• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:18
CEST 16:18
KST 23:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China7Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL64Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion SC uni coach streams logging into betting site BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 770 users

The Curious Case of soO's Macro Mechanics - Page 21

Forum Index > SC2 General
534 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 19 20 21 22 23 27 Next All
Quineotio
Profile Joined February 2011
Australia128 Posts
August 06 2015 11:39 GMT
#401
On August 06 2015 18:43 LaLuSh wrote:
On the highest level micro is the more important of the two. The higher you go, the greater its relative importance.


Which is the problem in a nutshell. Why is the most abstract, most mechanically difficult aspect of the game also the most important aspect of the game for new players? I think G3n's post "New Macro = Good!?" gives some insight to what it is like without the macro mechanics, where macro gets harder organically as the game goes on and more bases get taken.
Jesus is risen
Superbanana
Profile Joined May 2014
2369 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-06 12:14:06
August 06 2015 12:05 GMT
#402
I would like to see the following tests:

Reduced efficiency on injects: This is to reduce the punishment on bad injects. However zerg gets a small extra default larvae production so that the full larvae production is not reduced a lot. As BigJ pointed out, larvae injects are still worth it even with a considerable nerf. But thing like choosing between an inject or extra creep when you have a lot of hatches will be a real choice. Some players already do that with the current system so its interesting. Thats because i think fast larvae production is not a problem, it actually makes the game better with fast tech switches and production for zerg.

Auto cast on mules: Terrans don't have to click the drop mule button each time, but toggle auto cast on and off instead (the meaningful decision involved stays the same). This reduces the burden on new players but experienced players won't notice a big difference. Terran macro is intensive due to production, not mule drops, since there is no permanent loss if you store energy a bit.

No changes on chrono: The punishment for bad chrono is not big and there are meaningful choices involved. Maybe allow auto cast on chrono. Experienced players might toggle it off to not waste nexus energy and turn it on later in the game to boost an upgrade. New players will be able to use with more efficiency. Chrono is a great mechanic and im strongly against its removal.
In PvZ the zerg can make the situation spire out of control but protoss can adept to the situation.
Castor385
Profile Joined September 2011
Netherlands20 Posts
August 06 2015 12:21 GMT
#403
Pretty well written article. I'm not really sure if I should be for or against the 'macro' changes.

I would really like to see some actual testing data, instead of hours and hours of theory crafting.
Study everything, You'll find something you can use
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
August 06 2015 13:20 GMT
#404
On August 06 2015 11:35 Parcelleus wrote:
Well said Nony.

I also like what Morrow says on Remax (video should play at about 4min 15sec in):



That is a point i already made somewhere, people who focus on single tasks/details get it all wrong imo.
It's important that the whole experience is a good one, it doesn't really matter if injects are binary/uninteresting, the mechanic is part of what makes zerg interesting as a whole.
I also agree with his general statement that mechanics in sc2 are already too easy, but that's another point entirely^^
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Quineotio
Profile Joined February 2011
Australia128 Posts
August 06 2015 13:28 GMT
#405
On August 06 2015 22:20 The_Red_Viper wrote:
It's important that the whole experience is a good one, it doesn't really matter if injects are binary/uninteresting, the mechanic is part of what makes zerg interesting as a whole.


If being binary/uninteresting isn't a good enough reason to change something then what is?
Jesus is risen
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
August 06 2015 13:31 GMT
#406
On August 06 2015 22:28 Quineotio wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2015 22:20 The_Red_Viper wrote:
It's important that the whole experience is a good one, it doesn't really matter if injects are binary/uninteresting, the mechanic is part of what makes zerg interesting as a whole.


If being binary/uninteresting isn't a good enough reason to change something then what is?

Read my comment again / watch the video and you will understand why it doesn't matter if a single task might be not 100% interesting on its own.
The results of the combination of all these single tasks is what matters.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
mishimaBeef
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2259 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-06 13:37:11
August 06 2015 13:36 GMT
#407
On August 06 2015 21:21 Castor385 wrote:
I would really like to see some actual testing data, instead of hours and hours of theory crafting.


I agree.
Dare to live the life you have dreamed for yourself. Go forward and make your dreams come true. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-06 14:01:05
August 06 2015 13:56 GMT
#408
On August 06 2015 22:20 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2015 11:35 Parcelleus wrote:
Well said Nony.

I also like what Morrow says on Remax (video should play at about 4min 15sec in):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOn-kvc8kf4#t=4m15

That is a point i already made somewhere, people who focus on single tasks/details get it all wrong imo.
It's important that the whole experience is a good one, it doesn't really matter if injects are binary/uninteresting, the mechanic is part of what makes zerg interesting as a whole.
I also agree with his general statement that mechanics in sc2 are already too easy, but that's another point entirely^^


It's not a good argument because it doesn't justify inject.You could literally click away pop-ups or force you to do something else that has nothing to do with RTS like solve math equations and get the same effect. In the case of math equations it would actually be a skillfull task in itself by the way, so it would actually be a better way to create the wanted effect of distinguishing players. It would still be no decision but it would be an actual improvement to the game - which is kind of sad, but that's how bad the current state of injects is.

I'm not against the concept of having players look at their bases and do shit everywhere. But if I do it for building a barracks then it is because I made the spend my money in that way at that time. With inject it is simply a task that you will do regardless of what happens in the game. If you have a 25energy queen next to an uninjected hatchery then you inject that hatchery, plain and stupid as that.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9376 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-06 14:02:26
August 06 2015 14:01 GMT
#409
On August 06 2015 14:35 Cascade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2015 14:26 Hider wrote:
If you want strategy and micro, play a MOBA.


If you want micro to be related to controlling multiple units, then what? MOBA's doesn't properly fulfill that role.

You may then argue that you cuold play other RTS games like that, however, all of the "easy mode" RTS games have awfully slow and unresponsive units. Sc2 is the only game that gives satisfaction in terms of unit control.

But slow units makes the game more open to new players, and let's us focus on what RTS is REALLY about, namely strategy, so we should congratulate those games for that, right?
(Sorry, just trolling a bit, feel free to disregard.)


So those whink a real-time game is all about strategy are ccompletely wrong. Every single empirical example will proove you wrong. Let's look at real sports. Who on earth starts to play/watch football/soccer due to strategy? And let's look at the most played computer game in the world League of Legends. Noone gives a !@#$%^&* about strategy in soloq. You buy same items every game. P/B phase is pointless, you just play your favourite champions and most people care little about teamcomps dynamic. Yet it's still succesful becasue the mechanics inside the game work well.

Strategy can be good to have, but mechanics are what defines sports (it will be called technique there) and computergames as well as esports. Strategy should therefore be seen as a secondary goal while a high mechanical skillcap should be the primary goal.

However, the question is how do we make the mechanics interesting? How do we maintain a super high skillcap without a super high learning barrier.
mishimaBeef
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2259 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-06 14:07:46
August 06 2015 14:05 GMT
#410
High mechanical skillcap will exist regardless considering the way SC2 is designed. Oh, you can micro hellion groups at 2 different bases while dropping the main? Well TY can do that plus micro a banshee, plus expand, plus make units without idling production, plus start +3/+3 as soon as his +2/+2 finished. GG?
Dare to live the life you have dreamed for yourself. Go forward and make your dreams come true. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
August 06 2015 14:06 GMT
#411
And i still don't see the problem with there being tasks which are "plain and stupid" when looked at in a vacuum.
A lot of the decisions in sc2 are not all that interesting, even if they are in theory still decisions you have to make.
The game gets interesting when a lot of decisions are being made in succession.
The same is true for mechanical checks. One alone might be "plain and stupid", combine a lot and suddenly the gameplay shifts a lot and creates different situations for different kinds of players which then create different kinds of decisions as a result.

Looking at one task alone isn't useful.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
August 06 2015 14:15 GMT
#412
On August 06 2015 23:06 The_Red_Viper wrote:
And i still don't see the problem with there being tasks which are "plain and stupid" when looked at in a vacuum.
A lot of the decisions in sc2 are not all that interesting, even if they are in theory still decisions you have to make.
The game gets interesting when a lot of decisions are being made in succession.
The same is true for mechanical checks. One alone might be "plain and stupid", combine a lot and suddenly the gameplay shifts a lot and creates different situations for different kinds of players which then create different kinds of decisions as a result.

Looking at one task alone isn't useful.

You get into argumentation areas that let you justify everything you want in Starcraft because the game will be good regardless.

A feature has to be good in itself and in the bigger picture. If you can improve the bigger picture only with a stupid task then fine. If you can do it with a meaningful task in the same or a similar way then no, it's not fine to have a "plain and stupid" feature. You can keep the same game quality with a replacement or change of inject. And the point that you need inject to begin with for that game quality is argueable and at least worth testing.
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
August 06 2015 14:19 GMT
#413
On August 06 2015 22:36 mishimaBeef wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2015 21:21 Castor385 wrote:
I would really like to see some actual testing data, instead of hours and hours of theory crafting.


I agree.

What do you want to test? Changing this solves no particular problem. It just changes the core of the game. To test something you need to be able to look at the results and try to get some information from that. I don't see what we would be looking for. It's a change you either agree with or don't.
Neosteel Enthusiast
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-06 14:23:20
August 06 2015 14:22 GMT
#414
On August 06 2015 23:15 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2015 23:06 The_Red_Viper wrote:
And i still don't see the problem with there being tasks which are "plain and stupid" when looked at in a vacuum.
A lot of the decisions in sc2 are not all that interesting, even if they are in theory still decisions you have to make.
The game gets interesting when a lot of decisions are being made in succession.
The same is true for mechanical checks. One alone might be "plain and stupid", combine a lot and suddenly the gameplay shifts a lot and creates different situations for different kinds of players which then create different kinds of decisions as a result.

Looking at one task alone isn't useful.

You get into argumentation areas that let you justify everything you want in Starcraft because the game will be good regardless.

A feature has to be good in itself and in the bigger picture. If you can improve the bigger picture only with a stupid task then fine. If you can do it with a meaningful task in the same or a similar way then no, it's not fine to have a "plain and stupid" feature. You can keep the same game quality with a replacement or change of inject. And the point that you need inject to begin with for that game quality is argueable and at least worth testing.


I mostly argue against their solution of autocasting the inject here tbh.
Give me something more interesting which will still be an important task for macro and i am ok with it.
If you remove the macro mechanic and tell me "hey the players will do other exciting things which have nothign to do with macro!" (which i don't believe btw) i don't feel it would imrpove the game one bit.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
mishimaBeef
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2259 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-06 14:26:07
August 06 2015 14:24 GMT
#415
On August 06 2015 23:19 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2015 22:36 mishimaBeef wrote:
On August 06 2015 21:21 Castor385 wrote:
I would really like to see some actual testing data, instead of hours and hours of theory crafting.


I agree.

What do you want to test? Changing this solves no particular problem. It just changes the core of the game. To test something you need to be able to look at the results and try to get some information from that. I don't see what we would be looking for. It's a change you either agree with or don't.


For starters, if 'macro style' still exists and people can differentiate themselves that way.

I don't understand the bold part. Are you saying we can know the ramifications beforehand without testing?
Dare to live the life you have dreamed for yourself. Go forward and make your dreams come true. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
August 06 2015 14:28 GMT
#416
On August 06 2015 23:22 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2015 23:15 Big J wrote:
On August 06 2015 23:06 The_Red_Viper wrote:
And i still don't see the problem with there being tasks which are "plain and stupid" when looked at in a vacuum.
A lot of the decisions in sc2 are not all that interesting, even if they are in theory still decisions you have to make.
The game gets interesting when a lot of decisions are being made in succession.
The same is true for mechanical checks. One alone might be "plain and stupid", combine a lot and suddenly the gameplay shifts a lot and creates different situations for different kinds of players which then create different kinds of decisions as a result.

Looking at one task alone isn't useful.

You get into argumentation areas that let you justify everything you want in Starcraft because the game will be good regardless.

A feature has to be good in itself and in the bigger picture. If you can improve the bigger picture only with a stupid task then fine. If you can do it with a meaningful task in the same or a similar way then no, it's not fine to have a "plain and stupid" feature. You can keep the same game quality with a replacement or change of inject. And the point that you need inject to begin with for that game quality is argueable and at least worth testing.


I mostly argue against their solution of autocasting the inject here tbh.
Give me something more interesting which will still be an important task for macro and i am ok with it.
If you remove the macro mechanic and tell me "hey the players will do other exciting things which have nothign to do with macro!" (which i don't believe btw) i don't feel it would imrpove the game one bit.


True. I guess I'd personally be fine with that blizzard argumentation because I personally like it when I can spend a lot of time on the frontlines with little need to manage my bases, but I can very well see that this is not for Starcraft. And that this type of being forced away from the action is an interesting thing in itself. And thus might not be everyone's beef.
mishimaBeef
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2259 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-06 14:31:46
August 06 2015 14:30 GMT
#417
Also, I doubt anybody knows what the strongest ways to play LotV are... considering the new economy, there will be much more to do macro/economy wise.
Dare to live the life you have dreamed for yourself. Go forward and make your dreams come true. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-06 14:36:15
August 06 2015 14:34 GMT
#418
On August 06 2015 23:28 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2015 23:22 The_Red_Viper wrote:
On August 06 2015 23:15 Big J wrote:
On August 06 2015 23:06 The_Red_Viper wrote:
And i still don't see the problem with there being tasks which are "plain and stupid" when looked at in a vacuum.
A lot of the decisions in sc2 are not all that interesting, even if they are in theory still decisions you have to make.
The game gets interesting when a lot of decisions are being made in succession.
The same is true for mechanical checks. One alone might be "plain and stupid", combine a lot and suddenly the gameplay shifts a lot and creates different situations for different kinds of players which then create different kinds of decisions as a result.

Looking at one task alone isn't useful.

You get into argumentation areas that let you justify everything you want in Starcraft because the game will be good regardless.

A feature has to be good in itself and in the bigger picture. If you can improve the bigger picture only with a stupid task then fine. If you can do it with a meaningful task in the same or a similar way then no, it's not fine to have a "plain and stupid" feature. You can keep the same game quality with a replacement or change of inject. And the point that you need inject to begin with for that game quality is argueable and at least worth testing.


I mostly argue against their solution of autocasting the inject here tbh.
Give me something more interesting which will still be an important task for macro and i am ok with it.
If you remove the macro mechanic and tell me "hey the players will do other exciting things which have nothign to do with macro!" (which i don't believe btw) i don't feel it would imrpove the game one bit.


True. I guess I'd personally be fine with that blizzard argumentation because I personally like it when I can spend a lot of time on the frontlines with little need to manage my bases, but I can very well see that this is not for Starcraft. And that this type of being forced away from the action is an interesting thing in itself. And thus might not be everyone's beef.


If sc2 would be designed to have constant micro battles on a lot of fronts, then this might actually be a good change for the sake of the initial design.
I don't feel this is the case though. I probably would also have fun with such a game, but i don't think it would be starcraft anymore tbh ^^

edit: this is the reason i don't buy the reasoning "hey you will have more apm to micro!!"
Cool, now i can micro my lings i built to check the enemy wall, great!
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Startyr
Profile Joined November 2011
Scotland188 Posts
August 06 2015 14:35 GMT
#419
A great strength of starcraft 2 is the variety in play that is possible. From the original article.

"Every player is given tools on how they want to win. Then they decide how they want to win whether it be by deathball, economic starvation, constant multi-pronged attacks, parade pushes, doom drops, base trades, all-ins, counter build-orders or micro."

Not only are there 3 very different races, each race has a variety of tactics and strategies that they can focus on to achieve victory.These also provide ways for each player to distinguish themselves.

As mentioned MMa/GuMiho were the terran kings of constant multi pronged attacks.

soO is one of the few zergs who can do the extremely larva heavy style of ling/baneling and engaging terran off of creep.

Or lets say bombers mass macro, nothing but marines/medivacs in TvZ, undoubtedly entertaining, how would that work without mules?

If we say protoss is too restricted and focused on victory by death-ball, then lets improve their options for other styles.
Does anyone remember liquid herOs aggressive multi pronged harassment with warp prisms and high templar?

Removing macro mechanics reduces variety and options and forces players down fewer, narrower paths.
When instead the focus should be on enhancing or strengthening the various tactics for every race. This allows players a means to distinguish themselves as a 'King or Queen' of a certain style. Then there is even more entertainment when opposing styles clash or two players known for the same styles of play engage in an epic confrontation to determine who is best. It is also even more impressive if a player can seamlessly switch between the different styles, choosing the best way to play for a specific match-up and opponent. Targeting an opponents weakness or meeting their strengths and besting them.
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
August 06 2015 14:38 GMT
#420
On August 06 2015 23:24 mishimaBeef wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2015 23:19 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
On August 06 2015 22:36 mishimaBeef wrote:
On August 06 2015 21:21 Castor385 wrote:
I would really like to see some actual testing data, instead of hours and hours of theory crafting.


I agree.

What do you want to test? Changing this solves no particular problem. It just changes the core of the game. To test something you need to be able to look at the results and try to get some information from that. I don't see what we would be looking for. It's a change you either agree with or don't.


I don't understand the bold part. Are you saying we can know the ramifications beforehand without testing?

Well, yes. Apart from the obvious balance issues that the changes will bring it'll just make macro less important as a whole, and that is something you like, or don't like.
Neosteel Enthusiast
Prev 1 19 20 21 22 23 27 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
#43
WardiTV1342
OGKoka 545
Harstem451
IndyStarCraft 197
Rex166
CranKy Ducklings122
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 545
Harstem 451
Hui .215
mouzHeroMarine 199
IndyStarCraft 197
Rex 166
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 3837
Flash 2990
Jaedong 2030
Hyuk 873
EffOrt 704
Soulkey 536
ZerO 441
Larva 440
actioN 426
Stork 411
[ Show more ]
Snow 357
firebathero 348
Soma 323
GuemChi 224
sSak 124
Light 108
Mind 103
Pusan 88
JulyZerg 85
hero 79
Sharp 74
TY 73
PianO 67
Barracks 53
Yoon 45
Sea.KH 40
Aegong 33
JYJ32
sorry 29
GoRush 26
Terrorterran 24
HiyA 22
soO 21
Free 20
yabsab 15
zelot 12
IntoTheRainbow 9
Shine 7
ivOry 3
Rock 2
Dota 2
Gorgc4580
qojqva3061
syndereN393
XcaliburYe258
League of Legends
singsing2440
Dendi936
Counter-Strike
byalli349
markeloff132
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King172
Other Games
hiko1529
B2W.Neo934
Beastyqt537
crisheroes444
Lowko363
ArmadaUGS117
Liquid`VortiX109
ZerO(Twitch)17
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick39283
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 1026
StarCraft 2
IntoTheiNu 12
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3263
• WagamamaTV375
League of Legends
• Nemesis7130
Upcoming Events
RotterdaM Event
1h 42m
Replay Cast
9h 42m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
19h 42m
WardiTV European League
1d 1h
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 9h
The PondCast
1d 19h
WardiTV European League
1d 21h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.