• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:47
CEST 06:47
KST 13:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare12Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, sOs, Reynor, Solar15[ASL19] Ro8 Preview: Unyielding3Official Ladder Map Pool Update (April 28, 2025)17[ASL19] Ro8 Preview: Rejuvenation8
Community News
Maru & Rogue GSL RO12 interviews: "I think the pressure really got to [trigger]"0Code S Season 1 - Maru & Rogue advance to RO80Code S Season 1 - Cure & Reynor advance to RO84$1,250 WardiTV May [May 6th-May 18th]5Clem wins PiG Sty Festival #67
StarCraft 2
General
Maru & Rogue GSL RO12 interviews: "I think the pressure really got to [trigger]" Code S Season 1 - Maru & Rogue advance to RO8 Clem wins PiG Sty Festival #6 How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Code S Season 1 - Cure & Reynor advance to RO8
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group B [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group A $1,250 WardiTV May [May 6th-May 18th] SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed Mutation # 470 Certain Demise Mutation # 469 Frostbite
Brood War
General
(UMS) Artosis vs Ogre Zerg [The Legend Continues] BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games Preserving Battlereports.com
Tourneys
[BSL20] RO32 Group F - Saturday 20:00 CET [BSL20] RO32 Group E - Sunday 20:00 CET [ASL19] Ro8 Day 4 [CSLPRO] $1000 Spring is Here!
Strategy
[G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Creating a full chart of Zerg builds [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Nintendo Switch Thread Grand Theft Auto VI Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Elon Musk's lies, propaganda, etc. Ask and answer stupid questions here!
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Books] Wool by Hugh Howey Surprisingly good films/Hidden Gems
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
BLinD-RawR 50K Post Watch Party The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Why 5v5 Games Keep Us Hooked…
TrAiDoS
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
BW PvZ Balance hypothetic…
Vasoline73
Test Entry for subject
xumakis
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 13988 users

FPS - Starcraft 2 - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Hundisilm
Profile Joined July 2011
Estonia99 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 18:19:51
November 07 2011 18:17 GMT
#21
Strictly speaking, frames per second is unfortunately a bit bad measurement for smoothness and responsiveness, as a second is a terribly long time. For example if you have a smooth framerate of 60 fps and have it drop to 40 fps for a second, you can theoretically have 300 ms hole in there where nothing happens (rest of the second is displayed at normal rates). If the framerate is smooth, without spikes, I would guess 25-30 would be quite ok for RTS games (they usually feel a bit better at lower framerates).

Strictly speaking you would want smoothness (a drop from 120 fps to 60 fps can be very terrible if the framerate isn't smooth).


PS. I've found V-sync to be quite bad thing to have. I wouldn't suggest having it on unless shearing starts directly bothering you.
ZiegFeld
Profile Joined April 2011
351 Posts
November 07 2011 18:21 GMT
#22
On November 08 2011 01:15 Souljah wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.



dumb. obviously you've never seen the game at 120hz.
Aye, my m17x has a 120hz screen. Smooth as fuck.
pecore
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany62 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 18:45:56
November 07 2011 18:37 GMT
#23
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.
Dont Panic!
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20278 Posts
November 07 2011 18:42 GMT
#24
On November 08 2011 03:21 ZiegFeld wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 01:15 Souljah wrote:
On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.



dumb. obviously you've never seen the game at 120hz.
Aye, my m17x has a 120hz screen. Smooth as fuck.



I bought an m17x like 2.5 years ago... they only had "i7" cpu's avalible which were 1.6 and 2ghz, it chokes out and cant maintain 60fps in 1v1s on lowest settings with sli gtx260m's.

They even removed the sli option because of heat issues that cause the laptop to go from cold boot to thermal shutdown in 2-3 minutes or so unless you explicitly limit the framerate in every single game you play
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
BlackGosu
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Canada1046 Posts
November 07 2011 18:46 GMT
#25
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?
Jar Jar Binks
Mendelfist
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden356 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 18:56:55
November 07 2011 18:53 GMT
#26
On November 08 2011 03:46 BlackGosu wrote:
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?

This is just a stupid myth. There is no bug. Games are usually not framerate capped and high framerates do not kill your computer. When I start Quake 3 I get 1800 fps in the menus, and I'm not kidding.

The fix is useful for computers with bad cooling. It's not a bugfix, and none is needed.
Inex
Profile Joined October 2010
Bulgaria443 Posts
November 07 2011 18:55 GMT
#27
The difference between 60fps and 120fps is not a huge one, but is noticeable. The biggest problem I have is slowdowns during certain parts of the map, especially on Xel'Naga in the center and on the edges, which are not registered as drops in fps, yet my mouse drags around as if I am playing at 20fps. I maintain a stable 60-80 fps, except for the very busy 3x3,4x4 battles.
socommaster123
Profile Joined May 2010
United States578 Posts
November 07 2011 18:57 GMT
#28
Sorry a little off topic but did anyone come in here thinking there was an announcement of a starcraft 2........ first person shooter
Idra White Ra Sheth DRG SaSe Thorzain GOGO!
BlackGosu
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Canada1046 Posts
November 07 2011 19:06 GMT
#29
On November 08 2011 03:53 Mendelfist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 03:46 BlackGosu wrote:
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?

This is just a stupid myth. There is no bug. Games are usually not framerate capped and high framerates do not kill your computer. When I start Quake 3 I get 1800 fps in the menus, and I'm not kidding.

The fix is useful for computers with bad cooling. It's not a bugfix, and none is needed.

cool can anyone else confirm before i take out the txt? dont want to try to fry my gpu that fast T_T
Jar Jar Binks
Litti
Profile Joined November 2011
Germany16 Posts
November 07 2011 19:09 GMT
#30
OK well seems like nobody knows exactly why there are feelable differences between 80 fps and 120 fps but I can live with that.
Thx guys.
Lothargr
Profile Joined March 2011
Greece32 Posts
November 07 2011 19:11 GMT
#31
I've heard the 30fps argument before and went ahead and tested it (not in SC though). I set the max FPS to 30 and 60 and there was a HUGE difference between the two. 60 fps looked smooth and comfortable, 30 fps looked and felt A LOT worse, the motion was not natural or comfortable at all. So I can confidently say that the 30fps cap is a myth. Also some friends of mine who were playing CS relatively competitively were always setting the max fps to 60.
driftme
Profile Joined June 2010
United States360 Posts
November 07 2011 20:00 GMT
#32
On November 08 2011 04:06 BlackGosu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 03:53 Mendelfist wrote:
On November 08 2011 03:46 BlackGosu wrote:
hey i got an important question, hope someone can answer.

a year ago, when sc2 was released, many computers overheated and blizzard responded to the issue with putting this in your variables.txt

frameratecapglue=30
frameratecap=60

is that still needed or have blizzard patched and fixed the overheating bug?

This is just a stupid myth. There is no bug. Games are usually not framerate capped and high framerates do not kill your computer. When I start Quake 3 I get 1800 fps in the menus, and I'm not kidding.

The fix is useful for computers with bad cooling. It's not a bugfix, and none is needed.

cool can anyone else confirm before i take out the txt? dont want to try to fry my gpu that fast T_T


There is no such bug, and if there are problems, theyre on an individual basis, probably due to bad cooling, or clumped dust in the computer. I've never put that in my variables and I've played religiously since beta. The temperature on my gpu never really goes up while playing starcraft, less than any other game. And I play on the absolute highest possible settings.
r_con
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States824 Posts
November 07 2011 20:07 GMT
#33
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing
Flash Fan!
LoLAdriankat
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States4307 Posts
November 07 2011 20:30 GMT
#34
Would anyone say that it's better to have a constant 60 fps (without vsync of course) than to bounce around 60-100 fps? When I play shooters with fluctuating FPS, I seem to miss shots with weapons like the AWP and rail gun more often. Is it placebo or does having a constant FPS actually help with sensitive things like marine micro and long distance hitscan shots?
pecore
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany62 Posts
November 07 2011 20:37 GMT
#35
On November 08 2011 05:07 r_con wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing


It might cause input delay, but that depends completely on the implementation... meaning it doesn't have to cause input delay. I actually don't know if it causes input delay with StarCraft 2 to be honest so.. you might be right. That doesn't mean you shouldn't activate vsync though. I think the minimal amount of input delay vsync might cause is tiny (in fact so tiny it shouldn't even matter when humans are playing the game) in comparison to artifacts while panning the camera (especially), but that's just for me personally.
Dont Panic!
Medrea
Profile Joined May 2011
10003 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-07 20:46:27
November 07 2011 20:44 GMT
#36
500 FPS is reality perfect for the human eye, more or less anyway.

www.100fps.com

Good reading. Visual Sync is desired once you can render something stable above 60. But watch out because if the performance isnt WELL above 60 frames you will get problems.

Don't run SC2 with vsync on. Even powerful computers dip below 60 very often, even in 1v1.


On November 08 2011 04:09 Litti wrote:
OK well seems like nobody knows exactly why there are feelable differences between 80 fps and 120 fps but I can live with that.
Thx guys.



It is not a simple answer as the human eye is not very direct. Please read linked source to its fullest. including...

http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm
twitch.tv/medrea
r_con
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States824 Posts
November 07 2011 20:46 GMT
#37
On November 08 2011 05:37 pecore wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 05:07 r_con wrote:
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing


It might cause input delay, but that depends completely on the implementation... meaning it doesn't have to cause input delay. I actually don't know if it causes input delay with StarCraft 2 to be honest so.. you might be right. That doesn't mean you shouldn't activate vsync though. I think the minimal amount of input delay vsync might cause is tiny (in fact so tiny it shouldn't even matter when humans are playing the game) in comparison to artifacts while panning the camera (especially), but that's just for me personally.


vsync is a buffer, this buffer will cause input lag, there is nothing that you can do about it. And yes, it is noticable, but you have to be really acute to the change to notice it.(QuakeWorld with vsync feels unplayable)
Flash Fan!
Medrea
Profile Joined May 2011
10003 Posts
November 07 2011 20:50 GMT
#38
Yes competitive gaming with vsync is a bit of a conundrum.
twitch.tv/medrea
pecore
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany62 Posts
November 07 2011 20:57 GMT
#39
On November 08 2011 05:46 r_con wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2011 05:37 pecore wrote:
On November 08 2011 05:07 r_con wrote:
On November 08 2011 03:37 pecore wrote:
Always use vertical sync! If you don't it will cause artifacts called tearing and you can not see more anyway because of the refresh rate of your monitor. Big numbers don't mean anything, use vertical sync.
If you are below vertical sync with 40 or even 20 FPS you should definitely use lower settings or upgrade your hardware for optimal experience.

On November 08 2011 00:59 -Archangel- wrote:
Trust me you cannot feel the difference and the eye cannot catch more then 36fps (or something around that). Maybe you are talking about a refresh rate of your monitor. What you might be feeling is drops in fps on your computer (some computers can have big average fps but can have drops). Try to turn on vsync to avoid those.


With turning on vertical sync you will not eliminate drops if you can not render the frames per second needed. This is purely a framerate limiter, not a magical framerate accelerator.


no, vsync causes input delay, the only thing it solves is screen tearing


It might cause input delay, but that depends completely on the implementation... meaning it doesn't have to cause input delay. I actually don't know if it causes input delay with StarCraft 2 to be honest so.. you might be right. That doesn't mean you shouldn't activate vsync though. I think the minimal amount of input delay vsync might cause is tiny (in fact so tiny it shouldn't even matter when humans are playing the game) in comparison to artifacts while panning the camera (especially), but that's just for me personally.


vsync is a buffer, this buffer will cause input lag, there is nothing that you can do about it. And yes, it is noticable, but you have to be really acute to the change to notice it.(QuakeWorld with vsync feels unplayable)


No vsync is not a buffer... it is a synchronization pulse in the video raster and marks a new frame. Vertical sync with a framerate of 60 is about 16ms, so that is the maximum amount of input delay this could possibly cause.

Vsync has nothing to do with professional gaming. This is the problem I have with game companies even putting that in as an option. There is no reason to ever not activate vertical synchronization. Writing into a buffer while it is being scanned out is simply bad.

Dont Panic!
Kr1pos
Profile Joined January 2008
Norway67 Posts
November 07 2011 21:26 GMT
#40
Whoever thinks enabling vsync (when not in conjunction with triple buffering) doesn't have a tangible impact on input lag must never have tried it in a twitched-based game like Quake or CS. Q3 with vsync is to me unplayable. It's probably not nearly as much of an issue in RTSes though, so I can see the argument for it there -- though I've never compared it myself.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Online Event
04:00
May Mayhem: Group Stage D3
MaxPax vs herO
SHIN vs Cure
Clem vs MaxPax
ShoWTimE vs herO
ShoWTimE vs Clem
CranKy Ducklings156
IntoTheiNu 28
Liquipedia
Circuito Brasileiro de…
19:00
A Decisão - Playoffs D1
davetesta43
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 198
StarCraft: Brood War
Nal_rA 699
Leta 615
sSak 411
Sharp 59
Dota 2
monkeys_forever758
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 827
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox986
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor216
Other Games
summit1g9353
WinterStarcraft520
ViBE306
Ketroc20
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL1472
Other Games
gamesdonequick1096
StarCraft 2
ESL.tv117
Other Games
BasetradeTV43
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 49
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 40
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1424
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5h 13m
WardiTV Invitational
6h 13m
AllThingsProtoss
6h 13m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
9h 13m
Chat StarLeague
11h 13m
BSL Season 20
13h 13m
MadiNho vs dxtr13
Gypsy vs Dark
Circuito Brasileiro de…
14h 13m
Afreeca Starleague
1d 5h
BeSt vs Light
Wardi Open
1d 6h
Replay Cast
1d 19h
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Soulkey
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
ByuN vs Rogue
herO vs Cure
Replay Cast
3 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Classic vs Reynor
GuMiho vs Maru
The PondCast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
GSL Code S
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Nation Wars Season 2
PiG Sty Festival 6.0
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSLPRO Spring 2025
2025 GSL S1
Heroes 10 EU
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

NPSL S3
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
DreamHack Dallas 2025
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.