EPTAnd EG are the unprofessional ones...
Mind Blown.
Still waiting on that statement EG!!
Puma leaves TSL for EG - Page 200
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
LovE-
United States1963 Posts
And EG are the unprofessional ones... Mind Blown. Still waiting on that statement EG!! | ||
|
Lipski
Poland373 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:27 Liudo wrote: Also a contract does not make someone legally bound in the sense that slaves once were legally bound, for christ's sake. Even if a contract had existed, that would not stop Puma from leaving and joining EG. Yes, but if a contract existed it would actually be "fair" to contact his team first, instead of player directly. But as it stands, he was a free agent. He was not contracted by any team. I don't see any reason why any company that wanted to contract Puma should contact anybody about this but Puma himself. | ||
|
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:27 Jibba wrote: Seriously, what were they thinking. >.> Even if they didn't pay Puma, providing food/housing/etc. is a basis for creating a contract. Even without NCC and all that other stuff, if they exists they could still seek damages. It's just so bizarre that they wouldn't have him sign anything in order to join the house. No it isn't. There is clearly no contract here. Unless there was a verbal understanding that Puma would stay for an extended period of time. The service TSL provided Puma was the food/housing/etc. The service TSL received was ability to use Puma in Team Leagues, Puma representing them, etc. for the time that Puma was there. Nowhere in there does it suggest that TSL and Puma are in a long-term relationship. If it was then one could say the relationship must be extended indefinitely, right? | ||
|
oogieogie
United States3657 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:28 j3i wrote: This is new. The Korean sc2 scene being called amateurs. wow The Korean sc2 scene is imo amateurs when they let a player join with no contract. | ||
|
Z3kk
4099 Posts
| ||
|
PeZuY
935 Posts
 | ||
|
CptnObvious
United States54 Posts
| ||
|
PBG
40 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:25 Ansinjunger wrote: That's fair enough, but coach Lee has a good reputation, and EG's is not as sterling. What's amusing to me is that EG's known about this, or the possibility at least, since NASL finals 11 days ago and Sir Scoots just laughed at our collective absence of fact checking, while providing none himself. and TSL has had what, 4 people in the last month "leave" or for a lack of a better word, not on TSL anymore? While you can say he has a "better" reputation than EG, there's still something going on at TSL to have that many people leave in such a short period of time. In any case just poorly handed situation altogether really and it just seems like a big pissing contest with "he said this but I said this" garbage as we don't really know who to believe. | ||
|
TheButtonmen
Canada1401 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:29 Milkis wrote: Wow people are really bad at reading comprehension lol Then clarify for us if we are understanding you wrong? | ||
|
sekritzzz
1515 Posts
| ||
|
mapthesoul
Trinidad/Tobago429 Posts
| ||
|
integrity
United States1014 Posts
I have absolutely no problem with EG fishing for a Korean ace player....headhunting is all the rage in football (or soccer for Americans) | ||
|
Liudo
United Kingdom344 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:27 Jibba wrote: Seriously, what were they thinking. >.> Even if they didn't pay Puma, providing food/housing/etc. is a basis for creating a contract. Even without NCC and all that other stuff, if they exists they could still seek damages. It's just so bizarre that they wouldn't have him sign anything in order to join the house. This. A contract is not always a piece of paper. It is normally a piece of paper because it is a convenient form to record an agreement and proove that agreement. | ||
|
bonifaceviii
Canada2890 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:28 forgottendreams wrote: So wait Puma approached EG first and it turns out he never had a contract?! Damn this story is completely different now from last night, and far less controversial IMO.... I sincerely doubt that PuMa approached EG. But really, that doesn't matter. | ||
|
-Frog-
United States514 Posts
When Puma told Manager Lee that he wanted to join EG had he already signed a contract with EG? If he had not then this is the opportunity for TSL to offer Puma a better deal than what he is getting with EG. And if that's the case then a fair transaction has taken place. Puma was offered a better salary and living conditions and because TSL had decided not to contract Puma they lost him. | ||
|
hydra21
94 Posts
| ||
|
Sbrubbles
Brazil5776 Posts
I'm pretty sure not having a signed contract means you're a free agent. I mean, maybe we're just using different definitions of what being a "free agent" means. | ||
|
DwD
Sweden8621 Posts
| ||
|
DBOWNIZZ
United States66 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
SiguR
Canada2039 Posts
In all seriousness though, this seems pretty silly. It is clear that Puma was on a team. When you try to recruit him, there is no way to say you are not trying to poach him from his team, whether there was a contract in place or not. It seems pretty dirty from my perspective - perhaps it doesn't seem dirty from another perspective. We should wait for a comment from EG before we make the sort of claims some of you have been making in this thread. | ||
| ||
