EPTArtosis on the Duncan Trussell podcast. - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Kyles92
England183 Posts
| ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
| ||
|
radscorpion9
Canada2252 Posts
| ||
|
MethodSC
United States928 Posts
On February 22 2012 19:13 SimDawg wrote: This guy is pretty nuts. Half of what he says seems pretty prescient the other half is completely insane. Insane for talking about theory? This is 2012, get with the program, or get left behind like the rest of the dinosaurs. P.S. Yes, Duncan is high. No, Duncan does not believe everything he is saying,(probably almost none of it) he's just trying to get people to think abstractly. | ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On February 23 2012 03:04 MethodSC wrote: Insane for talking about theory? This is 2012, get with the program, or get left behind like the rest of the dinosaurs. P.S. Yes, Duncan is high. No, Duncan does not believe everything he is saying,(probably almost none of it) he's just trying to get people to think abstractly. I have to say you are a bit gullible if you actually think the things Duncan says are sensical or have any purpose. | ||
|
MethodSC
United States928 Posts
On February 23 2012 03:20 Doodsmack wrote: I have to say you are a bit gullible if you actually think the things Duncan says are sensical or have any purpose. See you just missed the whole point. There's no point in discussing these things with autists. | ||
|
Alpino
Brazil4390 Posts
On February 23 2012 00:00 Doodsmack wrote: Can someone explain this guy's humor to me...it just sounds like a random string of words that makes no sense whatsoever. Do people actually think he's making sense because he's using big words and sounding smart? + Show Spoiler + "Her antiquity in preceding and surviving succeeding tellurian generations: her nocturnal predominance: her satellitic dependence: her luminary reflection: her constancy under all her phases, rising and setting by her appointed times, waxing and waning: the forced invariability of her aspect: her indeterminate response to inaffirmative interrogation: her potency over effluent and refluent waters: her power to enamour, to mortify, to invest with beauty, to render insane, to incite to and aid delinquency: the tranquil inscrutability of her visage: the terribility of her isolated dominant resplendent propinquity: her omens of tempest and of calm: the stimulation of her light, her motion and her presence: the admonition of her craters, her arid seas, her silence: her splendour, when visible: her attraction, when invisible." Strings of words are smart, don't be so bitter. | ||
|
Twistacles
Canada1327 Posts
On February 23 2012 03:20 Doodsmack wrote: I have to say you are a bit gullible if you actually think the things Duncan says are sensical or have any purpose. We are on an entire forum that talks about a game that doesn't have any 'purpose' | ||
|
ThomasHobbes
United States197 Posts
| ||
|
DGenerate
Canada140 Posts
| ||
|
Kokosaft
Germany172 Posts
A lot of the stuff is said is really weird, but that doesn't make it bad - it is sad that so many people still don't appreciate real-life theory crafting, because it's a pretty good universe to do so! | ||
|
Comogury
United States412 Posts
| ||
|
Elbows
20 Posts
| ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On February 23 2012 03:26 MethodSC wrote: See you just missed the whole point. There's no point in discussing these things with autists. Not really. You think Duncan actually has a purpose with his words, which is to get people to think abstractly. I'm telling you he just has brain damage. | ||
|
Flamingo777
United States1190 Posts
| ||
|
NrGMalice
United States104 Posts
On February 23 2012 05:22 Doodsmack wrote: Not really. You think Duncan actually has a purpose with his words, which is to get people to think abstractly. I'm telling you he just has brain damage. Everyone keeps saying "Duncan has brain damage". Why do you think this? What did he say that made you think he has brain damage or is insane? I haven't seen anyone quote him or give any reasons why he is "insane". I found both people on the podcast to be very intelligent, deep thinkers and I enjoyed it thoroughly. Will definitely check out the Joe Rogan podcast now. | ||
|
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
| ||
|
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
On February 23 2012 02:41 farvacola wrote: And the doctors would agree with his opinion, along with the vast majority of studies on the effects of tryptamines on the brain. In fact, I'm worried for a mental hospital that employs people who use patient opinion as a means of truth bearing. Dont be worried, by "work at a mental hospital" he probably doesnt mean he's actually doing any clinical work or basic science research. He probably just makes sure people dont escape or something heh | ||
|
zachMEISTER
United States625 Posts
On February 23 2012 05:22 Doodsmack wrote: Not really. You think Duncan actually has a purpose with his words, which is to get people to think abstractly. I'm telling you he just has brain damage. Duncan is probably a bit "brain-damaged" from your perspective. However, a lot of what he speaks has truth in the basis. The ideas behind what he talks about are more for abstraction, and thought-provoking concepts. They're not for people to hang on his every word like it's the truth. Why not sit down for a moment and conceptualize with him instead of closing the door and citing his "insanity" or "brain damage" as the root cause for his "blabber." edit: Kind of like how Artosis "humored him" for lack of a better term, on the concept of God, as he is an Atheist. Artosis ENGAGED IN CONVERSATION and an exchange of intellectual ideas. | ||
|
forsooth
United States3648 Posts
Hate to break it to you, but some inarticulate, brain damaged fool going off on nonsensical tangents every 2 minutes is neither entertaining nor deep. As much as I enjoy listening to Artosis, I can't take this other dude. He ruins it. | ||
| ||
