MLG vs Proleague Invitational and MLG Fall Season - Page 4
Forum Index > SC2 General |
pmastah
Sweden8 Posts
| ||
sVnteen
Germany2238 Posts
| ||
TAMinator
Australia2706 Posts
So its... you know... fair? | ||
ES.Genie
Germany1370 Posts
| ||
raga4ka
Bulgaria5676 Posts
| ||
Arcanne
United States1519 Posts
Definitely could have come up with a better name. | ||
Incomplet
United Kingdom1419 Posts
Roro and SK Telecom Rain are going to destroy everyone depending on who the 6 ESF guys that are invited. | ||
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On September 14 2012 00:58 raga4ka wrote: Some of the kespa players make no sense . Bisu for example is not Top 24 in neither Kespa rank nor Proleague wins . Still i am looking forward to this . But he has the fans... | ||
See.Blue
United States2673 Posts
Edit: Didnt see theres 6 ESF guys coming. A little better... | ||
Apolo
Portugal1259 Posts
| ||
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On September 14 2012 00:59 Incomplet wrote: THIS IS HUGEEEE!!! Roro and SK Telecom Rain are going to destroy everyone depending on who the 6 ESF guys that are invited. CJ hero would like a word with you. | ||
Darneck
Sweden1394 Posts
On September 14 2012 00:36 Dodgin wrote: Bisu is top ranked in Proleague? I thought his record was like 3-6 ;o I'm not complaining, that's great that he's playing! He's doing a lot better now though, 1 game, 1 gameeeeee from qualifying for code A. T_T so close | ||
FaRess
Tunisia937 Posts
| ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
TumNarDok
Germany854 Posts
On September 14 2012 00:11 Rossi wrote: wanting to buy a spot or 2 for SEA I second this motion. 2 NA out, 2 SEA in please! | ||
Butterednuts
United States859 Posts
| ||
Frankon
3054 Posts
International eSports Group ??? | ||
SiguR
Canada2039 Posts
But very blatantly forcing more NA players than far more competitive communities for no legitimate competitive reason is, simply put, stupid. How did someone think this would be the right choice? Having 8 participants from every region is already favouring NA. Having more is just tomfoolery! 8NA 8EU 8KR makes more sense, as it is equitable. 6NA 12EU 6KR makes more sense, as it provides more foreigner vs korean games without drastically reducing the competitive quality of the matches. 6NA 6EU 12KR makes more sense, as it would provide the highest quality of play. 12NA 6EU 6KR makes the least amount of sense possible. I don't see how it could be a sponsor thing. Would having Socke, Dimaga, Whitera, Goody, Bly, Nightend, etc. instead of tt1, goswser, hawk, etc. really have a negative impact on sponsorship exposure to target audiences? I really don't think so. If there's another reason for the NA favouritism I'd really like to hear it. All that aside, this is going to be fucking awesome. | ||
TR
2320 Posts
| ||
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
On September 14 2012 00:54 Darpa wrote: You are forgetting Scarlet =P She is virtually NA's only hope. LOL I am not saying that it will be NA 0:12 Kespa. But I think it will be somewhat lopsided for Kespa and I don't see EU + KOR players making up for that. | ||
| ||