[D] HotS: Zerg detection - Page 11

canSore

132 Posts

November 07 2011 20:31 GMT

#201

On October 25 2011 18:50 Eviscerador wrote:

¿How anyone of this be better than a single spore? Remember spores can move and burrow pretty quick.

Also, queens are the priority target on a cloacked rush, so getting them to be detectors make them more priority target.

no I'm sorry, but spore crawlers do not move and burrow pretty quick

optical630

United Kingdom768 Posts

November 07 2011 20:47 GMT

#202

for those that dont know, there is a custom map on battlenet that lets you play the hots build. i played it earlier and i gotta say, 100/200 is pretty fucking ridiculous. your forced to defend if (in this example) protoss goes for dt's until you got the viper out, its so stupid. but idk, maybe its not and it will just take a new playstyle of zerg to utilize it fully

grs

Germany2339 Posts

November 08 2011 08:03 GMT

#203

On November 08 2011 04:11 Tschis wrote:
It would be good to define "near" in "need viper near the unit"

Not sure this needs a definition. The ocular parasite (which gives the unit detection) is a spell of the viper and the receiving unit needs to be close. Whether it has 7 or 10 range, e.g., does not really matter in contrast to making an Overseer from an Overlord.

Belial88

United States5217 Posts

November 08 2011 08:09 GMT

#204

I think zerg is screwed on scouting now. Zerg complains about early game scouting, so they buff overseer to make it quicker (less gas)... then they remove it in HOTS.

What the fuck are we supposed to do. Fly an extremely expensive and slow viper over their base?

Overlord speed needs to decreased in time and cost to make up for this. Or just keep the damn overseer.

Ballistixz

United States1269 Posts

November 08 2011 16:41 GMT

#205

if they buff overlord speed to be on par with a speed upgraded overseer then id have no problem in the scouting department.

Prev 1 9 10 11 All

Please or register to reply.

[D] HotS: Zerg detection - Page 11

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming