EPTDestiny and Root part ways - Page 86
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
As emotionally invested as people are on this topic, TL rules still apply. That includes flaming and ad hominem attacks. | ||
|
Dankleteer
United States1430 Posts
| ||
|
multiversed
United States233 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
*face... resisting urge to meet palm....* | ||
|
MountainDewJunkie
United States10346 Posts
Honestly so many of you are focusing on the wrong aspects of this situation. | ||
|
iky43210
United States2099 Posts
On August 30 2012 13:49 Sokrates wrote: Grow up? Because of hypocrits like you people have to be afraid that private conversations could leak and then have an impact on their job. Thats even more pathetic what destiny did. why shouldn't you be afraid of leaked private conversation. Its one of the worse disaster that could happen in any business, and even more so in the entertaining industry. Also there is no hypocrisy here, just you continuing to misuse the word | ||
|
R3DT1D3
285 Posts
On August 30 2012 13:49 Sokrates wrote: Grow up? Because of hypocrits like you people have to be afraid that private conversations could leak and then have an impact on their job. Thats even more pathetic what destiny did. An ex-felon is held to higher scrutiny that someone without a record. Destiny should know better than this from past history but he can't seem to avoid it. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
Go figure. | ||
|
FortMonty
United States63 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland26793 Posts
On August 30 2012 13:55 FortMonty wrote: It is pretty sad that celebrities need to censore themselves even in confidence of discretion simply because one misfortune of having their personal opinions released can result in them losing their position in a business. It's like people expect celebrities to be perfect human beings and play the roll of dolls who's only purpose is to look pretty in front of their fans. I understand there are rules and guidelines, but no one is perfect and people should ben entitled to privacy, even if they privately dislike someone who privately insult someone, persecuting them on those grounds is almost like convicting someone of thought crime. The entire celebrity/paparazzi culture is pathetic. I don't get why people think 'oh this guy's famous, I deserve to know who he's fucking' it's ridiculous. That said the seepage of that mentality over to SC2 also seems pretty inexorable, disappointing  | ||
|
RUFinalBoss
United States266 Posts
| ||
|
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On August 30 2012 13:55 Bill Murray wrote: He's an ex-felon? Go figure. Saying the N word and G word are Class 1-A e-Felonies in the Mob Court of Law. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5219 Posts
On August 30 2012 13:47 Sokrates wrote: Sigh. I cant belive the bullshit people write. If i say "wow she has great boobs but ugly" that makes me woman hater. Yeah. You guys just haven't read the chat log. The conversation was implying then women are only good for sex, objectifying them sexually. Read the chat log. I honestly don't think you guys are educated and mature enough to understand this. Sure you can say a woman has great boobs and is ugly, heck you can say she has great boobs and is pretty, and what are you doing? You are commenting on her worth as a sexual object. Women are not sexual objects. The sexual objectification is a lie that has been sold to society, and it is a recent development. Cavemen didn't wander around and discuss whether a woman was hot or not. And it is wrong. But I am speaking with uneducated teenagers who have bought the lie, so it won't be understood. Society markets women's as object. Don't hate the Pantene girl because she is beautiful, but we do hate her, because we are objectifying her. Thankfully, the sponsors understand. | ||
|
Sokrates
738 Posts
On August 30 2012 13:53 iky43210 wrote: why shouldn't you be afraid of leaked private conversation. Its one of the worse disaster that could happen in any business, and even more so in the entertaining industry. Also there is no hypocrisy here, just you continuing to misuse the word Because if i state my PRIVATE opinion shouldnt fear any consequences for that!? Why is it so hard to understand? I use the word hypocrit because EVERYONE has had one of these conversations but if anybody else has it then he should lose his job/team/whatever. You dont think thats hypocritic? If you say "god this chick as fat as a pig" to a friend you should lose your job because of that statement? People are msg sponsors about this stuff, this is just so wrong, these people are just so pathetic. I cant help myself but it is just purely wrong in my opinion that people have to fear punishment for their own private matters. People shouldnt contact sponsors about this people just say "whatever, his private stuff, he is a douche". | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland26793 Posts
On August 30 2012 13:58 BronzeKnee wrote: You guys just haven't read the chat log. The conversation was implying then women are only good for sex, objectifying them sexually. Read the chat log. I honestly don't think you guys are educated and mature enough to understand this. Sure you can say a woman has great boobs and is ugly, heck you can say she has great boobs and is pretty, and what are you doing? You are commenting on her worth as a sexual object. Women are not sexual objects. The sexual objectification is a lie that has been sold to society, and it is a recent development. Cavemen didn't wander around and discuss whether a woman was hot or not. And it is wrong. But I am speaking with uneducated teenagers, so it won't be understood. Thankfully, the sponsors understand. How's it a recent development? I hate the objectification of women, but I wouldn't consider it a recent phenomenon. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
you are going to take connotation off of the INTERNET where TONE can't come across... seriously? | ||
|
Sokrates
738 Posts
On August 30 2012 13:58 BronzeKnee wrote: You guys just haven't read the chat log. The conversation was implying then women are only good for sex, objectifying them sexually. Read the chat log. I honestly don't think you guys are educated and mature enough to understand this. Sure you can say a woman has great boobs and is ugly, heck you can say she has great boobs and is pretty, and what are you doing? You are commenting on her worth as a sexual object. Women are not sexual objects. The sexual objectification is a lie that has been sold to society, and it is a recent development. Cavemen didn't wander around and discuss whether a woman was hot or not. And it is wrong. But I am speaking with uneducated teenagers, so it won't be understood. Thankfully, the sponsors understand. Oh right so if i m masturbating i m a very very bad uneducated teenager and i m purely evil because i see woman only as sexual objects. Did you ever watch porn? So here you go you are just seeing women as sexual objects. Woman are not sexual objects?Yes they are. They are the point is if you ONLY see them this way then there is something wrong with you. | ||
|
lazyitachi
1043 Posts
Best effort post for those who missed it when posted earlier. Pretty sure all his legion troll downvoted the thread to oblivion. LOLOLOL.. "Dynasty" sure has lots of fanboys who like watching his antics | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
Fayth brought up someone who was a "face person". Different strokes for different folks. The key here is to not record your stroking. | ||
| ||
