• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 20:49
CET 02:49
KST 10:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners11Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada3SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage4
StarCraft 2
General
Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t Craziest Micro Moments Of All Time? Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close"
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions Where's CardinalAllin/Jukado the mapmaker?
Tourneys
[BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET [ASL20] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1837 users

Korean Weekly Feedback Thread - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 All
Diamond
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States10796 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-17 03:50:20
December 17 2011 03:50 GMT
#41
On December 17 2011 12:36 onedayclose wrote:
I think the Korean Weekly should be open only to players who are currently not in GSL code S.


Any particular reason? Code S players have not dominated the tournament at any point and both Finals were won by Code B players.
Ballistix Gaming Global Gaming/Esports Marketing Manager - twitter.com/esvdiamond
Diamond
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States10796 Posts
December 20 2011 05:25 GMT
#42
Did an interview with ESFI World and discussed some of the ideas and concepts I had for a few things for 2012. Check it out and let me know what you think .

Interview
Ballistix Gaming Global Gaming/Esports Marketing Manager - twitter.com/esvdiamond
DoomsVille
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada4885 Posts
December 20 2011 06:00 GMT
#43
Whatever you do, do not make it an invite-only or semi-open event.

This tournament is best as a 100% open event. It is literally the only chance we have of seeing the lesser known Code B Koreans compete. There is plenty of Code S level stuff with the GSL and every major tournament inviting the big korean names nowadays.

But I watch this event to see the up-and-comers. I watch because I want a glimpse into the Korean scene that most don't know about. The play is still some of the highest level you can find. These guys are still good enough to take games off of Code Sers.

Fully open is not a big deal in this format. You guys cast from replays. You're selecting the matches you want to broadcast. So that means you don't need to worry about the first few rounds if 500 people signup. Just ignore the players no one has heard of and lose immediately and broadcast the ones we want to see. This really will give a chance for some of the lesser known Koreans to make a name for themselves.

IMO the more players the better here. I know it gets infinitely harder to organize, but it really is something that Korean scene needs and the viewers would love.

Also, I like that orb- character. He's pretty good.
Adebisi
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada1637 Posts
December 20 2011 06:05 GMT
#44
On December 17 2011 12:36 Diamond wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 17 2011 12:33 sitromit wrote:
I think the format is fine. If more open means a bunch of bad players filling the earlier rounds of the tournament the way it is with TL opens and such, that's just going to make people not want to watch those rounds.


True. One concept I was thinking of was Master/GM on Korea only and start casting in the Round of 32 or 64. Not sure tho, just thoughts.

I think that sounds really good. I REALLY like the idea of fully open tournaments.

Also, the idea of seeding into foreign tournaments is much more attractive to me as opposed to GSL Code S, because you will never get rid of that conflict of interest where Code B players have SO much more on the line.
DoomsVille
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada4885 Posts
December 20 2011 06:13 GMT
#45
On December 20 2011 15:05 Adebisi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 17 2011 12:36 Diamond wrote:
On December 17 2011 12:33 sitromit wrote:
I think the format is fine. If more open means a bunch of bad players filling the earlier rounds of the tournament the way it is with TL opens and such, that's just going to make people not want to watch those rounds.


True. One concept I was thinking of was Master/GM on Korea only and start casting in the Round of 32 or 64. Not sure tho, just thoughts.

I think that sounds really good. I REALLY like the idea of fully open tournaments.

Also, the idea of seeding into foreign tournaments is much more attractive to me as opposed to GSL Code S, because you will never get rid of that conflict of interest where Code B players have SO much more on the line.

Seeding into foreign LANs doesn't work. Whose going to pay for their travel expenses? Korean teams certainly can't afford to. If they could they would send their best players, not the Code Bers.

Seeding into online foreign tournaments could work though.
Diamond
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States10796 Posts
December 20 2011 06:16 GMT
#46
On December 20 2011 15:00 DoomsVille wrote:
Whatever you do, do not make it an invite-only or semi-open event.

This tournament is best as a 100% open event. It is literally the only chance we have of seeing the lesser known Code B Koreans compete. There is plenty of Code S level stuff with the GSL and every major tournament inviting the big korean names nowadays.

But I watch this event to see the up-and-comers. I watch because I want a glimpse into the Korean scene that most don't know about. The play is still some of the highest level you can find. These guys are still good enough to take games off of Code Sers.

Fully open is not a big deal in this format. You guys cast from replays. You're selecting the matches you want to broadcast. So that means you don't need to worry about the first few rounds if 500 people signup. Just ignore the players no one has heard of and lose immediately and broadcast the ones we want to see. This really will give a chance for some of the lesser known Koreans to make a name for themselves.

IMO the more players the better here. I know it gets infinitely harder to organize, but it really is something that Korean scene needs and the viewers would love.

Also, I like that orb- character. He's pretty good.


Actually totally open (or something like Masters.GM only) is actually easier.

On December 20 2011 15:13 DoomsVille wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2011 15:05 Adebisi wrote:
On December 17 2011 12:36 Diamond wrote:
On December 17 2011 12:33 sitromit wrote:
I think the format is fine. If more open means a bunch of bad players filling the earlier rounds of the tournament the way it is with TL opens and such, that's just going to make people not want to watch those rounds.


True. One concept I was thinking of was Master/GM on Korea only and start casting in the Round of 32 or 64. Not sure tho, just thoughts.

I think that sounds really good. I REALLY like the idea of fully open tournaments.

Also, the idea of seeding into foreign tournaments is much more attractive to me as opposed to GSL Code S, because you will never get rid of that conflict of interest where Code B players have SO much more on the line.

Seeding into foreign LANs doesn't work. Whose going to pay for their travel expenses? Korean teams certainly can't afford to. If they could they would send their best players, not the Code Bers.

Seeding into online foreign tournaments could work though.


The idea would be find LAN's that would take care of that. Lots do, and lots want Koreans so it seems like a good fit.
Ballistix Gaming Global Gaming/Esports Marketing Manager - twitter.com/esvdiamond
DoomsVille
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada4885 Posts
December 20 2011 06:24 GMT
#47
On December 20 2011 15:16 Diamond wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2011 15:00 DoomsVille wrote:
Whatever you do, do not make it an invite-only or semi-open event.

This tournament is best as a 100% open event. It is literally the only chance we have of seeing the lesser known Code B Koreans compete. There is plenty of Code S level stuff with the GSL and every major tournament inviting the big korean names nowadays.

But I watch this event to see the up-and-comers. I watch because I want a glimpse into the Korean scene that most don't know about. The play is still some of the highest level you can find. These guys are still good enough to take games off of Code Sers.

Fully open is not a big deal in this format. You guys cast from replays. You're selecting the matches you want to broadcast. So that means you don't need to worry about the first few rounds if 500 people signup. Just ignore the players no one has heard of and lose immediately and broadcast the ones we want to see. This really will give a chance for some of the lesser known Koreans to make a name for themselves.

IMO the more players the better here. I know it gets infinitely harder to organize, but it really is something that Korean scene needs and the viewers would love.

Also, I like that orb- character. He's pretty good.


Actually totally open (or something like Masters.GM only) is actually easier.

Show nested quote +
On December 20 2011 15:13 DoomsVille wrote:
On December 20 2011 15:05 Adebisi wrote:
On December 17 2011 12:36 Diamond wrote:
On December 17 2011 12:33 sitromit wrote:
I think the format is fine. If more open means a bunch of bad players filling the earlier rounds of the tournament the way it is with TL opens and such, that's just going to make people not want to watch those rounds.


True. One concept I was thinking of was Master/GM on Korea only and start casting in the Round of 32 or 64. Not sure tho, just thoughts.

I think that sounds really good. I REALLY like the idea of fully open tournaments.

Also, the idea of seeding into foreign tournaments is much more attractive to me as opposed to GSL Code S, because you will never get rid of that conflict of interest where Code B players have SO much more on the line.

Seeding into foreign LANs doesn't work. Whose going to pay for their travel expenses? Korean teams certainly can't afford to. If they could they would send their best players, not the Code Bers.

Seeding into online foreign tournaments could work though.


The idea would be find LAN's that would take care of that. Lots do, and lots want Koreans so it seems like a good fit.

From a foreign LAN perspective, wouldn't it make more sense for them to just invite a top level Code S korean? Although I guess if travel/expenses for a top LAN is up for grabs you'll get the Code S players coming out anyways. If you can convince organizers to do so, that would definitely be the very best way to go IMO.
Adebisi
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada1637 Posts
December 20 2011 10:29 GMT
#48
On December 20 2011 15:24 DoomsVille wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2011 15:16 Diamond wrote:
On December 20 2011 15:00 DoomsVille wrote:
Whatever you do, do not make it an invite-only or semi-open event.

This tournament is best as a 100% open event. It is literally the only chance we have of seeing the lesser known Code B Koreans compete. There is plenty of Code S level stuff with the GSL and every major tournament inviting the big korean names nowadays.

But I watch this event to see the up-and-comers. I watch because I want a glimpse into the Korean scene that most don't know about. The play is still some of the highest level you can find. These guys are still good enough to take games off of Code Sers.

Fully open is not a big deal in this format. You guys cast from replays. You're selecting the matches you want to broadcast. So that means you don't need to worry about the first few rounds if 500 people signup. Just ignore the players no one has heard of and lose immediately and broadcast the ones we want to see. This really will give a chance for some of the lesser known Koreans to make a name for themselves.

IMO the more players the better here. I know it gets infinitely harder to organize, but it really is something that Korean scene needs and the viewers would love.

Also, I like that orb- character. He's pretty good.


Actually totally open (or something like Masters.GM only) is actually easier.

On December 20 2011 15:13 DoomsVille wrote:
On December 20 2011 15:05 Adebisi wrote:
On December 17 2011 12:36 Diamond wrote:
On December 17 2011 12:33 sitromit wrote:
I think the format is fine. If more open means a bunch of bad players filling the earlier rounds of the tournament the way it is with TL opens and such, that's just going to make people not want to watch those rounds.


True. One concept I was thinking of was Master/GM on Korea only and start casting in the Round of 32 or 64. Not sure tho, just thoughts.

I think that sounds really good. I REALLY like the idea of fully open tournaments.

Also, the idea of seeding into foreign tournaments is much more attractive to me as opposed to GSL Code S, because you will never get rid of that conflict of interest where Code B players have SO much more on the line.

Seeding into foreign LANs doesn't work. Whose going to pay for their travel expenses? Korean teams certainly can't afford to. If they could they would send their best players, not the Code Bers.

Seeding into online foreign tournaments could work though.


The idea would be find LAN's that would take care of that. Lots do, and lots want Koreans so it seems like a good fit.

From a foreign LAN perspective, wouldn't it make more sense for them to just invite a top level Code S korean? Although I guess if travel/expenses for a top LAN is up for grabs you'll get the Code S players coming out anyways. If you can convince organizers to do so, that would definitely be the very best way to go IMO.


Its more or less the same idea as IPL4 using I44 or PPSL as qualifiers. For example Homestory Cup could have used the Weekly instead of running their own qualifier. Dual purpose.

As for why use a Korean qualifier instead of using an invite system, its more merit based, nuff said. I hope more tournaments expand to this type of model because just using the popularity contest of an invite system is unfair and doesn't help promote talent development as much.
parazice
Profile Joined March 2011
Thailand5517 Posts
December 20 2011 18:02 GMT
#49
On December 17 2011 12:36 onedayclose wrote:
I think the Korean Weekly should be open only to players who are currently not in GSL code S.


somehow i agree with this
just look how many win by Taeja -"-
DoomsVille
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada4885 Posts
December 20 2011 19:51 GMT
#50
On December 20 2011 19:29 Adebisi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2011 15:24 DoomsVille wrote:
On December 20 2011 15:16 Diamond wrote:
On December 20 2011 15:00 DoomsVille wrote:
Whatever you do, do not make it an invite-only or semi-open event.

This tournament is best as a 100% open event. It is literally the only chance we have of seeing the lesser known Code B Koreans compete. There is plenty of Code S level stuff with the GSL and every major tournament inviting the big korean names nowadays.

But I watch this event to see the up-and-comers. I watch because I want a glimpse into the Korean scene that most don't know about. The play is still some of the highest level you can find. These guys are still good enough to take games off of Code Sers.

Fully open is not a big deal in this format. You guys cast from replays. You're selecting the matches you want to broadcast. So that means you don't need to worry about the first few rounds if 500 people signup. Just ignore the players no one has heard of and lose immediately and broadcast the ones we want to see. This really will give a chance for some of the lesser known Koreans to make a name for themselves.

IMO the more players the better here. I know it gets infinitely harder to organize, but it really is something that Korean scene needs and the viewers would love.

Also, I like that orb- character. He's pretty good.


Actually totally open (or something like Masters.GM only) is actually easier.

On December 20 2011 15:13 DoomsVille wrote:
On December 20 2011 15:05 Adebisi wrote:
On December 17 2011 12:36 Diamond wrote:
On December 17 2011 12:33 sitromit wrote:
I think the format is fine. If more open means a bunch of bad players filling the earlier rounds of the tournament the way it is with TL opens and such, that's just going to make people not want to watch those rounds.


True. One concept I was thinking of was Master/GM on Korea only and start casting in the Round of 32 or 64. Not sure tho, just thoughts.

I think that sounds really good. I REALLY like the idea of fully open tournaments.

Also, the idea of seeding into foreign tournaments is much more attractive to me as opposed to GSL Code S, because you will never get rid of that conflict of interest where Code B players have SO much more on the line.

Seeding into foreign LANs doesn't work. Whose going to pay for their travel expenses? Korean teams certainly can't afford to. If they could they would send their best players, not the Code Bers.

Seeding into online foreign tournaments could work though.


The idea would be find LAN's that would take care of that. Lots do, and lots want Koreans so it seems like a good fit.

From a foreign LAN perspective, wouldn't it make more sense for them to just invite a top level Code S korean? Although I guess if travel/expenses for a top LAN is up for grabs you'll get the Code S players coming out anyways. If you can convince organizers to do so, that would definitely be the very best way to go IMO.


Its more or less the same idea as IPL4 using I44 or PPSL as qualifiers. For example Homestory Cup could have used the Weekly instead of running their own qualifier. Dual purpose.

As for why use a Korean qualifier instead of using an invite system, its more merit based, nuff said. I hope more tournaments expand to this type of model because just using the popularity contest of an invite system is unfair and doesn't help promote talent development as much.

Oh I agree a qualification system is much better. I'd rather invites go away and everything be qualification based. But invites are just easier (which is why most tournaments use invites). Although ESV has proven they can produce quality online tournaments without running into issues like the PPSL, so that should work in their favor.

I do hope this works out. If some major events agree to this, it will be the best way to go.
GoSuChicken
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Germany1726 Posts
December 20 2011 19:54 GMT
#51
I like it, but the problem is, that ill never be able to catch your tourney, cause i think its quite bad for europeans
or am i wrong?
GreyKnight
Profile Joined August 2010
United States4720 Posts
December 20 2011 19:54 GMT
#52
On December 21 2011 03:02 parazice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 17 2011 12:36 onedayclose wrote:
I think the Korean Weekly should be open only to players who are currently not in GSL code S.


somehow i agree with this
just look how many win by Taeja -"-


hint hint taeja isn't code S.
Diamond
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States10796 Posts
December 20 2011 23:18 GMT
#53
On December 21 2011 03:02 parazice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 17 2011 12:36 onedayclose wrote:
I think the Korean Weekly should be open only to players who are currently not in GSL code S.


somehow i agree with this
just look how many win by Taeja -"-


Not only is Taeja not in Code S, but his winning streak started when he was in Code B.
Ballistix Gaming Global Gaming/Esports Marketing Manager - twitter.com/esvdiamond
FreudianTrip
Profile Joined July 2011
Switzerland1983 Posts
December 21 2011 00:14 GMT
#54
On December 21 2011 04:54 GoSuChicken wrote:
I like it, but the problem is, that ill never be able to catch your tourney, cause i think its quite bad for europeans
or am i wrong?


Shit's so awesome I stay up anyway.
Diamond
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States10796 Posts
December 21 2011 03:17 GMT
#55
On December 21 2011 04:54 GoSuChicken wrote:
I like it, but the problem is, that ill never be able to catch your tourney, cause i think its quite bad for europeans
or am i wrong?


Although our main demographic is NA (and the most important views to us) we do have some plans for rebroadcasts. It's a bit of a manpower issue atm.
Ballistix Gaming Global Gaming/Esports Marketing Manager - twitter.com/esvdiamond
Diamond
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States10796 Posts
December 21 2011 22:31 GMT
#56
Having a Video Making Contest for the Korean Weekly, check it out! Even if you don't make videos there is a ton of unreleased replays for your enjoyment!

Contest link
Ballistix Gaming Global Gaming/Esports Marketing Manager - twitter.com/esvdiamond
Prev 1 2 3 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
23:00
PiGosaur Cup #55
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech126
Nathanias 98
CosmosSc2 57
trigger 25
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 23490
Artosis 718
Shine 8
Dota 2
LuMiX0
Counter-Strike
fl0m1081
taco 698
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1621
AZ_Axe137
Other Games
summit1g11910
shahzam729
Day[9].tv626
ViBE175
Maynarde124
fpsfer 1
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV53
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 89
• Light_VIP 54
• davetesta21
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 54
• Azhi_Dahaki11
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21216
Other Games
• Scarra1503
• Day9tv626
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 11m
OSC
9h 41m
Kung Fu Cup
10h 11m
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
21h 11m
The PondCast
1d 8h
RSL Revival
1d 8h
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
1d 10h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 10h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 23h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
[ Show More ]
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
IPSL
3 days
ZZZero vs rasowy
Napoleon vs KameZerg
BSL 21
3 days
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
BSL 21
4 days
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
4 days
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Wardi Open
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-07
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.