EPTInternational:
PvT 48,8% - 51,2%
ZvT 49,9% - 50,1%
ZvP 50,3% - 49,7%
Korea:
PvT 54,2% - 45,8%
ZvT 56,1% - 43,9%
ZvP 43,2% - 56,8%
Sorry if I read some winrates wrong, it was very hard to read the small numbers.
TLPD winrates April 2012
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Snowbear
Korea (South)1925 Posts
International: PvT 48,8% - 51,2% ZvT 49,9% - 50,1% ZvP 50,3% - 49,7% Korea: PvT 54,2% - 45,8% ZvT 56,1% - 43,9% ZvP 43,2% - 56,8% Sorry if I read some winrates wrong, it was very hard to read the small numbers. | ||
|
Roxor9999
Netherlands771 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
How the mighty have fallen. | ||
|
white.fire
Canada2 Posts
It's always so difficult to tell what these numbers are saying but it appears that international + korea are pretty balanced; although, Protoss seems to be on the rise. I think the next two months of statistics will tell us the most of where the current meta-game is at. So far, it looks actually pretty balanced. | ||
|
Raid
United States398 Posts
| ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
Thanks though! | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
On May 03 2012 21:40 Raid wrote: Can terrans use the same arguments that zerg and protoss used of that we should "balance the game at the highest level" and since terran doing so bad in korea they need buff? Sure they can. Not sure someone will listen though :D | ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
On May 03 2012 21:40 Raid wrote: Can terrans use the same arguments that zerg and protoss used of that we should "balance the game at the highest level" and since terran doing so bad in korea they need buff? Because 54-46 is "so bad", especially compared to periods like July, October, and March >_> | ||
storywriter
Australia528 Posts
On May 03 2012 21:40 Raid wrote: Can terrans use the same arguments that zerg and protoss used of that we should "balance the game at the highest level" and since terran doing so bad in korea they need buff? Sure you can, but if you take ~7% from 50% for one month as imbalance when the sample size is less than 200, you won't be taken seriously. I'm not saying that the game is or isn't imbalanced, just saying that this graph doesn't determine balance either way. | ||
|
Coal
Sweden1535 Posts
| ||
|
GinDo
3327 Posts
| ||
|
Mehukannu
Finland421 Posts
Basically one player 2-0 makes it fucked up. | ||
|
Felvo
United States124 Posts
| ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
| ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
Edit: Oh wow, didn't realize it was that much smaller, Korea graph means pretty much nothing if so. | ||
|
Telenil
France484 Posts
On May 03 2012 23:00 hzflank wrote: I say this every month but I still dont understand how people do not realise that: the korean sample size is too small so the data makes no sense and just changed wildly from month to month. Worse still, people don't seem to realize that whenever the error bars overlap,the imbalances are smaller than the graphs can measure. In a world where balance is perfect, you don't have exactly 50%, you have overlapping error bars. Edit: By the way, statistics question: I guess the "global" results have smaller error bars because their are more games involved,but since these global results are made from each of the separate matchups below, wouldn't it make more sense to sum the errors quadratically instead? Like, if you have a 3% uncertainty on TvZ and a 3% uncertainty on TvP, claiming there is a 2% uncertainty on the global T win rate looks horribly wrong from my physicist perspective. | ||
|
Charger
United States2405 Posts
| ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
|
Equity213
Canada873 Posts
that just made my day :D Finally protoss showing some strength, so awsome. | ||
|
bLah.
Croatia497 Posts
| ||
| ||
