|
France7248 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2014_Red_Bull_Battle_Grounds:_Atlanta is starting in few days, from Friday 11th to Sunday 13th.
The event starts with an open group stage of 128 players divided in 32 groups of 4. Groups are all played with dual tournament format (same as WCS or GSL).
The group stage is followed by a 64-man single-elimination bracket, where all matches will be Bo3, except semifinals & finals that are Bo5.
Red Bull announced the casters and some of the players.
Casting will be done by:
Kevin "RotterdaM" van der Kooi Nathan "Nathanias" Fabrikant Yoan "ToD" Merlo Sean "Day[9]" Plott Alex "Axeltoss" Rodriguez
Concerning the players, the list is hard to decipher + Show Spoiler [Full list of Contenders as of 7/8] + StoicNonY624 BCNRehabThis ArtOfWar HuK iNcontroL SquidfingerS647 Egg Darkblue FrozenEcho1316 Huha toodming400 dSeleCT ironman.1811 desRow.816 Geeden Ralethon.724 PrimalMoon LuvstoSpooge CobraVenom Falcon.1801 BoneArchist Cowman.509 ReMiiX.306 Filoleg TheoRy Napoleon colqxc.503 hendralisk.869 eradin.543 Kansas1154 gladiusreal Merovingius.723 ViBE.727 livibee.177 honeybadger Aestis240 FXOSirRobin.629 SuGaR popsicleB Alumina Josiah.870 RuFF.528 ilililililil.1634 PiRatE516 Jank#192 LaxAxeman Sosaryu Apocalypse.1121 noko Havoc Future603 Baer639 Maximus Destiny1691 Blast.227 SiliconJeebus TheWay
but we can make this little list: desRow, Bomber, Suppy, HuK, Polt, TooDming, SeleCT, viOLet, qxc, ViBE, puCK, hendralisk, Apocalypse, Destiny, RuFF
Edit: iNcontroL & NonY are not going after all.
|
|
|
your Country52797 Posts
Looking forwards to seeing these players/casters this weekend, particularly qxc and Nony.
Also is it actually 1 giant bracket from RO64? That's sick :D
|
gogo RuFF, TooDming and SeleCT!
|
i assume Theory is the ex FXO player? also, its nice too see more of TooDming
|
Nony & Suppy ^-^
such happiness.
|
|
|
Wow lots of American participation. Also Toodming?! Awesome!!
Some good Terrans there + Show Spoiler +
|
|
|
Bisutopia19299 Posts
|
NonY just posted in his Stream Thread that he will not be going. So someone should update OP and Liquipedia
|
On July 10 2014 07:00 Paljas wrote: i assume Theory is the ex FXO player? also, its nice too see more of TooDming Yeah I can confirm that's the same TheoRy. Also I heard jank is going, that guy is a beast ;]
|
On July 10 2014 07:11 Universum wrote: NonY just posted in his Stream Thread that he will not be going. So someone should update OP and Liquipedia well that's unfortunate
|
|
|
France7248 Posts
On July 10 2014 07:11 Universum wrote: NonY just posted in his Stream Thread that he will not be going. So someone should update OP and Liquipedia oh, so that's where it comes from. updated op
|
|
|
If JD isn't going to be at DH or RB, where is he?
|
incontrol just tweeted that he won't be attending!!!
|
Canada16217 Posts
On July 10 2014 07:41 Packawana wrote: If JD isn't going to be at DH or RB, where is he? IEM perhaps
|
Awww. Why are Incontrol and Nony not going?
|
On July 10 2014 07:54 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Awww. Why are Incontrol and Nony not going?
Incontrol isn't feeling well according to Twitter. NonY decided not to go because he just moved and hasn't had internet/practice for a while.
|
this tournament has good payout, more people need to sign up !!!
|
United Kingdom50293 Posts
A Chinese player outside of WCS? This will be interesting.
|
|
|
a terran tourney after such a long time maybe? and why in gods name do i have to read Day9 and Schmäxltoss 1 day after beeing free again
|
This tournament seems kinda weak.
|
Sweet! Wouldn't be surprised to see toodming take this one. But I'll be rooting for suppy and polt.
|
On July 10 2014 08:16 FXOTheoRy wrote: this tournament has good payout, more people need to sign up !!!
assuming u wont run into a polt in ro128/64
|
On July 10 2014 08:36 coL.hendralisk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2014 08:16 FXOTheoRy wrote: this tournament has good payout, more people need to sign up !!! assuming u wont run into a polt in ro128/64 
haha yeah. some poor gm gonna get knocked out round 1 by polt and a lucky diamond player will get WCS points
|
Wow, seing that Lineup, ToD should probably consider playing and casting this tournament (like Catz did at MLG). Besides Bomber, Polt, Toodming and maybe 2-3 others he should be able to defeat everyone else here.
|
This is going to be a good event, looking forward to it.
|
Kinda odd that so many Koreans are willing and wanting to go to Dreamhack these days, yet are completely uninterested in Red Bull which has the same prize pool and WCS point pool. Im especially surprised that Jaedong and HerO arent here; i mean, i know they are not at their best atm, but they would still be favored over EVERYONE here except Bomber, Polt and Violet. Or how about the Axiom guys? I know ATC was going on for them, but now that they are out, why not go to this? Alicia and Heart could really improve their WCS Finals chances with strong showings, and they are in the same boat as HerO/Jaedong as skill level compared to the competition.
|
On July 10 2014 08:18 Fusilero wrote: A Chinese player outside of WCS? This will be interesting. Toodming also played in MLG Anaheim. He placed 21st - 24th, the highest out of the nonpool play foreigners.
|
ToD and Rotti casting and I'm completely happy!
|
Interesting group of players. Should be a good time as always with the BattleGrounds.
|
|
|
Go go Henry to win it all!
|
United States23455 Posts
On July 10 2014 08:49 FXOTheoRy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2014 08:36 coL.hendralisk wrote:On July 10 2014 08:16 FXOTheoRy wrote: this tournament has good payout, more people need to sign up !!! assuming u wont run into a polt in ro128/64  haha yeah. some poor gm gonna get knocked out round 1 by polt and a lucky diamond player will get WCS points The Ro128 is a dual tournament group style thing, then the Ro64 is bracket :D
EDIT: also gogo Hendralisk!
|
Belgium9949 Posts
Doesn't MrBitter work for Red Bull now? Why isn't he casting? (not that im not happy with current lineup)
|
Should be an awesome tournament.Nice to see SirRobin in there :D.
|
France7248 Posts
On July 10 2014 10:31 RaGe wrote: Doesn't MrBitter work for Red Bull now? Why isn't he casting? (not that im not happy with current lineup) because he's not working as a caster now, he's in the organization
|
So... Polt vs. the Protoss that beats Bomber finals confirmed?
|
Looking forward to this event! Pulling to see some of the American players put up a strong showing!
On July 10 2014 11:06 pure.Wasted wrote: So... Polt vs. the Protoss that beats Bomber finals confirmed?
Digging the 1337 post count
|
|
|
|
|
QxC will win this! I believe!
|
yessssss that caster list
|
I am surprised at how weak the lineup looked, or better put, how small the number of good players is! It has a great prize pool and plenty of WCS points, but the list given seems kind of sad for such a big tournament
|
On July 10 2014 14:05 Soke wrote:I am surprised at how weak the lineup looked, or better put, how small the number of good players is! It has a great prize pool and plenty of WCS points, but the list given seems kind of sad for such a big tournament 
Yea, same. Initially, I was concerned that I'd have to divide my time between this and EVO, but this is the weakest lineup I've ever seen for a premier SC2 tourney. I'll watch Polt/Bomber in the finals, and I'm interesting in seeing how Toodming fairs, but the rest of the playerbase is quite sub par
|
Oh it'll be nice to see le tod in an american event
|
On July 10 2014 10:57 Doodsmack wrote: Should be an awesome tournament.Nice to see SirRobin in there :D.
Is he the community caster from MLG back in the days ? I remember him from there, idk if he done other stuff tho...
|
Wow I got stoked when I saw NonY...unfortunate.
Oh well, Bomber fighting.
|
No Scarlett
|
Pretty weak lineup to be honest (the players that is)
|
Cowman is in the player list. Best tournament 2014. 10/10. would buy Red Bull again.
|
I guess incontrol cant go because of their sponsor
|
KeSPA players should come to participate now that Proleague is not running.
|
gogo desRow!! I really hope you make a great run!
|
Looking good, can't wait!
|
On July 10 2014 17:30 projectChaos wrote: I guess incontrol cant go because of their sponsor
Not a chance. HuK is still on the player list, and he played Red Bull NA as well.
|
On July 10 2014 14:31 kuan888 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2014 10:57 Doodsmack wrote: Should be an awesome tournament.Nice to see SirRobin in there :D. Is he the community caster from MLG back in the days ? I remember him from there, idk if he done other stuff tho...
He casted for IPL after that
Edit: no wait I might have mistaken him for another Robin
|
|
|
no nony ? sad he is my all time favorit
|
I am happy with the lineup, time to see some new faces!
|
any broadcast time/info anywhere?
|
im amaz'd that ruff would show his face after this fiasco with alot of ROOT players attending.
Id be too embarrassed
|
I will only get to make it on Sunday. Will it be worth it? Will the only games being shown on Sunday be the finals or the semi-finals? I cannot find a schedule anywhere.
|
No NonY....? well that just sucks!! i was hoping to see him play! ugh... next time NonY! hope practice goes well for you.
|
Rumor has it, some of these people will be at BnB tonight...
I know for a fact ArtOfWar and Theory are playing the finals for the local tourny tonight.
|
On July 10 2014 11:04 Yhamm wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2014 10:31 RaGe wrote: Doesn't MrBitter work for Red Bull now? Why isn't he casting? (not that im not happy with current lineup) because he's not working as a caster now, he's in the organization He might be there though. He is from Georgia after all.
|
On July 10 2014 22:32 Eggi wrote: im amaz'd that ruff would show his face after this fiasco with alot of ROOT players attending.
Id be too embarrassed I <3 that amaz easter egg-y.
Also...agree about Ruff. Not that he's got much of a shot anyway.
|
On July 10 2014 08:36 coL.hendralisk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2014 08:16 FXOTheoRy wrote: this tournament has good payout, more people need to sign up !!! assuming u wont run into a polt in ro128/64 
In true spirit of TL you cannon him if you run up against him becoming a true hero for all 'cross Europe, the one and only American champ gone and out to a scrub with cannons. Easy.
|
Does it bother anyone else that this event is worth 4k WCS points? That's as much as IEM Sao Paolo and Cologne!
I mean this is a great roster, and I'm definitely going to watch, but the competition here is small enough that I'm bothered that it has real WCS standings implications.
Not really a criticism of this event, just with the WCS point distribution in general. Korea really needs to be weighted a lot heavier.
|
France7248 Posts
On July 11 2014 06:44 Vindicare605 wrote: Does it bother anyone else that this event is worth 4k WCS points? That's as much as IEM Sao Paolo and Cologne!
I mean this is a great roster, and I'm definitely going to watch, but the competition here is small enough that I'm bothered that it has real WCS standings implications.
Not really a criticism of this event, just with the WCS point distribution in general. Korea really needs to be weighted a lot heavier. you can't change the wcs point once you see the players list and you think it looks weak. and I don't think quality of players is a requirement to have wcs point, its about prizepool, number of players and being offline or online
|
On July 11 2014 06:52 Yhamm wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 06:44 Vindicare605 wrote: Does it bother anyone else that this event is worth 4k WCS points? That's as much as IEM Sao Paolo and Cologne!
I mean this is a great roster, and I'm definitely going to watch, but the competition here is small enough that I'm bothered that it has real WCS standings implications.
Not really a criticism of this event, just with the WCS point distribution in general. Korea really needs to be weighted a lot heavier. you can't change the wcs point once you see the players list and you think it looks weak. and I don't think quality of players is a requirement to have wcs point, its about prizepool, number of players and being offline or online
Why is that? The whole point of even having the point system is so that Blizzcon at the end of the year can crown the World Champion of Starcraft 2014.
If the best players aren't there to compete doesn't that defeat the entire purpose?
At this point I'd think I'd rather just remove all of the extra points awarded by these secondary events and have it rely solely on performance in the actual WCS tournaments. There's still money to be won so it's not like it would kill the event.
As is, the only guys from WCS Korea that actually have a chance of going to Blizzcon are the ones that have actually WON the GSL, (and soO because of his 3 silvers.) That leaves out a LOT of top end players.
|
France7248 Posts
On July 11 2014 06:57 Vindicare605 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 06:52 Yhamm wrote:On July 11 2014 06:44 Vindicare605 wrote: Does it bother anyone else that this event is worth 4k WCS points? That's as much as IEM Sao Paolo and Cologne!
I mean this is a great roster, and I'm definitely going to watch, but the competition here is small enough that I'm bothered that it has real WCS standings implications.
Not really a criticism of this event, just with the WCS point distribution in general. Korea really needs to be weighted a lot heavier. you can't change the wcs point once you see the players list and you think it looks weak. and I don't think quality of players is a requirement to have wcs point, its about prizepool, number of players and being offline or online Why is that? The whole point of even having the point system is so that Blizzcon at the end of the year can crown the World Champion of Starcraft 2014. If the best players aren't there to compete doesn't that defeat the entire purpose? At this point I'd think I'd rather just remove all of the extra points awarded by these secondary events and have it rely solely on performance in the actual WCS tournaments. There's still money to be won so it's not like it would kill the event. As is, the only guys from WCS Korea that actually have a chance of going to Blizzcon are the ones that have actually WON the GSL, (and soO because of his 3 silvers.) That leaves out a LOT of top end players. because that's not how it works. You don't decrease the prizepool of a tennis tournament because the player #1 forfeited 1 day before coming  organizers say to blizzard "ok we do a tournament with xxx players, xxx money, and people can qualify like this and this, how many wcs point do we have?" blizzard won't answer "well, depends on who will come." since wcs points make good player come...
|
On July 11 2014 07:01 Yhamm wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 06:57 Vindicare605 wrote:On July 11 2014 06:52 Yhamm wrote:On July 11 2014 06:44 Vindicare605 wrote: Does it bother anyone else that this event is worth 4k WCS points? That's as much as IEM Sao Paolo and Cologne!
I mean this is a great roster, and I'm definitely going to watch, but the competition here is small enough that I'm bothered that it has real WCS standings implications.
Not really a criticism of this event, just with the WCS point distribution in general. Korea really needs to be weighted a lot heavier. you can't change the wcs point once you see the players list and you think it looks weak. and I don't think quality of players is a requirement to have wcs point, its about prizepool, number of players and being offline or online Why is that? The whole point of even having the point system is so that Blizzcon at the end of the year can crown the World Champion of Starcraft 2014. If the best players aren't there to compete doesn't that defeat the entire purpose? At this point I'd think I'd rather just remove all of the extra points awarded by these secondary events and have it rely solely on performance in the actual WCS tournaments. There's still money to be won so it's not like it would kill the event. As is, the only guys from WCS Korea that actually have a chance of going to Blizzcon are the ones that have actually WON the GSL, (and soO because of his 3 silvers.) That leaves out a LOT of top end players. because that's not how it works. You don't decrease the prizepool of a tennis tournament because the player #1 forfeited 1 day before coming  organizers say to blizzard "ok we do a tournament with xxx players, xxx money, and people can qualify like this and this, how many wcs point do we have?" blizzard won't answer "well, depends on who will come." since wcs points make good player come...
I'm more just saying this to keep in mind what should be done about next year.
If Blizzcon happens and there's only like 3 GSL players there total, that is going to be a bad thing and something Blizz needs to address when they lay out the format next year. Either GSL gets weighted a lot more heavily or they stop giving out points to events like this.
The current format favors foreign players and players on foreign teams too much. 750 points for a first place here is worth as much as a top 4 placing in GSL. That's just not right. Polt or Bomber could earn as much as Maru did for the entire Season 2 with a win here.
|
8751 Posts
On July 11 2014 07:07 Vindicare605 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 07:01 Yhamm wrote:On July 11 2014 06:57 Vindicare605 wrote:On July 11 2014 06:52 Yhamm wrote:On July 11 2014 06:44 Vindicare605 wrote: Does it bother anyone else that this event is worth 4k WCS points? That's as much as IEM Sao Paolo and Cologne!
I mean this is a great roster, and I'm definitely going to watch, but the competition here is small enough that I'm bothered that it has real WCS standings implications.
Not really a criticism of this event, just with the WCS point distribution in general. Korea really needs to be weighted a lot heavier. you can't change the wcs point once you see the players list and you think it looks weak. and I don't think quality of players is a requirement to have wcs point, its about prizepool, number of players and being offline or online Why is that? The whole point of even having the point system is so that Blizzcon at the end of the year can crown the World Champion of Starcraft 2014. If the best players aren't there to compete doesn't that defeat the entire purpose? At this point I'd think I'd rather just remove all of the extra points awarded by these secondary events and have it rely solely on performance in the actual WCS tournaments. There's still money to be won so it's not like it would kill the event. As is, the only guys from WCS Korea that actually have a chance of going to Blizzcon are the ones that have actually WON the GSL, (and soO because of his 3 silvers.) That leaves out a LOT of top end players. because that's not how it works. You don't decrease the prizepool of a tennis tournament because the player #1 forfeited 1 day before coming  organizers say to blizzard "ok we do a tournament with xxx players, xxx money, and people can qualify like this and this, how many wcs point do we have?" blizzard won't answer "well, depends on who will come." since wcs points make good player come... I'm more just saying this to keep in mind what should be done about next year. If Blizzcon happens and there's only like 3 GSL players there total, that is going to be a bad thing and something Blizz needs to address when they lay out the format next year. Either GSL gets weighted a lot more heavily or they stop giving out points to events like this. The current format favors foreign players and players on foreign teams too much. 750 points for a first place here is worth as much as a top 4 placing in GSL. That's just not right. Polt or Bomber could earn as much as Maru did for the entire Season 2 with a win here. The system is supposed to get the best players to travel to other regions. It's also supposed to encourage tournament organizers to put on tournaments. Your suggestion for next year is just giving up. In order to stick to the current goals and work on getting a stronger Blizzcon lineup, you need to get top GSL players to actually travel to these events or have some new Asian tournaments with WCS points pop up. I think those things would make for a better scene overall and they're as important to the purpose of the WCS as the actual finals in Blizzcon is.
|
On July 11 2014 07:31 NonY wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 07:07 Vindicare605 wrote:On July 11 2014 07:01 Yhamm wrote:On July 11 2014 06:57 Vindicare605 wrote:On July 11 2014 06:52 Yhamm wrote:On July 11 2014 06:44 Vindicare605 wrote: Does it bother anyone else that this event is worth 4k WCS points? That's as much as IEM Sao Paolo and Cologne!
I mean this is a great roster, and I'm definitely going to watch, but the competition here is small enough that I'm bothered that it has real WCS standings implications.
Not really a criticism of this event, just with the WCS point distribution in general. Korea really needs to be weighted a lot heavier. you can't change the wcs point once you see the players list and you think it looks weak. and I don't think quality of players is a requirement to have wcs point, its about prizepool, number of players and being offline or online Why is that? The whole point of even having the point system is so that Blizzcon at the end of the year can crown the World Champion of Starcraft 2014. If the best players aren't there to compete doesn't that defeat the entire purpose? At this point I'd think I'd rather just remove all of the extra points awarded by these secondary events and have it rely solely on performance in the actual WCS tournaments. There's still money to be won so it's not like it would kill the event. As is, the only guys from WCS Korea that actually have a chance of going to Blizzcon are the ones that have actually WON the GSL, (and soO because of his 3 silvers.) That leaves out a LOT of top end players. because that's not how it works. You don't decrease the prizepool of a tennis tournament because the player #1 forfeited 1 day before coming  organizers say to blizzard "ok we do a tournament with xxx players, xxx money, and people can qualify like this and this, how many wcs point do we have?" blizzard won't answer "well, depends on who will come." since wcs points make good player come... I'm more just saying this to keep in mind what should be done about next year. If Blizzcon happens and there's only like 3 GSL players there total, that is going to be a bad thing and something Blizz needs to address when they lay out the format next year. Either GSL gets weighted a lot more heavily or they stop giving out points to events like this. The current format favors foreign players and players on foreign teams too much. 750 points for a first place here is worth as much as a top 4 placing in GSL. That's just not right. Polt or Bomber could earn as much as Maru did for the entire Season 2 with a win here. The system is supposed to get the best players to travel to other regions. It's also supposed to encourage tournament organizers to put on tournaments. Your suggestion for next year is just giving up. In order to stick to the current goals and work on getting a stronger Blizzcon lineup, you need to get top GSL players to actually travel to these events or have some new Asian tournaments with WCS points pop up. I think those things would make for a better scene overall and they're as important to the purpose of the WCS as the actual finals in Blizzcon is.
I get why the incentive exists, honestly I do. I'm at this point just criticizing how much that incentive actually means in the overall standings.
Last year the season finals existed to act as a kind of counter-weight to the foreign tournament point spread, this year no such thing exists.
It costs a lot of money for the Koreans to travel abroad, and it's further compounded by their obligations to Proleague (which doesn't offer any WCS points just btw) so their team has a hard time justifying sending one of their best players abroad when that impacts their performance in proleague either due to lack of preparation or jet lag.
Ideally yes, there should be some more tournaments held in Asia that award WCS points, but while none of those exist we continue to get this huge divide of opportunities for point gain based entirely on whether or not you're on a Korean team.
I think most of this could just be solved by weighing the GSL more heavily. It's by far the most competitive tournament in the world, and I just can't see that changing barring some MASSIVE exodus to the other regions. Having it weigh as much as WCS AM or Europe just doesn't make much sense at this point. It doesn't reflect the true skill gap between the regions enough.
Or we could just start offering WCS points to Proleague. I don't know how you'd spread that out but it's another option.
|
United States124 Posts
The main reason why Blizzard created WCS was to increase SC2's popularity all around the globe and encourage more people to play/watch the game. It wasn't designed just to reward the Koreans who are already at the top (that doesn't help the game grow). What your suggesting may temporarily make the tournaments more interesting in the short run, but in the long run, it would actually hurt the game because it eliminates the incentive for amateur/mid-level players to participate.
|
On July 11 2014 08:31 XXTN wrote: The main reason why Blizzard created WCS was to increase SC2's popularity all around the globe and encourage more people to play/watch the game. It wasn't designed just to reward the Koreans who are already at the top (that doesn't help the game grow). What your suggesting may temporarily make the tournaments more interesting in the short run, but in the long run, it would actually hurt the game because it eliminates the incentive for amateur/mid-level players to participate.
Dude look at the standings right now. It's 100% Korean, you have to go down 20 spots to find a non-Korean on there. (Snute)
The current system isn't set up to give incentive to amateurs, it's to encourage the Koreans in Korea to travel abroad as NonY said.
If you wanted to have a system that encouraged amateurs, you'd build it like the 2012 WCS system. The current one is built as a true World Championship tournament to crown the annual best of the year. It currently isn't functioning that way.
It functioned well last year when the Season finals still existed, but right now it's functioning as simply providing more money to the players that are already the best supported in terms of travel by their sponsors and teams.
It isn't giving any more money to the mid level or low end players, it's actually JUST taking away chances for the actual best in the world to compete at the end of the year Championship tournament. How does that make any sense?
If the system worked as you're describing, there'd be a whole lot more support for the Chinese scene built into it, (there isn't) there'd be more incentive for open bracket tournaments like MLG and less for invite only tournaments like Redbull BG (they're weighted the same.)
None of it is working like you're describing. The popular players on the big teams are the ones benefiting the most by the current set up.
|
8751 Posts
Blizzcon is the biggest tournament of the international scene. Korea has their own bubble of competition. I think you are kinda misunderstanding what WCS/Blizzcon is if you think one of its goals is to have strictly the highest skill 16 players. It's supposed to have the best performing (on the international scene) players. If the Korean teams wanted to participate in the international scene more, then yeah their players would probably fill all those ranks. But giving them more spots without asking them to participate is just a nonsense idea. It's turning Blizzcon into something else.
Besides, your idea of just making GSL's count for more isn't a great way to get the best lineup. It'd be better to have more competitions than 3 a year -- there are plenty of good players who just have a string of bad luck at GSL. With more tournaments, the rankings become more accurate. And perhaps more importantly, inviting a young Korean who has never traveled to another continent and hasn't been succeeding at a tournament format like Blizzcon is generally a bad idea. Some rise to the occasion and some are a wasted slot. If you invite people based on international performance, then you have players who have demonstrated they thrive at a tournament like Blizzcon, not just a player who is playing really well in the vacuum of Seoul/GSL.
The best thing you can do is get used to the duality of SC2 competition. The Korean scene isn't cracking open to the international scene anytime soon because the major teams have sponsors that work best for the Korean market, not internationally. Blizzcon is in the international sphere. Clearly you're a fan of the best players and it's weird to see them have a harder road to the biggest tournament, but that's just the way it is. Solving that issue how you want is opening a pandora's box for the international scene. WCS is a bundle of compromises and you're advocating tipping it too hard one way. Enjoy GSL, enjoy Blizzcon for what it is.
|
2109 Posts
|
so according to the countdown on the front page of TL, this starts at 11am EST?
|
your Country52797 Posts
On July 11 2014 10:08 HelpMeGetBetter wrote: so according to the countdown on the front page of TL, this starts at 11am EST? It starts at 15:00 GMT (+00:00)
|
On July 11 2014 09:35 NonY wrote: Blizzcon is the biggest tournament of the international scene. Korea has their own bubble of competition. I think you are kinda misunderstanding what WCS/Blizzcon is if you think one of its goals is to have strictly the highest skill 16 players. It's supposed to have the best performing (on the international scene) players. If the Korean teams wanted to participate in the international scene more, then yeah their players would probably fill all those ranks. But giving them more spots without asking them to participate is just a nonsense idea. It's turning Blizzcon into something else.
Besides, your idea of just making GSL's count for more isn't a great way to get the best lineup. It'd be better to have more competitions than 3 a year -- there are plenty of good players who just have a string of bad luck at GSL. With more tournaments, the rankings become more accurate. And perhaps more importantly, inviting a young Korean who has never traveled to another continent and hasn't been succeeding at a tournament format like Blizzcon is generally a bad idea. Some rise to the occasion and some are a wasted slot. If you invite people based on international performance, then you have players who have demonstrated they thrive at a tournament like Blizzcon, not just a player who is playing really well in the vacuum of Seoul/GSL.
The best thing you can do is get used to the duality of SC2 competition. The Korean scene isn't cracking open to the international scene anytime soon because the major teams have sponsors that work best for the Korean market, not internationally. Blizzcon is in the international sphere. Clearly you're a fan of the best players and it's weird to see them have a harder road to the biggest tournament, but that's just the way it is. Solving that issue how you want is opening a pandora's box for the international scene. WCS is a bundle of compromises and you're advocating tipping it too hard one way. Enjoy GSL, enjoy Blizzcon for what it is.
I did some quick math and boosting the GSL WCS points by 30 percent wouldn't put a single extra GSL player into the top 16 as it currently stands, so I think "pandora's box" is overstating it a bit. I would like to see the WCS system tweaked a bit next year to include more of the world's best players. A system where roughly half the field are top players from the Korean scene would feel right to me. (nicely reflects that duality, you referred to) It would give Blizzcon more of a true World Championship feel without diluting the international nature of the tournament or the incentive for players to participate in the international scene.
A 30ish percent boost to GSL points is one way to accomplish that, but I'd prefer that Blizzard just reserve an invite for the Proleague player with best record who isn't already qualified by WCS points. That would ensure that Blizzcon would at least invite the best performing players on the Korean scene, which currently isn't the case(poor Maru), because Proleague results certainly matter to the major Korean teams.
|
From what I have observed these comparatively low quality, yet high-yield tournaments are not designed to encourage Korean to travel more, it's designed for a selected bunch of Koreans who failed at WCS to farm enough points to get into Blizzcon. Yeah JD, Bomber, San, Polt, violet and some others, always those dudes.
Maybe you guys are right about the travel stuffs, but maybe organizer shoulda given more invitees to other people instead of the same bunch again and again. Btw I dont think the priority of SPL is a valid argument anymore
|
Considering that Bomber and Polt are at a completely different level than everyone else here... we better get some Terran love in this one! (ala Taeja beating on foreigners at Dreamhack).
|
On July 11 2014 11:06 sc2isnotdying wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 09:35 NonY wrote: Blizzcon is the biggest tournament of the international scene. Korea has their own bubble of competition. I think you are kinda misunderstanding what WCS/Blizzcon is if you think one of its goals is to have strictly the highest skill 16 players. It's supposed to have the best performing (on the international scene) players. If the Korean teams wanted to participate in the international scene more, then yeah their players would probably fill all those ranks. But giving them more spots without asking them to participate is just a nonsense idea. It's turning Blizzcon into something else.
Besides, your idea of just making GSL's count for more isn't a great way to get the best lineup. It'd be better to have more competitions than 3 a year -- there are plenty of good players who just have a string of bad luck at GSL. With more tournaments, the rankings become more accurate. And perhaps more importantly, inviting a young Korean who has never traveled to another continent and hasn't been succeeding at a tournament format like Blizzcon is generally a bad idea. Some rise to the occasion and some are a wasted slot. If you invite people based on international performance, then you have players who have demonstrated they thrive at a tournament like Blizzcon, not just a player who is playing really well in the vacuum of Seoul/GSL.
The best thing you can do is get used to the duality of SC2 competition. The Korean scene isn't cracking open to the international scene anytime soon because the major teams have sponsors that work best for the Korean market, not internationally. Blizzcon is in the international sphere. Clearly you're a fan of the best players and it's weird to see them have a harder road to the biggest tournament, but that's just the way it is. Solving that issue how you want is opening a pandora's box for the international scene. WCS is a bundle of compromises and you're advocating tipping it too hard one way. Enjoy GSL, enjoy Blizzcon for what it is. I did some quick math and boosting the GSL WCS points by 30 percent wouldn't put a single extra GSL player into the top 16 as it currently stands, so I think "pandora's box" is overstating it a bit. I would like to see the WCS system tweaked a bit next year to include more of the world's best players. A system where roughly half the field are top players from the Korean scene would feel right to me. (nicely reflects that duality, you referred to) It would give Blizzcon more of a true World Championship feel without diluting the international nature of the tournament or the incentive for players to participate in the international scene. A 30ish percent boost to GSL points is one way to accomplish that, but I'd prefer that Blizzard just reserve an invite for the Proleague player with best record who isn't already qualified by WCS points. That would ensure that Blizzcon would at least invite the best performing players on the Korean scene, which currently isn't the case(poor Maru), because Proleague results certainly matter to the major Korean teams.
Thank you! This is the kind of compromise I want.
I totally understand and appreciate what NonY has said, but I as a spectator am not satisfied knowing that the tournament that is marketed as the "World Championship" is going to be played without an adequate number of Proleague/GSL players attending. A compromise like this would put me well at ease.
|
|
|
|
|
8751 Posts
On July 11 2014 11:06 sc2isnotdying wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 09:35 NonY wrote: Blizzcon is the biggest tournament of the international scene. Korea has their own bubble of competition. I think you are kinda misunderstanding what WCS/Blizzcon is if you think one of its goals is to have strictly the highest skill 16 players. It's supposed to have the best performing (on the international scene) players. If the Korean teams wanted to participate in the international scene more, then yeah their players would probably fill all those ranks. But giving them more spots without asking them to participate is just a nonsense idea. It's turning Blizzcon into something else.
Besides, your idea of just making GSL's count for more isn't a great way to get the best lineup. It'd be better to have more competitions than 3 a year -- there are plenty of good players who just have a string of bad luck at GSL. With more tournaments, the rankings become more accurate. And perhaps more importantly, inviting a young Korean who has never traveled to another continent and hasn't been succeeding at a tournament format like Blizzcon is generally a bad idea. Some rise to the occasion and some are a wasted slot. If you invite people based on international performance, then you have players who have demonstrated they thrive at a tournament like Blizzcon, not just a player who is playing really well in the vacuum of Seoul/GSL.
The best thing you can do is get used to the duality of SC2 competition. The Korean scene isn't cracking open to the international scene anytime soon because the major teams have sponsors that work best for the Korean market, not internationally. Blizzcon is in the international sphere. Clearly you're a fan of the best players and it's weird to see them have a harder road to the biggest tournament, but that's just the way it is. Solving that issue how you want is opening a pandora's box for the international scene. WCS is a bundle of compromises and you're advocating tipping it too hard one way. Enjoy GSL, enjoy Blizzcon for what it is. I did some quick math and boosting the GSL WCS points by 30 percent wouldn't put a single extra GSL player into the top 16 as it currently stands, so I think "pandora's box" is overstating it a bit. I would like to see the WCS system tweaked a bit next year to include more of the world's best players. A system where roughly half the field are top players from the Korean scene would feel right to me. (nicely reflects that duality, you referred to) It would give Blizzcon more of a true World Championship feel without diluting the international nature of the tournament or the incentive for players to participate in the international scene. A 30ish percent boost to GSL points is one way to accomplish that, but I'd prefer that Blizzard just reserve an invite for the Proleague player with best record who isn't already qualified by WCS points. That would ensure that Blizzcon would at least invite the best performing players on the Korean scene, which currently isn't the case(poor Maru), because Proleague results certainly matter to the major Korean teams. You did the math to calculate a points boost that would be ineffectual just so you could say that it wouldn't cause any problems? Great rhetoric technique I guess :o And still ignoring the fact that there are different kinds of competition.
|
|
|
|
|
|