• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:04
CEST 15:04
KST 22:04
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall8HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL42Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
RELIABLE USDT RECOVERY SERVICE//TECHY FORCE CYBER The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Help: rep cant save
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 657 users

Destiny on where he thinks SC2 is heading. - Page 85

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 83 84 85 86 87 105 Next
TheManInBlack
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Nigeria266 Posts
October 29 2012 08:35 GMT
#1681
Idra:

"Blizzard isn't doing anything so WE'RE gonna do something"...

Lol its easy for the EG guys to sit in their game house, getting at least 30k a year to drink Monster, whilst talking this nonsense. The real people doing something for the game consistently break their backs to stream, fly to events in order to get good results for their fans. Noone in EG besides Stephano does this. And for DjWheat to even act as an authority on a game he hasn't got a clue about is disturbing. I already think that the concept of E-Sports is a joke, but these guys took it toooo far.

I can't help feel that after watching that terrible episode of Inside The Game, Idra, Incontrol and DjWheat performed reacharounds on each other before Destiny came on air so that it looked like a horrible set up.
Meega
Profile Joined May 2011
Germany35 Posts
October 29 2012 10:25 GMT
#1682
Blizzard is like: Take this game we dont want it anymore.

Riot is like: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.
Labil
Profile Joined November 2010
Sweden52 Posts
October 29 2012 10:29 GMT
#1683
On October 29 2012 19:25 Meega wrote:
Blizzard is like: Take this game we dont want it anymore.

Riot is like: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


More like...


Blizzard: We have a brand, shit'll sort itselves.
Riot: Shut up and take our money.
Valve: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.
hoorah
bokeevboke
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Singapore1674 Posts
October 29 2012 10:46 GMT
#1684
How about we stop arguing a bit and try to find solutions:

I think one of the problems of poor gameplay is sc2 has too many hard counters.

Rock-paper-scissors philosophy in nutshell. it forces us to use one composition.

Usual scenario:
-what if I build unit A,
-NO, they will build unit B and you'll die, you better stick with the Colossi/gateway army,
- ok


Instead of making hardcounters, why won't we diversify units, make them interactable, microable, soft counters.
I would start from lowering damage of most units that do too much specified damage. Like, why marauder does +10 vs armored? Instead make it 8 base damage and +6 vs armored. Upgrades (+1/0). Increase their speed so that they could be microed better but don't do absurd damage. Cut in half damage of banelings, but increase explosion radius, so that opponent has more incentives to micro and spread his army. Make phoenixes do 7+7 base damage and no additional damage to light. And vuala, you can use them in fights, not only for scouting and killing workers, not utterly devastating but micro dependant. And many many more stuff should be tweaked. We're not asking to redesign units. Some tweaks would've make huge differences.

Thoughts?
Its grack
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
October 29 2012 10:49 GMT
#1685
On October 29 2012 19:29 Labil wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2012 19:25 Meega wrote:
Blizzard is like: Take this game we dont want it anymore.

Riot is like: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


More like...


Blizzard: We have a brand, shit'll sort itselves.
Riot: Shut up and take our money.
Valve: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


Personally, I think it is more like:

Blizzard: We are making two other games that will sell more that SC2, so we are focusing on that. Our parent company demands we do that. We will get to you when we are done with those.
Riot: Don't tell anyone we didn't have replays for like 2.5 years. Also, take our money.
Valve: We are making a great off the backs of our amazing steam sales. We are also working on insane VR tech, because we have way to much money. Hate battle.net 2.0, we have the same thing, but you won't get mad about it. Also, we are never making half life 3.

The grass is always greener when your game is 2 years old and not supported by micro transactions.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
October 29 2012 12:04 GMT
#1686
Ha ha, thanks noobskills,
That was a verry insightfull post and i learned alot about blizzard activision wich i didnt knew.
Think you are right pretty much, guess we dont have to expect annything great from activision/blizzard in the near future.

sixzeros
Profile Joined December 2010
72 Posts
October 29 2012 12:54 GMT
#1687
They need to stop listening to Browder, he's a fcking disaster.

Much of the game development world has been lost for years, under the lead of bogus game gurus, who spurt out pseudo game development science. Quasi concepts like, 'depth' and 'quality' and the need to fulfill a 20 hour experience, have them chasing ideas that lose the point. When all they really need is to focus on the player and the PLAYER EXPERIENCE, and ask themselves, these kinds of things.

What types of players are out there?
What types of things appeal to these players, and why?
And most important...
How do we create a system that reflects how COOL a player is, even when he is not the greatest?

Each of us is different, and we all prioritize different things, for different reasons. The games that are able to cater to MORE of these reasons do better, they get a broader audience.

Broodwar actually catered to a broader player base than all the others, and most important, it left you feeling good about yourself, once you got above average.

SC2 however, leaves you feeling like crap unless you are Grand Master.

The biggest problem is probably that the Starcraft ranking system, actually hurts it. It is a poorly implemented idea that insults and degrades average players. It does not feel good to hang with your friends and destroy them as a Goldie, when they're all Silvers. They just look at you like you're a big headed lamer, who actually sucks because you're not a GrandMaster. There is just something really unrewarding about that. Out of a billion players only 200 of us can say we dont suck. Yeah, real smart Blizzard.
But Broodwar didnt have that feeling, we didnt have to be elites, none of us were going to win a world tournament but we could appreciate each others differences as average as we were, and would actually look up to the Platinum level play as something special. Vs purely random skilled opponents, even the Gold becomes a force to be reckoned with.

Really to put it simply, it doesnt feel good to be Gold or Platinum or Diamond, and as snobby as you bastards are around here, those levels of play are actually above average. But you wont feel above average when you get there, you'll totally feel like a lame ass loser. And you wont start winning more either as you get better, you'll actually not experience what feels like an increase in skill, instead you'll feel like you are exactly the same, winning and losing exactly the same amount of games as you did when you were a bronzie. That means you are spitting pissed off the exact same amount of times a day, whether you are bronze, silver, gold, platinum, diamond, and ALL the way you are aware that you are not Master and you do not count for crap.
And whats more, if you vary your play system at all, just to have fun, you lose and fall backwards.

A focus on Competitive play, in a system that reflects your rankings and automatically pits you against players of estimated equal strength, has an alienating effect on the average player. You can't help but feel like a loser in Starcraft 2, as a bronze, gold or platinum player, you will lose a lot more games than you would have on Broodwar. There was something different about the game selection process, you actually had more control over how you were able to select your opponents, it had the effect of making you feel better about wins and losses. Most of us didn't ladder anyway, we just played mellee and UMS with friends or we newbie bashed in public multi-player games, and it was mad fun, even when the fast money madness came along.

Blizzard, back to the basics.. THE PLAYERS - THE PLAYERS - THE PLAYERS!
Get yourself into the head of THE PLAYERS.
NOT THE MASTERS ... THE PROFITS ... THE ESPORT ... THE QUALITY ... THE DEPTH .. THE BLA BLA .. THE CELEBRITY OPINION

THE PLAYERS!!!!

Its simple.. if you get better, you should win more! And in SC2 you dont. After 4 weeks of that crap you're like.. WTF? Lets play something else. You need a broader base, so dump the auto ranking system and you will have a better feeling game for THE PLAYER! Let the players decide who is good and who is not and who they should and shouldn't be playing.

OR give us the option to just play purely random opponents we might get Master level, or we might get Bronze, its just a crap shoot, we can get ranked when we are done. I know it's almost newbie bashing once you get above Gold, but heck, it's how it should be, you get better then your win ratio improves, and you will have teams that are having a blast beating the crap out of everyone , until every now and then they run into better teams. But as you get better that will happen less often.

As a platinum level player on BW you could expect to have a record that was something like 5000 wins and 500 loses. That is a very different experience though on SC2 you will lose a good many of your games. You lose a sense of progress.

What's more, when you are matched, your variety is reduced, because you are not able to deviate and be more flexible, or you will just lose instantly. Unlike in a random system, you can opt to do really silly things, like a mass queen rush, or a burrow rush, and you can actually have a lot of fun. We had a blast on Broodwar doing really stupid things and weird rushes like Ghost / Dark Archon combo's. The ranking system hinders variety, and the players are forced to slog it out, with very tight build orders, and very tight counter play, that is the same crap over and over and over again.

Blizzard is suffering from the Bozo bit = on syndrome, they have 2 opposing conceptual ideas that are clashing.
1. Competition is king
2. Everyone should be equal.

They need to get with reality. Newbies are Newbies, they should lose more, because they suck, and they can practice and get better. And then, they dont lose as much. If they want to protect newbies, then chain them up until out of bronze, and then let them loose in the real world, where they will lose a lot, but win a lot more as they improve, then let them rank themselves based upon a win/loss ratio instead of the skill ranking system. Then let the players decide if they want to play against a high ratio'd player or not.

What this will do, is allow platinum level players and above to appear as if they are in the top 10%, and it is a much more attainable status, than the current system allows, a lot more fun, with a lot more variety, giving them a. larger community and audience.

Losing half your games no matter what your skill level, is DUMB!! It feels painful Blizzard.. get with it.

Fix your ranking system,

End result...
Blizzard creates a fun to play system that reflects how COOL a player is, even when he is not the greatest!
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44185 Posts
October 29 2012 12:58 GMT
#1688
On October 29 2012 17:35 NarAliya wrote:
Idra:

"Blizzard isn't doing anything so WE'RE gonna do something"...

Lol its easy for the EG guys to sit in their game house, getting at least 30k a year to drink Monster, whilst talking this nonsense. The real people doing something for the game consistently break their backs to stream, fly to events in order to get good results for their fans. Noone in EG besides Stephano does this. And for DjWheat to even act as an authority on a game he hasn't got a clue about is disturbing. I already think that the concept of E-Sports is a joke, but these guys took it toooo far.

I can't help feel that after watching that terrible episode of Inside The Game, Idra, Incontrol and DjWheat performed reacharounds on each other before Destiny came on air so that it looked like a horrible set up.


Just to be clear, you are joking right?

-EG flies everywhere, just as much as any other team.
-They certainly stream just as much as other teams (more than most too).
-They provide far more e-sports related content than any other team.
-They have a practice house designed so that they can hone their talents.
-Wheat isn't an authority on SC2 or e-sports? LOL. How many famous shows does he have to host and tournaments does he have to cast before he becomes an authority in your eyes? And you realize Destiny was fabricating numbers and viewership fluctuations when Wheat literally works for Twitch, right?

Everyone elaborating on their own responses to Destiny's fully written argument was just making things even, and the fact that there was agreement among the good points means nothing more than consistency. Just because people agree with each other doesn't mean they weren't also bringing up good points lol.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
echobong
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada92 Posts
October 29 2012 13:26 GMT
#1689
On October 29 2012 19:46 bokeevboke wrote:
How about we stop arguing a bit and try to find solutions:

I think one of the problems of poor gameplay is sc2 has too many hard counters.

Rock-paper-scissors philosophy in nutshell. it forces us to use one composition.

Usual scenario:
-what if I build unit A,
-NO, they will build unit B and you'll die, you better stick with the Colossi/gateway army,
- ok


Instead of making hardcounters, why won't we diversify units, make them interactable, microable, soft counters.
I would start from lowering damage of most units that do too much specified damage. Like, why marauder does +10 vs armored? Instead make it 8 base damage and +6 vs armored. Upgrades (+1/0). Increase their speed so that they could be microed better but don't do absurd damage. Cut in half damage of banelings, but increase explosion radius, so that opponent has more incentives to micro and spread his army. Make phoenixes do 7+7 base damage and no additional damage to light. And vuala, you can use them in fights, not only for scouting and killing workers, not utterly devastating but micro dependant. And many many more stuff should be tweaked. We're not asking to redesign units. Some tweaks would've make huge differences.

Thoughts?



That is a great idea. I think you are right about the hard counters. They force such a boring and undynamic way to play.

I have nothing to add gameplay wise, especially as I hardly play anymore. I will say as a spectator there are only a couple of ways a game funnels into, and once it slides into one of those paths it's beyond me why they bother to cast the rest. Not that it's an autowin for any one race, but the counter that an opponent has to do is predictable as is the counter to that counter. I don't care who is going to win on the massive ball engagement, I know it is going to be b.lords and infestors vs a mothership, etc.

All in all it has gotten damn tedius to watch.
ShadeR
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia7535 Posts
October 29 2012 13:39 GMT
#1690
On October 29 2012 22:26 echobong wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2012 19:46 bokeevboke wrote:
How about we stop arguing a bit and try to find solutions:

I think one of the problems of poor gameplay is sc2 has too many hard counters.

Rock-paper-scissors philosophy in nutshell. it forces us to use one composition.

Usual scenario:
-what if I build unit A,
-NO, they will build unit B and you'll die, you better stick with the Colossi/gateway army,
- ok


Instead of making hardcounters, why won't we diversify units, make them interactable, microable, soft counters.
I would start from lowering damage of most units that do too much specified damage. Like, why marauder does +10 vs armored? Instead make it 8 base damage and +6 vs armored. Upgrades (+1/0). Increase their speed so that they could be microed better but don't do absurd damage. Cut in half damage of banelings, but increase explosion radius, so that opponent has more incentives to micro and spread his army. Make phoenixes do 7+7 base damage and no additional damage to light. And vuala, you can use them in fights, not only for scouting and killing workers, not utterly devastating but micro dependant. And many many more stuff should be tweaked. We're not asking to redesign units. Some tweaks would've make huge differences.

Thoughts?



That is a great idea. I think you are right about the hard counters. They force such a boring and undynamic way to play.

I have nothing to add gameplay wise, especially as I hardly play anymore. I will say as a spectator there are only a couple of ways a game funnels into, and once it slides into one of those paths it's beyond me why they bother to cast the rest. Not that it's an autowin for any one race, but the counter that an opponent has to do is predictable as is the counter to that counter. I don't care who is going to win on the massive ball engagement, I know it is going to be b.lords and infestors vs a mothership, etc.

All in all it has gotten damn tedius to watch.

Hard counters can be done well. ala BW.
Problem might more be 'un-microability' or the ai A-move being super effective.
Charon1979
Profile Joined October 2010
Austria317 Posts
October 29 2012 13:41 GMT
#1691
All in all it has gotten damn tedius to watch.


Pretty much this.
I stopped playing SC2 in favor of LoL a few Months ago but still watched GSL, Player Streams, Tournaments,...
Recently I also stopped watching SC2.
If I turn in I can see "aha its MMM against Mass Zealot/Colossi/HT" like every time. In the meanwhile I would say: If you have seen 5 PvT you have seen them all.
The Game ist stale to watch and has become increasingly boring to play. Macro up 10 Minutes, watch Ball vs Ball, queue up for the next game.
GizmoPT
Profile Joined May 2010
Portugal3040 Posts
October 29 2012 14:10 GMT
#1692
now im just playing custom games for fun and watch tournaments like wcs europe and homestory other than that its pretty boring hoping hots will bring some fresh air
Snipers Promod & Micro Arena Creator in SC2 Arcade - Portuguese Community Admin for SC2, HotS and Overwatch - Ex-Portugal SC2 Team Manager, Ex- Copenhagen Wolves and Grow uP Gaming Manager in SC2. Just Playing games now!
Incognoto
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
France10239 Posts
October 29 2012 14:12 GMT
#1693
On October 29 2012 19:29 Labil wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2012 19:25 Meega wrote:
Blizzard is like: Take this game we dont want it anymore.

Riot is like: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


More like...


Blizzard: We have a brand, shit'll sort itselves.
Riot: Shut up and take our money.
Valve: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


lol no Riot is actually very good about supporting its game unlike blizzard
maru lover forever
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
October 29 2012 14:14 GMT
#1694
On October 29 2012 23:10 GizmoPT wrote:
now im just playing custom games for fun and watch tournaments like wcs europe and homestory other than that its pretty boring hoping hots will bring some fresh air


I would settle for new maps to spice things up. The current maps have been around for to long. I have see so many games on daybreak and I never want to see any more. People say the game got stale because of the game play, but its mostly because everyone figured out a lot of the maps and we have been on them for months after they were figured out.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
October 29 2012 14:17 GMT
#1695
On October 29 2012 23:12 Incognoto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2012 19:29 Labil wrote:
On October 29 2012 19:25 Meega wrote:
Blizzard is like: Take this game we dont want it anymore.

Riot is like: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


More like...


Blizzard: We have a brand, shit'll sort itselves.
Riot: Shut up and take our money.
Valve: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


lol no Riot is actually very good about supporting its game unlike blizzard


With not having replays or any spectator mode for nearly 3 years. And couple of years with no way to deal with abusive players in a team based game. How quickly people forget.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Zoesan
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland141 Posts
October 29 2012 14:52 GMT
#1696
On October 29 2012 23:17 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2012 23:12 Incognoto wrote:
On October 29 2012 19:29 Labil wrote:
On October 29 2012 19:25 Meega wrote:
Blizzard is like: Take this game we dont want it anymore.

Riot is like: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


More like...


Blizzard: We have a brand, shit'll sort itselves.
Riot: Shut up and take our money.
Valve: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


lol no Riot is actually very good about supporting its game unlike blizzard


With not having replays or any spectator mode for nearly 3 years. And couple of years with no way to deal with abusive players in a team based game. How quickly people forget.


They fucked up the beginning, no one is gonna deny that. But they are learning from their mistakes and slowly making their game a lot better. In fact, they did almost everything right for quite some time now, as is evidenced by the player base.
Suffer the pain of discipline or suffer the pain of regret
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
October 29 2012 14:52 GMT
#1697
On October 29 2012 23:12 Incognoto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2012 19:29 Labil wrote:
On October 29 2012 19:25 Meega wrote:
Blizzard is like: Take this game we dont want it anymore.

Riot is like: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


More like...


Blizzard: We have a brand, shit'll sort itselves.
Riot: Shut up and take our money.
Valve: Lets work together to make the best possible game out there.


lol no Riot is actually very good about supporting its game unlike blizzard


Yeah, takes a lot of support to make a beta client, support it for 2 years, code the largest update in the history of the game for that client, and then drop it with a week's notice and never tell the players why or help the people that subsequently made a more functional client.
ToT)OjKa(
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Korea (South)2437 Posts
October 29 2012 14:59 GMT
#1698
Quick everyone, forget that Riot patches the game every ~3 weeks with balance and new content!
OjKa OjKa OjKa!
Talin
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Montenegro10532 Posts
October 29 2012 15:10 GMT
#1699
On October 29 2012 19:46 bokeevboke wrote:
How about we stop arguing a bit and try to find solutions:

I think one of the problems of poor gameplay is sc2 has too many hard counters.

Rock-paper-scissors philosophy in nutshell. it forces us to use one composition.

Usual scenario:
-what if I build unit A,
-NO, they will build unit B and you'll die, you better stick with the Colossi/gateway army,
- ok


Instead of making hardcounters, why won't we diversify units, make them interactable, microable, soft counters.
I would start from lowering damage of most units that do too much specified damage. Like, why marauder does +10 vs armored? Instead make it 8 base damage and +6 vs armored. Upgrades (+1/0). Increase their speed so that they could be microed better but don't do absurd damage. Cut in half damage of banelings, but increase explosion radius, so that opponent has more incentives to micro and spread his army. Make phoenixes do 7+7 base damage and no additional damage to light. And vuala, you can use them in fights, not only for scouting and killing workers, not utterly devastating but micro dependant. And many many more stuff should be tweaked. We're not asking to redesign units. Some tweaks would've make huge differences.

Thoughts?


I don't think the problem is finding solutions, it's getting them implemented. We can't implement any of the solutions that would require changing the game, because it's not our game.

At the end of the day, the game is inseparable from its developer, and like most games, its fate rests almost entirely on the decisions developer makes. The community's role in this context is a very passive one - no amount of well thought of posts or elaborate ideas is going to go anywhere if it conflicts with the developers' own vision of the game.

The units are the way they are because the dev team thinks that's what they should be like, they have been designed to conform to their design patterns and principles. It doesn't really matter how subtle the changes we ask for are if they essentially change the nature of units and gameplay as a whole.

Blizzard has made it pretty clear over the last couple of years as to what they're willing to change and what they won't change. They're happy to play around with balance tweaks all the time, but none of these tweaks has ever really changed how a race plays and feels like, only the optimal timings and compositions have changed.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
October 29 2012 15:13 GMT
#1700
On October 29 2012 23:59 ToT)OjKa( wrote:
Quick everyone, forget that Riot patches the game every ~3 weeks with balance and new content!


I am pretty sure they update their game every three weeks due to adding new champions and new skins, as that is how they make money.

The issue is not binary. Riot supports their games, no one will argue with that. They have improved it. Do they support their games far better than Blizzard? Well that is a questionable argument. I would say currently, they have better features. However, for the majority of the last 2.5 years, SC2 has had much better features that LoL. It is only recently that Riot has caught up and passed SC2 in features.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Prev 1 83 84 85 86 87 105 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 1: Playoffs Day 1
Clem vs ChamLIVE!
Rex132
IndyStarCraft 118
LiquipediaDiscussion
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 53
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko409
Harstem 287
Rex 132
IndyStarCraft 118
ProTech56
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 47572
Rain 3601
Sea 3595
Horang2 2899
Jaedong 1718
EffOrt 1108
BeSt 541
Larva 477
ZerO 443
Stork 345
[ Show more ]
actioN 343
Mini 288
ToSsGirL 253
Light 210
Last 204
Mong 151
Killer 140
Snow 139
Shinee 68
Sharp 61
Mind 50
Pusan 50
hero 49
Rush 42
Sea.KH 41
sSak 29
Nal_rA 26
Noble 25
ajuk12(nOOB) 23
JulyZerg 20
yabsab 15
NaDa 13
Movie 12
soO 11
IntoTheRainbow 11
sorry 11
Sacsri 10
GoRush 10
SilentControl 8
Terrorterran 6
Dota 2
qojqva1967
420jenkins471
XcaliburYe423
BananaSlamJamma416
Counter-Strike
x6flipin772
oskar197
byalli154
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King141
Other Games
B2W.Neo905
hiko660
DeMusliM529
crisheroes292
ArmadaUGS62
ZerO(Twitch)19
QueenE18
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 47
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV505
League of Legends
• Nemesis5005
Upcoming Events
WardiTV European League
2h 56m
ByuN vs NightPhoenix
HeRoMaRinE vs HiGhDrA
Krystianer vs sebesdes
MaxPax vs Babymarine
SKillous vs Mixu
ShoWTimE vs MaNa
Replay Cast
10h 56m
RSL Revival
20h 56m
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
OSC
23h 56m
WardiTV European League
1d 2h
Scarlett vs Percival
Jumy vs ArT
YoungYakov vs Shameless
uThermal vs Fjant
Nicoract vs goblin
Harstem vs Gerald
FEL
1d 2h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 13h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 20h
RSL Revival
1d 20h
FEL
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.