• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:34
CEST 20:34
KST 03:34
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17
StarCraft 2
General
Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. Who will win EWC 2025? Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Corsair Pursuit Micro? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pro gamer house photos Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 742 users

FPS - Starcraft 2 - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Hundisilm
Profile Joined July 2011
Estonia99 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 18:19:51
November 07 2011 18:17 GMT
#21
Strictly speaking, frames per second is unfortunately a bit bad measurement for smoothness and responsiveness, as a second is a terribly long time. For example if you have a smooth framerate of 60 fps and have it drop to 40 fps for a second, you can theoretically have 300 ms hole in there where nothing happens (rest of the second is displayed at normal rates). If the framerate is smooth, without spikes, I would guess 25-30 would be quite ok for RTS games (they usually feel a bit better at lower framerates).

Strictly speaking you would want smoothness (a drop from 120 fps to 60 fps can be very terrible if the framerate isn't smooth).


PS. I've found V-sync to be quite bad thing to have. I wouldn't suggest having it on unless shearing starts directly bothering you.
ZiegFeld
Profile Joined April 2011
351 Posts
November 07 2011 18:21 GMT
#22
On November 08 2011 01:15 Souljah wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.



dumb. obviously you've never seen the game at 120hz.
Aye, my m17x has a 120hz screen. Smooth as fuck.
pecore
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany62 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 18:45:56
November 07 2011 18:37 GMT
#23
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.
Dont Panic!
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
November 07 2011 18:42 GMT
#24
On November 08 2011 03:21 ZiegFeld wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 01:15 Souljah wrote:
On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.



dumb. obviously you've never seen the game at 120hz.
Aye, my m17x has a 120hz screen. Smooth as fuck.



I bought an m17x like 2.5 years ago... they only had "i7" cpu's avalible which were 1.6 and 2ghz, it chokes out and cant maintain 60fps in 1v1s on lowest settings with sli gtx260m's.

They even removed the sli option because of heat issues that cause the laptop to go from cold boot to thermal shutdown in 2-3 minutes or so unless you explicitly limit the framerate in every single game you play
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
BlackGosu
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Canada1046 Posts
November 07 2011 18:46 GMT
#25
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?
Jar Jar Binks
Mendelfist
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden356 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 18:56:55
November 07 2011 18:53 GMT
#26
On November 08 2011 03:46 BlackGosu wrote:
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?

This is just a stupid myth. There is no bug. Games are usually not framerate capped and high framerates do not kill your computer. When I start Quake 3 I get 1800 fps in the menus, and I'm not kidding.

The fix is useful for computers with bad cooling. It's not a bugfix, and none is needed.
Inex
Profile Joined October 2010
Bulgaria443 Posts
November 07 2011 18:55 GMT
#27
The difference between 60fps and 120fps is not a huge one, but is noticeable. The biggest problem I have is slowdowns during certain parts of the map, especially on Xel'Naga in the center and on the edges, which are not registered as drops in fps, yet my mouse drags around as if I am playing at 20fps. I maintain a stable 60-80 fps, except for the very busy 3x3,4x4 battles.
socommaster123
Profile Joined May 2010
United States578 Posts
November 07 2011 18:57 GMT
#28
Sorry a little off topic but did anyone come in here thinking there was an announcement of a starcraft 2........ first person shooter
Idra White Ra Sheth DRG SaSe Thorzain GOGO!
BlackGosu
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Canada1046 Posts
November 07 2011 19:06 GMT
#29
On November 08 2011 03:53 Mendelfist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 03:46 BlackGosu wrote:
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?

This is just a stupid myth. There is no bug. Games are usually not framerate capped and high framerates do not kill your computer. When I start Quake 3 I get 1800 fps in the menus, and I'm not kidding.

The fix is useful for computers with bad cooling. It's not a bugfix, and none is needed.

cool can anyone else confirm before i take out the txt? dont want to try to fry my gpu that fast T_T
Jar Jar Binks
Litti
Profile Joined November 2011
Germany16 Posts
November 07 2011 19:09 GMT
#30
OK well seems like nobody knows exactly why there are feelable differences between 80 fps and 120 fps but I can live with that.
Thx guys.
Lothargr
Profile Joined March 2011
Greece32 Posts
November 07 2011 19:11 GMT
#31
I've heard the 30fps argument before and went ahead and tested it (not in SC though). I set the max FPS to 30 and 60 and there was a HUGE difference between the two. 60 fps looked smooth and comfortable, 30 fps looked and felt A LOT worse, the motion was not natural or comfortable at all. So I can confidently say that the 30fps cap is a myth. Also some friends of mine who were playing CS relatively competitively were always setting the max fps to 60.
driftme
Profile Joined June 2010
United States360 Posts
November 07 2011 20:00 GMT
#32
On November 08 2011 04:06 BlackGosu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 03:53 Mendelfist wrote:
On November 08 2011 03:46 BlackGosu wrote:
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?

This is just a stupid myth. There is no bug. Games are usually not framerate capped and high framerates do not kill your computer. When I start Quake 3 I get 1800 fps in the menus, and I'm not kidding.

The fix is useful for computers with bad cooling. It's not a bugfix, and none is needed.

cool can anyone else confirm before i take out the txt? dont want to try to fry my gpu that fast T_T


There is no such bug, and if there are problems, theyre on an individual basis, probably due to bad cooling, or clumped dust in the computer. I've never put that in my variables and I've played religiously since beta. The temperature on my gpu never really goes up while playing starcraft, less than any other game. And I play on the absolute highest possible settings.
r_con
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States824 Posts
November 07 2011 20:07 GMT
#33
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing
Flash Fan!
LoLAdriankat
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States4307 Posts
November 07 2011 20:30 GMT
#34
Would anyone say that it's better to have a constant 60 fps (without vsync of course) than to bounce around 60-100 fps? When I play shooters with fluctuating FPS, I seem to miss shots with weapons like the AWP and rail gun more often. Is it placebo or does having a constant FPS actually help with sensitive things like marine micro and long distance hitscan shots?
pecore
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany62 Posts
November 07 2011 20:37 GMT
#35
On November 08 2011 05:07 r_con wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing


It might cause input delay, but that depends completely on the implementation... meaning it doesn't have to cause input delay. I actually don't know if it causes input delay with StarCraft 2 to be honest so.. you might be right. That doesn't mean you shouldn't activate vsync though. I think the minimal amount of input delay vsync might cause is tiny (in fact so tiny it shouldn't even matter when humans are playing the game) in comparison to artifacts while panning the camera (especially), but that's just for me personally.
Dont Panic!
Medrea
Profile Joined May 2011
10003 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 20:46:27
November 07 2011 20:44 GMT
#36
500 FPS is reality perfect for the human eye, more or less anyway.

www.100fps.com

Good reading. Visual Sync is desired once you can render something stable above 60. But watch out because if the performance isnt WELL above 60 frames you will get problems.

Don't run SC2 with vsync on. Even powerful computers dip below 60 very often, even in 1v1.


On November 08 2011 04:09 Litti wrote:
OK well seems like nobody knows exactly why there are feelable differences between 80 fps and 120 fps but I can live with that.
Thx guys.



It is not a simple answer as the human eye is not very direct. Please read linked source to its fullest. including...

http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm
twitch.tv/medrea
r_con
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States824 Posts
November 07 2011 20:46 GMT
#37
On November 08 2011 05:37 pecore wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 05:07 r_con wrote:
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing


It might cause input delay, but that depends completely on the implementation... meaning it doesn't have to cause input delay. I actually don't know if it causes input delay with StarCraft 2 to be honest so.. you might be right. That doesn't mean you shouldn't activate vsync though. I think the minimal amount of input delay vsync might cause is tiny (in fact so tiny it shouldn't even matter when humans are playing the game) in comparison to artifacts while panning the camera (especially), but that's just for me personally.


vsync is a buffer, this buffer will cause input lag, there is nothing that you can do about it. And yes, it is noticable, but you have to be really acute to the change to notice it.(QuakeWorld with vsync feels unplayable)
Flash Fan!
Medrea
Profile Joined May 2011
10003 Posts
November 07 2011 20:50 GMT
#38
Yes competitive gaming with vsync is a bit of a conundrum.
twitch.tv/medrea
pecore
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany62 Posts
November 07 2011 20:57 GMT
#39
On November 08 2011 05:46 r_con wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 05:37 pecore wrote:
On November 08 2011 05:07 r_con wrote:
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing


It might cause input delay, but that depends completely on the implementation... meaning it doesn't have to cause input delay. I actually don't know if it causes input delay with StarCraft 2 to be honest so.. you might be right. That doesn't mean you shouldn't activate vsync though. I think the minimal amount of input delay vsync might cause is tiny (in fact so tiny it shouldn't even matter when humans are playing the game) in comparison to artifacts while panning the camera (especially), but that's just for me personally.


vsync is a buffer, this buffer will cause input lag, there is nothing that you can do about it. And yes, it is noticable, but you have to be really acute to the change to notice it.(QuakeWorld with vsync feels unplayable)


No vsync is not a buffer... it is a synchronization pulse in the video raster and marks a new frame. Vertical sync with a framerate of 60 is about 16ms, so that is the maximum amount of input delay this could possibly cause.

Vsync has nothing to do with professional gaming. This is the problem I have with game companies even putting that in as an option. There is no reason to ever not activate vertical synchronization. Writing into a buffer while it is being scanned out is simply bad.

Dont Panic!
Kr1pos
Profile Joined January 2008
Norway67 Posts
November 07 2011 21:26 GMT
#40
Whoever thinks enabling vsync (when not in conjunction with triple buffering) doesn't have a tangible impact on input lag must never have tried it in a twitched-based game like Quake or CS. Q3 with vsync is to me unplayable. It's probably not nearly as much of an issue in RTSes though, so I can see the argument for it there -- though I've never compared it myself.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 15h 26m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mcanning 276
UpATreeSC 192
BRAT_OK 135
EmSc Tv 31
MindelVK 25
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 580
Larva 507
EffOrt 481
firebathero 281
BeSt 200
Stork 170
Free 62
Shine 15
ivOry 3
Dota 2
XaKoH 396
League of Legends
Grubby3695
Counter-Strike
fl0m1808
flusha414
Stewie2K91
Other Games
FrodaN3241
Beastyqt674
ceh9506
B2W.Neo325
KnowMe186
Trikslyr61
Organizations
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 742
EmSc Tv 31
EmSc2Tv 31
Other Games
BasetradeTV10
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 98
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki43
• HerbMon 32
• 80smullet 13
• FirePhoenix1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4232
• masondota21102
League of Legends
• TFBlade1091
Other Games
• imaqtpie1183
• Shiphtur424
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
15h 26m
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
1d 15h
Esports World Cup
2 days
Esports World Cup
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.