EPT[Poll] What do you want changed in SC2 the MOST? - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Dismay
United States1180 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On October 24 2012 15:05 jayaiwhy wrote: Spectator client + cute little things like betting feature that gives you points for some cosmetic, etc. Oooh smart, maybe micro transactions so Blizz gets more money and incentive to do something cool. And betting tis always fun. On October 24 2012 15:05 Risljaninasim wrote: The pro scene is pretty much there already. We need a bigger casual player base. Although i have no idea how to achieve that haha Well start small, what would it take to get you to enjoy SC2 more and play some?  | ||
|
th3_great
United Kingdom429 Posts
| ||
|
xSilverx
Sweden76 Posts
| ||
|
rift
1819 Posts
| ||
|
rename
Estonia329 Posts
I want better interface all around tho - the first thing i did after campaign was notice that i cant delete/remove maps from the huge list of versusAI maps and it blew my mind in a negative way. Would have also voted free client with select limited-custom games and few more goodies - but that's obviously already coming with blizzard all-stars. | ||
|
Grubby
Netherlands318 Posts
| ||
|
Ryan307 :)
United States1289 Posts
I don't think it's too much to ask for ALL of these changes to be included in HotS, as it's ridiculous most of these we not included in the first place. I think something that would really give bnet more 'flavor' would be the following: -Change the rating system back to BW ladder, none of these arbitrary bronze-master rankings. The gap from low masters to high masters is comparable to 900-1600 on fish, it's massive! -In Client Spectator and Tournament Promotion would just be absolutely amazing -Watching replays with friends (... it almost feels like a joke having to type that out) -It would be awesome to have a ladder profile for each race you play (definitely wont ever make it, $$ is at stake with this one) -Clan support... good god this would be amazing, this alone would bring me back to SC2! Now, those are all just UI suggestions, I think the heart of SC2's problems are really a matter of gameplay, here are some problems that need addressing: -The deathball vs deathball situation is extremely boring to play/watch -PvZ (enough said, right?) -Multiple building selection (I can dream!) -Unit pathing (again, I can dream!) There's countless threads dedicated to the problems with gameplay so I'll shut up about it. I realize you were asking for one thing in praticular, and I'm sorry I went off on a tangent. It just feels like there is so much to be done with this game. I spend most of my time these days watching afreeca restreems, just hoping SC2 might be a shred of what bw was. | ||
|
Belha
Italy2850 Posts
Fix the design of many units to change the dynamics and flow of a average high level 1v1 game, dynamics that right now makes the game somewhat boring/repetitive (after certain amount of time). Take a chance, and please try to REALLY turn the game into something much better. I'm sure the potential is out there. | ||
|
JPSke
United States54 Posts
On October 24 2012 15:00 Liquid`Sheth wrote: Good question Gremlin119! The same reason we can't simply say we want all of these! Because Blizzard has only a super tiny group of people devoted to SC2 and fixing the issues we want. So while we can secretly want all of these, we must choose to fix only one. You now have the same disadvantage Blizzard has. How the hell Blizzard sells four million copies of a $60 game designed around e-sports with the promise of two further premium expansions and gets away with a barebones post-launch developmental staff is beyond me. People may mock the D3 kiddies but at least they know how to raise holy hell and get things fixed. We just take it. | ||
|
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On October 24 2012 15:08 rift wrote: Fundamental game design. Could you explain it a little more clearly? | ||
|
BamBam
745 Posts
Fair enough, I'm sure one day we'll reach that technology eventually. Ended up voting for "other" - While I would love to see blizzard focus on tournament capability (IE viewing games real-time from client or in-game tournament structure like wc) I'd much rather see map making changed overall to have better functionality like removal of map cap uploading, cross server uploading of maps, removal of popularity system, etc.. Hopefully it would bring about a better form of UMS and give mapmakers a reason to make cool new maps without worrying of competing with the same games which have been on the first page for... 2 years now? | ||
|
Immaterial
Canada510 Posts
I desperately hope Blizzard implements all of the suggested B.NET 0.5 changes in the poll. You can't really overstate how much improvements like the ones listed would enhance the SC2 experience. Time will tell whether Blizzard decides to finally step up to this challenge or continue on their current path. | ||
|
Puppent_Master
27 Posts
| ||
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
edit - also more customizable things like skins and such (i cant believe i am saying this haha) which leads to micro transactions I suppose. | ||
|
Baltor
United States171 Posts
| ||
|
K3Nyy
United States1961 Posts
My second one would be somehow making the game more social. They implemented chat channels but from my experience, it didn't help enough. But game design is what really needs to be changed. | ||
|
MarcH
United Kingdom362 Posts
On October 24 2012 15:07 Liquid`Sheth wrote: Oooh smart, maybe micro transactions so Blizz gets more money and incentive to do something cool. And betting tis always fun. Well start small, what would it take to get you to enjoy SC2 more and play some? Your asking the wrong question their, RTS as a genre is very difficult to get into and do well at and I dont play much SC anymore but still watch tons of SC either player streams or Tournaments. That's why I suggested an In client Demo that's Free to download with a simple small Single player and some limited access to multiplayer to get people into the game and then couple that with better tournament advertisement and in client viewing services if possible to get people into competitive SC. | ||
|
Aild246
United States20 Posts
On October 24 2012 15:09 Grubby wrote: Sheth, would it be good to spoiler the poll results and textually pose the options first? Some people might get influenced by bandwagoning (like me! I just voted on the one that was already #1! Join the winning team!). I like this idea Do it! | ||
|
sva
United States749 Posts
| ||
| ||
