Random and its place on the ladder - Page 47
Forum Index > SC2 General |
aviator116
United States820 Posts
| ||
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
On August 23 2012 08:05 mostevil wrote: Funny but as a random player on the other side of this thinking, that ratio looks really odd. I get a lot of wins because of this mentality. I counter all-ins by scouting them, it's super effective (it works vs the dirty kind of random player you describe too). It's fun trying to work out what he's up to based on what you've seen and then deciding how to handle it to be as far ahead as you can without being dead. Making your own blind 1 base build and rolling that dice against his isn't a much of a strat, especially if you convince yourself its some kind of moral high ground. But then I like to play adaptive and I like to try different things. I rarely go the same build twice in a row, even in the unlikely event that I do roll the same matchup and see the same opener. It's not fun for me and fun is why I play. No its not a strat. I have no intrested in training vs randoms. Its fast easy wins or fast loose. I dont enjoy games verses randoms and take the mostly free win. I would have a problem vs guys that play save or react. Save would not give my opponent a big advantage early and because of the lack of training and understanding of the matchups, he need this advantage to win a game. Nothing vs you personal but i can count the amount of random that care what i build, on one hand. Perhaps you are one of the few that does that and get a lot of free wins because of guys like me. But we both get more wins than looses and are so t the winners of this whole situation. To the guys who talk about save expansions. Thats the last you want to do vs random. All early expansions can die to allins and get far behind against super greed ( what most randoms do) . So as protoss i would 4 gate, a random all the time. Most time he go nexus / cc first and autoloose. 1 rax fe is not a save build per se. How save it is depends on what you do after the cc. If you play the way its save, you are far behind a opponent who plays it not save. But thats the normal sc2 gamble. | ||
FortMonty
United States63 Posts
| ||
mostevil
United Kingdom611 Posts
On August 23 2012 08:18 aviator116 wrote: The ironic thing is most people will cheese randoms, even when the random player is going absolutely standard. It's not most people, at least not on EU, but it is definitely a higher proportion. (Although I announce race which may reduce it some) It's probably enough that it's worth playing some random if you want to practice your cheese defence. You can even restore some of the balance by cheesing on your off race rolls ![]() Early pools and 4 gates come thick and fast. I've not had many from terran that weren't their standard build (from a quick profile dive). | ||
FortMonty
United States63 Posts
| ||
Tao367
United Kingdom324 Posts
With the benefit of hindsight, I would have not called the thread "random and its place on ladder". I understand this title made many random players assume I was insulting them personally for playing random. As a result I would like to, and have done many times in this thread, clarify I was not out to attack random players personally, just the mechanic. Had I known that this thread would have been as "popular" as this, I'd have named it something like "random in its current form". That said, I still standby my original stance of personally believing that showing the actual race (with no indication that the player is random) is something I, and a few others would like to see as a personal preference. Once again, apologies for any offence caused. | ||
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
On August 23 2012 10:57 Tao367 wrote: Just to say, I didn't expect this thread to get as many hits and spark as big of a debate as this when I made it. With the benefit of hindsight, I would have not called the thread "random and its place on ladder". I understand this title made many random players assume I was insulting them personally for playing random. As a result I would like to, and have done many times in this thread, clarify I was not out to attack random players personally, just the mechanic. Had I known that this thread would have been as "popular" as this, I'd have named it something like "random in its current form". That said, I still standby my original stance of personally believing that showing the actual race (with no indication that the player is random) is something I, and a few others would like to see as a personal preference. Once again, apologies for any offence caused. But can you honestly say you never learned anything from playing against random? Like how to respond to X build or bounce back from Y situation? Is it so horrible to have a 3% variety in your games? Even if that variety is sometimes annoying, I think it helps with your build adjusting/reactions/overall skill. Also, saying that playing against random is unfair because the players choose random but you don't have a choice is like saying zerg is unfair because they get to choose zerg while you don't get to choose who you play against, and you just want to practice your vT and vP. I think people are trying to revert to PGT/ICCup days when you'd join games and people would kick you if you're not the race they wanted to play against. | ||
Tao367
United Kingdom324 Posts
On August 23 2012 11:05 CubEdIn wrote: But can you honestly say you never learned anything from playing against random? Like how to respond to X build or bounce back from Y situation? Is it so horrible to have a 3% variety in your games? Even if that variety is sometimes annoying, I think it helps with your build adjusting/reactions/overall skill. Also, saying that playing against random is unfair because the players choose random but you don't have a choice is like saying zerg is unfair because they get to choose zerg while you don't get to choose who you play against, and you just want to practice your vT and vP. I think people are trying to revert to PGT/ICCup days when you'd join games and people would kick you if you're not the race they wanted to play against. I'm sadly going to say no, I haven't learned much (if anything) how to improve my game vs random. As protoss that initial pylon does too much for most of the early/mid game. I'm sorry this isn't what you wanted to hear, but the only experience I've had has been sub optimal build orders and random cheese and/or 1 (rarely 2) base all ins. That's my personal experience though, and does not reflect everyone else's. | ||
FortMonty
United States63 Posts
| ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
To the guys who talk about save expansions. Thats the last you want to do vs random. All early expansions can die to allins and get far behind against super greed ( what most randoms do) . So as protoss i would 4 gate, a random all the time. Most time he go nexus / cc first and autoloose. 1 rax fe is not a save build per se. How save it is depends on what you do after the cc. If you play the way its save, you are far behind a opponent who plays it not save. But thats the normal sc2 gamble. 9Scouting and regular early expansions can be very safe against allins. Super greed can be very risky to normal play. I am interested to hear how many super greedy builds distinguish random above THE SAME player that picks his race. Your problem may be against super greedy builds and not random, since usually you have already scouted the player's race before you would radically change up your build order to something punishing super greed. Just to say, I didn't expect this thread to get as many hits and spark as big of a debate as this when I made it. With the benefit of hindsight, I would have not called the thread "random and its place on ladder". I understand this title made many random players assume I was insulting them personally for playing random. As a result I would like to, and have done many times in this thread, clarify I was not out to attack random players personally, just the mechanic. Had I known that this thread would have been as "popular" as this, I'd have named it something like "random in its current form". That said, I still standby my original stance of personally believing that showing the actual race (with no indication that the player is random) is something I, and a few others would like to see as a personal preference. Once again, apologies for any offence caused. Point taken. If you're out here to say somebody that picks Random gets his race for the game revealed on the start screen, I'm pretty close to agreeing with you. | ||
The Final Boss
United States1839 Posts
| ||
diddLY
United States215 Posts
On August 23 2012 11:24 The Final Boss wrote: There are all these random players posting in this thread about how they hold off all sorts of cheeses, but honestly when I play random players and wind up cheesing them I win a huge percentage of my games. I haven't met that many since I started playing a couple of weeks ago again, but like 5 months ago when I was mid-Masters I would win almost all of my vR games doing silly one base cheeses, and regardless of the map it was on. Let's go son! But I must admit, since these posts showed up I'm getting cheesed way more. 2 rax + pull SCVs, 2 gate proxy, 6 pool. But you guys are so clumsy with it! Practice practice practice! Randoms are good for ladder. | ||
kolst
United States13 Posts
| ||
Snijjer
United States989 Posts
We don't know they're position... no need to know they're race either. | ||
| ||