• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:03
CEST 20:03
KST 03:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation9$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps [G] Progamer Settings [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 694 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 146

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 144 145 146 147 148 1266 Next
Fig
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1324 Posts
October 11 2011 15:33 GMT
#2901
On October 12 2011 00:11 zmansman17 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2011 00:09 Wren wrote:
On October 12 2011 00:03 zmansman17 wrote:

2) Carrier/Mothership play
Why: Because col Rvsp, a Top 7 GM on NA, wrote a thread on here about how sick powerful this combo was with replays. Why Protoss don't find a way to transition to carriers-- the world may never know...Devastated a 200 zerg army, lost 40 army.

Doesn't take a genius, or even a Protoss, to see the gigantic hole that leaves as you try to transition. Both units are ridiculously expensive and slow to build; if you have the opening to make a transition like that, you've already had the opportunity to simply win.


col Rsvp had stated that he plays standard 200 supply army Before transitioning to this army. Insteaf of denying it can happen in even games or games where you are behind, try watching the replays and seeing for yourself. It might help not to be trapped by dogma. It can be done.

That's a weaker argument than saying that since Goody uses mech for all matchups, it is viable and therefore everyone should be trying it.
Can't elope with my cantaloupe
Wren
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States745 Posts
October 11 2011 15:42 GMT
#2902
On October 12 2011 00:11 zmansman17 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2011 00:09 Wren wrote:
On October 12 2011 00:03 zmansman17 wrote:

2) Carrier/Mothership play
Why: Because col Rvsp, a Top 7 GM on NA, wrote a thread on here about how sick powerful this combo was with replays. Why Protoss don't find a way to transition to carriers-- the world may never know...Devastated a 200 zerg army, lost 40 army.

Doesn't take a genius, or even a Protoss, to see the gigantic hole that leaves as you try to transition. Both units are ridiculously expensive and slow to build; if you have the opening to make a transition like that, you've already had the opportunity to simply win.


col Rsvp had stated that he plays standard 200 supply army Before transitioning to this army. Insteaf of denying it can happen in even games or games where you are behind, try watching the replays and seeing for yourself. It might help not to be trapped by dogma. It can be done.

Of course he does. What I'm pointing out is that he has to do well enough with the initial, non-carrier/mothership army, to get to the next composition that he has already essentially won the game.

While my knowledge is observational much more than experiential, there is no evidence yet that there's a nice transition whereby carriers can be gradually added to a composition as they are constructed. Without that, it's a silly endgame goal.
We're here! We're queer! We don't want any more bears!
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-11 16:22:07
October 11 2011 15:48 GMT
#2903
On October 12 2011 00:03 zmansman17 wrote:
All I have to say is I play Terran at Top 6 Master. I have a total of 45 games as Protoss. And I am a high master Protoss... I don't think anyone could do the reverse with Terran, as the race is completely dependent on your micro. For me, Toss is easier to play and the units tend to do the majority of the work for you.


We can also say the converse. For me, terran is easier to play because I actually have units to micro and tools to tax the multitasking of my opponents. It all depends on your style of play. I'm a macro protoss and consider having very good mechanics. When I play terran, I feel like those mechanics are way more useful because I can do so much more with my units while still macroing the same army as I would with Protoss.

Nobody ever says this, but the truth is: The race that has the least amount of tools may be the hardest to play, because you have to do so much with so little.

Now I'm not saying that Protoss has nothing in its bag of tricks. But stop with the "Protoss is a simple race, therefore don't complain, I have to micro with my units!". Even if it was true (that Protoss is A-move EZPZ), we would take having more micro to do over having a simplistic gameplay and awful winratios at the GSL.

Edit: Sorry, what I mean by "macro protoss" is just that I don't go for all ins or timing attacks. I try to have a good economy, defending attacks and harass, while trying to mix in some harass and pressure myself. If I see a weakness (I have a bigger army, better upgrades, better tech), I'll go for it, but the killing move is a reactive one, not some pre-planned 10 minutes timing attack.
Brainiak
Profile Joined May 2011
Germany91 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-11 16:31:13
October 11 2011 15:58 GMT
#2904
The problem with protoss is the lack of non commital aggression. The warpgate mechanik really broke protoss. The gateway units are really bad without mass upgrades or insane micro, because otherwise the gateway pushes would be wayyy too strong. To compensate that Blizzard intented the robotics and stargate units to be stronger which worked at first. Now collossus and stargate play has been figured out, and players abuse the weaknesses of robotics/stargate styles it doesnt work anymore.
So protoss is now supposed to all in, because they cant just build a lot of units and expand behind it like terran, because protoss has to make these ressources worth to even become near the strength of the other races army. If protoss tries warp prism harras they have no good cheap units that can harass good. Chargelots kinda work but they arent as ideal as marines, marauders, zerglings or banelings. dts are a huge investment and very long to get there+ they rely on the lack of detection to work. Moreover the tech of protoss is very stale due to high investment in tech. templar tech for example (twilight 150/100 + templar archives 200/200 + storm 200/200 ) infestor (lair 150/100 + infestation pit 100/100 + pathogen glands 150/150) ghost ( ghost academy 150/50 + moebius reactor 100/100 + techlabs with have been build for marauders anyways)
In summary:
protoss warpgate mechanic causes gateway units to be weaker
due to warpgate mechanics protoss cannot just attack and expand unless 200/200
lack of non commital agression favors all ins
robotic and stargate units has been figured out by the other races
Solutions:
Protoss:
warpgate mechanic changed: warpin time doubled ( so warp in in base become less effective)
warpgate cooldown time increased by 5 secs ( warp in cooldown still begins during warp in so that equals that )
buff gateway units some suggestions:
sentry attack damage back to 8
stalker attack increased to 12 (+4) ( this makes stalkers kill drones,scvs, marines and zerglings kill faster)
attack now scales with +2 to armored like its counterparts the roach and marauder so it can compete in the late stage of the game
zealot charge investment reduced to 150/150
templar archives cost reduced to 150/150
storm research also increases mana by 15
high templar speed increased to 2.25 ( not sure about this, but templar are so slow because they used to insta storm, now the speed of 1.88 is not necessary anymore)
terran:
I like terran the only problem is carpet emp ,so
Emp shield damage is not stackable, emp damage is now a dot (100 damage in 5 seconds)
So protoss actually can micro against emp
Emp range reduced to 9 its still possible to hit templar before they hit you because of the radius ( 9+2 >9 ) it also encourages snipe that is equal to feedback but has +1 range
Please post your comments on this try
I appreciate it
“History is written by the victors.” Winston Churchill
zmansman17
Profile Joined March 2011
United States2567 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-11 16:33:54
October 11 2011 16:31 GMT
#2905
On October 12 2011 00:03 zmansman17 wrote:Clearly, Protoss can win even with their current units and basic strategies.


On October 12 2011 00:03 SeaSwift wrote:
Clearly, they can't. Not often. Not enough for balance. Not enough for SC2 to be a successful esport.


lol Well I guess you have it all figured out. Limited thinking about new ideas isn't going to get you anywhere. The reality is 1 rax FE used be a crazy idea. 3 Hatch as a response to a forge FE used to be a crazy idea as well. Now both are standard.

The reason ideas are posted is to change the traditional paradigm with respect to these builds. If you don't believe in change, then keep doing what you're doing (clearly that's working). On the other hand, the top Toss players are adapting, as indeed they should be, and are reaping the benefits of their innovation.

This is why the top 10 players in NA, EU and at times KR are all *Surprise* Protoss players. Following this trend, it is only a matter of time before the GSL and other tournaments boast larger Protoss numbers. For those who are willing to adapt instead of sulk...
♞ - His EKG is flattening get me a defib stat! Prepped and Ready! - ♞
usethis2
Profile Joined December 2010
2164 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-11 16:37:35
October 11 2011 16:31 GMT
#2906
Geez. It's getting tiresome to listen to this "How Warp Gates broke Protoss" bandwagon. You know, you can easily make cases like "How Spawn Larvae broke Zerg" (which I personally believe the most broken thing in the game that is only masked by Blizzard's balancing act for now) or "How Orbital Commands broke Terran". I mean, you guys think Gateway units are weak because of warp-in mechanic. Well, then how about Spawn Larvae? Do you think Zerg units are weak because of Spawn larvae? Of course! Do Terran buildings need to be floating? Yes otherwise it'll be impossible for Terran to build since the opponents will constantly try to pick on building SCVs.

You can easily pick and choose evidences of such claims - there are plenty of them - and they will gain traction once a certain race is perceived overpowered/underpowered. But all these different traits of 3 races exist in order for richer and exciting gaming experience. Obviously it's more fun to watch and play different races than same races with different colors.

Warp gates are what attracted me to play Protoss, and I am staying positive that Blizzard will make the mechanic work at the very top level. And I don't think Warp gates themselves are broken or make Protoss underpowered in any way, form, or shape. It is an interesting and revolutionary mechanic that enriches the RTS genre.
Brainiak
Profile Joined May 2011
Germany91 Posts
October 11 2011 16:36 GMT
#2907
On October 12 2011 01:31 usethis2 wrote:
Geez. It's getting tiresome to listen to this "How Warp Gates broke Protoss" bandwagon. You know, you can easily make cases like "How Spawn Larvae broke Zerg" (which I personally believe the most broken thing in the game that is only masked by Blizzard's balancing act for now) or "How Orbital Commands broke Terran".

You can easily pick and choose evidence of such claims - there are plenty of them - and they will gain traction once a certain race is perceived overpowered/underpowered. But all these different traits of 3 races exist in order for richer and exciting gaming experience. Obviously it's more fun to watch and play different races than same races with different colors.

Warp gates are what attracted me to play Protoss, and I am staying positive that Blizzard will make the mechanic work at the very top level. And I don't think Warp gates themselves are broken or make Protoss underpowered in any way, form, or shape. It is an interesting and revolutionary mechanic that enriches RTS genre.

maybe if more and more people are convinced that warp gate broke protoss its better to listen and look at it closely. Thats how democracy works btw. There are a lot of reasons why warpgate might be a bad idea in the first place, though i agree with your argument of making the races differ. However were talking about high level of competition where you cannot just switch the race, otherwise player would have done so, they are not stupid
“History is written by the victors.” Winston Churchill
usethis2
Profile Joined December 2010
2164 Posts
October 11 2011 16:43 GMT
#2908
What's a video game have to do with how democracy works..? You're losing me there.
Brainiak
Profile Joined May 2011
Germany91 Posts
October 11 2011 16:46 GMT
#2909
Well teamliquid is a forum for expressing personal opinions, so every opinion has to be respected and considered. this example may be to general, sorry for that
“History is written by the victors.” Winston Churchill
Brainiak
Profile Joined May 2011
Germany91 Posts
October 11 2011 16:47 GMT
#2910
and the more people who are convinced of an idea the more likely the idea has succes and draws attention
“History is written by the victors.” Winston Churchill
SeaSwift
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Scotland4486 Posts
October 11 2011 16:51 GMT
#2911
On October 12 2011 01:31 zmansman17 wrote:
lol Well I guess you have it all figured out. Limited thinking about new ideas isn't going to get you anywhere. The reality is 1 rax FE used be a crazy idea. 3 Hatch as a response to a forge FE used to be a crazy idea as well. Now both are standard.

The reason ideas are posted is to change the traditional paradigm with respect to these builds. If you don't believe in change, then keep doing what you're doing (clearly that's working). On the other hand, the top Toss players are adapting, as indeed they should be, and are reaping the benefits of their innovation.

This is why the top 10 players in NA, EU and at times KR are all *Surprise* Protoss players. Following this trend, it is only a matter of time before the GSL and other tournaments boast larger Protoss numbers. For those who are willing to adapt instead of sulk...


How did what you say refute what I said in any way at all?

You said:

On October 12 2011 00:03 zmansman17 wrote:Clearly, Protoss can win even with their current units and basic strategies.


I said:

On October 12 2011 00:03 SeaSwift wrote:
Clearly, they can't. Not often. Not enough for balance. Not enough for SC2 to be a successful esport.


Now you are talking about Protoss innovating and adapting - surely that actually refutes your point instead of mine? You just made a blanket few paragraphs (last one is just plain wrong, by the way, the top 10 players in any region has NEVER been only Protoss) about something completely unrelated to the quote. 0_o
SeaSwift
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Scotland4486 Posts
October 11 2011 16:59 GMT
#2912
On Protoss, all I think the Warp Gate mechanic needs is a shunt through to Twilight Council along with a slight research time increase and then Gateway units (particularly Stalkers) can be buffed to a decent level.

So:

Warp Gate -> Twilight Council + Build time increase
Zealot -> +10 shields, 9(*2) damage
Stalker -> 12 damage (+4 to armoured)
Sentry -> Forcefield should then become researchable at Cybernetics Core and Hallu should come standard.

I don't really see any major problems with this idea, please enlighten me ^_^
XiGua
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden3085 Posts
October 11 2011 17:02 GMT
#2913
On October 12 2011 01:59 SeaSwift wrote:
On Protoss, all I think the Warp Gate mechanic needs is a shunt through to Twilight Council along with a slight research time increase and then Gateway units (particularly Stalkers) can be buffed to a decent level.

So:

Warp Gate -> Twilight Council + Build time increase
Zealot -> +10 shields, 9(*2) damage
Stalker -> 12 damage (+4 to armoured)
Sentry -> Forcefield should then become researchable at Cybernetics Core and Hallu should come standard.

I don't really see any major problems with this idea, please enlighten me ^_^

If you can't forcefield the ramp, then I can see some big problems with early aggresion from Z,T and P.
ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) APM, Why u make me spam?
NerZhuL
Profile Joined November 2010
United States57 Posts
October 11 2011 17:08 GMT
#2914
On October 12 2011 01:59 SeaSwift wrote:
On Protoss, all I think the Warp Gate mechanic needs is a shunt through to Twilight Council along with a slight research time increase and then Gateway units (particularly Stalkers) can be buffed to a decent level.

So:

Warp Gate -> Twilight Council + Build time increase
Zealot -> +10 shields, 9(*2) damage
Stalker -> 12 damage (+4 to armoured)
Sentry -> Forcefield should then become researchable at Cybernetics Core and Hallu should come standard.

I don't really see any major problems with this idea, please enlighten me ^_^


shut up and play the game you tool

User was warned for this post
Impossible is nothing
freetgy
Profile Joined November 2010
1720 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-11 17:35:56
October 11 2011 17:34 GMT
#2915
On October 12 2011 02:08 NerZhuL wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2011 01:59 SeaSwift wrote:
On Protoss, all I think the Warp Gate mechanic needs is a shunt through to Twilight Council along with a slight research time increase and then Gateway units (particularly Stalkers) can be buffed to a decent level.

So:

Warp Gate -> Twilight Council + Build time increase
Zealot -> +10 shields, 9(*2) damage
Stalker -> 12 damage (+4 to armoured)
Sentry -> Forcefield should then become researchable at Cybernetics Core and Hallu should come standard.

I don't really see any major problems with this idea, please enlighten me ^_^


shut up and play the game you tool


kk, continue to abuse ramp forcefields and Warpgate all-ins.

it so obvious that both these mechanics are what makes and brakes protoss.
If you know how to abuse FF and Warpgate Pushes early/mid game you win.
if the other race knows how to deal with it you lose.
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
October 11 2011 17:51 GMT
#2916
On October 12 2011 02:08 NerZhuL wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2011 01:59 SeaSwift wrote:
On Protoss, all I think the Warp Gate mechanic needs is a shunt through to Twilight Council along with a slight research time increase and then Gateway units (particularly Stalkers) can be buffed to a decent level.

So:

Warp Gate -> Twilight Council + Build time increase
Zealot -> +10 shields, 9(*2) damage
Stalker -> 12 damage (+4 to armoured)
Sentry -> Forcefield should then become researchable at Cybernetics Core and Hallu should come standard.

I don't really see any major problems with this idea, please enlighten me ^_^


shut up and play the game you tool


Wow.

On another note, I don't think gateway units need to be buffed. Something must be added to protoss to apply pressure without all inning, and I don't think it can come from the warpgates. I hope the new units in HotS can give this dynamic to protoss.

If gateway units were stronger, terran all ins wouldn't work anymore (like, not at all) and that's not what Blizzard want. One base play seems to be something they fancy (just look at the maps). I don't think one base terran should be as strong as they are now, but they must not be completely negated either.
Let's take a concrete example: 1 gate FE against terran. It's very hard to hold sometimes, as it should be, because it's somewhat taking a risk to expand that early. It does not rely on the warpgate mechanics. But with good enough micro, it can hold even the most agressive builds. Imagine now that gateway units are stronger. Suddenly, you're free to 1 gate FE very easily without breaking a sweat, and Protoss starts rolling low level play with 1 gate FE -> 6 gates.

However I agree on the scaling of upgrades for the stalker. It's quite ridiculous that an attack upgrade doesn't even give it a +1(+1).
Caspas
Profile Joined April 2011
Germany157 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-11 18:05:04
October 11 2011 18:03 GMT
#2917
content removed
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
October 11 2011 18:05 GMT
#2918
On October 12 2011 02:02 XiGua wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2011 01:59 SeaSwift wrote:
On Protoss, all I think the Warp Gate mechanic needs is a shunt through to Twilight Council along with a slight research time increase and then Gateway units (particularly Stalkers) can be buffed to a decent level.

So:

Warp Gate -> Twilight Council + Build time increase
Zealot -> +10 shields, 9(*2) damage
Stalker -> 12 damage (+4 to armoured)
Sentry -> Forcefield should then become researchable at Cybernetics Core and Hallu should come standard.

I don't really see any major problems with this idea, please enlighten me ^_^

If you can't forcefield the ramp, then I can see some big problems with early aggresion from Z,T and P.


Yep, exactly what he said. The last thing I need is 8 roachs or 20 lings charging up my ramp every game while Im struggling to get out a set of stalkers.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44218 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-11 18:12:10
October 11 2011 18:05 GMT
#2919
On October 12 2011 02:02 XiGua wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2011 01:59 SeaSwift wrote:
On Protoss, all I think the Warp Gate mechanic needs is a shunt through to Twilight Council along with a slight research time increase and then Gateway units (particularly Stalkers) can be buffed to a decent level.

So:

Warp Gate -> Twilight Council + Build time increase
Zealot -> +10 shields, 9(*2) damage
Stalker -> 12 damage (+4 to armoured)
Sentry -> Forcefield should then become researchable at Cybernetics Core and Hallu should come standard.

I don't really see any major problems with this idea, please enlighten me ^_^

If you can't forcefield the ramp, then I can see some big problems with early aggresion from Z,T and P.


Agreed, and warp gate in the twilight council? Are Protoss players never actually going to make units?

We don't actually need hallucination that early either. We can usually scout Zerg or Protoss decently well at the beginning. It's Terran who can wall and who has the ranged tier one unit -.-'
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44218 Posts
October 11 2011 18:27 GMT
#2920
What about the simple nerf where we shorten ghost's EMP range so high templar's feedback could outrange a ghost's EMP? Even such that the high templar has only a range of one or two greater (and keep in mind that ghosts can still cloak, so Protoss still needs observers out anyway), so Protoss players still need to be on top of their game?

This way, the Protoss (who would prefer storm over feedback in a battle anyway) could actually counter ghosts with feedback if need be (since currently, ghosts hard counter high templar and demolish the rest of Protoss)? Ghosts pretty much make late game TvP battles very one-sided.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Prev 1 144 145 146 147 148 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV European League
16:00
Swiss Groups Day 3
Scarlett vs ShamelessLIVE!
WardiTV836
TKL 242
Liquipedia
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
16:00
Warmup Cup 2
uThermal325
IndyStarCraft 226
SteadfastSC86
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 428
uThermal 325
TKL 242
IndyStarCraft 226
SteadfastSC 86
UpATreeSC 79
BRAT_OK 67
MindelVK 21
ProTech5
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 1633
Shuttle 987
EffOrt 947
firebathero 314
Mini 264
Dewaltoss 98
TY 93
soO 55
Rock 22
sas.Sziky 21
[ Show more ]
yabsab 15
IntoTheRainbow 8
GoRush 7
Dota 2
Gorgc11548
qojqva1918
League of Legends
Dendi1022
Counter-Strike
fl0m1095
byalli563
flusha348
zeus224
Foxcn168
sgares31
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu402
Khaldor151
Other Games
FrodaN2144
Beastyqt582
KnowMe139
oskar135
Trikslyr54
QueenE51
ArmadaUGS5
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick45299
StarCraft 2
angryscii 17
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 5
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2526
• masondota2760
League of Legends
• Nemesis6078
• Jankos1256
• TFBlade883
Other Games
• imaqtpie1028
• Shiphtur630
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 57m
RSL Revival
15h 57m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
18h 57m
Replay Cast
1d 5h
RSL Revival
1d 15h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 21h
OSC
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.