• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 05:45
CET 11:45
KST 19:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets0$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)12Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 103SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1822
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list? Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns Spontaneous hotkey change zerg Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) WardiTV Winter Cup WardiTV Mondays SC2 AI Tournament 2026
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes
Brood War
General
Potential ASL qualifier breakthroughs? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Data analysis on 70 million replays
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 SLON Grand Finals – Season 2
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced
Blogs
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Physical Exercise (HIIT) Bef…
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2163 users

FPS - Starcraft 2 - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Hundisilm
Profile Joined July 2011
Estonia99 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 18:19:51
November 07 2011 18:17 GMT
#21
Strictly speaking, frames per second is unfortunately a bit bad measurement for smoothness and responsiveness, as a second is a terribly long time. For example if you have a smooth framerate of 60 fps and have it drop to 40 fps for a second, you can theoretically have 300 ms hole in there where nothing happens (rest of the second is displayed at normal rates). If the framerate is smooth, without spikes, I would guess 25-30 would be quite ok for RTS games (they usually feel a bit better at lower framerates).

Strictly speaking you would want smoothness (a drop from 120 fps to 60 fps can be very terrible if the framerate isn't smooth).


PS. I've found V-sync to be quite bad thing to have. I wouldn't suggest having it on unless shearing starts directly bothering you.
ZiegFeld
Profile Joined April 2011
351 Posts
November 07 2011 18:21 GMT
#22
On November 08 2011 01:15 Souljah wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.



dumb. obviously you've never seen the game at 120hz.
Aye, my m17x has a 120hz screen. Smooth as fuck.
pecore
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany62 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 18:45:56
November 07 2011 18:37 GMT
#23
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.
Dont Panic!
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20322 Posts
November 07 2011 18:42 GMT
#24
On November 08 2011 03:21 ZiegFeld wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 01:15 Souljah wrote:
On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.



dumb. obviously you've never seen the game at 120hz.
Aye, my m17x has a 120hz screen. Smooth as fuck.



I bought an m17x like 2.5 years ago... they only had "i7" cpu's avalible which were 1.6 and 2ghz, it chokes out and cant maintain 60fps in 1v1s on lowest settings with sli gtx260m's.

They even removed the sli option because of heat issues that cause the laptop to go from cold boot to thermal shutdown in 2-3 minutes or so unless you explicitly limit the framerate in every single game you play
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
BlackGosu
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Canada1046 Posts
November 07 2011 18:46 GMT
#25
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?
Jar Jar Binks
Mendelfist
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden356 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 18:56:55
November 07 2011 18:53 GMT
#26
On November 08 2011 03:46 BlackGosu wrote:
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?

This is just a stupid myth. There is no bug. Games are usually not framerate capped and high framerates do not kill your computer. When I start Quake 3 I get 1800 fps in the menus, and I'm not kidding.

The fix is useful for computers with bad cooling. It's not a bugfix, and none is needed.
Inex
Profile Joined October 2010
Bulgaria443 Posts
November 07 2011 18:55 GMT
#27
The difference between 60fps and 120fps is not a huge one, but is noticeable. The biggest problem I have is slowdowns during certain parts of the map, especially on Xel'Naga in the center and on the edges, which are not registered as drops in fps, yet my mouse drags around as if I am playing at 20fps. I maintain a stable 60-80 fps, except for the very busy 3x3,4x4 battles.
socommaster123
Profile Joined May 2010
United States578 Posts
November 07 2011 18:57 GMT
#28
Sorry a little off topic but did anyone come in here thinking there was an announcement of a starcraft 2........ first person shooter
Idra White Ra Sheth DRG SaSe Thorzain GOGO!
BlackGosu
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Canada1046 Posts
November 07 2011 19:06 GMT
#29
On November 08 2011 03:53 Mendelfist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 03:46 BlackGosu wrote:
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?

This is just a stupid myth. There is no bug. Games are usually not framerate capped and high framerates do not kill your computer. When I start Quake 3 I get 1800 fps in the menus, and I'm not kidding.

The fix is useful for computers with bad cooling. It's not a bugfix, and none is needed.

cool can anyone else confirm before i take out the txt? dont want to try to fry my gpu that fast T_T
Jar Jar Binks
Litti
Profile Joined November 2011
Germany16 Posts
November 07 2011 19:09 GMT
#30
OK well seems like nobody knows exactly why there are feelable differences between 80 fps and 120 fps but I can live with that.
Thx guys.
Lothargr
Profile Joined March 2011
Greece32 Posts
November 07 2011 19:11 GMT
#31
I've heard the 30fps argument before and went ahead and tested it (not in SC though). I set the max FPS to 30 and 60 and there was a HUGE difference between the two. 60 fps looked smooth and comfortable, 30 fps looked and felt A LOT worse, the motion was not natural or comfortable at all. So I can confidently say that the 30fps cap is a myth. Also some friends of mine who were playing CS relatively competitively were always setting the max fps to 60.
driftme
Profile Joined June 2010
United States360 Posts
November 07 2011 20:00 GMT
#32
On November 08 2011 04:06 BlackGosu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 03:53 Mendelfist wrote:
On November 08 2011 03:46 BlackGosu wrote:
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?

This is just a stupid myth. There is no bug. Games are usually not framerate capped and high framerates do not kill your computer. When I start Quake 3 I get 1800 fps in the menus, and I'm not kidding.

The fix is useful for computers with bad cooling. It's not a bugfix, and none is needed.

cool can anyone else confirm before i take out the txt? dont want to try to fry my gpu that fast T_T


There is no such bug, and if there are problems, theyre on an individual basis, probably due to bad cooling, or clumped dust in the computer. I've never put that in my variables and I've played religiously since beta. The temperature on my gpu never really goes up while playing starcraft, less than any other game. And I play on the absolute highest possible settings.
r_con
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States824 Posts
November 07 2011 20:07 GMT
#33
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing
Flash Fan!
LoLAdriankat
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States4307 Posts
November 07 2011 20:30 GMT
#34
Would anyone say that it's better to have a constant 60 fps (without vsync of course) than to bounce around 60-100 fps? When I play shooters with fluctuating FPS, I seem to miss shots with weapons like the AWP and rail gun more often. Is it placebo or does having a constant FPS actually help with sensitive things like marine micro and long distance hitscan shots?
pecore
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany62 Posts
November 07 2011 20:37 GMT
#35
On November 08 2011 05:07 r_con wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing


It might cause input delay, but that depends completely on the implementation... meaning it doesn't have to cause input delay. I actually don't know if it causes input delay with StarCraft 2 to be honest so.. you might be right. That doesn't mean you shouldn't activate vsync though. I think the minimal amount of input delay vsync might cause is tiny (in fact so tiny it shouldn't even matter when humans are playing the game) in comparison to artifacts while panning the camera (especially), but that's just for me personally.
Dont Panic!
Medrea
Profile Joined May 2011
10003 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 20:46:27
November 07 2011 20:44 GMT
#36
500 FPS is reality perfect for the human eye, more or less anyway.

www.100fps.com

Good reading. Visual Sync is desired once you can render something stable above 60. But watch out because if the performance isnt WELL above 60 frames you will get problems.

Don't run SC2 with vsync on. Even powerful computers dip below 60 very often, even in 1v1.


On November 08 2011 04:09 Litti wrote:
OK well seems like nobody knows exactly why there are feelable differences between 80 fps and 120 fps but I can live with that.
Thx guys.



It is not a simple answer as the human eye is not very direct. Please read linked source to its fullest. including...

http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm
twitch.tv/medrea
r_con
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States824 Posts
November 07 2011 20:46 GMT
#37
On November 08 2011 05:37 pecore wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 05:07 r_con wrote:
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing


It might cause input delay, but that depends completely on the implementation... meaning it doesn't have to cause input delay. I actually don't know if it causes input delay with StarCraft 2 to be honest so.. you might be right. That doesn't mean you shouldn't activate vsync though. I think the minimal amount of input delay vsync might cause is tiny (in fact so tiny it shouldn't even matter when humans are playing the game) in comparison to artifacts while panning the camera (especially), but that's just for me personally.


vsync is a buffer, this buffer will cause input lag, there is nothing that you can do about it. And yes, it is noticable, but you have to be really acute to the change to notice it.(QuakeWorld with vsync feels unplayable)
Flash Fan!
Medrea
Profile Joined May 2011
10003 Posts
November 07 2011 20:50 GMT
#38
Yes competitive gaming with vsync is a bit of a conundrum.
twitch.tv/medrea
pecore
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany62 Posts
November 07 2011 20:57 GMT
#39
On November 08 2011 05:46 r_con wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 05:37 pecore wrote:
On November 08 2011 05:07 r_con wrote:
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing


It might cause input delay, but that depends completely on the implementation... meaning it doesn't have to cause input delay. I actually don't know if it causes input delay with StarCraft 2 to be honest so.. you might be right. That doesn't mean you shouldn't activate vsync though. I think the minimal amount of input delay vsync might cause is tiny (in fact so tiny it shouldn't even matter when humans are playing the game) in comparison to artifacts while panning the camera (especially), but that's just for me personally.


vsync is a buffer, this buffer will cause input lag, there is nothing that you can do about it. And yes, it is noticable, but you have to be really acute to the change to notice it.(QuakeWorld with vsync feels unplayable)


No vsync is not a buffer... it is a synchronization pulse in the video raster and marks a new frame. Vertical sync with a framerate of 60 is about 16ms, so that is the maximum amount of input delay this could possibly cause.

Vsync has nothing to do with professional gaming. This is the problem I have with game companies even putting that in as an option. There is no reason to ever not activate vertical synchronization. Writing into a buffer while it is being scanned out is simply bad.

Dont Panic!
Kr1pos
Profile Joined January 2008
Norway67 Posts
November 07 2011 21:26 GMT
#40
Whoever thinks enabling vsync (when not in conjunction with triple buffering) doesn't have a tangible impact on input lag must never have tried it in a twitched-based game like Quake or CS. Q3 with vsync is to me unplayable. It's probably not nearly as much of an issue in RTSes though, so I can see the argument for it there -- though I've never compared it myself.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 15m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 133
Rex 2
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 5644
Sea 4507
Horang2 1326
Shuttle 659
Hyuk 535
Mini 441
Stork 394
actioN 279
Larva 275
ZerO 270
[ Show more ]
Leta 184
EffOrt 170
Mong 169
Soma 150
Zeus 122
Hyun 106
Light 103
ggaemo 93
Nal_rA 91
Rush 91
JulyZerg 90
910 67
Killer 64
hero 52
Mind 39
zelot 33
Sharp 29
Free 24
Sexy 21
Terrorterran 19
soO 17
scan(afreeca) 15
Sacsri 11
Bale 10
Noble 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
Dota 2
XcaliburYe109
NeuroSwarm109
ODPixel82
League of Legends
C9.Mang0446
JimRising 441
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1841
shoxiejesuss774
allub220
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King92
Other Games
summit1g7504
ceh9586
Pyrionflax312
Fuzer 180
ZerO(Twitch)11
crisheroes8
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3022
StarCraft 2
WardiTV6
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 3
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• naamasc22
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2376
• Lourlo1003
• Stunt490
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
1h 15m
PiGosaur Cup
14h 15m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 1h
The PondCast
1d 23h
OSC
2 days
OSC
3 days
All Star Teams
3 days
INnoVation vs soO
sOs vs Scarlett
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
All Star Teams
4 days
MMA vs DongRaeGu
Rogue vs Oliveira
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-12
Big Gabe Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W4
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Thunderfire SC2 All-star 2025
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.