• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:35
CEST 05:35
KST 12:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3
Community News
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?18Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)8Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over2New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!40Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week6
StarCraft 2
General
Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game SC4ALL: II Winner Will Earn a Spot at HSC 30! Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) September World Ranking: herO leads, Serral climbs Weekly Cups (August 10-16): SHIN doubles
Tourneys
IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly SC2 INu's Battles#20 [BO.9] 2026 GSTL Announcement Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This Mutation # 539 Thunder Dome
Brood War
General
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? ASL22 General Discussion [Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60 BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3 BSL LAN Party - Kraków 29-30 August - OPEN SIGNUPS [ASL22] Ro24 Group F
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Game Theory for Starcraft Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Diablo IV EVE Corporation Nintendo Switch Thread [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Regacy Esports: The Bh…
regacyesports
Violent Games and Crime Rate…
TrAiDoS
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8103 users

TiG Opinion Article on NASL Situation - Page 19

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 17 18 19 20 21 32 Next All
Fubi
Profile Joined March 2011
2228 Posts
August 12 2011 18:21 GMT
#361
On August 13 2011 02:57 NASL.tv wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 02:50 Fubi wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:48 Azzur wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:45 mango_destroyer wrote:
I can`t believe people give sc2con shit for making a decision to protect its players. People really need to start thinking clearly.

Yeah, but if protecting their players meant going against a SIGNED contract - then it is unethical. If it's in the negotiation phase, then I have no problems with it.


Yes, that is the main problem. Is there an actual signed contract for Season 2? We have still yet to hear an official response from NASL


WeMadeFox contract signed July 25th. Prime contracted signed July 26th. oGs contracts signed July 26th. So from the period in which they were signed (July 25-26), it took TEN days for Mr.Chae (not even a person from SC2Con) to tell me that the Korean players had issues. After I responded, it took another FIVE days (August 9th) for Mr.Chae to notify the NASL that Koreans would not play in Season 2.



So if contracts already exist, are you not able to enforce them or take legal actions for breach of contracts?

I know you probably can't give out specific details regarding the actual terms of the contracts due to privacy reasons, but would be nice to get a general idea as to why all these problems are still currently exist when there are clear contracts in place
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6267 Posts
August 12 2011 18:23 GMT
#362
On August 13 2011 03:21 Fubi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 02:57 NASL.tv wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:50 Fubi wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:48 Azzur wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:45 mango_destroyer wrote:
I can`t believe people give sc2con shit for making a decision to protect its players. People really need to start thinking clearly.

Yeah, but if protecting their players meant going against a SIGNED contract - then it is unethical. If it's in the negotiation phase, then I have no problems with it.


Yes, that is the main problem. Is there an actual signed contract for Season 2? We have still yet to hear an official response from NASL


WeMadeFox contract signed July 25th. Prime contracted signed July 26th. oGs contracts signed July 26th. So from the period in which they were signed (July 25-26), it took TEN days for Mr.Chae (not even a person from SC2Con) to tell me that the Korean players had issues. After I responded, it took another FIVE days (August 9th) for Mr.Chae to notify the NASL that Koreans would not play in Season 2.



So if contracts already exist, are you not able to enforce them or take legal actions for breach of contracts?

I know you probably can't give out specific details regarding the actual terms of the contracts due to privacy reasons, but would be nice to get a general idea as to why all these problems are still currently exist when there are clear contracts in place

Even if NASL did pursue the matter legally, it would be difficult to sue them for they have no money. The signed contracts did prove something - that SC2Con is not an organisation to be trusted. I hope the players realise this.
FairForever
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada2392 Posts
August 12 2011 18:24 GMT
#363
On August 13 2011 03:21 Fubi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 02:57 NASL.tv wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:50 Fubi wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:48 Azzur wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:45 mango_destroyer wrote:
I can`t believe people give sc2con shit for making a decision to protect its players. People really need to start thinking clearly.

Yeah, but if protecting their players meant going against a SIGNED contract - then it is unethical. If it's in the negotiation phase, then I have no problems with it.


Yes, that is the main problem. Is there an actual signed contract for Season 2? We have still yet to hear an official response from NASL


WeMadeFox contract signed July 25th. Prime contracted signed July 26th. oGs contracts signed July 26th. So from the period in which they were signed (July 25-26), it took TEN days for Mr.Chae (not even a person from SC2Con) to tell me that the Korean players had issues. After I responded, it took another FIVE days (August 9th) for Mr.Chae to notify the NASL that Koreans would not play in Season 2.



So if contracts already exist, are you not able to enforce them or take legal actions for breach of contracts?

I know you probably can't give out specific details regarding the actual terms of the contracts due to privacy reasons, but would be nice to get a general idea as to why all these problems are still currently exist when there are clear contracts in place


Sure they probably could sue for breach of contract...

1) But litigation is expensive. If NASL cannot afford to pay Koreans more how can they afford to litigate?
2) Even if they litigate, will they be successful?
3) Even if they are successful, they will earn damages. Unless damages are stated in the contract, how is the value going to be determined? My guess is a court would give NASL a very small amount
4) If they are not successful how can they now afford to cover legal fees for the defendant?
5) Regardless of outcome, this would affect NASL's perception - what kind of person would want to sign contracts with NASL knowing the potential consequences? (NFL teams don't enforce long-term season ticket contracts - bad PR)

I think 3 and 5 are the big points here. There's very little to be gained with a lot to be lost, even with successful litigation.
hesho89
Profile Joined August 2011
Canada106 Posts
August 12 2011 18:25 GMT
#364
hmmm.. so to me, this seems like not all the money has been passed around. Even NASL has said they have 60 days to pay them (which is in their contract) but some of the teams had to pay the cost of travel upfront and hasn't been paid back hence y they backed out. I have to admit though, seems kinda weird how the prizes of the first season hasn't all been paid out yet but season 2 is starting...
eh?
NASL.tv
Profile Joined April 2011
699 Posts
August 12 2011 18:25 GMT
#365
We are not planning of doing anything of the sort -- we're going to move on with our lives, and make sure NASL Season 2 is awesome !
jenzebubble
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States183 Posts
August 12 2011 18:26 GMT
#366
On August 13 2011 03:25 NASL.tv wrote:
We are not planning of doing anything of the sort -- we're going to move on with our lives, and make sure NASL Season 2 is awesome !


Sorry to hear about S3.
"It's like waxing your balls, it hurts like a biiiitch but after they are silky smooth...." -Kennigit
bucckevin
Profile Joined April 2011
858 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-12 18:28:05
August 12 2011 18:27 GMT
#367
On August 13 2011 03:19 Azzur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 03:14 BaekHo wrote:
You guys should know that, many Koreans team are sponsorless (is this even word?)

Prime.WE doesnt have sponsor, as well as ZeNEX, fOu didnt have one, so contracted with FXO.

Only SlayerS IM has proper sponsor. all other teams are very low in income, i mean extremely low or

even 0. oGs, and MVP, I dont believe they have Korean sponsors, as well.

From what has happened in the last few days (including the treatment of Coach Lee), they have been shown to be extremely unprofessional. And unprofessional teams don't attract sponsors.

Yes, I agree money is an issue, and I'm not blaming them for trying to secure better conditions. I also don't blame them if money prevents participation.

However, what I don't accept is their unethical way they went about it.


So I guess the only professional SC2 team in Korea is SlayerS right? They got all those sponsors because of Jessica's hard work and her connections. oGs, MVP, fOu, and the rest of the korean teams barely have any sponsors or even none at all. TSL has some sponsors but coach Lee still had to take out loans to support the team. IM were sponsor-less until recently. Even then, they had to be sponsored by a local chicken restaurant lol.
BluePanther
Profile Joined March 2011
United States2776 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-12 18:38:50
August 12 2011 18:28 GMT
#368
Regarding the contracts and suing:

Specific Performance is not a remedy used in law for enforcement of contracts (generally speaking). Damages is the preferred remedy for breach of contract. The question is if the damages are worth the pursuit of legal remedies (i'm guessing it's not great expense to delay production and find new players; the claim that worse players produces worse revenue may be possible, but i just don't think they'd have the proof they need for this), if there is a lawyers fees clause in the contract (without one it's not worth suing), and what the choice of laws clause says (and the law of that jurisdiction).


Honestly, the damages aren't going to be that high, the hassle will be great, and i'm not sure if NASL hired an actual lawyer to draft a contract with these types of protections in them. I'm guessing legal remedies are off the table. It's a war of public confidence and credibitlity.
waitwhat
Profile Joined February 2011
United States152 Posts
August 12 2011 18:28 GMT
#369
I like how he made a statement about how NASL is out to make money. Does he not realize it's a fucking business? Of course they're out to make money. I don't understand this Korean's logic one bit. I am definitely not an NASL fan, but I do side with them when it comes to this matter. It's quite absurd that they kept offering more and more to help the Koreans come over and basically got shit on through this guy's opinion.

Also, why does it matter if some teams have sponsors and some don't? SlayerS and IM have proper sponsorships and aren't participating either.
TeeTS
Profile Joined June 2011
Germany2762 Posts
August 12 2011 18:28 GMT
#370
On August 13 2011 02:57 NASL.tv wrote:

WeMadeFox contract signed July 25th. Prime contracted signed July 26th. oGs contracts signed July 26th. So from the period in which they were signed (July 25-26), it took TEN days for Mr.Chae (not even a person from SC2Con) to tell me that the Korean players had issues. After I responded, it took another FIVE days (August 9th) for Mr.Chae to notify the NASL that Koreans would not play in Season 2.



If that is actual true, then why the hell don't you take proceedings against those teams. If you have a legit contract, you can force them to participate or compensate for it. That's what contracts are made for. So the fact, that you don't pull this into consideration, makes me think that you might have had an pre-contractual agreement, but nothing that could stand before a court.
If I'm wrong and you got it, then I have no idea, why you don't make use of it.
gregnog
Profile Joined December 2010
United States289 Posts
August 12 2011 18:29 GMT
#371
That entire post seems like a load of shit. I don't believe more then a few words in this entire post. Even the stuff that seems truthful, its like... why even bring it up? Your making yourself look bad. The Korean elitism shows through again right here.
BluePanther
Profile Joined March 2011
United States2776 Posts
August 12 2011 18:30 GMT
#372
On August 13 2011 03:28 TeeTS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 02:57 NASL.tv wrote:

WeMadeFox contract signed July 25th. Prime contracted signed July 26th. oGs contracts signed July 26th. So from the period in which they were signed (July 25-26), it took TEN days for Mr.Chae (not even a person from SC2Con) to tell me that the Korean players had issues. After I responded, it took another FIVE days (August 9th) for Mr.Chae to notify the NASL that Koreans would not play in Season 2.



If that is actual true, then why the hell don't you take proceedings against those teams. If you have a legit contract, you can force them to participate or compensate for it. That's what contracts are made for. So the fact, that you don't pull this into consideration, makes me think that you might have had an pre-contractual agreement, but nothing that could stand before a court.
If I'm wrong and you got it, then I have no idea, why you don't make use of it.


see my post above. they can't force participation, and the compensation would be minimal at best.
NASL.tv
Profile Joined April 2011
699 Posts
August 12 2011 18:31 GMT
#373
On August 13 2011 03:30 BluePanther wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 03:28 TeeTS wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:57 NASL.tv wrote:

WeMadeFox contract signed July 25th. Prime contracted signed July 26th. oGs contracts signed July 26th. So from the period in which they were signed (July 25-26), it took TEN days for Mr.Chae (not even a person from SC2Con) to tell me that the Korean players had issues. After I responded, it took another FIVE days (August 9th) for Mr.Chae to notify the NASL that Koreans would not play in Season 2.



If that is actual true, then why the hell don't you take proceedings against those teams. If you have a legit contract, you can force them to participate or compensate for it. That's what contracts are made for. So the fact, that you don't pull this into consideration, makes me think that you might have had an pre-contractual agreement, but nothing that could stand before a court.
If I'm wrong and you got it, then I have no idea, why you don't make use of it.


see my post above. they can't force participation, and the compensation would be minimal at best.


Correct
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6267 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-12 18:36:12
August 12 2011 18:32 GMT
#374
On August 13 2011 03:27 bucckevin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 03:19 Azzur wrote:
On August 13 2011 03:14 BaekHo wrote:
You guys should know that, many Koreans team are sponsorless (is this even word?)

Prime.WE doesnt have sponsor, as well as ZeNEX, fOu didnt have one, so contracted with FXO.

Only SlayerS IM has proper sponsor. all other teams are very low in income, i mean extremely low or

even 0. oGs, and MVP, I dont believe they have Korean sponsors, as well.

From what has happened in the last few days (including the treatment of Coach Lee), they have been shown to be extremely unprofessional. And unprofessional teams don't attract sponsors.

Yes, I agree money is an issue, and I'm not blaming them for trying to secure better conditions. I also don't blame them if money prevents participation.

However, what I don't accept is their unethical way they went about it.


So I guess the only professional SC2 team in Korea is SlayerS right? They got all those sponsors because of Jessica's hard work and her connections. oGs, MVP, fOu, and the rest of the korean teams barely have any sponsors or even none at all. TSL has some sponsors but coach Lee still had to take out loans to support the team. IM were sponsor-less until recently. Even then, they had to be sponsored by a local chicken restaurant lol.

Don't forget FXOKorea (lol deL :p) is also a professional team. Also look at Boxer's professionalism - he toughed out the NASL season because he agreed to it upfront, but withdrew from S2. Obviously, we all hold him in high esteem and this is just further evidence of it. I wonder what he must be thinking about SC2Con???

Also, I'm not 100% sure if IM is part of the SC2Con (anyone can enlighten me on this?). Anyways, if I'm not wrong, they have no players in NASL and thus they didn't sign anything (correct me if I'm wrong). I also like Nestea's attitude - if he doesn't like the conditions, he just doesn't participate - no qq about bad conditions, etc

Also, nothing wrong with a chicken sponsorship (although i think the chicken sponsors were for oGs and Prime). IM's sponsor is Coke I think.
Jojo131
Profile Joined January 2011
Brazil1631 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-12 18:35:13
August 12 2011 18:33 GMT
#375
On August 13 2011 02:52 zerglingsfolife wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 02:49 Ravencruiser wrote:
On the other hand, players who played in NASL Season 1 didnt get their security deposit and pay check (from winning tournament). Also, SC2Con decide that except FXOKorea who emerged with FXOpen, all teams and players decide not to participate in Season ll of NASL . (This paragraph is Fact, not opinion, I believe.)


If this was true then there is absolutely zero confusion as to why the Koreans withdrew.

Also, if this was true then the NASL organizers are complete greedy ****s.


There is a 60 day payback period after season 1 ended. It hasn't been 60 days yet... Some people have gotten their deposits back, and some are still waiting. But the 60 days isn't up.


Participants paid the security deposit so that NASL can have a leash tied on them in case any disciplinary issues happened in the league. Those who weren't charged of anything deserve their money sent back. I can't imagine why the money would just be sitting there waiting to get claimed rather then being sent back, is NASL trying to make a quick buck out of people who forget/misunderstand the policy?



User was warned for this post
udgnim
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States8024 Posts
August 12 2011 18:34 GMT
#376
On August 13 2011 03:28 TeeTS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 02:57 NASL.tv wrote:

WeMadeFox contract signed July 25th. Prime contracted signed July 26th. oGs contracts signed July 26th. So from the period in which they were signed (July 25-26), it took TEN days for Mr.Chae (not even a person from SC2Con) to tell me that the Korean players had issues. After I responded, it took another FIVE days (August 9th) for Mr.Chae to notify the NASL that Koreans would not play in Season 2.



If that is actual true, then why the hell don't you take proceedings against those teams. If you have a legit contract, you can force them to participate or compensate for it. That's what contracts are made for. So the fact, that you don't pull this into consideration, makes me think that you might have had an pre-contractual agreement, but nothing that could stand before a court.
If I'm wrong and you got it, then I have no idea, why you don't make use of it.


litigation costs lots of money. NASL suing Korean teams would only create bad publicity for NASL even if NASL is in the right. it's not worth the time and effort.

it sucks that contracts can't really be enforced by NASL (other than security deposit garnishes), but that is basically all the power NASL has in this situation
E-Sports is competitive video gaming with a spectator fan base. Do not take the word "Sports" literally.
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6267 Posts
August 12 2011 18:35 GMT
#377
On August 13 2011 03:33 Jojo131 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 02:52 zerglingsfolife wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:49 Ravencruiser wrote:
On the other hand, players who played in NASL Season 1 didnt get their security deposit and pay check (from winning tournament). Also, SC2Con decide that except FXOKorea who emerged with FXOpen, all teams and players decide not to participate in Season ll of NASL . (This paragraph is Fact, not opinion, I believe.)


If this was true then there is absolutely zero confusion as to why the Koreans withdrew.

Also, if this was true then the NASL organizers are complete greedy ****s.


There is a 60 day payback period after season 1 ended. It hasn't been 60 days yet... Some people have gotten their deposits back, and some are still waiting. But the 60 days isn't up.


Participants paid the security deposit so that NASL can have a leash tied on them in case any disciplinary actions happened in the league. Those who weren't charged of anything deserve their money sent back.


I personally don't agree with the security deposit. However, I would've raised it up before I signed anything. And definitely not agree to it and then qq later.
purecarnagge
Profile Joined August 2010
719 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-12 18:38:51
August 12 2011 18:38 GMT
#378
On August 13 2011 03:15 Azzur wrote:
The last few days have shown me one thing - the SC2Con is a weak and poorly run organisation. First, it was the slander of Coach Lee's name based on false testimony from FD and Tester. Now, it is the NASL debacle. Instead of reminding the teams of their legal and ethical obligations (to something they have signed on), they threaten a withdrawal to secure better conditions.

I'm speculating, but it is no wonder that some teams are struggling to get sponsors. Sponsors dislike dealing with unprofessional people.

I think the players all deserve better - I'm hoping that teams or players will see the light and jump ship.


Why the Koreans are getting everything they want by being unified. They are also creating demand for themselves.

So far the Koreans seem unwilling to honor their committments. Its all very political and sometimes shady.
muddymuddy
Profile Joined May 2011
United States22 Posts
August 12 2011 18:38 GMT
#379
On August 13 2011 03:33 Jojo131 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2011 02:52 zerglingsfolife wrote:
On August 13 2011 02:49 Ravencruiser wrote:
On the other hand, players who played in NASL Season 1 didnt get their security deposit and pay check (from winning tournament). Also, SC2Con decide that except FXOKorea who emerged with FXOpen, all teams and players decide not to participate in Season ll of NASL . (This paragraph is Fact, not opinion, I believe.)


If this was true then there is absolutely zero confusion as to why the Koreans withdrew.

Also, if this was true then the NASL organizers are complete greedy ****s.


There is a 60 day payback period after season 1 ended. It hasn't been 60 days yet... Some people have gotten their deposits back, and some are still waiting. But the 60 days isn't up.


Participants paid the security deposit so that NASL can have a leash tied on them in case any disciplinary issues happened in the league. Those who weren't charged of anything deserve their money sent back. I can't imagine why the money would just be sitting there waiting to get claimed rather then being sent back, is NASL trying to make a quick buck out of people who forget/misunderstand the policy?




The security deposits have been and are being paid back in a timely manner as decided between NASL and the Korean teams before the season even started. This has been proven by posts in this thread by NASL.

Please read the thread before throwing around such accusations.
Zzoram
Profile Joined February 2008
Canada7115 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-12 18:39:36
August 12 2011 18:39 GMT
#380
Seems like the translation might've just been understood by SC2Con IMO. It'd be a shame if this was all due to misunderstanding.
Prev 1 17 18 19 20 21 32 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
22:30
Masters Cup #151
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 153
EnDerr 8
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2729
GuemChi 1619
actioN 529
Sharp 86
Aegong 83
Noble 39
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm166
Counter-Strike
taco 628
minikerr209
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox616
Mew2King88
Other Games
summit1g5839
Coldzera 908
XaKoH 204
ViBE84
Trikslyr54
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV30
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• EnkiAlexander 125
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Light_VIP 18
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21867
League of Legends
• Lourlo498
• Stunt223
Other Games
• Scarra895
Upcoming Events
IntoTheTV X SOOP
7h 25m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 6h
Big Brain Bouts
1d 6h
Garitos vs ArT
Lambo vs Percival
TriGGeR vs ByuN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
OSC
2 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
2 days
Mixu vs TBD
Spirit vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
Patches Events
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Soma vs Shuttle
BeSt vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Leta vs ggaemo
Jaedong vs Queen
[ Show More ]
GSL
4 days
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-02
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Light Tournament 2026

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.