|
On October 05 2011 04:04 forgottendreams wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2011 04:02 mcc wrote:On October 05 2011 03:58 forgottendreams wrote:On October 05 2011 03:54 mcc wrote:On October 05 2011 03:05 Trealador wrote: It's not just about winning, it's about how they win. Looking at IdrA's play versus Puma and Revival he is clearly in the top running for best foreigner. Although he isn't as consistent, players like Naniwa have been very hot and cold as well as Thorzain. As of now, IdrA is probably the best foreigner at this exact moment in time, although Thorzain and Naniwa are in Korea training or at least they were. IdrA has dipped since leaving Korea which is a real factor of skill. But he did just beat two very good Koreans in a major tournament as well as beating a decent few europeans. When IdrA is on his game, he would give any top Korean a run for his money, and when he's not he just loses for stupid reason. Overall at Thorzain's highest level and IdrA's highest level I really don't know anyone who would bet against IdrA. Idra beat 1 European at the tourney - elfi. And arguing about potentials is useless. Results are more important, and ThorZain recently took two games from DGR, game/series from Coca, series from HuK, series from Hero, any many more in GSTL. As far as Koreans (and non-Koreans) go ThorZain's recent record is much better. Cuts both ways though, if results are important thorzain didn't win the tournament in the end. As far as the GSTL performances.... meh not a fan of bo1's. In recent months Thorzain has 1 win in big tournaments, Idra has 1. Thorzain has 1 second place Idra has none. Then there is only one way to resolve this, they must either fight or duel to the death. Not in game either, this must be resolved with a real life fight to the death between idra and thorzain. ThorZain has the hammer I think the result is clear
|
Wow are some of you people REALLY trying to discredit idras play at the IEM by saying he didn't beat anyone good? I mean I understand it's cool to hate idra and all because everyone does it, but really trying to discredit his win and call whoever he beat bad, really?
|
Ret ofcourse. .........  If i have to be really honest probably huk. thorzain might come close, but he lacks consistency. I mean yea he beat some koreans, but so did Qxc .
also: Sase, Stephano, Mana, Select ????? It`s okay if you want to include them so people can vote, but just include more people in the whole list, because this is just shortsighted. Or are there only so many possible options?
|
how is the guy is ranked no1 in both NA and EU servers not in this?(demuslim btw)
|
On October 05 2011 04:15 mcc wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2011 04:02 Hider wrote:On October 05 2011 03:54 mcc wrote:On October 05 2011 03:05 Trealador wrote: It's not just about winning, it's about how they win. Looking at IdrA's play versus Puma and Revival he is clearly in the top running for best foreigner. Although he isn't as consistent, players like Naniwa have been very hot and cold as well as Thorzain. As of now, IdrA is probably the best foreigner at this exact moment in time, although Thorzain and Naniwa are in Korea training or at least they were. IdrA has dipped since leaving Korea which is a real factor of skill. But he did just beat two very good Koreans in a major tournament as well as beating a decent few europeans. When IdrA is on his game, he would give any top Korean a run for his money, and when he's not he just loses for stupid reason. Overall at Thorzain's highest level and IdrA's highest level I really don't know anyone who would bet against IdrA. Idra beat 1 European at the tourney - elfi. And arguing about potentials is useless. Results are more important, and ThorZain recently took two games from DGR, game/series from Coca, series from HuK, series from Hero, any many more in GSTL. As far as Koreans (and non-Koreans) go ThorZain's recent record is much better. If one doesn't understand the game, results is the best way of getting information. However if you do understand the game, you can see who are actually good would win in the long-term, because their wins aren't based on luck/gimmicks/other coincidences. Long-term in this context =/potential. Long-term should be understood as if the games were played an inifinity number of times. Who would have the best results? Firstly, medium-long term results are the best way of determining quality of players. Your way based on "understanding" of the game is subjective and based purely on opinions as noone understands (and I think never will) the game on the level necessary to infer future results from the play of the players with any degree of certainty. The only objective way to determine quality of players is based on results. Second, are you saying that ThorZain achieved his wins through cheese/gimmicks ? That is like the most ridiculous statement ever. And even if I agreed with your assumptions my answer to your final question is ThorZain anyway. EDIT: Also a note on your reply to Cyrak, you seem to think the way you think the game should be played is the best or the only way. That explains why you discount results as a measure and instead use subjective and vague "understanding of the game".
I agree that the way I analyze games is somewhat subjective, and it would require very long text through intense game analysis that thorzain doesn't have very good mechanics, and I am really not interested in using that much time.
What is medium-long term results? Results through 20 games? 30 games? 50 games? You still cant say anything about who the best player is by only looking at results, unelss one player has much much better results than his opponents. Variance can be too high, and the second problem is: How do you interpret these results. How do you value thorzains win compared to idra compared to huk with only looking at results? Unless you have some very advanced modificed ELO formula you cant to that objectively.
Btw I dont think thorzain is bad or gimmicky. I just think he is too slow, and i refuse to vote him as the best foreigner when he cant do a quick standard 3/2base tank/marine push against zerg.
|
On October 05 2011 04:39 Hider wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2011 04:15 mcc wrote:On October 05 2011 04:02 Hider wrote:On October 05 2011 03:54 mcc wrote:On October 05 2011 03:05 Trealador wrote: It's not just about winning, it's about how they win. Looking at IdrA's play versus Puma and Revival he is clearly in the top running for best foreigner. Although he isn't as consistent, players like Naniwa have been very hot and cold as well as Thorzain. As of now, IdrA is probably the best foreigner at this exact moment in time, although Thorzain and Naniwa are in Korea training or at least they were. IdrA has dipped since leaving Korea which is a real factor of skill. But he did just beat two very good Koreans in a major tournament as well as beating a decent few europeans. When IdrA is on his game, he would give any top Korean a run for his money, and when he's not he just loses for stupid reason. Overall at Thorzain's highest level and IdrA's highest level I really don't know anyone who would bet against IdrA. Idra beat 1 European at the tourney - elfi. And arguing about potentials is useless. Results are more important, and ThorZain recently took two games from DGR, game/series from Coca, series from HuK, series from Hero, any many more in GSTL. As far as Koreans (and non-Koreans) go ThorZain's recent record is much better. If one doesn't understand the game, results is the best way of getting information. However if you do understand the game, you can see who are actually good would win in the long-term, because their wins aren't based on luck/gimmicks/other coincidences. Long-term in this context =/potential. Long-term should be understood as if the games were played an inifinity number of times. Who would have the best results? Firstly, medium-long term results are the best way of determining quality of players. Your way based on "understanding" of the game is subjective and based purely on opinions as noone understands (and I think never will) the game on the level necessary to infer future results from the play of the players with any degree of certainty. The only objective way to determine quality of players is based on results. Second, are you saying that ThorZain achieved his wins through cheese/gimmicks ? That is like the most ridiculous statement ever. And even if I agreed with your assumptions my answer to your final question is ThorZain anyway. EDIT: Also a note on your reply to Cyrak, you seem to think the way you think the game should be played is the best or the only way. That explains why you discount results as a measure and instead use subjective and vague "understanding of the game". I agree that the way I analyze games is somewhat subjective, and it would require very long text through intense game analysis that thorzain doesn't have very good mechanics, and I am really not interested in using that much time. What is medium-long term results? Results through 20 games? 30 games? 50 games? You still cant say anything about who the best player is by only looking at results, unelss one player has much much better results than his opponents. Variance can be too high, and the second problem is: How do you interpret these results. How do you value thorzains win compared to idra compared to huk with only looking at results? Unless you have some very advanced modificed ELO formula you cant to that objectively. Btw I dont think thorzain is bad or gimmicky. I just think he is too slow, and i refuse to vote him as the best foreigner when he cant do a quick standard 3/2base tank/marine push against zerg. I never said that the results method that I intuitively try to use has enough precision to rate any two given players. For some players the only thing you can say is "tough to say who is better" and leave it at that. I think Idra Thorzain is one of those situations where you can actually say something. But for example Idra and Sheth not really.
Medium-long term means few months and more in the past (of course the results should be weighted based on their age).
Do you know he can't do the push, or that he does not want to do the push ? Again it is clear that you picked few elements of gameplay that you like and decreed that they are the only important ones.
|
According to MKP SaSe is the best foreigner
|
On October 05 2011 04:38 A-BomB wrote: how is the guy is ranked no1 in both NA and EU servers not in this?(demuslim btw) Because that's ladder.
Happy a few months back had a 93% winrate on ladder, yet was not considered the best, or top 5. This is due to results. People care about tournament results and achievements as it is worth far more. Not only this, it's far more accurate to judge a player on these things then just ladder. As some players don't even use it.
|
Well IdrA is up there all of the sudden. I don't think he's quite the best again, though.
|
On October 05 2011 05:27 FataLe wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2011 04:38 A-BomB wrote: how is the guy is ranked no1 in both NA and EU servers not in this?(demuslim btw) Because that's ladder. Happy a few months back had a 93% winrate on ladder, yet was not considered the best, or top 5. This is due to results. People care about tournament results and achievements as it is worth far more. Not only this, it's far more accurate to judge a player on these things then just ladder. As some players don't even use it.
He's been doing well in NASL as well.
|
On October 05 2011 06:04 jalstar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2011 05:27 FataLe wrote:On October 05 2011 04:38 A-BomB wrote: how is the guy is ranked no1 in both NA and EU servers not in this?(demuslim btw) Because that's ladder. Happy a few months back had a 93% winrate on ladder, yet was not considered the best, or top 5. This is due to results. People care about tournament results and achievements as it is worth far more. Not only this, it's far more accurate to judge a player on these things then just ladder. As some players don't even use it. He's been doing well in NASL as well. Ah, yep, didn't include that.
Though It's more the point I'm trying to make as he hasn't produced a major tournament win just yet..yada yada yada.
|
I hope this win was enough to make people saying IdrA doesn't deserve to be on this list feel pretty silly lol. I'm not going to say anything brash like hes suddenly the best foreigner now after a single tournament, but I think it was a good reminder that IdrA is a sick fucking freak when he's on his game.
|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
One tournament does not the best player make. IdrA has certainly shown he's still got the goods, but to say he's the best non-korean player is a little foolish.
|
Who doesn't deserve to even be on that list? + Show Spoiler +Poll: Who doesn't deserve to even be on that list?IdrA (928) 43% Kas (524) 24% Stephano (162) 7% SaSe (160) 7% MaNa (99) 5% Ret (74) 3% ThorZaiN (69) 3% SeleCt (54) 2% Dimaga (34) 2% HuK (32) 1% Sen (24) 1% NaNiWa (22) 1% 2182 total votes Your vote: Who doesn't deserve to even be on that list? (Vote): Sen (Vote): HuK (Vote): IdrA (Vote): SeleCt (Vote): NaNiWa (Vote): ThorZaiN (Vote): SaSe (Vote): Stephano (Vote): MaNa (Vote): Dimaga (Vote): Kas (Vote): Ret
Wait how is Idra so high up on this list? I admit I dont follow about half of the players on the list so is he really that much worse than the rest?
|
There should be an Unvote botton so everyone can take back the "Who dosen't deserve to be on this list" with "IdrA"
|
On October 05 2011 05:21 mcc wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2011 04:39 Hider wrote:On October 05 2011 04:15 mcc wrote:On October 05 2011 04:02 Hider wrote:On October 05 2011 03:54 mcc wrote:On October 05 2011 03:05 Trealador wrote: It's not just about winning, it's about how they win. Looking at IdrA's play versus Puma and Revival he is clearly in the top running for best foreigner. Although he isn't as consistent, players like Naniwa have been very hot and cold as well as Thorzain. As of now, IdrA is probably the best foreigner at this exact moment in time, although Thorzain and Naniwa are in Korea training or at least they were. IdrA has dipped since leaving Korea which is a real factor of skill. But he did just beat two very good Koreans in a major tournament as well as beating a decent few europeans. When IdrA is on his game, he would give any top Korean a run for his money, and when he's not he just loses for stupid reason. Overall at Thorzain's highest level and IdrA's highest level I really don't know anyone who would bet against IdrA. Idra beat 1 European at the tourney - elfi. And arguing about potentials is useless. Results are more important, and ThorZain recently took two games from DGR, game/series from Coca, series from HuK, series from Hero, any many more in GSTL. As far as Koreans (and non-Koreans) go ThorZain's recent record is much better. If one doesn't understand the game, results is the best way of getting information. However if you do understand the game, you can see who are actually good would win in the long-term, because their wins aren't based on luck/gimmicks/other coincidences. Long-term in this context =/potential. Long-term should be understood as if the games were played an inifinity number of times. Who would have the best results? Firstly, medium-long term results are the best way of determining quality of players. Your way based on "understanding" of the game is subjective and based purely on opinions as noone understands (and I think never will) the game on the level necessary to infer future results from the play of the players with any degree of certainty. The only objective way to determine quality of players is based on results. Second, are you saying that ThorZain achieved his wins through cheese/gimmicks ? That is like the most ridiculous statement ever. And even if I agreed with your assumptions my answer to your final question is ThorZain anyway. EDIT: Also a note on your reply to Cyrak, you seem to think the way you think the game should be played is the best or the only way. That explains why you discount results as a measure and instead use subjective and vague "understanding of the game". I agree that the way I analyze games is somewhat subjective, and it would require very long text through intense game analysis that thorzain doesn't have very good mechanics, and I am really not interested in using that much time. What is medium-long term results? Results through 20 games? 30 games? 50 games? You still cant say anything about who the best player is by only looking at results, unelss one player has much much better results than his opponents. Variance can be too high, and the second problem is: How do you interpret these results. How do you value thorzains win compared to idra compared to huk with only looking at results? Unless you have some very advanced modificed ELO formula you cant to that objectively. Btw I dont think thorzain is bad or gimmicky. I just think he is too slow, and i refuse to vote him as the best foreigner when he cant do a quick standard 3/2base tank/marine push against zerg. I never said that the results method that I intuitively try to use has enough precision to rate any two given players. For some players the only thing you can say is "tough to say who is better" and leave it at that. I think Idra Thorzain is one of those situations where you can actually say something. But for example Idra and Sheth not really. Medium-long term means few months and more in the past (of course the results should be weighted based on their age). Do you know he can't do the push, or that he does not want to do the push ? Again it is clear that you picked few elements of gameplay that you like and decreed that they are the only important ones.
Well genereally if you want to do a solid tank/marine push you need to spotters (often combined with scans). This can however be very mehcnically demanding if you at the same time have to position your front to be safe against coutner attacks and muta harass. Kas is imo the best foreign terran player at doing solid tank/marine attacks. Ryung is a korean player who is really good at that. Both ryung and kas will often have 2-3 marine spotters to constanty have in front of their army. If you watch thorzain plays he some times iwll have bad siege timing as he isn't really using spotters properly. So he often will do a very very slow tank push where he doesn't need spotters ahead. Given his somewhat low apm this is a pretty intelligent play if he want to maximise his win percentage against subtop korean zerg players and foreigners, but really I dont think his style has long term potential. So he might be somewhat succesfull now, but that IMO doesn't make him the best foreigner.
This is why I dont think wins = skills. A skilled player wins with long-term solid strategies that doesn't rely on the opponent not playing "correctly" against you. Thorzain style kinda has the reputation for being solid, but imo that is not totally true (solid is of course a relative term. Thorzain still has a relatively solid style, but i believe there are foreigners who have a even more solid style).
|
hmmm... It's pretty hard to choose. *close eyes* *picks Sen*
|
On October 05 2011 09:03 Supamang wrote:Who doesn't deserve to even be on that list?+ Show Spoiler +Poll: Who doesn't deserve to even be on that list?IdrA (928) 43% Kas (524) 24% Stephano (162) 7% SaSe (160) 7% MaNa (99) 5% Ret (74) 3% ThorZaiN (69) 3% SeleCt (54) 2% Dimaga (34) 2% HuK (32) 1% Sen (24) 1% NaNiWa (22) 1% 2182 total votes Your vote: Who doesn't deserve to even be on that list? (Vote): Sen (Vote): HuK (Vote): IdrA (Vote): SeleCt (Vote): NaNiWa (Vote): ThorZaiN (Vote): SaSe (Vote): Stephano (Vote): MaNa (Vote): Dimaga (Vote): Kas (Vote): Ret
Wait how is Idra so high up on this list? I admit I dont follow about half of the players on the list so is he really that much worse than the rest?
Relax, you do realize this poll was made right around the time idra was at an all time low losing in the first round of like 5 different tournaments.
Idra's only recently turned back on the heat within the past 2 weeks or so.
|
On October 05 2011 10:20 forgottendreams wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2011 09:03 Supamang wrote:Who doesn't deserve to even be on that list?+ Show Spoiler +Poll: Who doesn't deserve to even be on that list?IdrA (928) 43% Kas (524) 24% Stephano (162) 7% SaSe (160) 7% MaNa (99) 5% Ret (74) 3% ThorZaiN (69) 3% SeleCt (54) 2% Dimaga (34) 2% HuK (32) 1% Sen (24) 1% NaNiWa (22) 1% 2182 total votes Your vote: Who doesn't deserve to even be on that list? (Vote): Sen (Vote): HuK (Vote): IdrA (Vote): SeleCt (Vote): NaNiWa (Vote): ThorZaiN (Vote): SaSe (Vote): Stephano (Vote): MaNa (Vote): Dimaga (Vote): Kas (Vote): Ret
Wait how is Idra so high up on this list? I admit I dont follow about half of the players on the list so is he really that much worse than the rest? Relax, you do realize this poll was made right around the time idra was at an all time low losing in the first round of like 5 different tournaments. Idra's only recently turned back on the heat within the past 2 weeks or so. lol "relax"...
And of course I didnt realize that which is why I asked for clarification. All I remember is Idra holding his own in Code S way back when and rage quitting in MLG against MMA. He seemed pretty good to me so I was just kinda confused.
|
|
|
|
|