• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:55
CEST 06:55
KST 13:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou10Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (March 17-23): Clem Bounces Back Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" DreamHack Open 2013 revealed The New Patch Killed Mech!
Tourneys
$1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st) SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
Is there anyway to get a private coach? BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ The Lose More Card BSL Season 21
Tourneys
300$ 3D!Community Brood War Super Cup #4 [ASL20] Semifinal B Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Current Meta Roaring Currents ASL final [I] Funny Protoss Builds/Strategies [I] TvZ Strategies and Builds
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Certified Crazy
Hildegard
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1288 users

The Close Spawning Position [poll] - Page 27

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 25 26 27 28 Next All
iCanada
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada10660 Posts
July 20 2011 17:35 GMT
#521
I feel like close spawns are imbalanced because you cannot take a third, and Zerg (atleast as of right now) doesn't really have the same strong 1-2 base options that Terran/Protoss do.

Most times I spawn close positions I either roach-ling allin, or baneling bust if I see an opportunity (like a 3 supply depot wall for example.).

And Terran/Toss players aren't stupid, they know that a Zerg player is in deep if they try to take a third and are likely just to allin. Hell, I recall Jinro saying something similar before.
Kiaro
Profile Joined July 2011
United States75 Posts
July 21 2011 20:02 GMT
#522
On July 20 2011 06:48 Probe1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2011 03:25 Kiaro wrote:
On July 18 2011 20:54 Probe1 wrote:
Belial I think the relevant statistic speaks for itself.


Poll: Should Blizzard Eliminate Close Positions On These Maps

Yes! (3087)
 
81%

No! (state why below) (738)
 
19%

3825 total votes

Your vote: Should Blizzard Eliminate Close Positions On These Maps

(Vote): Yes!
(Vote): No! (state why below)





3000+ people and if you think the majority of them are Zerg players, I think you're just trolling. Aside from 20% of voters, close spawn should be eliminated. I'm sure these results could be replicated in numerous polls. I'm also sure I am yet to see an argument that makes sense posted by someone who said no.

But I have seen many arguments that flat out state they don't want close positions removed because they want easy wins.


I'm pretty sure almost every terran voted no and every non-terran voted yes. People just want whats best for them, and thats why I like close spawns.

I'm not surprised at how many people want close spawns to be removed, considering that protoss and zerg are much more numerous on tl than terrans. (I remember seeing a poll taken in may that shows this, I can't find the link though).


I'm going to go ahead and directly attack your intelligence.
-> "Iconsidering that protoss and zerg are much more numerous on tl than terrans".
Really? 2 out of 3 races are more numerous than one?

I cannot stand the prevailing mentality of Terrans that what we've complained about is unfair. Terrans can stop rushes better than either race on one base, deny scouting and scout better than either race and recover from mistakes easier than any other race. If I win close positions ZvT the only reason is I was a much, much better player. There is no game or strategy. It's pure luck- unless my opponent is a joke.

Hopefully you understand a small amount of the frustration that the other races feel playing close positions. I doubt it, as Dustin Browder himself has shown how painfully ignorant he is.

Luckily the tournament community realized long ago that this issue has been decided. Close positions are broken.


What I meant was that terrans are less numerous than both zergs and protoss, I assumed that anyone with a brain would understand that.

I cannot stand the prevailing mentality of Zergs that they are much better than terran opponents when they win, and that whenever they lose, the game is somehow imbalanced. Learn to take a loss like a man and stop blaming it on race imbalance.
Belial88
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5217 Posts
July 22 2011 07:58 GMT
#523
^ Where does any Zerg say they are much better than Terran opponents, and what does that have to do with close spawns?

While at the shitty starcraft2.com forums everyone qqs about imbalance, this is a mature discussion about the brokenness of close spawns. It's not race imbalance, it's map imbalance, and we've already seen how broken certain maps can be, and that the races are perfectly balanced at the moment barring ridiculous maps.
How to build a $500 i7-3770K Ultimate Computer:http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=392709 ******** 100% Safe Razorless Delid Method! http://www.overclock.net/t/1376206/how-to-delid-your-ivy-bridge-cpu-with-out-a-razor-blade/0_100
Hashmeister
Profile Joined April 2011
Germany238 Posts
July 22 2011 09:28 GMT
#524
lol 80% for removing close position - Blizzard plz read this
bit.ly/hashmeister
TENTHST
Profile Joined December 2010
United States204 Posts
July 22 2011 09:48 GMT
#525
On July 22 2011 18:28 Hashmeister wrote:
lol 80% for removing close position - Blizzard plz read this


yea its pretty ridiculous that they havent even addressed this issue, let alone changed it
InsigmaTheory
Profile Joined November 2010
United States47 Posts
July 22 2011 11:27 GMT
#526
Just out of curiosity, I'm looking for all these statistics people are spouting off. I'm having trouble finding current statistics that are specifically what we're looking for. [Keep in mind most people resort to Correlation = Causation fallacies.]

Btw, this poll doesn't accurately affect the statistics we're debating over.

Voting No as well. Blizzard themself has stated in recent HotS interviews that things are seeming pretty balanced to them. There's only 2 things they're looking at and we don't quite know what they are.

Once again, keep in mind people inherently want to win 3/4 games and consider that balanced. The problem with that is it isn't "balanced" for the other people that are losing 3/4 games. In general people blame losses on the first thing they can point a finger at instead of pointing it at themselves, and keep in mind people generally LOOK for statistics that support their theory instead of looking at the real statistics and drawing theories from those.
Ninja_Bread
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States113 Posts
July 22 2011 11:32 GMT
#527
I don't think close positions are fair, that pretty much sums my opinions up.
Mang
Yettyman
Profile Joined May 2010
United States37 Posts
July 22 2011 11:36 GMT
#528
I wouldn't say close positions benefit one race more than another. I do feel that it take enjoyment out of the game because I know it will most likely end up being one base play which is lame in my opinion.

I play random btw.
Wish there was a random icon :/
Belial88
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5217 Posts
July 22 2011 21:53 GMT
#529
Once again, keep in mind people inherently want to win 3/4 games and consider that balanced. The problem with that is it isn't "balanced" for the other people that are losing 3/4 games. In general people blame losses on the first thing they can point a finger at instead of pointing it at themselves, and keep in mind people generally LOOK for statistics that support their theory instead of looking at the real statistics and drawing theories from those.


If every single map was close spawn and 'broken' that'd be fine, but the issue is on ladder you are matched with an opponent. Generally the map is normal spawns, normal distance, and the game is considered an even match. But sometimes, it's close spawn.

However, I guess we could assume the matchmaking system takes into account those 5-10% games on close spawn. I guess that means Zerg generally are always better players than their opponents on ladder, rofl.
How to build a $500 i7-3770K Ultimate Computer:http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=392709 ******** 100% Safe Razorless Delid Method! http://www.overclock.net/t/1376206/how-to-delid-your-ivy-bridge-cpu-with-out-a-razor-blade/0_100
InsigmaTheory
Profile Joined November 2010
United States47 Posts
July 22 2011 22:52 GMT
#530
On July 23 2011 06:53 Belial88 wrote:
However, I guess we could assume the matchmaking system takes into account those 5-10% games on close spawn. I guess that means Zerg generally are always better players than their opponents on ladder, rofl.



This is exactly why we can't seriously talk balance discussions here. Saying things like this only says that players "deserve" wins because they're "better". If your requirement for being the better player means click more buttons more often, go play Mario Party where the minigames actually require hitting buttons the fastest.

Starcraft 2 is about timings, its about strategy, its not about who's the faster at hitting buttons. Its a war game, and EVERYTHING is fair in war. You do what you can to win. If you "feel" like he didn't win because he did X and X is cheesy, then you still lost to X, and didn't prepare for X. Its like saying "I ran 5 miles today, but I really feel like I ran 10 miles, so I deserve the 10 mile count." When you don't. It doesn't mean anything. You ran 5.

Rushing is a viable strategy, and you CAN hold it off regardless of race. Pro's have been doing it for a long time. The only thing stopping you from winning is you. Fix it, don't fix it so others lose, fix it so you win. [If that makes sense]
Kiaro
Profile Joined July 2011
United States75 Posts
July 22 2011 23:28 GMT
#531
On July 23 2011 06:53 Belial88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
Once again, keep in mind people inherently want to win 3/4 games and consider that balanced. The problem with that is it isn't "balanced" for the other people that are losing 3/4 games. In general people blame losses on the first thing they can point a finger at instead of pointing it at themselves, and keep in mind people generally LOOK for statistics that support their theory instead of looking at the real statistics and drawing theories from those.


If every single map was close spawn and 'broken' that'd be fine, but the issue is on ladder you are matched with an opponent. Generally the map is normal spawns, normal distance, and the game is considered an even match. But sometimes, it's close spawn.

However, I guess we could assume the matchmaking system takes into account those 5-10% games on close spawn. I guess that means Zerg generally are always better players than their opponents on ladder, rofl.


So basically, you think that because close spawns exist, zergs are better and more skilled than any other race on ladder... Please just learn to accept that your non-zerg opponent beat you because they are actually better than you, not because of some non-existant OPness.
Jayjay54
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Germany2296 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-23 00:13:37
July 22 2011 23:58 GMT
#532
[edit: post may not be as clever, as close pos is disabled on shakuras, which I didn't consider]

blizz will never remove it, because it's kind of hard to explain to casual gamers where they can spawn. you know, those who do not even know the term 'close positions'. If blizzard says yeah you can spawn whereever you want but your opponent is actually not next to you in direction X, the player is prob confused. If you play for the first time, you just don't understand if the person can spawn close air? or close ground? why?And many would not know, given those who do know a tiny scout advantage. so blizzard just goes 'go ahead and change them in tournaments, we keep them'. and I somehow understand it considering how difficult it is for new players to just play the game.

so on the one hand close pos is def imbalance (r we even discussing this?), but on the other hand, I can somehow understand why blizzard keeps them...
Things are laid back in Unidenland. And may the road ahead be lid with dreams and tomorrows. Which are lid with dreams. Also.
Probe1
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States17920 Posts
July 23 2011 00:08 GMT
#533
Did you seriously just say Blizzard will never remove a imbalanced map feature because new players may not know about it? You do realize that Shakuras plateau has close ground disabled. I've never heard anyone complain about that one.
우정호 KT_VIOLET 1988 - 2012 While we are postponing, life speeds by
Jayjay54
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Germany2296 Posts
July 23 2011 00:12 GMT
#534
On July 23 2011 09:08 Probe1 wrote:
Did you seriously just say Blizzard will never remove a imbalanced map feature because new players may not know about it? You do realize that Shakuras plateau has close ground disabled. I've never heard anyone complain about that one.


hmm. ackknowledged. not much too say. that's a valid point. I still feel like this is kinda unfair for new players.
Things are laid back in Unidenland. And may the road ahead be lid with dreams and tomorrows. Which are lid with dreams. Also.
Angry_Fetus
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada444 Posts
July 23 2011 00:19 GMT
#535
On July 23 2011 09:12 Jayjay54 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2011 09:08 Probe1 wrote:
Did you seriously just say Blizzard will never remove a imbalanced map feature because new players may not know about it? You do realize that Shakuras plateau has close ground disabled. I've never heard anyone complain about that one.


hmm. ackknowledged. not much too say. that's a valid point. I still feel like this is kinda unfair for new players.


Unfair? How? New players will be competing against each other, so I fail to see what is unfair about them being oblivious to the fact that close positions are disabled. Besides, why is this very minor issue outweigh the balance of higher level play, where the people who commit far more time have to suffer? There is a lot of things new players have absolutely no idea about, that's what learning is for.
Ihpares
Profile Joined April 2011
United States40 Posts
July 23 2011 00:27 GMT
#536
On July 23 2011 07:52 InsigmaTheory wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On July 23 2011 06:53 Belial88 wrote:
However, I guess we could assume the matchmaking system takes into account those 5-10% games on close spawn. I guess that means Zerg generally are always better players than their opponents on ladder, rofl.



This is exactly why we can't seriously talk balance discussions here. Saying things like this only says that players "deserve" wins because they're "better". If your requirement for being the better player means click more buttons more often, go play Mario Party where the minigames actually require hitting buttons the fastest.

Starcraft 2 is about timings, its about strategy, its not about who's the faster at hitting buttons. Its a war game, and EVERYTHING is fair in war. You do what you can to win. If you "feel" like he didn't win because he did X and X is cheesy, then you still lost to X, and didn't prepare for X. Its like saying "I ran 5 miles today, but I really feel like I ran 10 miles, so I deserve the 10 mile count." When you don't. It doesn't mean anything. You ran 5.

Rushing is a viable strategy, and you CAN hold it off regardless of race. Pro's have been doing it for a long time. The only thing stopping you from winning is you. Fix it, don't fix it so others lose, fix it so you win. [If that makes sense]


The problem is, there are strategies that with close spawn are actually imbalanced. Let me lend you an example - in close spawns on Metalopolis, a Terran who does a three barracks all-in is AHEAD of a Zerg opponent, regardless of what the Zerg does. The reason for this is that the Terran WILL necessarily either destroy the natural expansion outright, or at the very least cut into the Zerg's capacity to make drones for a long while.

Oh, and the Terran is able to maintain this pressure AND safely take an expansion, because of the income granted from MULEs. So it's not really all-in, but it forces an all-in defense from a Zerg player.

Now, on NON-CLOSE spawns, in the same situation, the extra distance means that reinforcing units are slower to get to the Zerg players base, the defender's advantage is greater, and the Zerg can hold the all-in without falling behind. It's because of this that tournaments disable close spawn positions - They allow safe aggression and expansion and economy growth to one race, while disabling all of the above from another, and that's not balanced.
Belial88
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5217 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-23 20:36:50
July 23 2011 20:31 GMT
#537
On July 23 2011 07:52 InsigmaTheory wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2011 06:53 Belial88 wrote:
However, I guess we could assume the matchmaking system takes into account those 5-10% games on close spawn. I guess that means Zerg generally are always better players than their opponents on ladder, rofl.



This is exactly why we can't seriously talk balance discussions here. Saying things like this only says that players "deserve" wins because they're "better". If your requirement for being the better player means click more buttons more often, go play Mario Party where the minigames actually require hitting buttons the fastest.

Starcraft 2 is about timings, its about strategy, its not about who's the faster at hitting buttons. Its a war game, and EVERYTHING is fair in war. You do what you can to win. If you "feel" like he didn't win because he did X and X is cheesy, then you still lost to X, and didn't prepare for X. Its like saying "I ran 5 miles today, but I really feel like I ran 10 miles, so I deserve the 10 mile count." When you don't. It doesn't mean anything. You ran 5.

Rushing is a viable strategy, and you CAN hold it off regardless of race. Pro's have been doing it for a long time. The only thing stopping you from winning is you. Fix it, don't fix it so others lose, fix it so you win. [If that makes sense]


Uh.... did you even read my post at all? I was saying if, as Kiaro argued, that the game/ladder is balanced now, which is only because of the inclusion of close spawn maps that obviously no Zerg ever win 5-10% when it happens, that must mean that Zerg are naturally better than their opponents that they meet with - approximately 5-10% better. It also may mean that Zerg is 5-10% 'imbalanced' as in 5-10% better than the other races, but close spawns 5-10% of the time means that every race as a 50% win ratio.

This, of course, is a fucking ass backwards thing to say, but this is only using Kiaro's logic that close spawn should stay in the game because they make sure the game is balanced, according to whatever statistics he is pulling out of thin air (bbbbbut I win only 50% of the time on ladder!).

blizz will never remove it, because it's kind of hard to explain to casual gamers where they can spawn. you know, those who do not even know the term 'close positions'. If blizzard says yeah you can spawn whereever you want but your opponent is actually not next to you in direction X, the player is prob confused. If you play for the first time, you just don't understand if the person can spawn close air? or close ground? why?And many would not know, given those who do know a tiny scout advantage. so blizzard just goes 'go ahead and change them in tournaments, we keep them'. and I somehow understand it considering how difficult it is for new players to just play the game.

so on the one hand close pos is def imbalance (r we even discussing this?), but on the other hand, I can somehow understand why blizzard keeps them...


What? New 'casual' players don't even know what map they are playing on, let alone worried about close spawn. They don't even scout with a worker, why would they care about close spawn? Ask any bronze league player how much map positions even matter to them.

And not only that, but low league Zerg players know that close spawn is broken too. People seem to think that like close spawn adds variety, helps new players, such on and so on, but I think you fail to realize that EVERY zerg player just hates close spawn. Like, it's not even a fun game. It's not high pressure, it's not some intense game, no, it's just stressful and fucking miserable. Why would you want to play a game that is stressful and miserable?

edit: I also want to clear up that I don't think close spawns are broken because of 3 rax, 2 rax, 2 gate, 2 rax scv all in, etc rush strats (things like 4 gate and speedling/baneling all-in negate map distance anyways), close spawns are only broken because of MACRO games. A zerg will never win a macro game against T/P on close spawn Metal or ST. Ever.
How to build a $500 i7-3770K Ultimate Computer:http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=392709 ******** 100% Safe Razorless Delid Method! http://www.overclock.net/t/1376206/how-to-delid-your-ivy-bridge-cpu-with-out-a-razor-blade/0_100
K9GM3
Profile Joined January 2011
Netherlands116 Posts
July 24 2011 22:39 GMT
#538
Close positions do mean quicker reinforcements, but only in terms of distance: the intervals between attacks should remain the same. Close positions also allow for faster attacks and counterattacks, which ensure a back-and-forth game and lots of small skirmishes. Personally, I find that much more interesting to watch and play than two maxed armies headbutting into each other.

Close positions lend themselves to shorter games. Of course they do. But they also make the games more exciting, they allow for more variety (ever see Hydralisks in cross positions against Terran?), and they make the 'unclaimed' territory far larger, which inevitably means more room for flanks, hidden expansions, run-bys, etc...

And I play Random, so I do experience close positions as Zerg. I stand by my statements.
No, I don't want your number.
Phayze
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2029 Posts
July 24 2011 22:44 GMT
#539
Blizzard uses the justification that they want more rush oriented maps for lower league players who like to rush. But to be honest, all rushes will work against lower players regardless of the rush distance. A 7rr vs a noob is going to work cross pos or close pos. It's just the truth.
Proud member of the LGA-1366 Core-i7 4Ghz Club
Dalguno
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States2446 Posts
July 24 2011 22:47 GMT
#540
On July 25 2011 07:44 Phayze wrote:
Blizzard uses the justification that they want more rush oriented maps for lower league players who like to rush. But to be honest, all rushes will work against lower players regardless of the rush distance. A 7rr vs a noob is going to work cross pos or close pos. It's just the truth.


You'd think with their logic- "We like to cater to those who like rushing"- they'd allow those who don't like those rushes to opt for a veto to close positions. That way, people who want rushes can, and those who don't don't have to play it.
"I'm gonna keep making drones cause I'm a baller, and ballers make drones." -Snute
Prev 1 25 26 27 28 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
00:00
#54
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 136
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 685
Aegong 42
Noble 27
Purpose 11
Icarus 6
NotJumperer 4
Dota 2
monkeys_forever447
League of Legends
JimRising 842
Reynor67
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K599
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox501
Other Games
summit1g8409
C9.Mang0380
WinterStarcraft331
Tasteless49
Mew2King21
Trikslyr21
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick959
Counter-Strike
PGL211
Other Games
BasetradeTV95
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler16
League of Legends
• Rush1256
• Lourlo811
• Stunt387
Other Games
• WagamamaTV128
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 5m
OSC
11h 5m
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
18h 5m
The PondCast
1d 5h
OSC
1d 7h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Online Event
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.