|
hi guys, i am awared that the Korean version of august TLPD win rates is missed so I calculate my own(to my curiosity, I just want to know how awesome protoss can be).
Procedure,
use RSS to export the data during August,
then mark wins by race one by one.
Add total and calculate,
then it is the winning ratio.
Also I found that, some taeja games are not displayed in TLPD but you can see that in RSS.
+ Show Spoiler +
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgJGz0YwL1yTdHNMeXNfdWIzc0hMODE3Q29JUUVwdmc
Above is my work.
Then here is the stats.
PvZ 60%
PvT 61.42%
ZvT 46.8%
Edit: found that WCS Korea is missed, working on them. WCS Korea stats added.
|
|
|
So we're back at terran having a problem with Protoss, and zerg having a problem with terran..
|
zerg truly is overpowered.
|
in b4 all the sad qq tosses from international thread come here and say that korean winrates mean nothing
|
On September 15 2012 23:58 VPVanek wrote:
So we're back at terran having a problem with Protoss, and zerg having a problem with terran..
I'd say a 60% win rate in pvz is indicative of zerg struggling with protoss...
|
|
|
On September 16 2012 00:02 syriuszonito wrote:
in b4 all the sad qq tosses from international thread come here and say that korean winrates mean nothing
Aren't you saying the same thing about the international statistics?
A whopping 28 PvZs says tonnes.
This sample size is ridiculously small.
|
Hate to burst your bubble dude, but you've completely missed out WCS Korea.
|
On September 16 2012 00:05 Yonnua wrote:
Hate to burst your bubble dude, but you've completely missed out WCS Korea.
And PvZ was already 60%....
|
On September 15 2012 23:58 VPVanek wrote:
So we're back at terran having a problem with Protoss, and zerg having a problem with terran..
So we're back at people having a problem with statistics, drawing balance conclusions out of ridiculously small sample sizes flawed with skill discrepancy between some of the players.
|
I feel bad for Zerg players...
|
On September 16 2012 00:08 TommyP wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2012 00:05 Yonnua wrote:
Hate to burst your bubble dude, but you've completely missed out WCS Korea. And PvZ was already 60%....
Twenty. Eight. Games. 17-11. You really think that says much? Literally one player winning a single tournament would be enough to skew this in the complete opposite direction.
|
Oh man 250 games. This looks promising.
|
On September 16 2012 00:09 TheDwf wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2012 23:58 VPVanek wrote:
So we're back at terran having a problem with Protoss, and zerg having a problem with terran.. So we're back at people having a problem with statistics, drawing balance conclusions out of ridiculously small sample sizes flawed with skill discrepancy between some of the players.
I was just reading from the thread. Chill dude.
|
|
|
On September 16 2012 00:05 Yonnua wrote:
Hate to burst your bubble dude, but you've completely missed out WCS Korea.
sorry for that, i will try to work on that, but its already high = =
let's see what it finally be
|
On September 16 2012 00:11 thezanursic wrote:
I feel bad for Zerg players...
Why, no one is doing anything remotely impressive or unique with the race. Korean protoss are just using their race better right now.
|
On September 16 2012 00:12 Shiori wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2012 00:08 TommyP wrote:On September 16 2012 00:05 Yonnua wrote:
Hate to burst your bubble dude, but you've completely missed out WCS Korea. And PvZ was already 60%.... Twenty. Eight. Games. 17-11. You really think that says much? Literally one player winning a single tournament would be enough to skew this in the complete opposite direction.
when u add in wcs korea expect it to have like fifty games with protoss winning 35 or something
|
I wonder how many of those PvZs are immortal sentry allins so ez.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
