EPTHeart of the Swarm Pre-Order - Page 24
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Apollo_Shards
1210 Posts
| ||
|
KimJongChill
United States6429 Posts
| ||
|
how2TL
1197 Posts
If it was standalone, it wouldn't change anything for people who already have WoL and it'd make it much more palatable for people who want to jump in without buying and installing multiple games. It would also help those who want multiple ladder accounts (because technology for separate ladder rankings per race isn't there yet /sarcasm). | ||
|
hesho89
Canada106 Posts
On February 29 2012 09:00 darkcloud8282 wrote: I thought it's not coming out til next year cause D3 is this year? this.... i am expecting d3 and a wow expansion this year. I just have a gut feeling that HotS won't be released this year. | ||
|
Catatonic
United States699 Posts
On October 25 2011 07:52 EscPlan9 wrote: I'm pretty sure Blizzard mentioned early on they fully intend to charge the same prices for all the expansions. I would not be surprised if the price at release date is $50-60. Considering Starcraft is one of the only games I really like putting hundreds of hours into, it is totally worth the price to me anyways. As long as they don't start charging monthly fees for Battle.Net... that would suck (I might still pay though). No they said they wouldn't charge the same price so itll be cheaper | ||
|
Fealthas
607 Posts
 . | ||
|
SPYTE
United States289 Posts
 | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
| ||
|
Gourmand
Canada101 Posts
| ||
|
Khenra
Netherlands885 Posts
| ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7031 Posts
On February 29 2012 09:49 how2TL wrote: If they make it an expansion pack, they will not get new players. If it was standalone, it wouldn't change anything for people who already have WoL and it'd make it much more palatable for people who want to jump in without buying and installing multiple games. It would also help those who want multiple ladder accounts (because technology for separate ladder rankings per race isn't there yet /sarcasm). genius, that must be why having expansions worked for games companies for 15 years now | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On February 29 2012 09:57 hesho89 wrote: this.... i am expecting d3 and a wow expansion this year. I just have a gut feeling that HotS won't be released this year. Activision's earnings call put HotS for this year, so I assume at some point. D3 was set for quarter 2, so that is like June-ish. I would assume that HotS would come out in the 4th quarter, since there is some reasonable overlap in with both games. | ||
|
Korlinni
125 Posts
| ||
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
On February 29 2012 10:15 Grumbels wrote: genius, that must be why having expansions worked for games companies for 15 years now the first plan actual was standalone, but they scrapped it because of many complaints (and i guess because they scrapped the bnet2 completely). Buying sc2 also for single player i didn't really mind, as they extended the single player because of this. And multiplayer people pay the tripple amount then they would have had before, but hey they get new units, they so wanted /heh. Standalone is probably a better idea for multiplayer, but expansions also do the trick, especially if so many people complain. | ||
|
Zinroc
Canada73 Posts
On February 29 2012 09:42 Apollo_Shards wrote: I hope they make WoL 20 or 30$ now. It is $30... My friend bought it from EBgames for 30 | ||
|
Silentness
United States2821 Posts
I have only played TWO campaign missions total out of the whole starcraft series including the original Starcraft. I hate single player mode. | ||
|
RaiD.RaynoR
United States294 Posts
| ||
|
NicolBolas
United States1388 Posts
On February 29 2012 10:27 FeyFey wrote: the first plan actual was standalone, but they scrapped it because of many complaints (and i guess because they scrapped the bnet2 completely). Buying sc2 also for single player i didn't really mind, as they extended the single player because of this. And multiplayer people pay the tripple amount then they would have had before, but hey they get new units, they so wanted /heh. Standalone is probably a better idea for multiplayer, but expansions also do the trick, especially if so many people complain. The first plan was not standalone. That was a misunderstanding propogated by some people coming out of BlizzCon 08. I was there, and they were very clear: one game, two expansions. | ||
|
Silidons
United States2813 Posts
On February 29 2012 10:37 Silentness wrote: Can I just pay $20 and just get multiplayer mode? Damn man I think it's crazy to pay $40 just to be up to date on the ladder. I have only played TWO campaign missions total out of the whole starcraft series including the original Starcraft. I hate single player mode. Meh the multi itself is worth the money IMO | ||
|
Daniri
387 Posts
On February 29 2012 10:27 FeyFey wrote: the first plan actual was standalone, but they scrapped it because of many complaints (and i guess because they scrapped the bnet2 completely). Buying sc2 also for single player i didn't really mind, as they extended the single player because of this. And multiplayer people pay the tripple amount then they would have had before, but hey they get new units, they so wanted /heh. Standalone is probably a better idea for multiplayer, but expansions also do the trick, especially if so many people complain. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=215213¤tpage=7#127 | ||
| ||
