[Resolved] Kespa, GOM, ESF dispute - Page 84
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Tsubbi
Germany7967 Posts
| ||
Laryleprakon
New Zealand9496 Posts
| ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
![]() | ||
sam05396
United States783 Posts
On August 27 2012 17:05 Fionn wrote: September 12th? So the Ro32 of Code S will be done before the Code A qualifiers even happen? Meh. Guessing no Code S seeds if they need time to prep. they should be giving one to alicia in all honesty | ||
boag11
United States28 Posts
| ||
![]()
ArvickHero
10387 Posts
anyways, good to hear that things worked out in the end ![]() | ||
yOngKIN
Korea (North)656 Posts
| ||
![]()
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
On August 27 2012 17:06 sam05396 wrote: they should be giving one to alicia in all honesty Should be Alicia + First since Stephano declined, Nerchio is busy, and Naniwa is already in GSL. | ||
ShiroKaisen
United States1082 Posts
On August 27 2012 17:07 Fionn wrote: Should be Alicia + First since Stephano declined, Nerchio is busy, and Naniwa is already in GSL. Yeah, especially since the two most likely from KeSPA to recieve Code S seeds - By.Sun and RorO - are playoff teams. I really hope Alicia gets one, he deserves it a lot. | ||
Entropic
Canada2837 Posts
| ||
sam05396
United States783 Posts
On August 27 2012 17:07 Fionn wrote: Should be Alicia + First since Stephano declined, Nerchio is busy, and Naniwa is already in GSL. yea i was unsure who the second seed would be but first may be the best candidate since mvp and taeja are already code s | ||
ilsamsamchil
155 Posts
| ||
![]()
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
On August 27 2012 17:10 sam05396 wrote: yea i was unsure who the second seed would be but first may be the best candidate since mvp and taeja are already code s First has been tearing it up lately. Glad things got sorted out and kespa will participate in GSL season 4. | ||
Frankon
3054 Posts
On August 27 2012 16:59 coloursheep wrote: So ESF, not GOM which you are blaming, is not allowed to have their players not compete in OSL but KESPA can have their players not compete in GSL, how is that not the definition of hypocritical? I just wrote that you cannot take out players from a competition they don't take part in the first place. Also i cannot blame anyone since both sides eSF(acting as GOM proxy) and Kespa are fighting for their own economic interests. Btw. This whole situation shows us that right now Blizzard is on top of KR Starcraft. Which could be both good or bad (imagine if WC4 would come out Blizzard "soon") | ||
sam05396
United States783 Posts
On August 27 2012 17:10 Entropic wrote: This was great drama while it lasted. im sure it will be back official kespa statement "kespa players could not attend qualifiers because of traffic, o and we have a big project" | ||
Initiative
United States131 Posts
This is great news | ||
achan1058
1091 Posts
On August 27 2012 17:12 Frankon wrote: I just wrote that you cannot take out players from a competition they don't take part in the first place. Also i cannot blame anyone since both sides eSF(acting as GOM proxy) and Kespa are fighting for their own economic interests. Btw. This whole situation shows us that right now Blizzard is on top of KR Starcraft. Which could be both good or bad (imagine if WC4 would come out Blizzard "soon") Soon can mean 5-10 years after legacy of the Void. | ||
ShakkaFL
Norway647 Posts
| ||
Timmsh
Netherlands201 Posts
| ||
sam05396
United States783 Posts
On August 27 2012 17:14 ShakkaFL wrote: does article say anything about seaon 5 and onwards as well? i guarantee u that esf would not be in the osl if that wasnt worked out | ||
| ||