RE: PhysicsLee and the Impulse eSports Scandal - Page 5

On April 21 2013 09:43 Megiddosc wrote:
According to MLGAdam, he lost to Miya. Thank god. Would have hated if he had won.

On April 21 2013 09:44 Littlemuff wrote:
Well he just lost to Miya so I'm unsure what the situation is with him. Maybe Catz gets his place in lower bracket? MLG said they're looking into replays and such. Got this from twitter.

On April 21 2013 09:46 .kv wrote:


yeah but what about catz and the others that faced physicslee...this just unfortunate this investigation happens to happen in the middle of the entire tournament

On April 21 2013 09:50 TricksAre4Figs wrote:

This was originally exposed on Reddit with plenty of evidence. For the record, Reddit admins felt the need to close the thread for a "lack of evidence" when actually there was plenty. This could have potentially come out in full days ago, however I feel Reddit admins did a disservice to the community by closing the original thread there.

On April 21 2013 09:51 Shin_Gouki wrote:


Yea, it was depressing when they shut down the thread, despite the amount of evidence was there. If anything, it should have stayed up because multiple people were coming out, and information was being spread all over the place. This literally could have been prevented.

On April 21 2013 09:51 Shin_Gouki wrote:


Yea, it was depressing when they shut down the thread, despite the amount of evidence was there. If anything, it should have stayed up because multiple people were coming out, and information was being spread all over the place. This literally could have been prevented.

On April 21 2013 09:50 TricksAre4Figs wrote:

This was originally exposed on Reddit with plenty of evidence. For the record, Reddit admins felt the need to close the thread for a "lack of evidence" when actually there was plenty. This could have potentially come out in full days ago, however I feel Reddit admins did a disservice to the community by closing the original thread there.

On April 21 2013 09:55 Zath.erin wrote:


What was originally in it? When I saw it the evidence was pretty weak. There was some sort of evidence pointing towards someone else playing the account, but not really much in the way of map hacking, even now there isn't any glaring evidence of map hack. Maybe if your thread had focus'd on the theory of someone else playing the account rather then map hacking it could have turned out better. I also think you should have got a bit more evidence / proof before coming, starting on something like this prematurely with a lack of evidence never really turns out well.

On April 21 2013 10:07 BeyondCtrL wrote:


In the game vs. Protoss you can see him never scan or scout, all he can see is Collo 2x Forge, without scouting he prepares with lots of Turrets and also at one point as the Shrine is almost complete and he took his 3rd he was banking tons of energy on the CC's - so without scouting the Shrine and considering its timing why is a Terran saving so much energy when they just landed their 3rd instead of dropping a ton of mules?

At one point when the Zealot gets warped in he is monitoring that area intensively, even tho he is pressing the 3rd of the P, then reacts practically immediately on the warp in. His movements seem to also "luckily" favor him before any engagement (even though he lost one massively). Also at one point when the P army is pressing upwards to his 3rd, which he has absolutely no vision of but decides to move his army back even though he was trying to deal with the DT.

Point is you can be really clever in hiding map hacking, i.e. looking only at minimap and reacting at last moment, but this case the several occasions where he could have taken a lot of damage he manages to be in the right positions to stop them even though he has not scanned or scouted.

Looking at his mechanics and play I find it very fishy. I cannot say 100% that he is map hacking, but I cannot overlook how lucky he is despite his abysmal scouting.

On April 21 2013 09:55 Zath.erin wrote:


What was originally in it? When I saw it the evidence was pretty weak. There was some sort of evidence pointing towards someone else playing the account, but not really much in the way of map hacking, even now there isn't any glaring evidence of map hack. Maybe if your thread had focus'd on the theory of someone else playing the account rather then map hacking it could have turned out better. I also think you should have got a bit more evidence / proof before coming, starting on something like this prematurely with a lack of evidence never really turns out well.

On April 21 2013 10:11 Zath.erin wrote:

Yeah I'm pretty sure it's at least production tab, I've watched him in several clan wars pretty closely after someone told me they thought he was a maphcker. What I found was he wouldn't see drops coming in advance but always seemed to counter the opponents build so who knows.

On April 21 2013 10:24 orangeorange wrote:


I'm glad this is finally coming out (and that people are backing up what I said with concrete proof - Kalinov knows 100% what he's talking about). As I said, I know the guy and I know he production tab hacks. It's easy to look at one replay and say he "got lucky" but if you collect a large enough sample of his GM ladder/tourney replays, you'll see he always makes the correct tech choices (e.g. throwing down double starport if robo bay goes up...), always scans bases at the right time if his opponent is doing some weird tech choice, varies his opening if his opponent does a weird opening, etc. Here's a post that he made on an online hacking forum in connection with his leveling service:

"Production tab is always good in some tourneys, noone of cheeses in BO1 can kill you.
As a bonus I can tell you, that few pros (no need to tell their names) also uses it in online tourneys."

On April 21 2013 10:24 orangeorange wrote:


I'm glad this is finally coming out (and that people are backing up what I said with concrete proof - Kalinov knows 100% what he's talking about). As I said, I know the guy and I know he production tab hacks. It's easy to look at one replay and say he "got lucky" but if you collect a large enough sample of his GM ladder/tourney replays, you'll see he always makes the correct tech choices (e.g. throwing down double starport if robo bay goes up...), always scans bases at the right time if his opponent is doing some weird tech choice, varies his opening if his opponent does a weird opening, etc. Here's a post that he made on an online hacking forum in connection with his leveling service:

"Production tab is always good in some tourneys, noone of cheeses in BO1 can kill you.
As a bonus I can tell you, that few pros (no need to tell their names) also uses it in online tourneys."

On April 21 2013 10:24 orangeorange wrote:


I'm glad this is finally coming out (and that people are backing up what I said with concrete proof - Kalinov knows 100% what he's talking about). As I said, I know the guy and I know he production tab hacks. It's easy to look at one replay and say he "got lucky" but if you collect a large enough sample of his GM ladder/tourney replays, you'll see he always makes the correct tech choices (e.g. throwing down double starport if robo bay goes up...), always scans bases at the right time if his opponent is doing some weird tech choice, varies his opening if his opponent does a weird opening, etc. Here's a post that he made on an online hacking forum in connection with his leveling service:

"Production tab is always good in some tourneys, noone of cheeses in BO1 can kill you.
As a bonus I can tell you, that few pros (no need to tell their names) also uses it in online tourneys."

On April 21 2013 10:37 orangeorange wrote:
Good work to you too Kalinov

BeyondCtrL - that's not my quote, it's what the "leveler" posted himself on an online forum regarding production tab hacking.