EPTI saw the game on TLO's stream, he had really good stalker micro. Very strong one base play suggests it is Nani
MeatyOwlLegs first player to 4000 points! - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
I saw the game on TLO's stream, he had really good stalker micro. Very strong one base play suggests it is Nani | ||
|
Ayush_SCtoss
India3051 Posts
| ||
|
Alphasquad
Austria505 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:24 Shikyo wrote: That is because of his winloss ratio and the extremely low amount of games played, it has nothing to do with bonus pool. no?177 wins with an average of 20 points from pool is quite huge isnt it? (not that this win % isnt extremely good as well) | ||
|
TT1
Canada10057 Posts
| ||
|
Erectum
France194 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:31 Talkerst wrote: It is about the bonus pool as the most points you can ever receive without the bonus pool is 25. So to get 40-50 a match he has to be burning through a huge bonus pool. The account was started only 2 months ago so he would have had a starting pool of well over 1000. Given that he didn't play much the first month or so it would proably be close to 1300. Without the bonus pool he could not have achieved his score with his record, not even close. That's not to say he doesn't have an insane amount of talent. Just that the bonus pool skews things heavily in favor of smurfs. I disagree bonus pool is not infinite every people with around 150 wins could be without any points bonus left . you are looking in the wrong direction mate. | ||
|
Gigaudas
Sweden1213 Posts
She actually climbed from ~76 to nearly 80% win the last few games. | ||
|
billyX333
United States1360 Posts
| ||
|
Erectum
France194 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:35 Gigaudas wrote: Getting your MMR up goes real fast, he has been playing top players for a lot of consecutive games and still kept a sick win%. It is redoubtably very impressive. She actually climbed from ~76 to nearly 80% win the last few games. To be sure we should see his game list  Maybe the MMR not goes up that fast | ||
|
PhiliBiRD
United States2643 Posts
| ||
|
Talkerst
124 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:34 Erectum wrote: I disagree bonus pool is not infinite every people with around 150 wins could be without any points bonus left . you are looking in the wrong direction mate. The bonus pool is what has allowed him to get to 4000 so quickly but his skill (and smufing) allowed him to get to 4000. It really depends on how you want to argue the point but you cannot take the bonus pool out of the equation entirely. The pool on a smurf account got him to about 80% or so. The last bit, and granted the hardest, he did without any point aides. | ||
|
Fregate
Italy50 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:30 Erectum wrote: Every other top player will do the same result on a smurf. He is 26-2 in the last 3 days, and he is the top MMR now, so he played only Top players. I think that Ladder Matchmaking could have helped him in the first 70-80 matches or so, but then it's just a matter of pure skill. This guy is insanely good | ||
|
Erectum
France194 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:40 Talkerst wrote: The bonus pool is what has allowed him to get to 4000 so quickly but his skill (and smufing) allowed him to get to 4000. It really depends on how you want to argue the point but you cannot take the bonus pool out of the equation entirely. The pool on a smurf account got him to about 80% or so. The last bit, and granted the hardest, he did without any point aides. sure but every other top ranked player as the same amount of bonus point in their stats so we can remove the same amount of point on everyone | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:36 Erectum wrote: To be sure we should see his game list Maybe the MMR not goes up that fast I have him added, and yes, he played top players and maintained an about 80% win rate while doing that. And yes, its Naniwa. Now he needs to follow that up with good tournament performances. Its kind of strange that toss players (not only Naniwa) are dominating the European ladder lately, but dont have that good results in tournaments. I seriously wonder why that is the case. | ||
|
Erectum
France194 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:41 Fregate wrote: He is 26-2 in the last 3 days, and he is the top MMR now, so he played only Top players. I think that Ladder Matchmaking could have helped him in the first 70-80 matches or so, but then it's just a matter of pure skill. This guy is insanely good That coud be true, or false Depend on how MMR worksHave we the list of the opponent played ? | ||
|
Ciddass
Germany149 Posts
dimaga + whitera DMEATY Filipchuk + OWLLEGSey Krupnyk ... | ||
|
drooL
United Kingdom2108 Posts
edit: HOOOLY SHIT @ post above me, that's genius! | ||
|
Erectum
France194 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:43 Redox wrote: I have him added, and yes, he played top players and maintained an about 80% win rate while doing that. And yes, its Naniwa. Now he needs to follow that up with good tournament performances. Its kind of strange that toss players (not only Naniwa) are dominating the European ladder lately, but dont have that good results in tournaments. I seriously wonder why that is the case. ok then case closed, pure skill ahead ! | ||
|
ALPINA
3791 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:44 Ciddass wrote: it`s ofc dimaga + whitera DMEATY Filipchuk + OWLLEGSey Krupnyk ... Yeah that's obvious ^^ | ||
|
Erectum
France194 Posts
ahhaha nice one ^^ | ||
|
bioboyAT
Austria1765 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:44 Ciddass wrote: it`s ofc dimaga + whitera DMEATY Filipchuk + OWLLEGSey Krupnyk ... haha lol, that's pretty smart | ||
| ||
