EPTA new release of the EULA?
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
BlizzrdSlave
161 Posts
| ||
|
awu25
United States2003 Posts
| ||
|
BlizzrdSlave
161 Posts
On August 02 2011 04:57 awu25 wrote: I doubt "no right to transfer ownership" was just added. It's definitely been there for WoW Well all the parts are BOLD CAPS letters, suggesting they may be reinforcing these points. But still, Im sure I accepted this EULA a while ago, why did it pop up again? Anyone else get this? | ||
|
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
| ||
|
Clamchop1
Canada42 Posts
"Playable by Starcraft 2: Starter Edition" This is getting suspicious. (Holds money in fear) | ||
|
NostalgiaTag
Canada508 Posts
| ||
|
stormchaser
Canada1009 Posts
Oh and the sound problem was just me accidentally disabling sound xD I watch too much day9 daily  | ||
|
awu25
United States2003 Posts
| ||
|
SouL_sc2
United States90 Posts
On August 02 2011 05:53 awu25 wrote: Could be that they are possibly gearing up for HotS. I guess some maps will be for HotS only, while others can be played if you have either version makes sense right? | ||
|
latan
740 Posts
| ||
|
Nausea
Sweden807 Posts
On August 02 2011 05:53 awu25 wrote: Could be that they are possibly gearing up for HotS. I guess some maps will be for HotS only, while others can be played if you have either version Ye probably, will probably be some issues with new maps feat. new HotS destructible rocks. | ||
|
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
| ||
|
Rinrun
Canada3509 Posts
| ||
|
branflakes14
2082 Posts
| ||
|
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
On August 02 2011 05:34 Clamchop1 wrote: Also, there are new icons next to some of the blizzard maps. "Playable by Starcraft 2: Starter Edition" This is getting suspicious. (Holds money in fear) Starter Edition is a demo version ish thing. It's even playable off B.net. I know because if I sleep my computer with SC2 running and then start it back up, SC2 is stuck in Starter Edition mode. I have to quit and restart it. | ||
|
schmeebs
United States115 Posts
On August 02 2011 06:20 branflakes14 wrote: Aren't there laws against forcing contracts on someone to allow them to use something they've purchased after they purchased it? Even if they exist those wouldn't apply, you don't purchase StarCraft 2, you purchase a License to play it. | ||
|
Clamchop1
Canada42 Posts
On August 02 2011 06:20 branflakes14 wrote: Aren't there laws against forcing contracts on someone to allow them to use something they've purchased after they purchased it? lololol I have a great South Park episode for you to watch. Season 15 episode 1 - "Human CentiPAD" | ||
|
[N3O]r3d33m3r
Germany673 Posts
would be nice if anyone could get a detailed list of what is actually different now | ||
|
RoKetha
United States211 Posts
These changes included a mention that no refund was available to users of the free demo version who rejected the EULA (the full version allows a refund if you reject it the first time). The new EULA also describes the extent of features available for the Starter Edition, such as how the map editor can be used to create a map but not publish one. | ||
|
RudrA
Canada67 Posts
On August 02 2011 05:45 Tag wrote: Any lawyer type people in the community can take a look at the EULA and give us some insight into the changes made? LOL.... I am a "lawyer type people" and I wouldnt bother wasting my time. Its a game guys... Doubt they will be introducing a clause which sells your soul to the devil LOL | ||
|
closey
Hong Kong272 Posts
On August 04 2011 08:10 RudrA wrote: LOL.... I am a "lawyer type people" and I wouldnt bother wasting my time. Its a game guys... Doubt they will be introducing a clause which sells your soul to the devil LOL Agree. The devil has got enough evil from Dustin and wont need anymore | ||
|
KiF1rE
United States964 Posts
On August 04 2011 08:10 RudrA wrote: LOL.... I am a "lawyer type people" and I wouldnt bother wasting my time. Its a game guys... Doubt they will be introducing a clause which sells your soul to the devil LOL thats happened before actually. http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20002689-71.html ive read through it when it went live. and couldnt really find anything new =/ i only read it as i was hoping for some new details etc of why they would need to change it. | ||
|
EnderSword
Canada669 Posts
| ||
|
Vei
United States2845 Posts
On August 04 2011 08:10 RudrA wrote: LOL.... I am a "lawyer type people" and I wouldnt bother wasting my time. Its a game guys... Doubt they will be introducing a clause which sells your soul to the devil LOL you don't strike me as a lawyer type at all ~_~ altho its a EULA and not a TOS so yea | ||
|
Typhoon1789
Australia292 Posts
On August 04 2011 14:58 Vei wrote: you don't strike me as a lawyer type at all ~_~ altho its a EULA and not a TOS so yea Do lawyer (cough liers) have to act like they have sticks up there asses to be a lawyer? Anyhows, if they updated there EULA and did not show you all, that would put them in trouble pretty fast. Its better they update it and show you all instead of updating it and not showing it. | ||
| ||
