• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:41
CEST 06:41
KST 13:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202561RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension5
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Server Blocker Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 639 users

MLG Format Explanation - Page 6

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 17 Next All
Bobster
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany3075 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-27 15:26:10
February 27 2011 15:23 GMT
#101
Another issue I see is that the pool play games between seeds on Day 1 and 2 (which are supposed to be one of the bigger plus points of the tournament format) are all non-elimination games.

Meaning that winning them will improve a player's chances in the tournament (by having him play fewer games, which opens a whole other angle of criticism), but no matter how many that player loses, he still is not out of the tournament. I strongly believe that a major draw of a double elimination tournament like MLG's 2010 events was that every game at every stage was vital for the survival of the players. Hell, even a regular round robin format, while not featuring "true" knockout games until the last round, is ultimately all about survival, making pretty much every game count.


Any system where a seeded player can lose his first 4 Bo3s and still win the tournament (while every other competitor is eliminated after losing only two Bo3s) is flawed, simple as that.

On February 27 2011 18:43 BattRoll wrote:
To Motbob - I have the same viewpoint as avilo. I'm not discontent because I didn't perform. I would never qualify for one of these tournaments in a million years. But it stands to reason that with a game as big and popular as starcraft 2 - the pool of talent is constantly changing. Having 80% of your tournament players automatically moved ahead because of what they accomplished months ago is ridiculous. I have no problem with maybe the top 2 or even top 4 players securing a position but it seems like a lot of these tournaments are pretty much trying to segregate recognizable faces from the crowd to cater to their audience in lieu of having a fair competition. I think this is wrong.

An alternative could simply be to have favored players in different qualifying divisions so they would be less likely to face each other earlier.

*raises eyebrow*

16 out of 272 (total amount of players) isn't 80%. Neither is 16 out of 32 (Championship Bracket after Open Tournament and Pool Play).

Having a 256 man bracket seed 16 players into a 32 man Championship Bracket is fine, percentage wise. Now, the way the Championship Bracket itself is structured, that's a valid point of contention, but not the number of players involved here.
Hrrrrm
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2081 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-27 16:04:02
February 27 2011 16:02 GMT
#102
On February 28 2011 00:17 Bobster wrote:
Another issue I see is that the pool play games between seeds on Day 1 and 2 (which are supposed to be one of the bigger plus points of the tournament format) are all non-elimination games.

Meaning that winning them will improve a player's chances in the tournament (by having him play fewer games, which opens a whole other angle of criticism), but no matter how many that player loses, he still is not out of the tournament. I strongly believe that a major draw of a double elimination tournament like MLG's 2010 events was that every game at every stage was vital for the survival of the players. Hell, even a regular round robin format, while not featuring "true" knockout games until the last round, is ultimately all about survival, making pretty much every game count.


Any system where a seeded player can lose his first 4 Bo3s and still win the tournament (while the open players are eliminated after losing only two Bo3s) is flawed, simple as that.


This honestly cannot be stressed enough. It's not that the 16 seeds are gaining an advantage, it's that they are playing under a COMPLETELY different set of rules. On top of that if you do somehow manage to make it out of the OPEN tournament as the top 16 players you would think you would get a shot at eliminating the other 16 seeds somehow in the championship bracket. Since you know, top 16 out of 256 should say these guys aren't scrubs. WRONG! MLG decides to protect them even further.

The 16 seed's(pool play) are still out of reach at the top until seeds 25-32(bottom 12 of the open tournament) eliminate themselves. You would think the winner's bracket would continue and people getting their first loss would get tossed down to the loser's bracket but nope, they instantly get to defeat themselves. In what planet does that make sense?

The cards are so stacked against non-seeds it's disgusting and just looking at the top 32 seeds no one can say that difference in skill level between seed 16 and seed 17 warrant such a HUGE advantage(guaranteeing them top 24 finish). Especially in a game like SC2. If this format was only for the Championship at the end of the year(which is what I initially thought when I saw the HUGE advantage top 16 seeds received) I could see the case made for it.

Thanks for this thread and explanation motbob.
alot = a lot (TWO WORDS)
EMCL
Profile Joined September 2010
United States71 Posts
February 27 2011 16:39 GMT
#103
Real quick I wanted to shine a light on WHY those 16 players are protected so incredibly much.

If anyone followed the Halo scene at ALL in the past few years, you'd know that the top 16 teams are legitimate celebrity status in the scene, MLG does everything they can to hype up these team's players, gives them sponsorships (from dr pepper/doritos) and t.v. series. They do NOT want these teams to lose to scrubs, or even competent teams - ever.

Eventually this came to the actuality that it was so physically grueling that almost ZERO teams would ever come from open bracket into the top 16. I believe it was the norm for 1 or even 0 teams to accomplish this a YEAR.

MLG is going to protect these 16 players by making it almost impossible for them to lose, because they will be investing heavily into the popularity status of these players. There will be commercials/contracts/series/forced drama and more between these players.


I can say with all confidence that MLG will be a tournament in which there is simply no point in entering if you are in the open bracket. You can play 18 matches, lose twice and be out, meanwhile a top 16 seeded person can lose EVERY SINGLE MATCH (four!!!) before they get knocked out, and be given money/sponsors/advertisements for it.

Regardless, this will do a LOT for the e-sports scene, just very much hurt those gamers who are trying to enter the competitive SC2 world.
TicketoHELL
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada368 Posts
February 27 2011 17:45 GMT
#104
wow a single diagram made mlg format a simple format for me just wow
nice job motbob
(づ.ㅡ) 부비적 (ㅡ.ど) 부비적 (づ.ど) 부비부비
gods_basement
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States305 Posts
February 27 2011 17:58 GMT
#105
wow great write up. you really simplified everything. I dont mind that non-seeds have a hard time, because the seeds have already paid their dues, so to speak. i think that the proven players should be exposed to less risk from spawn position, cheese, and other bullshit losses.

I also like how first place from the losers has to win 2 best ofs. how does extended series work with this? doesnt it mean that its triple stacked for the winner of the winners league? if A (winners champion) knocked out B (losers champion) earlier, will the first championship set be extended series? so he will have to win a bo7 from 1 behind, and THEN win a bo5?
(TT~TT)
Aegeis
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1619 Posts
February 27 2011 18:02 GMT
#106
Thanks this makes more sense to me now, I really appreciate it motbob.
"Skills to pay the bills" - Artosis, https://twitter.com/AegeisSC2 ,http://www.tumblr.com/blog/socal-esports
hugman
Profile Joined June 2009
Sweden4644 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-27 18:18:41
February 27 2011 18:12 GMT
#107
A lot of posts here hit the nail on the head. Having an open bracket and a championship bracket is fine, a lot of events have BYOC qualifiers and the like, but having a tournament format that makes people compete on uneven terms is not fine.

If you qualifiy from the open bracket you should be on even footing with everyone else in the championship bracket. As it stand, if you enter the open bracket you're out after losing two Bo3s whereas a seeded player can affort to lose 4 Bo3s and still stay in the tournament. You are giving extra lives to some players, the rules favour them. It's not fair competition. If they are the best then they will win playing with the same rules as everyone else.

"IdrA lost, but since we know he's actually better than that we'll give him another chance". That's what you're saying with this format.

edit: also, I don't think it makes sense for losses in the open bracket to carry over into the championship bracket. The open bracket is just a qualification tournament. It's not like losses from previous MLGs carry over.
talismania
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States2364 Posts
February 27 2011 18:18 GMT
#108
the way you've drawn it seems to set up an insane number of extended series. I'm just looking at where the players fall from group play into the championship losers bracket.

If all of one group is falling into the same thread of the loser's bracker, then you're practically guaranteeing several extended series unless the one guy who came out of the open bracket manages to charge through.

I don't know if MLG plans this exact distribution, but if I were them I would stagger it so that group A 2nd awaits the winner of group B 3rd vs the winner of group C 4th vs the winner of group D 5th vs X. That sentence technically makes sense but just look at the diagram to see what I'm talking about.

If they don't split the groups up, then they're going to have one hell of a long tournament on their hands.
hugman
Profile Joined June 2009
Sweden4644 Posts
February 27 2011 18:22 GMT
#109
On February 28 2011 03:18 talismania wrote:
the way you've drawn it seems to set up an insane number of extended series. I'm just looking at where the players fall from group play into the championship losers bracket.

I don't think he drew it correctly. The simulated bracket Slasher posted has the groups more spread out in the loser's bracket.
S.O.L.I.D.
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States792 Posts
February 27 2011 18:22 GMT
#110
Didn't understand it before this, thanks a lot motbob!
andytb
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom180 Posts
February 27 2011 18:40 GMT
#111
I get it, and I get what they're trying to achieve with it - protection.

However;

How can pool play start 'immediately on day one' when awaiting 1/5 of the players to qualify from the open bracket? Each player can play 3 bo3s and then they run out of opponents until the open bracket is finished!
Doraemon.doraemon
Profile Joined May 2010
United States335 Posts
February 27 2011 18:43 GMT
#112
On February 28 2011 03:40 andytb wrote:
I get it, and I get what they're trying to achieve with it - protection.

However;

How can pool play start 'immediately on day one' when awaiting 1/5 of the players to qualify from the open bracket? Each player can play 3 bo3s and then they run out of opponents until the open bracket is finished!


the 4 play each other first, the fifth is going to run the gauntlet when they qualify
Zooper31
Profile Joined May 2009
United States5710 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-27 18:47:03
February 27 2011 18:46 GMT
#113
So worst case scenario coming from the Open Bracket is 21 bo3's; average 14min a game comes out to 14.7hours of game time (winning each 2-1) or 9.8hours of game time if you win them all 2-0.

Best case scenario coming from the Open Bracket is 10 bo3's and 4 games from Pool Play, average 14min a game comes out to 7.9hours of game time (winning each 2-1) or 5.6hours of game time if you win them all 2-0.

If you're a seed and start from Pool Play you immediately have to play your 4games from Pool Play and then at best 3 bo3's in the Championship Bracket; again average 14min a game comes out to 2.3hours of game time if you win them all 2-0. If you lose in the Championship Bracket you at worst have to play your 4games from Pool Play and then 5 bo3's in order to win with 4.4hours of game time.

For comparison, in the GSL starting from the Code S you have to play at best 13 games; average 14min a game comes out to 3hours of game time or at worst 4.9hours of game time.

So from the looks of it, being a top16 seed and starting from Code S you have to play the same amount of games in order to win it all. If you're not a seed then you better be ready for a gaming marathon the likes of which most of people have not done before and GL with that

edit: that was alot of math and would be a good add to the OP lol.
Asato ma sad gamaya, tamaso ma jyotir gamaya, mrtyor mamrtam gamaya
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
February 27 2011 18:55 GMT
#114
I guess simplicity is no longer a virtue in this world. :/
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
motbob
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States12546 Posts
February 27 2011 18:58 GMT
#115
On February 28 2011 03:22 hugman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 28 2011 03:18 talismania wrote:
the way you've drawn it seems to set up an insane number of extended series. I'm just looking at where the players fall from group play into the championship losers bracket.

I don't think he drew it correctly. The simulated bracket Slasher posted has the groups more spread out in the loser's bracket.

Yeah, it's just me being lazy with copy and paste. The real format will have the #5 and group A and the #4 in group A in different parts of the bracket.
ModeratorGood content always wins.
Hrrrrm
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2081 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-27 19:08:12
February 27 2011 19:07 GMT
#116
On February 28 2011 03:58 motbob wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 28 2011 03:22 hugman wrote:
On February 28 2011 03:18 talismania wrote:
the way you've drawn it seems to set up an insane number of extended series. I'm just looking at where the players fall from group play into the championship losers bracket.

I don't think he drew it correctly. The simulated bracket Slasher posted has the groups more spread out in the loser's bracket.

Yeah, it's just me being lazy with copy and paste. The real format will have the #5 and group A and the #4 in group A in different parts of the bracket.


Actually it's quite a bit more different. Here is my rough edit of your image I did with the correct spots.

alot = a lot (TWO WORDS)
HCastorp
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States388 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-27 21:07:02
February 27 2011 19:12 GMT
#117
On February 28 2011 03:55 TheBB wrote:
I guess simplicity is no longer a virtue in this world. :/


All else being equal, simplicity is obviously a virtue.

I think the reason that the format is so complicated is because MLG is trying to meet so many different and occasionally conflicting goals, including but not limited to:

a) Being able to broadcast good games throughout the tourney schedule

b) Making it worthwhile for the most popular/marketable players to show up even if they have to travel a great distance. (This is closely related to what another poster mentioned about ensuring a stable group of top players)

c) Making it possible for anybody to sign up and play

d) Making a structure that is fair to the players.

e) Making a structure that is entertaining to spectators.


Having a simple and easy to understand tournament structure, while desirable, is less important to them than the above things.

While the system as it stands is extremely complicated, I don't think that in itself is enough to hurt them. As several other posters have pointed out, I think the biggest challenge will be finding a balance between protecting top players and serving as a viable path for new talent. Both of these things should be important to both fans and players.

Just from quickly eyeballing the system, it looks like it is more fair in this sense than the GSL, but that is setting the bar pretty low.
shavi
Profile Joined July 2010
United States127 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-27 19:16:02
February 27 2011 19:15 GMT
#118
So, could something happen where during the pool group stage, player A beats player B 2-0, but player B goes on to win the group, and then win the winners championship bracket.

And then player A goes on to win the losers championship bracket.

It'll result in an extended series, with the person coming up from LOSERS having the advantage right? That seems to big a pretty glaring weakness to this format, other than that I think it looks pretty solid.
SolonTLG
Profile Joined November 2010
United States299 Posts
February 27 2011 19:18 GMT
#119
On February 28 2011 01:39 EMCL wrote:
Real quick I wanted to shine a light on WHY those 16 players are protected so incredibly much.

If anyone followed the Halo scene at ALL in the past few years, you'd know that the top 16 teams are legitimate celebrity status in the scene, MLG does everything they can to hype up these team's players, gives them sponsorships (from dr pepper/doritos) and t.v. series. They do NOT want these teams to lose to scrubs, or even competent teams - ever.

...



Okay, this MLG format totally makes sense in the context of Halo teams. But competitive SC2 is primarily 1v1, and imho there are more than 16 players who can beat each other on any given day. As stated in previous replies, it seems the top 16 essentially have "extra lives" in this tournament format.
The Law Giver
Agh
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States966 Posts
February 27 2011 19:20 GMT
#120
probably been said or mentioned already in the thread, but is the plan to filter the 4 pools in a straight like linear type fashion? where all of the a placements are at the top, b next, etc? seems kind of dumb since the same matches will occur.
I may appear to be an emotionless sarcastic pos, but just like an onion when you pull off more and more layers you find the exact same thing everytime and you start crying
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 17 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 19m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft544
Nina 230
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4431
Sexy 53
League of Legends
JimRising 653
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1162
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor63
Other Games
summit1g8082
shahzam1055
ViBE212
C9.Mang0208
NotJumperer2
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1397
BasetradeTV22
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH211
• practicex 28
• Adnapsc2 1
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity7
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota225
League of Legends
• Doublelift4526
• Lourlo1281
• Stunt377
Other Games
• Scarra927
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
5h 19m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
9h 19m
CSO Cup
11h 19m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
13h 19m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 4h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 9h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 13h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL Team Wars
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.