It's worse for you, why do you think only the U.S. uses it and in such high amounts, cause they monopolize and get their paper. I love how he points to conspiracies to make the real problem seem exaggerated.
It's worse than real sugar, that's all their is to it, so don't defend it.
Maybe Coca Cola got irritated that no one thanking the sponsors could get it straight whether they make Gatorade or Powerade . Nothing like thanking your sponsor and then pushing the competition's product lol.
On June 29 2011 02:45 Trentelshark wrote: Maybe Coca Cola got irritated that no one thanking the sponsors could get it straight whether they make Gatorade or Powerade . Nothing like thanking your sponsor and then pushing the competition's product lol.
thats also probably why pepsi became the sponsor, to thank them of course XD
It's worse for you, why do you think only the U.S. uses it and in such high amounts, cause they monopolize and get their paper. I love how he points to conspiracies to make the real problem seem exaggerated.
It's worse than real sugar, that's all their is to it, so don't defend it.
Did you read the article, tariff's are not conspiracies, its just the government looking out for local businesses(HOLY SHIT I KNOW). I love how you didn't read the chemistry lesson, and how close it is chemically to sugar and how are body responds.
It's worse for you, why do you think only the U.S. uses it and in such high amounts, cause they monopolize and get their paper. I love how he points to conspiracies to make the real problem seem exaggerated.
It's worse than real sugar, that's all their is to it, so don't defend it.
Did you read the article, tariff's are not conspiracies, its just the government looking out for local businesses(HOLY SHIT I KNOW). I love how you didn't read the chemistry lesson, and how close it is chemically to sugar and how are body responds.
Science yo, its good shit!
Except the only reason 'local businesses' grow so much corn is because of tax benefits that are (surprise surprise) given out by the government to begin with. If corn wasn't so cheap for farmers (in terms of tax reasons) then it wouldn't be grown.
So basically the government has an unholy obsession with corn. They aren't looking out for local businesses. As for the 'chemistry lesson,' sorry but throwing jargon around doesn't prove anything. The only thing I gathered is that sugar and HFCS are chemically similar, but a lot of things are chemically similar yet are vastly different. Case in point: http://urlybits.com/2011/03/a-chemistry-joke/
I've read many scientific and non-scientific sources that disagree with what the article wrote, so I fail to see your point when everyone claims to know the truth. It's clear that he shrugs off the obesity issue though.