorterran 8
scan(afreeca) 7
Icarus 6
Dota 2
Gorgc3793
Dendi1767
monkeys_forever282
XcaliburYe142
Counter-Strike
fl0m3771
olofmeister908
kRYSTAL_28
Other Games
singsing1684
B2W.Neo917
Lowko310
syndereN197
crisheroes177
XaKoH 163
hiko106
Mew2King94
QueenE34
ArmadaUGS33
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 16
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 9
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• ChaeLyn 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1188
• WagamamaTV457
League of Legends
• Jankos2225
• Stunt482
• TFBlade69
Upcoming Events
OSC
2h 33m
OSC
9h 33m
ArT vs MindelVK
MiniZergUA vs TBD
Shameless vs TBD
Ultimate Battle
22h 33m
OSC
1d
OSC
1d 10h
ByuN vs MaxPax
herO vs Krystianer
Percival vs Shameless
LetaleX vs YoungYakov
Nicoract vs Gerald
GgMaChine vs ArT
CranKy Ducklings
1d 20h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 22h
IPSL
2 days
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
BSL
2 days
TerrOr vs OyAji
UltrA vs Gosudark
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
IPSL
3 days
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
BSL
3 days
Artosis vs Dewalt
Ret vs Tech
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-11
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
Individual League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

YSL S4
Sector 591
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
StarCraft2 Weekly Open Tournament 2026 Grand Finals
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.