EPT
Season 8 Lock and new Ladder changes incoming - Page 16
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
| ||
|
pallad
Poland1958 Posts
On September 08 2012 02:21 Mrvoodoochild1 wrote: Blizzard is a fucking joke. Why wasn't this simply implemented at the start of the game? It makes no sense to have hidden rankings among same divisions (not MMR). This just leaves the player clueless as to when he will get promoted or not. For fucks sake, it takes you two years to realize that your ladder system is confusing? Blizzard....... Your post make no sense..you know that ? Blizzard fix something.. people say that blizzard is a joke because they fix it.. People like you are a joke. | ||
|
HoLe
Canada183 Posts
| ||
|
Eatme
Switzerland3919 Posts
On September 08 2012 16:15 AxionSteel wrote: Damn, I liked Arakan Citadel Well it has been in the map pool since beta (iirc) so it's time for it to go. While apparently very popular I never liked it for some reson. I had alot of interesting features like mineral only gold and lots of possibilites Cant really put my finger on why I dislike it, other than shared bases. Well I have played extremely few entertaining games on it, might be that. Have had it vetoed for over a year but I play it once in a while when I'm not party leader. Happy to see it go anyways but I can see that people liked it. | ||
|
aintthatfunny
193 Posts
| ||
|
Kaitokid
Germany1327 Posts
On September 08 2012 21:46 aintthatfunny wrote: But who cares about rank? It has always has been points that count for how good you are, not rank. Nevermind what if there are 2 players in one division with a lot of points, you can't say only rank 1 will be in the top 1%, that can't be true. Before the patch points were not relevant <master league because there were division tiers. Next season rank will still mean as much as before because relative to the people in your division your points are still the same. After the patch you can just compare yourself better to people from other divisions. It's a good change. | ||
|
Aterons_toss
Romania1275 Posts
| ||
|
Gumbotwins
Netherlands256 Posts
On September 08 2012 22:07 Aterons_toss wrote: Wait, they had divisions based on "tiers"... am i the only one who never knew this ?! I dont get this aswell. And i dont know what is changing now :S. How is rank 1 in lets say diamond group A, going to compete with group B who's top 16 players all have more points? How does this make sense? Edit: Why dont they make it such as all divisions are connected; You still have divisions with 100 people in it. But in order to get from rank 100 to 99 u need to have more points then all 99 ranked people? | ||
|
whatusername
Canada1181 Posts
On September 08 2012 20:30 pallad wrote: Your post make no sense..you know that ? Blizzard fix something.. people say that blizzard is a joke because they fix it.. People like you are a joke. it's a joke because it took them 2 years to fix a plainly obvious problem | ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
I would rather know exactly how I measure up to other diamond players. | ||
|
Penecks
United States600 Posts
| ||
|
Tao367
United Kingdom324 Posts
On September 08 2012 23:16 Penecks wrote: Wow people still think win ratio means something in a system designed for the sole purpose to give you a 50% win/loss across all varying skill levels... Does the system still try to put you at a 50/50 ratio in masters? I haven't actually read anywhere that it confirms or denies. All they usually say is that the Masters league is tierless., | ||
|
elKaDor
Sweden376 Posts
| ||
|
WatchOutNow
48 Posts
| ||
|
AKnopf
Germany259 Posts
On September 08 2012 22:07 Aterons_toss wrote: Wait, they had divisions based on "tiers"... am i the only one who never knew this ?! I never knew, either. I guess it makes sense in terms of having fun in your division. It is more pleasant to be close to the one above your rank so you can actually catch up with him within a few games. If you have 200 points to go just to gain one rank its much less encouraging. So I'd say if you want to have divisions, this tier thing is OK. If you want to globally compare players, its not transparent. But why would you have division then anyway? Ohh and btw: +1 for having losses visible again.  | ||
|
redDuke
Australia207 Posts
On September 07 2012 10:19 NovemberstOrm wrote: Ladder tier means theirs different tiers... "there is" Your english also sucks. This is a cool idea. It'll be nice to be able to better understand our rankings! | ||
|
Sankanyo
United States140 Posts
| ||
|
KuKri
Germany168 Posts
| ||
|
StateofReverie
United States633 Posts
| ||
|
Messi
United States212 Posts
| ||
| ||
