• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:48
CEST 03:48
KST 10:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202512Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder2EWC 2025 - Replay Pack2Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced26BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
Serral wins EWC 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Afreeca app available on Samsung smart TV Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 550 users

[D] Fundamental problems with Terran - Page 15

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 41 Next All
MVTaylor
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United Kingdom2893 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-30 16:37:39
November 30 2011 16:32 GMT
#281
On December 01 2011 01:23 ceaRshaf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2011 01:16 mvtaylor wrote:
On December 01 2011 00:31 ceaRshaf wrote:
On December 01 2011 00:22 Hider wrote:
On December 01 2011 00:04 ceaRshaf wrote:
On November 30 2011 23:59 Hider wrote:
On November 30 2011 23:38 Belha wrote:
On November 30 2011 22:49 Hider wrote:
On November 30 2011 21:38 tomatriedes wrote:
In last month's TLPD win rate graph, which takes into account tournaments worldwide, terran was ahead of the other two races and, according to the same figures, has been ahead of the other two races since the game was released. Let me emphasize- this is not just GSL, but tournaments worldwide. I'm sorry OP, but these figures mean more to me than picking a few recent tournaments. Perhaps in next month's TLPD win rate graph we'll see slightly less terran domination but, if that's the case, that can only be a good thing, considering they've been ahead of the other two races since the game was released. About time one of the other two races in the game had a turn at the top, no?


This isn't really the point of discussion. Terran can do a lot of stupid shit early/mid game, and hence win. I would like to know what are the probabilites of teran winning in games longer than 25 minutes?


Take adventage of the supperiority of early/mid game damage MAYBE???


Your again missing the point on a few levels here. Its simply bad design if a race cant win late game (or if its too hard tow in late game).


After these recent patches we have terrans playing outdated strategies. It's fair for them to lose but not fair to call UP.

Why doesn't Terran add 5-10 tanks to the BioBall? They want mobility? Well than they pay with vulnerability.


Wrong wrong. Terrans dont do outdated strategies. THey do optimal strategies. Bio is everything terran can do(thor/banshee is really really bad if the toss knows its ocmming and is reacting correctly).

Tanks are just bad tvp btw.

Btw I am not saying terran cant win. Im just saying its ´much harder for terran to win than it is for toss.

Mediocore toss plays > beats mediocore terran play.


Well maybe they should force tanks in the composition because they have splash. EMP the zealots and tanks melt them down. I find terrans really cocky that they want to win a fight with bio against a protoss army that has storm, colosus and archon, so big AOEs.


T would need three flipping tank shots to destroy one zealot once it's shield had gone. Even without Zealot charge the Zealot would be close enough to a deployed tank before the third shot that the tank wouldn't fire. When it was a chargelot then the tank would fire once and then promptly be obliterated.

Tanks do not work in a TvP that goes any sort of length due to zealot charge and stalker blink meaning they can be on top of a tank in second, blink allowing P to move around wherever the tanks happen to be, immortals negating the majority of tank damage while being able to three shot a tank in return, phoenixes being able to lift up deployed tanks... enough reasons?

Meanwhile Hellions are far too flimsy (hurrah for HotS!) while Thors, Battlecruisers, Banshees and Ravens are all screaming "please feedback me!" and are easily countered with mass immortal for Thors and Stalkers/Phoenix/Voids depending on what air army Terran is going for.

The only WORKABLE AoE Terran has is EMP and against mass chargelot that can at most reduce the P army to 66% of it's max hp and really isn't that big a deal considering armour is upgraded to 3 before shield is upgraded once and the innate +1 Zealots gain to their armour.


First of all tanks should be placed behind the line. Blinking stalkers on top of the tanks should be suicide for the toss because bio would melt down everything.

Second, EMPing and firing Seeker Missiles at the zealots would melt them and even if they don't they would not stand a chance in front of the bio + tanks. To delay the chargelots you can even path their way with Auto-Turrets.

Blink stalkers would dance in front of point defence drones.

And I am talking about a new composition, not using every unit on it's own, because that is fail. I think idra should start talking about the raven as he was about the ghost "People need to start using them".


The range on auto turret and seeker missile deployment is such that before a T can use it near a P army they'll be feedbacked to death. Likewise one feedback and the PDD is also gone. Also the chance to mass a tier 3 unit that costs 200 gas and can only be produced one at a time from a tier three tech building that requires an upgrade to use the strategies you are suggesting and will start 25/50 or 50/75 energy short of the spells you are mentioning (depending on upgrade) shows how non viable it is without crippling yourself to the level where P have massive windows where they acan deal significant damage.

EDIT: Last post I'm making in this thread, I've seen so many of these TvP threads recently which all go down the same path I cannot be bothered.
@followMVT
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 30 2011 16:44 GMT
#282
On December 01 2011 00:22 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2011 00:04 ceaRshaf wrote:
On November 30 2011 23:59 Hider wrote:
On November 30 2011 23:38 Belha wrote:
On November 30 2011 22:49 Hider wrote:
On November 30 2011 21:38 tomatriedes wrote:
In last month's TLPD win rate graph, which takes into account tournaments worldwide, terran was ahead of the other two races and, according to the same figures, has been ahead of the other two races since the game was released. Let me emphasize- this is not just GSL, but tournaments worldwide. I'm sorry OP, but these figures mean more to me than picking a few recent tournaments. Perhaps in next month's TLPD win rate graph we'll see slightly less terran domination but, if that's the case, that can only be a good thing, considering they've been ahead of the other two races since the game was released. About time one of the other two races in the game had a turn at the top, no?


This isn't really the point of discussion. Terran can do a lot of stupid shit early/mid game, and hence win. I would like to know what are the probabilites of teran winning in games longer than 25 minutes?


Take adventage of the supperiority of early/mid game damage MAYBE???


Your again missing the point on a few levels here. Its simply bad design if a race cant win late game (or if its too hard tow in late game).


After these recent patches we have terrans playing outdated strategies. It's fair for them to lose but not fair to call UP.

Why doesn't Terran add 5-10 tanks to the BioBall? They want mobility? Well than they pay with vulnerability.


Wrong wrong. Terrans dont do outdated strategies. THey do optimal strategies. Bio is everything terran can do(thor/banshee is really really bad if the toss knows its ocmming and is reacting correctly).

Tanks are just bad tvp btw.

Btw I am not saying terran cant win. Im just saying its ´much harder for terran to win than it is for toss.

Mediocore toss plays > beats mediocore terran play.


You see Terran players are just better than you. If you are of march up on the ladder the only reason you win is because the Terran race is weaker. You skill level factors little, since your race is just better. You are in fact playing SC2 on easy mode.

If a Terran were to race switch, they would destroy 2 of their initial probes. Why? It is the only way to make it fair.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Honeybadger
Profile Joined August 2010
United States821 Posts
November 30 2011 16:45 GMT
#283
I support this message. Terran is just a harder race to play, with more unforgiving macro mechanics and more rewarding micro mechanics (which have been balanced in such a way that failing to micro properly results in losing)

But I'm not whining for buffs or changes. I know I'm only diamond because I'm doing things wrong, not because my race is bad.
"I like to tape my thumbs to my hands to see what it would be like to be a dinosaur."
FeyFey
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany10114 Posts
November 30 2011 16:52 GMT
#284
well terran takes micro to be effective, so if you are bad at micro you will be weaker with terran, means you train more. Now where is the problem ? Makes terran the difficult race, i like it. Other races need micro too. But i guess you are talking about the point that the other races have aoes that can easily destroy unmicroed units and terran doesn't have these sort of units. That might be true, but we have units that can fight those units pretty effectively.
On low level its just another composition, someone better can use the micro intensive units, but this is true for the other races as well.
So i don't really see it as an issue. People that say they lose because of their race, are doing something wrong anyway. And its natural that a game that has such a diversity in units, is at some points easier for one race. But the only solution would be just one race with different models.
And the terran domination in korea doesn't only come from the micro only.

Anyway i love terran how they are and love playing them, by the way seeker works on low lvel just fine lol. And actually since the emp nerf infestors outrange ghosts.
Clazziquai10
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Singapore1949 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-30 16:54:55
November 30 2011 16:52 GMT
#285
It may be a bit of an exaggeration, but i think this is what TS is trying to say:

[image loading]

Which kinda explains why korean terrans are owning korean protosses and korean zergs but foreign terrans arent exactly owning foreign protosses and zergs.
PyroN
Profile Joined November 2011
Sweden53 Posts
November 30 2011 16:52 GMT
#286
Well I am not going to talk about balance, but the one thing that annoys me most is that people always seem to cheer for the non Terran player in events like MLG/Dreamhack.

For example some casters did pull of bad jokes like:

"Can´t wait for the Final this year! it´s gonna be awesome!"
"Yee I am curious to see which TvT it will be"

Don´t see why people are bashing on Terrans(correct me If i am wrong i get that feeling)

For me the most complete Satisfying thing is to see a really good terran microing, and owning

Like Boxers TvZ in BW, so incredible ! I dont get it why people dont wan´t to see such an amazing play !.
"That trade didn´t went good for huk,I Mean look at the supply depots now" - Copa América Caster
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 30 2011 16:54 GMT
#287
On December 01 2011 01:45 Honeybadger wrote:
I support this message. All the races are hard to play, with more unforgiving macro mechanics and more rewarding micro mechanics (which have been balanced in such a way that failing to micro properly results in losing)

But I'm not whining for buffs or changes. I know I'm only diamond because I'm doing things wrong, not because my race is bad.


Ahhhhhh...so much better. It is the little things that matter.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
NoScary
Profile Joined November 2010
United States151 Posts
November 30 2011 16:55 GMT
#288
If I thought that Blizzard had made any changes that significantly decreased the ability to micro Terran units, I would agree with you.
"And when he came back to, he was flat on his back on the beach in the freezing sand, and it was raining out of a low sky, and the tide was way out." From birth to death, no time to rest, no time to waste.
Umpteen
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United Kingdom1570 Posts
November 30 2011 17:05 GMT
#289
Not sure if Polt said it 1-2 GSL's ago that once patch hits "all the bad terrans will drop out from GSL because of this"


I could sympathise with the OP but for this.

Here is Polt (I also think it was him) stating the GSL was oversubscribed with bad Terrans prior to a certain patch.

Presumably bad Terrans don't have awesome micro and multitasking.

Yet they were still able to eliminate top-notch Zergs and Protoss.

To me, this undermines rather than reinforces the pillars supporting the OP's hypothesis. Polt didn't think the GSL was full of Terrans because Terran was balanced but rewarded great micro better. He thought they didn't deserve to be there. He didn't think they were as good as the Zergs and Protoss they were beating.

If he's right, and the patch corrected an imbalance that was allowing inferior players to flourish, need we look further for an explanation of the distribution of races in the GSL?
The existence of a food chain is inescapable if we evolved unsupervised, and inexcusable otherwise.
MaV_gGSC
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1345 Posts
November 30 2011 17:07 GMT
#290
On November 30 2011 13:10 BlueBoxSC wrote:
You're choosing selectively to look at foreigner Terran players, and that's a terrible point to argue on. Koreans (and I hate to say this, because I don't believe in the Korean/Foreigner divide, or I don't want to, at least) generally provide higher level play, and that's why there's always been a Terran in the Ro4 in the GSL.

Still, I feel like the design of Terran is remarkably solid, and it's actually the ineffectual design of the other races (in that they don't have amazing micro capability like T) that leads to this perception.

I know you said this thread wasn't about balance, but someone will step in and tell me I'm flaunting about garbage, so game is balanced.


About the Korea/Foreigner divide you are talking about: I don't think it exists either. In broodwar, the only reason there was a huge skill cap is that the Koreans practice HARDER. In sc2, we actually have dedicated teams that are training almost as hard as the Koreans and therefore we can compete.
Life's good :D
GreyMasta
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada197 Posts
November 30 2011 17:19 GMT
#291
On December 01 2011 01:52 Clazziquai10 wrote:
It may be a bit of an exaggeration, but i think this is what TS is trying to say:

[image loading]

Which kinda explains why korean terrans are owning korean protosses and korean zergs but foreign terrans arent exactly owning foreign protosses and zergs.


lol @ top Foreigners closer to bronze level than to Korean level.

Does this means I have chances to beat Idra, Thorzain or Mana in a BO3??? Wow I didn't knew !!
gillon
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden1578 Posts
November 30 2011 17:21 GMT
#292
On December 01 2011 00:31 ceaRshaf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2011 00:22 Hider wrote:
On December 01 2011 00:04 ceaRshaf wrote:
On November 30 2011 23:59 Hider wrote:
On November 30 2011 23:38 Belha wrote:
On November 30 2011 22:49 Hider wrote:
On November 30 2011 21:38 tomatriedes wrote:
In last month's TLPD win rate graph, which takes into account tournaments worldwide, terran was ahead of the other two races and, according to the same figures, has been ahead of the other two races since the game was released. Let me emphasize- this is not just GSL, but tournaments worldwide. I'm sorry OP, but these figures mean more to me than picking a few recent tournaments. Perhaps in next month's TLPD win rate graph we'll see slightly less terran domination but, if that's the case, that can only be a good thing, considering they've been ahead of the other two races since the game was released. About time one of the other two races in the game had a turn at the top, no?


This isn't really the point of discussion. Terran can do a lot of stupid shit early/mid game, and hence win. I would like to know what are the probabilites of teran winning in games longer than 25 minutes?


Take adventage of the supperiority of early/mid game damage MAYBE???


Your again missing the point on a few levels here. Its simply bad design if a race cant win late game (or if its too hard tow in late game).


After these recent patches we have terrans playing outdated strategies. It's fair for them to lose but not fair to call UP.

Why doesn't Terran add 5-10 tanks to the BioBall? They want mobility? Well than they pay with vulnerability.


Wrong wrong. Terrans dont do outdated strategies. THey do optimal strategies. Bio is everything terran can do(thor/banshee is really really bad if the toss knows its ocmming and is reacting correctly).

Tanks are just bad tvp btw.

Btw I am not saying terran cant win. Im just saying its ´much harder for terran to win than it is for toss.

Mediocore toss plays > beats mediocore terran play.


Well maybe they should force tanks in the composition because they have splash. EMP the zealots and tanks melt them down. I find terrans really cocky that they want to win a fight with bio against a protoss army that has storm, colosus and archon, so big AOEs.


You're not really getting it. Tanks just are not good enough in TvP. They're not worth it. They are NEVER costefficient lategame, except when the protoss is playing like a retard.

They have uses in specific timing attacks and allins (one/two base) but that's it. Once the toss gets more tech and upgrades, they start sucking. Badly.
www.teamproperty.net | "You should hate losing, but you should never fear defeat." - 이윤열
FreeTossCZComentary
Profile Joined September 2011
Czech Republic143 Posts
November 30 2011 17:25 GMT
#293
On December 01 2011 02:19 GreyMasta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2011 01:52 Clazziquai10 wrote:
It may be a bit of an exaggeration, but i think this is what TS is trying to say:

[image loading]

Which kinda explains why korean terrans are owning korean protosses and korean zergs but foreign terrans arent exactly owning foreign protosses and zergs.


lol @ top Foreigners closer to bronze level than to Korean level.

Does this means I have chances to beat Idra, Thorzain or Mana in a BO3??? Wow I didn't knew !!


Are you serious? That pic is just ilustration of course! Either shut... your mouth, or use your brain...
www.youtube.com/OnlyFreeToss, FreeCraft ForFun SC2 MOD Rulez: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=292319 Dont even dare waiting, join FreeCraft now!
Sabu113
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States11047 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-30 17:37:19
November 30 2011 17:34 GMT
#294
This isn't BW. Terran is not the most mechanical race.

Terran has more resiliency both because of the design of their basic production units and the mule (and I suppose superrepair bunkers as well).

Terrans simple combos scale amazingly with upgrades as the game goes on.

Mechanically you can shift click your hypereffective drops. If you're running an MMA style drop campaign, OK then you're looking really impressive on par with Hero's warp prism pvz. Macroing you hit a hotkey to macro EZPZ while you're microing your units. In PvT, your splash is more devastating and more unforgiving. Likewise, while you do active control in your microing you pay marginally less attention to the location or arrangement of your troops compared to the other races. "Metagame" wise you can generally play mindgames with an opening that threatens a 1-1-1 and take a pretty safe 1rax expo. There are few reasons you can't be on par or ahead in bases in most matchups (atleast first 10 minutes)

Only exception to the microcase is the latelategame as stated by Drewbie. Because once your army gets emped... not much spell tricks a toss can do beyond the initial positioning.

The foreign results can in large part be explained by the foreign participation in Korea.
Biomine is a drunken chick who is on industrial strength amphetamines and would just grab your dick and jerk it as hard and violently as she could while screaming 'OMG FUCK ME', because she saw it in a Sasha Grey video ...-Wombat_Ni
Crisco
Profile Joined March 2011
1170 Posts
November 30 2011 17:36 GMT
#295
On December 01 2011 02:19 GreyMasta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2011 01:52 Clazziquai10 wrote:
It may be a bit of an exaggeration, but i think this is what TS is trying to say:

[image loading]

Which kinda explains why korean terrans are owning korean protosses and korean zergs but foreign terrans arent exactly owning foreign protosses and zergs.


lol @ top Foreigners closer to bronze level than to Korean level.

Does this means I have chances to beat Idra, Thorzain or Mana in a BO3??? Wow I didn't knew !!


i think you missed the "bit of an exaggeration" part
mrlie3
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada350 Posts
November 30 2011 17:40 GMT
#296
If Heart of Swarm brings more micro-intensive units to Protoss and Zerg, I believe the 'fundamental' problem that OP is mentioning will fix itself quite nicely. Units like Viper, Oracle, and Replicator seem to fulfill this issue imo.
Crimson @ Clan CORE | ESFI World Translator
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
November 30 2011 17:43 GMT
#297
And of course, the OP is Terran
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
Jyxz
Profile Joined November 2009
United States117 Posts
November 30 2011 17:45 GMT
#298
I skimmed the original post but in general I agree, from Bronze to Diamond terran is the easiest race, then protoss with zerg being the hardest, but once you get into masters Zerg is by far the easiest race to play, then protoss then terran is actually quite difficult. This is not a problem with terran this is just how the game should be, zerg needs to be made way harder to play... it is wayyyyy too easy, just look at someone like sheth, he is no one, but because he plays the easiest race he is able to achieve things in SC2.
This is Jimmy
Dbla08
Profile Joined March 2011
United States211 Posts
November 30 2011 17:48 GMT
#299
i understand the purpose of this thread, but i don't think its one thats really threadworthy. if they tried to balance this game for all the bronzies it would never succeed as an esport, adjusting the game to balance at the highest possible level is the best way, and only way imo, to do it. only at that point do glaring imbalances really begin to show. as the ghost has proven, and still proves despite the emp nerf. otherwise you'll be trying to balance over people's in-game mistakes and lack of action which even sounds like a poor idea, let alone being one.
heroofcanton
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States167 Posts
November 30 2011 17:52 GMT
#300
On December 01 2011 02:05 Umpteen wrote:
Show nested quote +
Not sure if Polt said it 1-2 GSL's ago that once patch hits "all the bad terrans will drop out from GSL because of this"


I could sympathise with the OP but for this.

Here is Polt (I also think it was him) stating the GSL was oversubscribed with bad Terrans prior to a certain patch.

Presumably bad Terrans don't have awesome micro and multitasking.

Yet they were still able to eliminate top-notch Zergs and Protoss.

To me, this undermines rather than reinforces the pillars supporting the OP's hypothesis. Polt didn't think the GSL was full of Terrans because Terran was balanced but rewarded great micro better. He thought they didn't deserve to be there. He didn't think they were as good as the Zergs and Protoss they were beating.

If he's right, and the patch corrected an imbalance that was allowing inferior players to flourish, need we look further for an explanation of the distribution of races in the GSL?



I think what Polt said makes a lot of sense. I remember Artosis saying on SotG that a lot of "bad Terrans" were going to suffer because of the EMP nerf, as they would not hit as many and they'd get stormed more. We saw that in that hour-long game between TOD and Happy at dreamhack (not shitting on Happy, just saying pre-nerf he would have left no templar un-EMPed), and that a lot of "bad terrans" who thought they were good were going to start losing more games TvP.

I don't sympathize with a lot of the current threads that terran players have been making about the inherent "betterness" of Terran players. Terran micro is simply more rewarding, not more difficult. I don't think Terran has ANY fundamental problems. Furthermore- Terrans are still set on Bio play in TvP, and most refuse to mech instead focusing on Bio play which is going to be inherently weaker, especially to AoE attacks. If terrans want to play a more mobile style they need to accept that its going to be weaker and move on.

There needs to be like, a Terran Bunker thread, where all the Terran players can go to post threads like this and they can all agree and have fun together with their marines and ghosts and shit.
The hero of Canton, the man they call me.
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 41 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SpeCial 226
Nina 206
Livibee 112
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4145
Aegong 74
Sexy 44
Icarus 4
Dota 2
monkeys_forever605
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 608
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2053
Coldzera 170
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox646
Other Games
summit1g11356
shahzam1401
Day[9].tv455
C9.Mang0301
ToD247
Maynarde227
kaitlyn29
RuFF_SC218
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1640
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta75
• Hupsaiya 64
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift8006
• Stunt1196
• Rush175
Other Games
• Shiphtur911
• Day9tv455
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
8h 12m
WardiTV European League
14h 12m
PiGosaur Monday
22h 12m
OSC
1d 10h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 14h
The PondCast
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Online Event
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.