• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:41
CEST 22:41
KST 05:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
ASL20 General Discussion Soulkey on ASL S20 BW General Discussion ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D NaDa's Body
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Ro16 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
i'm really bored guys
Peanutsc
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1681 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 1078

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1266 Next
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12262 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-28 23:12:52
August 28 2014 23:10 GMT
#21541
It's still important to remember we had more protoss than terran players in aligulac in october 2011 during the 1-1-1 peak... I think it's pretty clear that in periods where races are favored, people of these races are going to go deeper in tournaments, that makes a ton of sense. But if after this patch population of terran goes back to an equal number with the other races and in the same time terran starts to win everything (this is hypothetical, I don't claim this will happen), I don't want people to say everything looks fine because there's no overrepresentation of terrans.
No will to live, no wish to die
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9399 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-28 23:43:34
August 28 2014 23:40 GMT
#21542
On August 29 2014 00:15 Awin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 28 2014 22:50 Hider wrote:
On August 28 2014 22:33 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On August 28 2014 20:09 mijagi182 wrote:
On August 27 2014 08:37 usethis2 wrote:
On August 24 2014 16:05 Svizcy wrote:
I still think we have preatty good balance atm, since we have such nice RO16 in GSL code S now. I don't even remmeber when it was the last time when we had 5-5-6 race distribution in RO16.


What do you mean by "good balance atm?" You must have said that in a good will, but I can't help but seeing the shallowness of this community from that line. I wonder if people will change their minds in two weeks when the distribution in RO8 becomes 5-2-1 or something like that? Then what? Blizzard fail?

I would look more into the actual game plays.


Its simply stupid to just look at roXX and draw conclusion from there given the GSL format.
What seems more reasonable is to look at results of post patch GSL qualifiers :

11 P - 9 T - 5 Z to CODE A
13 - 6 - 5 to CODE S

Looks pretty much how I see the balance now. I hope Zerg doesn't extinct before next patch


And how does race distribution dictate game balance? That's like saying china is the dominant culture because there are more Chinese than anyone else.


Except there are roughly the same amount of active protoss, terran and zerg players.
In terms of how well they perform, that has historically dependant on balance on the game with too many terrans gettting too far in 2010/2011, too many zergs in 2013 and too many protosses over the last year.



"Except there are roughly the same amount of active protoss, terran and zerg players."

I d like to see sources for this sentence


nios.kr

But you're putting the cart before the horse. Race distribution doesn't prove anything other than the population subset of an arbitrary crosscut of the total census. When zerg and protoss was the main race winning GSL in 2010 => 2011 was that a sign of underpowered terrans? Was it a sign that terran sucked when only MKP, MVP, and MMA would consistently do well amongst terran players only to have MC/Nestea/Fruitdealer get all the trophies? No, because making arbitrary population cross cuts proves nothing.


Well arbitrary population cost can suffer heavily from variance. Thus, that's why you will never see my comment on balance based on 1 or 2 tournaments. Rather, I believe the best estimate of balance is through correct usage of Aliguac statistics.
I just repsonded to your Chinese comment, which doens't make sense here.
r691175002
Profile Joined October 2012
249 Posts
August 29 2014 18:07 GMT
#21543
On August 29 2014 08:40 Hider wrote:Well arbitrary population cost can suffer heavily from variance. Thus, that's why you will never see my comment on balance based on 1 or 2 tournaments. Rather, I believe the best estimate of balance is through correct usage of Aliguac statistics.

The definition of a population is a complete set of data. A population statistic does not have variance, it is a simple fact. A sample is a randomly* chosen subset of a population, and a sample statistic is an attempt to guess the population statistic.

For example, the ratio of men and women in the USA has a single, factual value. If you perform a comprehensive census on the entire population, then you know that number. If you take ten people off the street and extrapolate from that sample, then your guess will have a known error distribution.
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
August 29 2014 18:24 GMT
#21544
On August 28 2014 22:50 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 28 2014 22:33 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On August 28 2014 20:09 mijagi182 wrote:
On August 27 2014 08:37 usethis2 wrote:
On August 24 2014 16:05 Svizcy wrote:
I still think we have preatty good balance atm, since we have such nice RO16 in GSL code S now. I don't even remmeber when it was the last time when we had 5-5-6 race distribution in RO16.


What do you mean by "good balance atm?" You must have said that in a good will, but I can't help but seeing the shallowness of this community from that line. I wonder if people will change their minds in two weeks when the distribution in RO8 becomes 5-2-1 or something like that? Then what? Blizzard fail?

I would look more into the actual game plays.


Its simply stupid to just look at roXX and draw conclusion from there given the GSL format.
What seems more reasonable is to look at results of post patch GSL qualifiers :

11 P - 9 T - 5 Z to CODE A
13 - 6 - 5 to CODE S

Looks pretty much how I see the balance now. I hope Zerg doesn't extinct before next patch


And how does race distribution dictate game balance? That's like saying china is the dominant culture because there are more Chinese than anyone else.


Except there are roughly the same amount of active protoss, terran and zerg players.
In terms of how well they perform, that has historically dependant on balance on the game with too many terrans gettting too far in 2010/2011, too many zergs in 2013 and too many protosses over the last year.

Too many zergs in 2012 really, when hots came out there was an exodus of zerg
usethis2
Profile Joined December 2010
2164 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-30 05:51:36
August 30 2014 05:49 GMT
#21545
On August 29 2014 08:10 Nebuchad wrote:
It's still important to remember we had more protoss than terran players in aligulac in october 2011 during the 1-1-1 peak... I think it's pretty clear that in periods where races are favored, people of these races are going to go deeper in tournaments, that makes a ton of sense. But if after this patch population of terran goes back to an equal number with the other races and in the same time terran starts to win everything (this is hypothetical, I don't claim this will happen), I don't want people to say everything looks fine because there's no overrepresentation of terrans.

Well, then tell us what you think of. Do not wait until a new fad catches on. It is unfair to players and concerned observers alike that some people get too jealous of others' success.

I will spell out what I think shortly. But I wanted to point out how disingenuous and passive-aggressive your stance is.

I think everyone else who participate in this thread should also reveal their positions now that there seem to be uneasy peace for the moment among the factions. Do not wait until something pops up then tell us "I knew it was broken," or some such. Your time is NOW.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
August 30 2014 17:27 GMT
#21546
I'd really like to see the nuke buffed, quite substantially. Just feels silly right now, in my opinion.

Perhaps increase cast range of the ghost by 1 (or maybe even 2), increase the damage and splash radius by 25%, let each ghost academy build 2 nukes instead of 1...

It's a little gimmicky of an ability to start with, but helps a lot with positional based play and could buff the Terran lategame. Also, an APM sink for the other player... and isn't that the main complaint? Terran needs so much APM?
brickrd
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States4894 Posts
August 30 2014 17:47 GMT
#21547
On August 31 2014 02:27 FabledIntegral wrote:
I'd really like to see the nuke buffed, quite substantially. Just feels silly right now, in my opinion.

Perhaps increase cast range of the ghost by 1 (or maybe even 2), increase the damage and splash radius by 25%, let each ghost academy build 2 nukes instead of 1...

It's a little gimmicky of an ability to start with, but helps a lot with positional based play and could buff the Terran lategame. Also, an APM sink for the other player... and isn't that the main complaint? Terran needs so much APM?

nuke falls under the same category as things like nydus, neural parasite, capital ships and the mothership where if it's buffed even slightly it could quickly get out of hand and become insanely OP
TL+ Member
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
August 30 2014 17:59 GMT
#21548
On August 31 2014 02:47 brickrd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2014 02:27 FabledIntegral wrote:
I'd really like to see the nuke buffed, quite substantially. Just feels silly right now, in my opinion.

Perhaps increase cast range of the ghost by 1 (or maybe even 2), increase the damage and splash radius by 25%, let each ghost academy build 2 nukes instead of 1...

It's a little gimmicky of an ability to start with, but helps a lot with positional based play and could buff the Terran lategame. Also, an APM sink for the other player... and isn't that the main complaint? Terran needs so much APM?

nuke falls under the same category as things like nydus, neural parasite, capital ships and the mothership where if it's buffed even slightly it could quickly get out of hand and become insanely OP


There's potential, but I still think the above changes are still viable^^.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12262 Posts
August 31 2014 21:38 GMT
#21549
On August 30 2014 14:49 usethis2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 29 2014 08:10 Nebuchad wrote:
It's still important to remember we had more protoss than terran players in aligulac in october 2011 during the 1-1-1 peak... I think it's pretty clear that in periods where races are favored, people of these races are going to go deeper in tournaments, that makes a ton of sense. But if after this patch population of terran goes back to an equal number with the other races and in the same time terran starts to win everything (this is hypothetical, I don't claim this will happen), I don't want people to say everything looks fine because there's no overrepresentation of terrans.

Well, then tell us what you think of. Do not wait until a new fad catches on. It is unfair to players and concerned observers alike that some people get too jealous of others' success.

I will spell out what I think shortly. But I wanted to point out how disingenuous and passive-aggressive your stance is.

I think everyone else who participate in this thread should also reveal their positions now that there seem to be uneasy peace for the moment among the factions. Do not wait until something pops up then tell us "I knew it was broken," or some such. Your time is NOW.


That's just a terrible post. How am I disingenuous or passive-aggressive? I said straight up what I think about population number arguments, and I don't see how any of what I said is unfair, nor do you show it in any way. It's kind of epic that I'm arguing that population numbers can only be looked at in conjunction to winrates, and your answer is that I'm jealous about players' success... Says much about your own agenda.
No will to live, no wish to die
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9399 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-08-31 21:46:15
August 31 2014 21:45 GMT
#21550
On August 30 2014 03:07 r691175002 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 29 2014 08:40 Hider wrote:Well arbitrary population cost can suffer heavily from variance. Thus, that's why you will never see my comment on balance based on 1 or 2 tournaments. Rather, I believe the best estimate of balance is through correct usage of Aliguac statistics.

The definition of a population is a complete set of data. A population statistic does not have variance, it is a simple fact. A sample is a randomly* chosen subset of a population, and a sample statistic is an attempt to guess the population statistic.

For example, the ratio of men and women in the USA has a single, factual value. If you perform a comprehensive census on the entire population, then you know that number. If you take ten people off the street and extrapolate from that sample, then your guess will have a known error distribution.


Sorry, what I mean was arbitrarily choosing which tournaments you pick data from.
Population = total amount of active players which can be found from nios.kr
Maniak_
Profile Joined October 2010
France305 Posts
September 01 2014 19:47 GMT
#21551
http://aligulac.com/misc/balance/
August stats are in.
So... I'm guessing everything is back where it should be? Terrans simply play better and the other races should just learn to adapt?

*sigh*
"They make psychiatrists get psychoanalyzed before they can get certified, but they don't make a surgeon get cut on. Does that seem right to you?" -- Jubal Early - Firefly
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
September 01 2014 19:58 GMT
#21552
Obligatory `please look at population numbers' instead of 1 month worth of data. Which means you should look at least look at Aligulac lists, not the balance report.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Maniak_
Profile Joined October 2010
France305 Posts
September 01 2014 20:50 GMT
#21553
On September 02 2014 04:58 Ghanburighan wrote:
Obligatory `please look at population numbers' instead of 1 month worth of data. Which means you should look at least look at Aligulac lists, not the balance report.

I haven't seen anything indicating that this month data has no relevance whatsoever. Maybe you could enlighten me?
Of course, this is in the context of
Note that this yields information about metagame balance near the top of the skill ladder, and is not to be confused with (although likely correlated to) actual game balance throughout the whole player population.

It's obviously not a global "truth" applicable to everyone everywhere, but it should still be a good indicator of what's been happening over the last few weeks. No more no less.
Besides, the correlation between this graph and actual overall game balance has been pretty good thus far.
But yes, it's only one month. I'm curious to see what this will look like next month.

Though I'm guessing that since it's currently back in the terrans' favor, we can go back to discarding everything based on population/taeja/whatever. And it's probably just a big coincidence anyway. Not like during the months where this very same graph was used to justify whining about Terran needing buffs.
"They make psychiatrists get psychoanalyzed before they can get certified, but they don't make a surgeon get cut on. Does that seem right to you?" -- Jubal Early - Firefly
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12262 Posts
September 01 2014 21:00 GMT
#21554
On September 02 2014 05:50 Maniak_ wrote:
Though I'm guessing that since it's currently back in the terrans' favor, we can go back to discarding everything based on population/taeja/whatever. And it's probably just a big coincidence anyway. Not like during the months where this very same graph was used to justify whining about Terran needing buffs.


If you were so annoyed with this attitude, why take back the torch?
No will to live, no wish to die
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
September 01 2014 21:02 GMT
#21555
Enlightenment incoming in 24 h.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Tyrhanius
Profile Joined April 2011
France947 Posts
September 01 2014 21:10 GMT
#21556
The last list 118 show TvZ winrates is 58% for 992 games, but the list 117 TvZ = 50% winrates for 3300 games. So it's hard to say if Terran have better use of their new kit vs Zerg, or it's just the holidays, there is too few games, and not necessary representative of balance.
I just think we can't really say nothing about the recent winrates, specially during holidays, and need to wait and see the next month.
Maniak_
Profile Joined October 2010
France305 Posts
September 01 2014 23:02 GMT
#21557
On September 02 2014 06:00 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2014 05:50 Maniak_ wrote:
Though I'm guessing that since it's currently back in the terrans' favor, we can go back to discarding everything based on population/taeja/whatever. And it's probably just a big coincidence anyway. Not like during the months where this very same graph was used to justify whining about Terran needing buffs.


If you were so annoyed with this attitude, why take back the torch?

Have you seen me asking for protoss and zerg buffs because of how OP terran is?
I'm happy waiting for next month to see if the trend continues. There have been far too many unnecessary balance changes lately in response to whining.
I'd love to see the mines go back to their non-randomly-game-changing state, but I'd love even more if Blizzard stopped messing with the game unless there's a *real* problem, or to fix actual design issues. Where was the need for the last balance patch, except *maybe* for Time Warp? The game was already getting better on its own before it, and now back to square one, waiting for an indefinite amount of time to see if the latest changes can stabilize or cause more problems.
"They make psychiatrists get psychoanalyzed before they can get certified, but they don't make a surgeon get cut on. Does that seem right to you?" -- Jubal Early - Firefly
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9399 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-01 23:56:35
September 01 2014 23:26 GMT
#21558
The below graph shows adjusted Aliguac win/rates over time. The adjustments takes into account distribution, which means that if there is an excessive amount of race X, the win/rates of the race are adjusted downards. For August and September 2010, sample sizes are quite small which creates this huge adjusted win/rate for terran. Regardless, it's quite obvious that terran was really favored in 2010 and in the first couple of months in 2011.

In the middle of 2011, it's also clear to see that terrans were winning too much vs protoss due to the 1/1/1, but at the end of 2011, matchup was close to 50/50 due to EMP nerfs, new maps and Immortal at 6 range.

During the patch-zerg era, ZvP and ZvT were both zerg favored, however terran suffered more than protoss - probably due to Immortal allins helping protosses. An ignored element in this period was that protoss actually was a bit favored vs terran as well. Given the fact that more terrans were eliminated from tournaments than protossses, we would expect that win/rates of terrans should be over 50% in 2012 vs protoss. Since win/rates were slightly below 50% instead, terran was actually underperforming during this period. I believe this is a likely consequence of protoss learning to defend terran drop play during this phase of the game. As I remember it, dropplay was a big part of the midgame in 2011, but evenutally just got figured out in 2012, and protoss late game has always been considered a bit toss favored (post EMP nerf).

Going into HOTS, adjusted win/rates were quite balanced for the initial months. After a while, terrans new options were figured out and they received some small nerfs. They especially started suffering vs protoss.
When Widow Mine patch hits, zerg was actually having adjusted win/rates above that of terran.
This is supported by the development in the recent meta, where terrans prefer to go Hellbat/Thors than Widow Mines vs zerg.

In early 2014, adjusted win-rates improved somewhat vs toss, but became worse vs zerg. The average w/r of the 4 months prior to the Widow Mine buff was 46% in TvZ and 44% the 4 months after. However, win/rates continued to decline after those 4 months, which indicates that the Widow-Mine nerf in it self didn't have a huge direct effect on balance, but rather that zergs were more efficient at figuring the matchups out than terrans were. My theory is that this is likely a consequence of zergs learning the importance of not engaging off-creeps, something they did too often the first couple of months in HOTS.

As of August, the win/rates points to a statistically balanced game - similar to that of early HOTS.
The fact that terran has (unadjusted) win/rates over 50%, is a completely expected result of the buffs of the patch, and will over time go downwwards to 50%. As a percentage of total non-mirror matchups, there was a terran in 58% of the games, which is up from 56% in the most recent month. Having studied the historical data, you see this type of trend almost every single time (win/rates adjust first, then games played by competitive players afterwards)
It can also be seen that protoss players improved their results vs zerg in August, which actually has been statistically zerg favored in 2014.

[image loading]
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
September 01 2014 23:34 GMT
#21559
Thanks for the post, Hider. But could you elaborate on `The adjustments takes into account distribution, which means that if there is an excessive amount of race X, the win/rates of the race are adjusted downwards'? I'd like to know the formula for the adjustment downwards.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12262 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-02 00:04:02
September 01 2014 23:59 GMT
#21560
On September 02 2014 08:26 Hider wrote:
An ignored element in this period was that protoss actually was a bit favored vs terran as well. Given the fact that more terrans were eliminated from tournaments than protossses, we would expect that win/rates of terrans should be over 50% in 2012 vs protoss. Since win/rates were slightly below 50% instead, terran was actually underperforming during this period.


Your whole post is interesting but this is particularly interesting to me because I wouldn't think that's true, my memory of TvP at the end of WoL was that it was pretty good for terran in general, with ghost viking performing really well against the lategame toss army (I remember surprised reactions when it turned out at the start of HotS that protoss could handle ghost viking really well, if not even too well). Did you take into account that there weren't a ton of protosses in GSL at the end of WoL? 2 out of the first 20 qualified players were protoss, at some point. So even though terrans lost more badly to zergs, I'm not sure protosses qualified a ton more (I don't remember the rest of the events well enough, but I also remember that some of the good results of protoss came from the wcs event, which held qualifiers at an earlier time when protoss was doing really well in Korea).
No will to live, no wish to die
Prev 1 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 19m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 549
UpATreeSC 222
SteadfastSC 188
NeuroSwarm 144
IndyStarCraft 144
ForJumy 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 16172
Dewaltoss 149
Shuttle 119
Larva 66
Aegong 32
Sexy 23
Dota 2
Fuzer 194
Counter-Strike
flusha287
Stewie2K87
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King45
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu464
Other Games
summit1g4706
FrodaN1635
Sick1260
fl0m898
Beastyqt537
mouzStarbuck300
ToD195
C9.Mang0163
Trikslyr43
PPMD37
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta22
• Reevou 4
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4946
League of Legends
• Doublelift3670
• TFBlade867
Other Games
• imaqtpie861
• WagamamaTV446
• Shiphtur217
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
13h 19m
Zoun vs Classic
Map Test Tournament
14h 19m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 6h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d 11h
RSL Revival
1d 13h
Reynor vs Cure
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.