• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:44
CEST 03:44
KST 10:44
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach0[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple3BSL Season 2313Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Grand Finals ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot [ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach StarCraft Human 'N' AI League
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL22] Ro8 Day 1
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Violent-Cooperative Play and…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 12790 users

Call to Action: July 11 Balance Testing - Page 7

Forum Index > SC2 General
215 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24239 Posts
July 12 2014 22:31 GMT
#121
I kinda agree, but we're talking about buffing the widow mine even in comparison to its original state : a "strong unit" made a tad stronger has at least to be carefully monitored. I'm actually quite worried about the friendly fire aspect which will be even more dangerous with a bigger radius ; I'd have been far more comfortable with a revert to the original state (while keeping the +shields damage) but Blizzard seems to think going back to the point where things looked promising can't be a good idea and prefers to add layers of mistaken bandaid patches over another.

Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9448 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-12 22:42:57
July 12 2014 22:38 GMT
#122
On July 13 2014 07:31 [PkF] Wire wrote:
I kinda agree, but we're talking about buffing the widow mine even in comparison to its original state : a "strong unit" made a tad stronger has at least to be carefully monitored. I'm actually quite worried about the friendly fire aspect which will be even more dangerous with a bigger radius ; I'd have been far more comfortable with a revert to the original state (while keeping the +shields damage) but Blizzard seems to think going back to the point where things looked promising can't be a good idea and prefers to add layers of mistaken bandaid patches over another.



Well it oneshots Banelings in a lower area. That might be an important variable.
And yeh, then there is the friendly fire radius being increased. I clearly remember the months before the nerf where I found it difficult to use mines optimally becasue I would suffer a lot from friendly fire. But I think at that point in time, terrans had generally been a bit spoiled. During the first months of HOTS, it was quite easy to just build widow mines, drop everywhere and win without really having proper splitting control. But then zergs got overseer buff and overall learned to play vs the Mine, and terrans suddenly had to work for their victories as well.

Thus, over the last 6 motnhs every terran has had insane focus on battle micro since we couldn't rely on AOE anymore. So I actually think that the dynamic that will be created here will work well. Zerg now feels a punishment for just righclicking lings into marines. They need to split them properly now. And if they do drag mines in bio units without bio units splititng properly, there is a big reward for the zerg, which is fine IMO.
Tyrhanius
Profile Joined April 2011
France947 Posts
July 12 2014 22:39 GMT
#123
On July 13 2014 07:27 ZeromuS wrote:
I edited the GIF provided by Tyrhanius into the OP. If you know who made it on Reddit, I will credit them fully but I do not know who it was.

His username is "nice_username" ^^
Here is the full link :
http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/2aiqfj/how_the_proposed_balance_changes_look_in_game/
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24239 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-12 22:43:17
July 12 2014 22:42 GMT
#124
On July 13 2014 07:38 Hider wrote:
Well it oneshots Banelings in a lower area. That might be an important variable.


Which I keep saying is a mistake : with the complex combination of the first nerf, the intermediate +shields damage and this buff, we'll end up with the mine that killed templar openings without fully restoring Terran chances in TvZ.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9448 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-12 23:52:39
July 12 2014 22:44 GMT
#125
On July 13 2014 07:42 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 13 2014 07:38 Hider wrote:
Well it oneshots Banelings in a lower area. That might be an important variable.


Which I keep saying is a mistake : with the complex combination of the first nerf, the intermediate +shields damage and this buff, we'll end up with the mine that killed templar openings without fully restoring Terran chances in TvZ.


Yeh so I just added a bit extra text to my post. I am not 100% sure of this subject either. But all I want for the mine in TvZ is to punish a zerg that is rightcliking/amoving his entire army.

Balancewise, I think there is room to buff the Thor if there still are lategame issues. I don't believe the Mine needs to be the only unit we look at here.

For TvP, I wonder if it's blizzards attention to make the Mine so "imbalanced" vs someone walking into them in a straight up battle that the protoss can never get away with that, and thus needs to kill them before the battle.

I don't know how that wll work out well. I fear Psy Storm/Collosus will still kill Viking/Widow Mine quite easily.
dNa
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Germany591 Posts
July 12 2014 22:46 GMT
#126
On July 12 2014 12:34 EngrishTeacher wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 12:32 Twine wrote:
I really think they should buff tanks (building time and damages) instead of mines. It would maybe make TvP interesting with tanks bio against colossus and mines bio vs hts chargelots. And, tanks are less of a random unit than mines.

As for the TW change ... Hell, it's about time.
I'm curious to see how the AA priority will work in TvT (focusins vikings/medivacs instead of tanks, etc..)


Really tired of hearing this argument when people fail to consider TvT. Please do post a viable and not-completely-quirky solution that limits the tank buffs to vs. P and Z only.


increase damage to shields and nerf ultralisk
"a pitchfork is for hay. a trident is for killing bitches." -djwheat
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24239 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-12 22:59:55
July 12 2014 22:51 GMT
#127
On July 13 2014 07:44 Hider wrote:
For TvP, I wonder if it's blizzards attention to make the Mine so "imbalanced" vs someone walking into them in a straight up battle that the protoss can never get away with that, and thus needs to kill them before the battle.

I don't know how that wll work out well. I fear Psy Storm/Collosus will still kill Viking/Widow Mine quite easily.


Don't get me wrong, that could be a great thing. But David Kim never mentioned in any of his posts any intention to (if needed) tamper with +shields damage ; it looks like he's just trying to make the mine worth using again in TvZ without thinking of the consequences in TvP (-> colossi-less styles buried for some time ; which could be good by the way, we could organize a funeral).

The problem with balance test maps is that it's quite worthless for a "bad" player like me (lowish master) to test them because my adaptation to the changes will be far from optimal. I hope there's going to be some XMG hosted tournament like the last times so that we can see what the changes could look like in the hands of pros.
hfsrj
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany166 Posts
July 12 2014 23:04 GMT
#128
I think the tank should get an armor bonus when not in siege mode, do make tank pushes much more viable.

More importantly, and a grounded viking should benefit from medivac healing. That'd be really good in lategame TvP.
yoshi245
Profile Joined May 2011
United States2974 Posts
July 12 2014 23:27 GMT
#129
On July 12 2014 13:03 Mjolnir wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 12:34 EngrishTeacher wrote:
On July 12 2014 12:32 Twine wrote:
I really think they should buff tanks (building time and damages) instead of mines. It would maybe make TvP interesting with tanks bio against colossus and mines bio vs hts chargelots. And, tanks are less of a random unit than mines.

As for the TW change ... Hell, it's about time.
I'm curious to see how the AA priority will work in TvT (focusins vikings/medivacs instead of tanks, etc..)


Really tired of hearing this argument when people fail to consider TvT. Please do post a viable and not-completely-quirky solution that limits the tank buffs to vs. P and Z only.


So, what's the gripe here? You think tanks would be too strong in TvT if they were buffed? Bio spam would be less effective? Games would turn into positional wars and/or turtles? Is that the fear?

Maybe that's not what your concern is (and if it isn't, please clarify); but if it is well man, I've gotta disagree. TvT was fantastic in BW and tanks shit all over infantry in that one. I think SC2 needs something to mix up the strats. I'd love to see more TvT mech to air strats. I'm tired of bio, bio, bio in every tournament or every game I play on b.net.

Tweaking mines, Thors, and the MC are silly changes. Mines are boring and only facilitate more MMMWM (bio) play (yawn). Thor targeting is ridiculous - where's the micro? That's part of the game! And the MC nerf? Please, all the damage is done in the first 5-10 seconds.

Terran needs a complete overhaul. I agree with those who want to see a tank buff.



I agree. Tanks need a buff, the thor AA prioritization is grounded in good intentions and can be much more useful against Mutas, but that's basically it. Still doesn't prevent a Thor from being magic boxed to death though. I'd rather see mech based TvT something akin to BW back in the day TBH anyway.

They should have nerfed the effectiveness of TW to have a reduced slow from what it is now instead of duration.
"Numbers speak about the past, not the present." -Thorzain
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
July 12 2014 23:41 GMT
#130
They should just nerf seeker missile and make it always hit. This would counter mutalisks and make ravens reliable. Also it requires alot of quick split micro from the zerg. PDD needs severe nerfs or removal/replacement, mass ravens can make themselvs basically invulnerable to the only kind of attacks that can damage them, which is a design flaw by itself.

This alone would be a better move than buffing mines.
DeadByDawn
Profile Joined October 2012
United Kingdom476 Posts
July 12 2014 23:50 GMT
#131
On July 13 2014 08:04 hfsrj wrote:
I think the tank should get an armor bonus when not in siege mode, do make tank pushes much more viable.

More importantly, and a grounded viking should benefit from medivac healing. That'd be really good in lategame TvP.

I don't think that the first is justified and the second would be even weirder than Hellbats being healed by Medivacs.

I would like the tank to unsiege much faster so that you can shoot close units or retreat a little easier. Also, I would like the damage output and health of Vikings slightly increased when landed.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9448 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-12 23:54:00
July 12 2014 23:53 GMT
#132
On July 13 2014 08:50 DeadByDawn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 13 2014 08:04 hfsrj wrote:
I think the tank should get an armor bonus when not in siege mode, do make tank pushes much more viable.

More importantly, and a grounded viking should benefit from medivac healing. That'd be really good in lategame TvP.

I don't think that the first is justified and the second would be even weirder than Hellbats being healed by Medivacs.

I would like the tank to unsiege much faster so that you can shoot close units or retreat a little easier. Also, I would like the damage output and health of Vikings slightly increased when landed.


Hmm Tanks can unsiege faster and both of the Vikings transformations can be faster as well. I don't think we have to make either unit stronger when amoved.
LingBlingBling
Profile Joined December 2012
United States353 Posts
July 13 2014 00:01 GMT
#133
On July 13 2014 08:41 LSN wrote:
They should just nerf seeker missile and make it always hit. This would counter mutalisks and make ravens reliable. Also it requires alot of quick split micro from the zerg. PDD needs severe nerfs or removal/replacement, mass ravens can make themselvs basically invulnerable to the only kind of attacks that can damage them, which is a design flaw by itself.

This alone would be a better move than buffing mines.



Yeah lets nerf the only good tier2/tier 3 Unit Terran has....that would be a big nerf, Terran does not need a crappy dmg seeker that always hits.
Remember our motto: We ain't got it.
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
July 13 2014 00:03 GMT
#134
On July 13 2014 08:50 DeadByDawn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 13 2014 08:04 hfsrj wrote:
I think the tank should get an armor bonus when not in siege mode, do make tank pushes much more viable.

More importantly, and a grounded viking should benefit from medivac healing. That'd be really good in lategame TvP.

I don't think that the first is justified and the second would be even weirder than Hellbats being healed by Medivacs.

I would like the tank to unsiege much faster so that you can shoot close units or retreat a little easier. Also, I would like the damage output and health of Vikings slightly increased when landed.


That's not weird at all. I've always thought of Medics/Medivacs as combat engineers. Surely having those on the battlefield is a lot more practical given that any wound that takes a soldier out of commission is also likely to have left him with giant holes in his combat armor. Repairing the armor must be a much higher priority.

The "bio" tag is easy enough to explain - walker suits all have similar parts and designs. It's not hard for an engineer to branch off from repairing marines to marauders to hellbats to vikings. Ghosts and Reapers are the odd men out... but... you know... whatever.
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
Faust852
Profile Joined February 2012
Luxembourg4004 Posts
July 13 2014 00:49 GMT
#135
On July 13 2014 08:41 LSN wrote:
They should just nerf seeker missile and make it always hit. This would counter mutalisks and make ravens reliable. Also it requires alot of quick split micro from the zerg. PDD needs severe nerfs or removal/replacement, mass ravens can make themselvs basically invulnerable to the only kind of attacks that can damage them, which is a design flaw by itself.

This alone would be a better move than buffing mines.

You publicly admitted that you don't play the game.
Why would you nerf something that is never seen but at a lower level. Since you don't play the game, the only game you can have as a reference in the last 3 months is Flash vs Life which was an awesome game. I don't get you want that nerf so much when it's really not something that cause problem. At all.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9448 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-13 01:34:57
July 13 2014 01:34 GMT
#136
On July 13 2014 09:49 Faust852 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 13 2014 08:41 LSN wrote:
They should just nerf seeker missile and make it always hit. This would counter mutalisks and make ravens reliable. Also it requires alot of quick split micro from the zerg. PDD needs severe nerfs or removal/replacement, mass ravens can make themselvs basically invulnerable to the only kind of attacks that can damage them, which is a design flaw by itself.

This alone would be a better move than buffing mines.

You publicly admitted that you don't play the game.
Why would you nerf something that is never seen but at a lower level. Since you don't play the game, the only game you can have as a reference in the last 3 months is Flash vs Life which was an awesome game. I don't get you want that nerf so much when it's really not something that cause problem. At all.


PDD is one of the dumbest things in the game. Get rid of that !@#$%^&* and balance mech around being good in it iself instead of relying on stupid spellcasters.
Faust852
Profile Joined February 2012
Luxembourg4004 Posts
July 13 2014 01:44 GMT
#137
On July 13 2014 10:34 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 13 2014 09:49 Faust852 wrote:
On July 13 2014 08:41 LSN wrote:
They should just nerf seeker missile and make it always hit. This would counter mutalisks and make ravens reliable. Also it requires alot of quick split micro from the zerg. PDD needs severe nerfs or removal/replacement, mass ravens can make themselvs basically invulnerable to the only kind of attacks that can damage them, which is a design flaw by itself.

This alone would be a better move than buffing mines.

You publicly admitted that you don't play the game.
Why would you nerf something that is never seen but at a lower level. Since you don't play the game, the only game you can have as a reference in the last 3 months is Flash vs Life which was an awesome game. I don't get you want that nerf so much when it's really not something that cause problem. At all.


PDD is one of the dumbest things in the game. Get rid of that !@#$%^&* and balance mech around being good in it iself instead of relying on stupid spellcasters.


These kind of change are impossible before lotv.
And I really like the PDD, it might lead to some sick play. I remember a couple of weeks ago, I don't remember who, a terran who used an early PDD to drop on the head of 12 stalkers with 2 medivacs. That was sick.
PDD also is the sole unit that allow you to still do some 1/1/1 1 base allin.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9448 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-13 02:19:37
July 13 2014 02:18 GMT
#138
On July 13 2014 10:44 Faust852 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 13 2014 10:34 Hider wrote:
On July 13 2014 09:49 Faust852 wrote:
On July 13 2014 08:41 LSN wrote:
They should just nerf seeker missile and make it always hit. This would counter mutalisks and make ravens reliable. Also it requires alot of quick split micro from the zerg. PDD needs severe nerfs or removal/replacement, mass ravens can make themselvs basically invulnerable to the only kind of attacks that can damage them, which is a design flaw by itself.

This alone would be a better move than buffing mines.

You publicly admitted that you don't play the game.
Why would you nerf something that is never seen but at a lower level. Since you don't play the game, the only game you can have as a reference in the last 3 months is Flash vs Life which was an awesome game. I don't get you want that nerf so much when it's really not something that cause problem. At all.


PDD is one of the dumbest things in the game. Get rid of that !@#$%^&* and balance mech around being good in it iself instead of relying on stupid spellcasters.


These kind of change are impossible before lotv.
And I really like the PDD, it might lead to some sick play. I remember a couple of weeks ago, I don't remember who, a terran who used an early PDD to drop on the head of 12 stalkers with 2 medivacs. That was sick.
PDD also is the sole unit that allow you to still do some 1/1/1 1 base allin.


Tbh, your probably one of the few who enjoy it then. Sometimes you also see Collosus-drop play micro, which can be cool, but doesn't mean that unit is welldesigned.
Zanzabarr
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada217 Posts
July 13 2014 02:29 GMT
#139
The widow mine change is absolutely ridiculous. If they don't go and nerf back the +shield damage on the mines, the new mine radius is going to be absurd. It will be stronger against protoss than the pre-nerf mine at 1.75 radius splash. New mine one shots probes in a 2 radius (over current 1.5, and pre-nerf 1.75). That's nothing short of insane. It also one shots sentry / templar in a radius of 1.5 (over current 1.25). Needless to say, if this change goes through, welcome to widow mine drops in PvT every single game. You'll basically be able to one shot the whole mineral line with a single mine. If they actually want to change the mine, they need to unbuff the +shield damage on splash.
YyapSsap
Profile Joined September 2010
New Zealand1511 Posts
July 13 2014 02:46 GMT
#140
On July 13 2014 10:34 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 13 2014 09:49 Faust852 wrote:
On July 13 2014 08:41 LSN wrote:
They should just nerf seeker missile and make it always hit. This would counter mutalisks and make ravens reliable. Also it requires alot of quick split micro from the zerg. PDD needs severe nerfs or removal/replacement, mass ravens can make themselvs basically invulnerable to the only kind of attacks that can damage them, which is a design flaw by itself.

This alone would be a better move than buffing mines.

You publicly admitted that you don't play the game.
Why would you nerf something that is never seen but at a lower level. Since you don't play the game, the only game you can have as a reference in the last 3 months is Flash vs Life which was an awesome game. I don't get you want that nerf so much when it's really not something that cause problem. At all.


PDD is one of the dumbest things in the game. Get rid of that !@#$%^&* and balance mech around being good in it iself instead of relying on stupid spellcasters.


The thing is that ravens will always be an integral part of the mech army due to being a detector and providing abilities that cover the weakness of the mech army. Just like the science vessel in BW. With the science vessel shutting down mutalisks, defilers and so forth, the mech army would be literally shat on.

But one thing for sure is that the abilities should be tweaked somewhat.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
2026 GSTL: Grand Finals
CranKy Ducklings116
LiquipediaDiscussion
OSC
23:00
OSC Masters Cup #151 Qualifier
davetesta31
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 190
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 11354
White-Ra 264
Dota 2
monkeys_forever872
NeuroSwarm175
febbydoto16
League of Legends
Doublelift6203
JimRising 667
Counter-Strike
minikerr30
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox870
Other Games
summit1g9537
Maynarde201
ArmadaUGS68
Mew2King37
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick369
BasetradeTV195
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 7
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 89
• Letter143
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
8h 16m
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
9h 16m
Monday Night Weeklies
14h 16m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 8h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 8h
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
1d 22h
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
BSL Open Qualifier
6 days
BSL Open Qualifier
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-27
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Calamity Invitational

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.